logo
'Ali Khan Mahmudabad Could Say Sorry For Operation Sindoor Post': How Row Snowballed

'Ali Khan Mahmudabad Could Say Sorry For Operation Sindoor Post': How Row Snowballed

News1820-05-2025

Last Updated:
The complainant, Haryana State Commission for Women's head Renu Bhatia, says a genuine apology from the Ashoka University professor could have eased things
Is Ali Khan Mahmudabad a scholar who has been wronged, or has he 'degraded women"? The arrest of the associate professor at Ashoka University and former leader of the Samajwadi Party may have academics from institutions, including Oxford, Yale, and Jawaharlal Nehru University, urging his release, but the complainant, Haryana State Commission for Women's head Renu Bhatia, disagrees.
'His thought process is for everyone to see. His choice of words is there for the world to have a look at. Any educated person, as he claims to be, should have presented his side when we summoned him. But he chose to be absent. He even chose to evade the commission when we visited Ashoka University after informing them about the purpose of our visit," Bhatia told News18.
On Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh—the two women who emerged as India's face at a press briefing during Operation Sindoor — Ali Khan Mahmudabad had written in his May 9 post on social media that he was 'very happy to see so many right-wing commentators applauding" the Indian Army officers, but 'perhaps they can equally loudly demand that victims of mob lynchings, arbitrary bulldozing… are protected as Indian citizens". At a time when India was united in battling Pakistan, the charge against the Ashoka University professor was calling the optics 'hypocrisy". 'The optics of two women soldiers presenting their findings is important, but optics must translate to reality on the ground, otherwise it's just hypocrisy," he wrote on social media, adding fuel to the fire.
Terms like 'genocide", 'hypocrisy", and 'dehumanisation" attracted the wrath of the women's commission. 'I will keep talking about those from whom I can smell treachery," Bhatia said.
Very subtly, Bhatia referred to Mahmudabad's paternal lineage, where his grandfather, Mohammad Amir Ahmed Khan, was the last ruling Raja of Mahmudabad and a key financier of the Muslim League in the pre-Partition era. He campaigned for Mohammad Ali Jinnah's Pakistan against Mahatma Gandhi. Just before Partition, he migrated to Iraq. He subsequently moved to Pakistan in 1957 but later settled down in London. He, however, sent his wife and son to India to reacquire his property, which by then was in state possession.
While more than one FIR has been filed against Professor Mahmudabad, the one based on a complaint by Bhatia has serious sections like 152 (acts that endanger India's sovereignty, unity and integrity) along with 353 (statements conducing to public mischief) and 79 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman).
Meanwhile, a carefully crafted official message from Ashoka University read, 'We have been made aware that Prof. Ali Khan Mahmudabad has been taken into police custody. We are in the process of ascertaining details of the case. The University will continue to cooperate with the Police and local authorities in the investigation, fully." But the university's faculty association was more liberal in its choice of words, calling the charges 'untenable" and his arrest 'calculated harassment".
Mahmudabad has approached the Supreme Court for relief. A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice AG Masih agreed to hear his plea by Wednesday, after senior advocate Kapil Sibal said the professor had been 'arrested for (making) a patriotic statement". The Ashoka professor's May 14 clarification about his May 9 post wasn't helping much, attempting to 'solely express concern over the rhetorical excesses and reckless warmongering exhibited by certain sections of the civilian public".
But you ask the complainant, Renu Bhatia, and she would say a genuine apology could have eased things. 'He could have accepted his mistake. He could have just apologised," she said.
Now, the row is far beyond the realm of any apologies, where society is extremely polarised on this issue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan's UNSC posts present diplomatic challenge for India's fight against terror
Pakistan's UNSC posts present diplomatic challenge for India's fight against terror

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Pakistan's UNSC posts present diplomatic challenge for India's fight against terror

Written by Shivam Shekhawat On June 5, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced Pakistan's appointment as chair and vice chair of two important United Nations Security Council (UNSC) committees: The Taliban Sanctions Committee formed through Resolution 1988 and the Counter-Terrorism Committee, which monitors the implementation of Resolution 1373, formed after 9/11. Islamabad is now also a co-chair of two working groups: One on documentation and procedural issues with Denmark and another, newly formed one with Greece tasked with analysing the effectiveness of UN sanctions. Pakistan is also set to preside over the council next month. In the aftermath of Operation Sindoor and India's efforts to engage with the international community to highlight Pakistan's nefarious role in fomenting terrorism, the appointments have raised concerns about their possible implications for New Delhi. After being elected to the UNSC in June last year, Pakistan started its tenure as a non-permanent member on January 1. Its term will end on December 31, 2026. Marking its eighth stint at the UNSC, Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN, Asim Iftikar Ahmad, restated the country's commitment to utilise the platform to highlight the Kashmir issue and work towards preventing the adverse impacts of terrorism. There can be no doubt that Islamabad will leverage its membership to further its anti-India agenda. The statement released by the Security Council condemning the Pahalgam terror attack was relatively watered down from previous iterations of support to India. Then, on May 5, the UNSC held a closed-door consultation on the 'India-Pakistan Question', the first time after 2019. Thus, cognisant of the possible role Pakistan can play in the UNSC, India's post-conflict outreach to the world focused on reaching out to permanent and non-permanent members except Pakistan, China and Somalia. Similar to India's outreach, Pakistan also sent its delegation to the UN headquarters in New York, as well as to Washington DC, Moscow, Brussels and London. These delegations, led by senior current and former ministers, are urging for the immediate resumption of the Indus Waters Treaty. While the all-party delegations sent by New Delhi have made a clear case for India's imperative to target terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and the threat it faces from its western neighbor, the road ahead, to win the narrative war, will not be easy. India has been urging a rethink of the financial support offered to Pakistan by the IMF and the World Bank, and its possible utilisation by Rawalpindi to fund activities against India. India has also decided to revamp its push for Pakistan's re-inclusion in the FATF's grey list after it was removed in 2022. For India, this is important to prevent Pakistan from strengthening its terror-military scaffolding further. While ties between Kabul and Islamabad plummeted in the last few months, they have now decided to elevate their relationship to the ambassadorial level, the agreement for which was reached during the informal meeting between the foreign ministers of Pakistan, Afghanistan and China, further changing the dynamics in the region. Both sides have had continued communications, even when the conflict between India and Pakistan broke out. While the Taliban is trying to play both sides, China's close strategic partnership with Pakistan and its openness to engaging with Kabul makes the situation difficult for India. There has been a close synchronisation between Islamabad and Beijing against India at the UNSC and other international platforms. Pakistan will leverage the platform to propagate false claims of India's support for terrorist attacks in the country, particularly the attacks by Baloch outfits. Islamabad has also tried to pin the blame for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan's actions on both Afghanistan and India. While the UNSC posts will not offer Pakistan a lot of leeway directly, it will give it more space to bring up issues that align with its own interests and deflect attention from India's concerns. Pakistan will also vehemently oppose India's permanent membership bid at the UNSC. The writer is a junior fellow with ORF's Strategic Studies Programme

Complainant against influencer Sharmistha Panoli arrested in Kolkata
Complainant against influencer Sharmistha Panoli arrested in Kolkata

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Complainant against influencer Sharmistha Panoli arrested in Kolkata

Wajahat Khan, the man who filed the police complaint that led to the arrest of social media influencer and law student Sharmistha Panoli, was arrested in Kolkata on Monday after allegedly being on the run since 1 June. Panoli was arrested in Gurugram on 30 May in connection with a hate speech case and was granted bail by the Calcutta High Court on 5 June. She was released from Alipore Women's Correctional Home on 6 June. Who is Wajahat Khan? Khan had lodged the initial complaint against Panoli, citing hate speech. Following that, he allegedly went into hiding with his father. On 2 June, a formal complaint was filed against him by the Shree Ram Swabhiman Parishad, accusing him of using derogatory, inflammatory, and sexually explicit language aimed at Hindu deities, religious practices, and the community at large. Who is Sharmistha Panoli? What is the case against Sharmistha Panoli? Panoli had posted a video on social media making communal remarks and referring to Operation Sindoor. The video drew criticism and led to a police complaint on 15 May at the Garden Reach police station in Kolkata. The Kolkata Police classified the content as hate speech and filed a case against her. Later the same day, she deleted the video and issued an unconditional public apology for her remarks. TMC vs BJP in the Panoli case The case has taken on a political dimension in West Bengal. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of appeasement politics, alleging bias in the police action. Leader of the Opposition and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari posted on X, calling Panoli's arrest a case of 'police atrocities'. He wrote, 'This is a case of police atrocities as an innocent young lady, for using her freedom of speech and expression, has been illegally arrested by the Kolkata Police and was sent to judicial custody. This is yet another example of police overzealousness and eagerness to please their political masters.' BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul echoed these sentiments, claiming that the police were shielding Wajahat Khan due to 'Muslim appeasement'. In response, Trinamool Congress (TMC) spokesperson Riju Datta defended the police action, stating that the Kolkata Police was acting on a court warrant. He also issued a warning to young social media users and their families, saying: 'Do not get influenced by the RW cabal run by BJP IT Cell… they will earn their salary hiding behind a cellphone but your children's lives will be spoiled forever.'

QRSAM Air Defence System To Bolster India's Frontline, Nod Expected Soon: Report
QRSAM Air Defence System To Bolster India's Frontline, Nod Expected Soon: Report

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

QRSAM Air Defence System To Bolster India's Frontline, Nod Expected Soon: Report

Last Updated: The Indian Army may soon acquire a new indigenous QRSAM system, costing Rs 30,000 crore, for deployment along western and northern borders The Indian Army may soon get a new indigenous surface-to-air missile system. The development comes at a time when Indian air defence systems are making headlines for successfully bringing down missile and drone attacks launched by Pakistan in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor. The proposal, which would cost Rs 30,000 crore, is scheduled to be taken by the Ministry of Defence for buying three regiments of the home-grown Quick Reaction Surface to Air Missile system (QRSAM) for deployment along both western and northern borders, news agency ANI reported. The meeting of the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) is planned to be held around the fourth week of June. The QRSAM, developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), is configured on highly mobile platforms and is capable of providing air defence on the move. QRSAM Features The Quick Reaction Surface-to-Air Missile (QRSAM) is a short-range air defence system developed to safeguard moving armoured columns from aerial threats. With an operational range of approximately 30 km, it complements existing systems like the Akash and MRSAM in the short-to-medium range category. QRSAM is equipped with capabilities for surveillance and tracking while on the move and can engage targets during brief halts. It features an active phased array surveillance radar with a detection range of up to 120 km and a tracking radar effective up to 80 km, integrated with Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) technology. The system is designed for multi-target engagement and can counter threats from aircraft, hovering helicopters, UAVs, and other airborne targets. Indian forces had not deployed air defence systems and missiles in active operations since the Kargil War. However, this changed following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives, when India launched BrahMos missiles to strike terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). First Published: June 09, 2025, 20:31 IST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store