Readers sound off on Brooklyn's waterfront, yeshivas and S.E. Cupp
Manhattan: Re 'We need working docks on Brooklyn's waterfront' (op-ed, April 22): I'm always open to differences of opinion about my organization's work, but this article gets basic facts wrong. NYC's working waterfront isn't being ignored, it's being upgraded. I share the concern that we must protect and invest in our maritime industry. And that's exactly what we're doing. The 'practically empty' NYC Ferry is actually a crowd favorite. We've hit a record number of riders (98% New Yorkers, by the way) and farebox highs, with the lowest per-passenger subsidy of any public passenger ferry system in the country.
Our 'rarely used' Brooklyn Cruise Terminal brings 500,000 passengers to our city each year, pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into NYC's economy.
We've made more progress on 'blue highways' in the last three years than the three decades before, including a new hub at Downtown Skyport to handle micro-freight by water, and a new barging operation at Hunts Point, which will take 1,000 trucks off our streets every month.
And in Red Hook, we're finalizing a plan for the long-neglected Brooklyn Marine Terminal, including an all-electric modern port with new cranes and resilient bulkheads to handle more cargo more efficiently, creating thousands of jobs alongside desperately needed affordable housing.
NYC was born and raised on the waterfront. With work underway, we're not just honoring that legacy, we're building on it. Andrew Kimball, president and CEO, NYC Economic Development Corp.
Brooklyn: Re 'Albany must prep for federal cuts' (op-ed, April 27): One thing missing from this opinion is the total mismanagement of state revenues, leading to the assertion that more taxes are the way to go: 'New York's elected leaders must start by eliminating wasteful tax cuts… and then prepare to raise revenue as necessary.' Why is the answer to raise taxes rather than determine where funds are going? We need a DOGE-type review of our programs and waste therein. As a proud taxpayer, I want to know why our elected leaders can't control costs and maintain services with integrity. Susan Caprio
Edgewater, N.J.: Re David Bloomfield's April 22 op-ed ('Yeshivas must keep teaching standards'), lost in the debate is how the male graduates find sustenance when they lack marketable job skills. So many marry young, create large families that they can't support and turn to government aid, food stamps and Medicaid for multiple generations. Were we talking about Brown-skinned folks, Republican state Senate Leader Rob Ortt and his ilk would likely refer to them as 'welfare queens,' but because Ortt's party can reliably depend on these voters (because, given their aversion to media, these religious communities' only political information is voting directives they hear from the pulpit), Ortt is happy to reframe this as a parental-rights issue. Freedom (to live on the dole — as long as you vote correctly). So cynical, and financially exhausting. Jay K. Egelberg
Port Jefferson Station, L.I.: To Voicer Rebecca Pagan-Rodriguez: Thank you for your description and listing of the faults former Gov. Andrew Cuomo has. Although accurate, please don't expect a change from the silly Democratic voting group. They would elect a slug if he ran as a Dem. Look at the people currently in government: AOC, Hakeem Jeffries, Mayor Adams. Can you honestly say they are the brightest bulbs in the rack? No way. Let's not forget the incomparable Bill de Blasio, another wonderful, competent leader. Not! Until the left-wing voters of NYC catch up to the smarter voters in upstate New York and Long Island, expect dumb people to get elected and do dumb things. Bob Cavaliere
Brooklyn: I'll admit it, TV sitcoms as we know them passed away when CBS cancelled 'Poppa's House,' which was the breakout hit with the breakout cast this season. It was a future classic. Time to ghost CBS. Even CBS might ghost soon. Enough said. Raquel Hanon
Mililani, Hawaii: Re 'FBI busts Milwaukee judge accused of helping migrant evade immigration agents' (April 26): Is this the proper way for a judge to behave? Judge Hannah Dugan was aware that ICE agents were preparing to execute an administrative warrant for the illegal immigrant's arrest. Nonetheless, Dugan escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz through a jury door to let him escape on foot, according to the unsealed criminal complaint. My question: Does this judge routinely escort suspects through a jury door so they can evade a warrant? Michael Rohrer
Kings Park, L.I.: 'If you see something, say something.' Here's my 2 cents: I'm shocked and saddened by the vile, disgusting, mean-spirited Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's commercial that regularly airs on ABC during the news and possibly other stations. ABC should know better. What a waste of taxpayer money! We should be welcoming and helping immigrants, not this. Dennis Wheeler
Ottawa, Ontario: Re 'Bill Maher: Larry David satire of Trump dinner is 'insulting to 6M dead Jews,' ' (April 25): It is phenomenally difficult to know when, if ever, it is acceptable to use Hitler in satire. Mel Brooks in 'The Producers' is the most prominent person to tackle this issue in the post-war era. After the war, Charlie Chaplin said he had second thoughts about making 'The Great Dictator' (1940). I think comedians are underusing Benito Mussolini for purposes of satire. He is less of a cultural reference point than Hitler, but using him would be less offensive. He combined territorial ambitions with being a sexually promiscuous, pompous fool. If there are any modern politicians who have any of those attributes, Il Duce would be an excellent analog. Bruce Couchman
Nutley, N.J.: If only I had the unlimited faith in our peerless president that Voicer Roberta Chaleff expressed. However, I don't. In response to the positives she cited, I offer these alternate views. Regarding Ukraine, Trump's incredibly pro-Russian proposal involves Ukraine recognizing the legitimacy of Russia's right to Crimea, which Russia unilaterally annexed in 2014, and Russia keeping territory in Ukraine that Russian troops occupy. Regarding illegal immigrants, yes, Trump is deporting those convicted of crimes, but his wholesale approach has also swept up some who are leading peaceful and productive lives, some whose only offense is demonstrating against administration policies, and even one the administration has admitted is here legally, Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Regarding tariffs, is Trump in active talks with China? A spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Guo Jiakun, stated that China is not engaged in trade talks. Peter Griswold
Howard Beach: What's wrong with Americans? Relax, calm down. Give it time to work. Americans want to see immediate results. It doesn't work that way. If something was destroyed for years, it will take months to rebuild. We have Trump at the head of the table. Who is a better negotiator? Keep your eyes open and your mouth shut! When things start turning around, others can't say to you, 'I told you so.' Let us show the world that Americans do not panic when the tough gets going. This is a perfect example of how Americans can make America great again! Be part of it, don't be so negative! Nick Di Pasquale
White Plains, N.Y.: If Pete Hegseth is removed as secretary of defense, that's bad news for him. The good news for him is he can go back to drinking. Jeff Gold
Valley Stream, L.I.: I found it rather amusing and ironic that Voicer William Clark criticized columnist S.E. Cupp for being woke, among other things. It made me curious if he and many others are unaware that this columnist is a lifelong conservative Republican. Before 2016, I disagreed with her respectfully on almost every issue, so I know this quite well. Her columns from the past decade no longer reflect this because she is actually a sane conservative Republican who recognizes that whatever party's running the country right now is not Republican in the least. It is a flat-out cult and that's what she has a problem with. She recognizes a danger to democracy that is beyond party and I respect her for that. In the end, history will be much kinder to her than all the MAGA sycophants out there. When that happens, I'll be happily disagreeing with her on most topics again. Allan Canino
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia won't let Ukrainian forces rest until Putin's demands are met – Russian deputy foreign minister
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov has stated that Moscow will not allow the Armed Forces of Ukraine to "use any pause to rest and regroup" without "eliminating the root causes of the conflict". Source: Ryabkov in an interview with Kremlin-aligned Russian news agency TASS Details: Ryabkov emphasised that US President Donald Trump's return to the White House has become a "reason for cautious optimism" in Russia regarding the normalisation of relations with the United States. He said that Russian leader Vladimir Putin during phone conversations with Trump "confirmed the basic directive on the necessity to eliminate the root causes of the conflict within the framework of political and diplomatic efforts". Ryabkov noted that if the Kremlin's conditions are not met, Russia will act to prevent the Armed Forces of Ukraine from taking advantage of "any pause to rest and regroup". According to him, the Kremlin's position is well known to Washington and threats of sanctions will not change it. "It is strange that hotheads in the US Senate, who have lost their last remnants of common sense, are ignoring this reality. We will continue efforts to achieve the objectives of the special military operation [Russian propaganda term for the war in Ukraine – ed.]. Thus, the decision and the choice are up to Washington, up to Trump," Ryabkov concluded. Background: On 3 June, Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council and former president of the Russian Federation, declared that the true purpose of the so-called peace talks with Ukraine in Istanbul is to ensure Russia's swift and complete victory. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
an hour ago
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.'
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
