logo
Australia's major airlines and airports brace for surge in complaints amid aviation customer rights charter

Australia's major airlines and airports brace for surge in complaints amid aviation customer rights charter

West Australian03-05-2025

Perth Airport is warning a 'deluge of frivolous or vexatious complaints' from a plan aimed at giving passengers more rights amid growing criticism about the nation's aviation sector.
National carrier Qantas is among the major airlines and airports that acknowledge Labor's proposal could help to better inform passengers about their rights when travelling. But they say proposed guidelines as written could raise unrealistic expectations among consumers — or compromise safety.
Aviation will face intense scrutiny regardless of the Federal election result, with customers increasingly dissatisfied with how airlines handle flight cancellations, delays, refunds and complaints. Labor will likely proceed with its draft aviation customer rights charter, while Coalition transport spokeswoman Bridget McKenzie has spent years targeting major airlines.
Labor's proposed charter — announced just days before Christmas — will form part of the new statutory Aviation Industry Ombuds Scheme and will be overseen by the Ombudsperson who will have the powers to determine that customer disputes be resolved with specific remedies.
Perth Airport has called for clarity in the charter, saying well-meaning but broad and vaguely worded proposals would only encourage 'a deluge of frivolous or vexatious complaints'.
This would cause unnecessary costs on the industry and undermine the ability of the scheme to help consumers with legitimate complaints, it said.
Under the charter, customers would receive a full refund for a cancelled flight within 14 days, and receive assistance to rebook with the airline or an alternative airline with the option to cancel for a full refund if a flight is disrupted or delayed for more than three hours.
The charter also demands 'accurate, timely and accessible information and customer service' and requires airlines to pay for the cost of returning lost suitcases.
Perth Airport — Australia's fourth biggest — said the charter as written also opened the door for the Ombudsman to be increasingly required to make calls on issues where perceptions and feelings, rather than facts, were in dispute.
But if a passenger claimed to have been spoken to disrespectfully by an airport security officer or an airline staff — and that worker denied the allegations — Perth Airport questioned how the Ombudsman would determine right or wrong.
Meanwhile, Qantas said it already provided customers with a wide range of support in the event of a delay or cancellation within its control.
This included options for a refund or re-booking on another flight, as well as meal vouchers, transfers and accommodation — all required by existing consumer law.
The Flying Kangaroo — led by Vanessa Hudson — said there were several sections within the draft charter that needed clarification to 'avoid unintended consequences, ensure responsibility is shared appropriately and deliver improved outcomes for all aviation consumers'.
The Regional Aviation Association of Australia — whose 120 members include Virgin Australia Regional Airlines, QantasLink and failed Rex Airlines — said if the charter was applied to all regional airlines, it had the potential to affect remote communities across the country in adverse ways. This included price rises and reduction in services.
'Safety must also remain the industry's number one priority. Any charter must not threaten or compromise the world-class safety culture of the Australian aviation industry,' it said.
The Australian Travel Industry Association — the peak body for travel businesses — called for travel agents and other third parties that sell aviation services to be left out of the charter, citing there were already effective avenues for recourse.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese may have a clear vision for Australia, but it's not clear to the rest of us
Albanese may have a clear vision for Australia, but it's not clear to the rest of us

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Albanese may have a clear vision for Australia, but it's not clear to the rest of us

In Victoria last week, the prime minister was able to talk about one of his favourite topics: infrastructure. The North East Link Project would 'allow commuters to skip 18 sets of traffic lights and take 15,000 trucks off local roads.' Cutting through abstract economic debates, he declared, 'This is what productivity benefits look like, right here and now.' In Western Australia, he visited an Urgent Care Clinic: 'we promised 50, but delivered 87'. This is politics as Albanese often practises it: concrete, both literally and figuratively. It is concerned, above all, with tangible and demonstrable benefits. On both visits, he was asked about the defection of Senator Dorinda Cox from the Greens to Labor. Twice, with only slightly different wording, he explained that Cox had decided the Greens were 'not capable of achieving the change that she wants to see… if you're serious about social change in Australia, the Labor Party is where you should be.' Last week, the overwrought political debate continued around the government's proposed superannuation tax changes. Those changes are minor. The original impulse behind Australia's modern superannuation system was the opposite. One of that system's originators, former union leader Bill Kelty, three years ago described to journalist Jennifer Hewett how it all began, early in the Hawke government. 'Paul [Keating] said we gotta make up our mind what we are, and what we want to do with super.' They rejected various pathways – most notably, 'we don't want to be tinkerers or reformers'. Instead, they decided: 'We want to start a new system… We will be revolutionaries. We will change the system. But we will not tear down the existing system. We will build a new system.' Interestingly, Kelty's phrasing is almost directly the opposite of a phrase Albanese has come to like, and which he deployed two days before the election. Kelty said he and Keating decided to be revolutionaries, not reformers. Albanese said: 'I don't pretend to be a revolutionary. I'm a reformist'. Loading Which fits with Labor's proposed tax hike on the earnings of superannuation balances over $3 million. Remember we are talking about a rarefied set of Australians: in 2023, the Australian Financial Review, one of the loudest critics of the change, reported that earnings from such a balance would get you 'two luxury holidays a year, home renovations every five to 10 years and comprehensive health insurance'. This is definitely not revolution. So why all the fuss? Treasurer Jim Chalmers answered that last week. He did so, probably smartly, in fairly indirect language, as though trying to walk a line: clear enough to reach journalists listening, not so sharp as to draw more attention to the issue. In essence, he said three things. First, because the rich want to hang onto what they have. Second, because a couple of newspapers are obsessed – most people don't care.

Australians curb their enthusiasm for US holidays
Australians curb their enthusiasm for US holidays

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australians curb their enthusiasm for US holidays

Flight Centre chief executive Graham Turner said business travel to the US was holding up, but fewer Australians were booking holidays there. 'Certainly compared to the pre-Trump era, everything that we see … is the leisure market in particular is down. There's no doubt that April and May have been down,' Turner said. 'US carriers have increased their capacity [to Australia] over the last six to 12 months, and there's no doubt they'll be suffering a bit. 'There's been cheaper airfares through sales and there will be [more] over the next few months unless things dramatically improve.' More than a million Australians visited the US last year. The country's latest official figures show 291,230 Australians visited the US from January to April, down 0.2 per cent on the same period last year. In April, Australian visitor numbers to the US grew 1 per cent year-on-year to 89,363. Meanwhile, 83,460 Americans arrived in Australia this March, making the US the second-largest source of visitors behind New Zealand. Australia's favourite destinations over the same period were New Zealand, Indonesia and Japan. Mitchell said young people most affected by the cost of living were choosing cheaper destinations such as Latin America or Asia, instead. He said the April slump in the Australian dollar sparked by Trump's tariff wars had 'spooked a lot of people' from booking trips to the US. 'The feedback we're getting is the US is an expensive destination to go to, with the service taxes and the tipping. And I think that word of mouth has honestly been getting around for a while now,' Mitchell said. He said even those who could afford to visit the US were cutting back on costs. 'I don't think it's stopping some people from going there, but it probably does change how they travel a bit. They might not go for 2½, three weeks; they might go for two weeks. They might not go five-star, they might go four-star or three-star,' he said. Qantas, which operates about 40 return flights a week between Australia and the US, said demand for US travel was holding up locally. Chief executive Vanessa Hudson recently said the airline was feeling optimistic about demand for the US, and 'business-purpose travel and business travel in premium cabins remains strong'. The airline said this year's sale for flights to the US had outperformed similar sales last year. Loading Michael Feller, an ex-diplomat and foreign policy adviser, said the second Trump presidency had caused enormous damage to US soft power and prestige. But he said it was difficult to trace that into consumer behaviour beyond unique cases like Canada. 'Boycotts are really tricky,' said Feller, who is now chief strategist at Geopolitical Strategy, which provides advice to companies around the world. 'US products are ubiquitous. And when you consume a quintessential US product like Coke, it's manufactured and bottled in Australia. And then there are other quintessential products like iPhones, which are manufactured and assembled in China. So, it's hard to disentangle 'Brand US'.' Despite gloom over Trump's trade wars, Feller said there were two silver linings for Australia. Loading 'The Australian consumer will probably benefit from Trump's trade wars insofar as cheap Chinese goods will be dumped on our shores, leading to lower costs,' he said. 'And if Trump cracks down on international students, those students will presumably look to a country like ours to study.'

Albanese may have a clear vision for Australia, but it's not clear to the rest of us
Albanese may have a clear vision for Australia, but it's not clear to the rest of us

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

Albanese may have a clear vision for Australia, but it's not clear to the rest of us

In Victoria last week, the prime minister was able to talk about one of his favourite topics: infrastructure. The North East Link Project would 'allow commuters to skip 18 sets of traffic lights and take 15,000 trucks off local roads.' Cutting through abstract economic debates, he declared, 'This is what productivity benefits look like, right here and now.' In Western Australia, he visited an Urgent Care Clinic: 'we promised 50, but delivered 87'. This is politics as Albanese often practises it: concrete, both literally and figuratively. It is concerned, above all, with tangible and demonstrable benefits. On both visits, he was asked about the defection of Senator Dorinda Cox from the Greens to Labor. Twice, with only slightly different wording, he explained that Cox had decided the Greens were 'not capable of achieving the change that she wants to see… if you're serious about social change in Australia, the Labor Party is where you should be.' Last week, the overwrought political debate continued around the government's proposed superannuation tax changes. Those changes are minor. The original impulse behind Australia's modern superannuation system was the opposite. One of that system's originators, former union leader Bill Kelty, three years ago described to journalist Jennifer Hewett how it all began, early in the Hawke government. 'Paul [Keating] said we gotta make up our mind what we are, and what we want to do with super.' They rejected various pathways – most notably, 'we don't want to be tinkerers or reformers'. Instead, they decided: 'We want to start a new system… We will be revolutionaries. We will change the system. But we will not tear down the existing system. We will build a new system.' Interestingly, Kelty's phrasing is almost directly the opposite of a phrase Albanese has come to like, and which he deployed two days before the election. Kelty said he and Keating decided to be revolutionaries, not reformers. Albanese said: 'I don't pretend to be a revolutionary. I'm a reformist'. Loading Which fits with Labor's proposed tax hike on the earnings of superannuation balances over $3 million. Remember we are talking about a rarefied set of Australians: in 2023, the Australian Financial Review, one of the loudest critics of the change, reported that earnings from such a balance would get you 'two luxury holidays a year, home renovations every five to 10 years and comprehensive health insurance'. This is definitely not revolution. So why all the fuss? Treasurer Jim Chalmers answered that last week. He did so, probably smartly, in fairly indirect language, as though trying to walk a line: clear enough to reach journalists listening, not so sharp as to draw more attention to the issue. In essence, he said three things. First, because the rich want to hang onto what they have. Second, because a couple of newspapers are obsessed – most people don't care.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store