Kananaskis prepares to host world leaders
News
Duration 3:42
We talk to John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto, about Canada's role in hosting next month's G7 leaders' summit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
30 minutes ago
- CTV News
Duke of Edinburgh to make three stops in Canada, attend Canada Day celebrations
Britain's Sophie the Duchess of Edinburgh, and Prince Edward, Duke of Edinburgh, arrive to attend a Service of Thanksgiving at Westminster Abbey on V-E Day in London, Thursday, May 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth) FREDERICTON — The Duke of Edinburgh is scheduled to visit Prince Edward Island later this month, just weeks after King Charles opened Parliament and read the throne speech. The Royal Diary says Prince Edward is scheduled to make three stops in Canada. It says he is set to visit Prince Edward Island in his capacity as colonel-in-chief of the Prince Edward Island Regiment, and will attend its 150th anniversary celebrations on June 25. He is scheduled to go to Toronto on June 28, although no details are given about his stop in that city. The Duke of Edinburgh is then set to go to Ottawa where he will attend Canada Day celebrations. Last month, King Charles -- Edward's older brother -- spent a busy two days in Ottawa where the monarch's visit was mostly aimed at reasserting Canada's sovereignty. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 9, 2025 The Canadian Press
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Great new military spending, Canada. Where's the money going to come from?
Todd Hirsch is a Calgary-based economist, author and public speaker. He is also the director of the Energy Transition Centre. Canada will reach NATO's defence spending benchmark of 2 per cent of GDP this fiscal year – five years earlier than planned. That's according to an announcement on Monday by Prime Minister Mark Carney. The move is timely and necessary in an unstable world. Ottawa is upping this year's budget for the Department of National Defence by $9.3-billion. That and existing spending from other departments will push defence-related expenditure to $62.7-billion for 2025-26 – 2 per cent of GDP, as per the requirements of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Never mind that the rest of NATO now wants to meet U.S. President Donald Trump's demand of 5 per cent. The fact that we, the laggard, finally got our act together and came up with such a bold plan to get to 2 per cent is good news. Now for the unglamorous part: There's no magic money tree. Defence can't surge to $62.7-billion and leave everything else untouched. The reality is, unless there is something Mr. Carney is not telling us, getting to the 2-per-cent target is going to be hard and uncomfortable. The problem isn't the size of Ottawa's $490-billion budget – it's where that money is already going. Most of it is locked up in transfers to individuals and other governments, and almost none of it is politically or legally touchable. I wrote about this issue in The Globe and Mail more than a year ago. Pardon me if I'm repeating myself a little, but the situation hasn't changed and will never change. Roughly a quarter of federal spending flows directly to Canadians through programs such as Old Age Security, the Guaranteed Income Supplement, Employment Insurance and the Canada Child Benefit. Another 20 per cent heads straight to the provinces through the Canada Health Transfer and the Canada Social Transfer to fund health care and social services. Then there's equalization: $26.2-billion this year, constitutionally enshrined. And let's not forget interest on the national debt, which rings in at $49-billion. No wiggle room there. After those are accounted for – along with other assorted transfers and programs such as money to the territories and Indigenous peoples – Ottawa is left with about $130-billion in 'Operating Spending.' Out of that, almost $40-billion is already committed to the military. Which leaves us with an uncomfortable fact: Out of nearly half a trillion dollars in federal spending, just $90-billion is truly discretionary – available for cuts, trims or efficiencies. And now, the Prime Minister wants to boost military spending by $9.3-billion. Easy, right? Cut the entire CBC? That covers a fraction of the target. Shutter every national park? Axe the federal justice system? Pull funding from Olympic athletes and sports? Abandon every federal dollar of scientific and medical research? How is this extra military spending to be accomplished? Mr. Carney did suggest some creative accounting on Monday, moving the coast guard to the defence department, presumably to redefine some non-defence budget as defence. So, sure, some of the $9.3-billion could come out of existing spending. But Mr. Carney didn't exactly elaborate on the accounting on Monday, and let's remember, this government hasn't put out a budget. Call me cynical and uncreative, but from where I'm standing and given what we know right now, we're looking at some combination of ugly options. The first is to raise taxes. Set aside for a moment the promised tax cut coming for middle-income households. The Liberal Party will have a hard time convincing Canadians that higher taxes are necessary – especially when they campaigned on the opposite. The second option is to borrow more and pile it onto an already ballooning national debt, erasing any realistic hope of a balanced budget for the foreseeable future. This option also drives up total debt-servicing costs. The third is to cut from existing spending in other areas. None of these is good. These options might not manifest visibly. We might not see a new 'weapons tax.' We might not see war bonds. We might not hear Mr. Carney announce one day that, say, this agency or Crown corporation could have gotten a $100-million budget increase instead of $50-million if not for the defence spending. But make no mistake: The number of dollars the government has is finite, and every one has to come out of somewhere. It's not easy for a leader to up defence spending. It's never been a popular thing in this country. So, kudos to Mr. Carney for stepping up. But now he has an even harder task. Mr. Carney needs to have an honest conversation with this country about where all the money is going to come from.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada's innovation policies need overhaul to boost economy, experts say
Canada's outdated innovation policies are causing a loss of economic sovereignty amid critical shifts in global trade relations and the knowledge-based economy, experts say. While Canada continues to lead globally in education and research, innovation experts say the country's inability to plan past that phase is costing it hundreds of billions of dollars every year in data and intellectual property ownership. And with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement up for review in 2026, they argue the federal government should arrive at negotiations with a Canada-first approach. Speaking Monday at the Intersect conference at the Fairmont Royal York hotel in Toronto, Jim Balsillie, former co-CEO of Research In Motion Ltd., said Canada needs to have an offensive strategy heading into USMCA negotiations. 'The most important thing is to learn how the economy works, know that the agreement isn't worth the paper it's printed on,' said Mr. Balsillie, who is also a co-founder and chair of the Canadian Council of Innovators. Under the Trump administration, the U.S. is leading a shift in global economic policy to become more aggressive and transactional, Mr. Balsillie said. This, added to the emergence in recent decades of a new, knowledge-based economy, has heightened the need for governments to defend their industries and IP. Yet Canada continues to fall behind. Canada has 'ambition deficit' and regulations that are scaring away investment, Sabia says CIBC CEO says Canada needs to be on 'wartime footing' to bolster productivity 'We've got this funny disease where everybody helps their companies, but we don't help ours. In fact, we subvert them,' he said, pointing to sticking points such as the highly controversial capital gains tax increase or the federal government's investments in foreign companies. Mr. Balsillie also addressed Ottawa's claim that eliminating interprovincial trade barriers will add as much as $200-billion to the economy, calling it a 'myth' and a 'distraction.' 'The most meaningful barriers were addressed long ago. Clinging to this narrative distracts from creating serious national economic strategy,' he said. Dan Breznitz, the Munk chair of innovation studies at the University of Toronto, touted the country's investments in fundamental research for technology such as artificial intelligence as world leading. But that's where it stops, he said. When it comes time for companies to scale up and commercialize their research, they, unsurprisingly, go elsewhere. 'We just assumed that, somehow, because we have educated people and ideas, magic will happen in the market,' Prof. Breznitz said. 'Instead people do the rational thing: They look around and they say, 'It's almost impossible to do it in Canada.'' On Monday morning, while Prof. Breznitz was addressing the crowd at the Fairmont, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced he would ensure that Canada hits NATO's target to spend 2 per cent of GDP on defence this fiscal year. Prof. Breznitz said that's important – but not the kind of transformational policy Canada needs right now, after 20 years of slowly declining GDP numbers. 'We've got a prime minister that basically tells us right now, that if he will bring us back to that moment of slow decline, it will be the biggest transformation. I'm worried,' he said. Canada needs to gain strategic control of its talent and research, he said. It needs to figure out how to capitalize on its valuable industries, such as critical minerals, and engage and invest in its own technology. 'It is not okay that we are the lowest, by far, in the G7 in buying and engaging with new technology,' he said. Ultimately, Mr. Balsillie said, Canada's progress hinges on its ability to bring in and listen to new voices within its policymaking spaces who will help it adapt to the modern economy. 'The issue isn't only new ideas. It's escaping old ideas.'
