logo
Top Priority for Pope Leo: Warn the World of the A.I. Threat

Top Priority for Pope Leo: Warn the World of the A.I. Threat

New York Times15-05-2025

The parishioners at St. Matthias Schöneberg Church in Berlin worry about artificial intelligence.
Congregants fret that their children are finding false information on chatbots or social media. Teachers at the parish school regularly monitor for A.I.-enabled cheating. And in this parish of 12,000 Catholics from more than 100 countries, those who make a living as interpreters fear their jobs will soon be obsolete.
Now, they have an ally in the new pope.
Less than a week into the role, Leo XIV has publicly highlighted his concerns about the rapidly advancing technology. In his inaugural address to the College of Cardinals, he said the church would address the risks that artificial intelligence poses to 'human dignity, justice and labor.' And in his first speech to journalists, he cited the 'immense potential' of A.I. while warning that it requires responsibility 'to ensure that it can be used for the good of all.'
While it is far too early to say how Pope Leo will use his platform to address these concerns or whether he can have much effect, his focus on artificial intelligence shows he is a church leader who grasps the gravity of this modern issue.
Paolo Benanti, a Franciscan friar, professor and the Vatican's top adviser on the ethics of artificial intelligence, said he was surprised by Leo's 'bold' priorities. Father Benanti remembers that just 15 years ago, when he told his doctoral advisers that he wanted to study cyborgs and human enhancement at the Gregorian, the pontifical university where he now teaches, his advisers thought he was nuts.
'And now it's the first topic of a pope,' he said in an interview at his monastery this week.
As a cardinal and head of the Vatican office that selects and manages bishops around the world, Pope Leo was already thinking about artificial intelligence. Father Benanti said that last September, the future pope, who has a degree in mathematics, invited the friar to talk to the heads of other Vatican departments about how to deal with digital life generally, including A.I.
The subject preoccupied his predecessor, Pope Francis, as well. Under his leadership, the Roman Catholic Church called for more oversight of A.I., and in 2024, Francis said the technology must be harnessed for solving social problems, not 'the desire for profit and the thirst for power.'
That kind of exhortation dates back much further, and was a source of inspiration for Leo. He chose his name mainly because Pope Leo XIII, who occupied the papacy in the late 19th century, took on the industrial revolution, writing in 1891 that governments must 'save unfortunate working people from the cruelty of men of greed, who use human beings as mere instruments for money making,' even as he marveled about 'discoveries of science.'
Now Pope Leo's advocacy comes at a time of similar technological disruption — and promise. Companies are spending tens of billions of dollars and working at a breakneck development pace, while there is little global agreement about regulation. Leaders in countries like the United States see advancing A.I. as a geopolitical imperative and fear that any major restrictions could give rivals like China a chance to race ahead.
Many in the tech world believe, with religious-like conviction, that A.I. is a technological breakthrough comparable to the steam engine, electricity and the internet. Its biggest champions believe the tools will lead to new health discoveries, scientific leaps and economic growth. But A.I. also poses many risks, including the spread of fake videos and other disinformation, algorithms taking over financial and other key decisions, autonomous weapons that can evade human control and the mass replacement of workers.
The International Monetary Fund estimates that A.I. will affect about 40 percent of global jobs, complementing some and eliminating others. Those labor market effects could exacerbate wealth inequality, by dividing the haves who capitalize on A.I. from the have-nots whose jobs cease to exist.
The church has championed technological progress in the past. Medieval Catholic monks invented new labor-saving technology like tidal-powered water wheels, and the church supported inventions by Catholics, including the barometer and an early calculator, said Brian Patrick Green, director of technology ethics at Santa Clara University. 'But as the power of technology has really become very very large, then the potential downsides have really come into view,' Mr. Green said.
Like any other institution, the church and its 1.4 billion followers can benefit from artificial intelligence — by using it to streamline menial tasks, conduct deep research and tackle massive data computation. An emerging niche market for apps and other services allows users to talk with priest-like A.I. chatbots.
On Bible Chat, a chatbot trained on the teachings of the Bible, some of the most common conversation topics include, 'Is getting tattoos a sin?' or 'How do I overcome lust?' The program, which costs $59.99 for an annual premium subscription, has recently been among Apple's most-downloaded apps. Services like Magisterium AI help clergy choose readings for Mass or answer basic theological questions like 'is euthanasia ever morally permissible?'
Catholics say the church will need to learn how to navigate the tools of A.I. like anybody else. 'If you said, 'Please write a homily for this Sunday,' and they print it and then read it, of course that sucks,' said Jose Manuel De Urquidi, who founded a digital marketing company in Dallas that helps Catholic organizations connect with U.S. Latinos and who sat at a table with Pope Leo last year during a meeting of bishops and lay people in Rome.
Catholic ethicists believe the pope can be a voice for restraint. 'What we can do is convene people of good will,' said the Rev. Brendan McGuire, the pastor of St. Simon Parish in Los Altos, California and a frequent consultant to technology leaders in Silicon Valley. 'This is not a Catholic problem, this is a humanity problem.'
Father Josef Wieneke, the pastor at St. Matthias in Berlin, said he was 'happy to hear' the pope talk about artificial intelligence so quickly, because leaders outside the church are interested in the Catholic ethical perspective. Father Wieneke said publishers have asked him for referrals on someone who could write about the religious view of A.I.
Leo's 19th-century namesake pressured governments to mitigate the damage of new technology as it was harnessed to capitalism. Wage earners, he wrote, 'should be specially cared for and protected by the government.' Whether Leo XIV will have any better luck at persuading governments or multinational corporations to rein in excesses and protect workers is an open question.
The pope may 'struggle to convert convictions into things that are really going to influence the big businesses and corporations' or legislation, said Stephen N. Williams, emeritus professor of systematic theology at Union Theological College in Belfast.
Matthew Harvey Sanders, who founded Magisterium AI, said he wanted the pope to offer the church as a refuge to those who lose jobs, fall into a virtual reality vortex or end up in despair when a ChatGPT lover fails them. He said the pope shouldn't be trying 'to ensure that governments are behaving and are doing the right things,' adding, 'That's not, effectively, I think, the role of the pope.'
Perhaps a hint of Leo's approach may be found in an interview he gave in 2012 to Catholic News Service about the harm caused by popular culture and social media. 'I don't think that turning away from the media would be the answer,' he said. The answer was to think about how to 'teach people to become critical thinkers' and to 'understand that not everything you hear or everything you read should be taken at face value.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Artificial Intelligence in Education: Risks, Opportunities and What's Next
Artificial Intelligence in Education: Risks, Opportunities and What's Next

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Artificial Intelligence in Education: Risks, Opportunities and What's Next

is an education podcast featuring author Michael Horn and Futre's Diane Tavenner in conversation with educators, school leaders, students and other members of school communities as they investigate the challenges facing the education system in the aftermath of the pandemic — and where we should go from here. Find every episode by bookmarking our Class Disrupted page or subscribing on Apple Podcasts, Google Play or Stitcher. In the last episode of the season, Michael Horn and Diane Tavenner come together, in person, to reflect on the arc of their artificial intelligence-focused series. They discuss key themes and takeaways, including the enduring importance of foundational knowledge, skepticism around the speed and impact of AI-driven change within traditional schools, and how transformative innovation is more likely to emerge from new educational models. Their conversation explores the challenges and opportunities AI brings — particularly in developing curiosity as a critical habit for learners — and revisits how their own perspectives shifted throughout the season. Listen to the episode below. A full transcript follows. Michael Horn: Hey, Diane, it is good to be with you in person. Diane Tavenner: It's really good to be in person. It's a little funny where we are in person, but it's kind of the perfect setting to end our A.I. you know, miniseries season six. We are at the air show. I think that's what it's called, the AI show in San Diego. Michael Horn: I'm gonna take a selfie, as we say. Diane Tavenner: We're gonna send you a picture of this. So we're. We're recording here from the floor that is filled with educators and edtech companies and AI. AI. AI! Michael Horn: Because AI is the thing, which is perfect because our season this year has almost exclusively focused on the question of what will the impact of AI be in education? How do we shape that? What do we want it to be? All these questions, frankly, in ways that neither of us had imagined fully. I think when we started this and we did a first sort of rapid reaction. Diane Tavenner: We did. Were we starting our kind of baseline assessment of what we thought and our knowledge and what we were curious about? Michael Horn: Yep. And we've gone through this journey, and now today, we sort of get to tidy it up with our very sharp, insightful takes. No pressure on us. Diane Tavenner: No pressure for those key headlines. But, you know, along the way, we interviewed a bunch of really interesting people, some skeptics, some really positive folks. And we benefited a lot from it. Michael Horn: I learned a ton. My understanding of the space. I don't know if I conveyed it on our prior episode, but I think it's a lot deeper than it was when we started. Diane Tavenner: For me, too. I really appreciate them. And then, you know, in true fashion, we just publicly processed out loud last episode. Michael Horn: We do. Diane Tavenner: And now we're going to try to actually pull it together with some key takeaways. So that's how we're going to wrap it today. And so we kind of outlined, you know, three big categories here. And the first one is, I want to ask you what belief was confirmed for you as we made our way through this season? Michael Horn: Yeah. So people obviously heard where we started, but I will confess, I've been struggling. I knew you were going to ask this question, and for days I've been wondering, what did it confirm for me? I think I will say two things. If that. And maybe that's cheating. But it's our podcast. Right. So, number one, I think it confirmed for me that foundational knowledge will still be important. Diane Tavenner: Yes. Michael Horn: And I think developing it into skills will still be important, just as Google did not change that reality, despite what a lot of educators and maybe more schools of education sadly were telling their students that became teachers. I don't think AI will change that either. We had a long conversation in the last episode around the nature of expertise and who AI is useful for. I think the second thing that maybe hit harder for me but, but confirmed something that we talked about in the first episode was I think the most transformational use cases of AI in education will be in areas outside of the traditional schools with new models that leverage AI that wrap around it to do things very differently from business as usual, frankly. Like why you started public school is outside of the traditional. Right. I think the other piece of that is I'm somewhat skeptical that venture capital will be the thing that funds a lot of these new models that emerge. Diane Tavenner: Say more about that. Why? Michael Horn Well, I could be very wrong in the latter. I'm just coming, we're at this conference and I just coming from a place where a few people said no, we are funding these things. So I could be completely wrong. I guess my thoughts are that the time frames for explosive growth for VC are short; five to seven years. Diane Tavenner: Yeah. Michael Horn: The micro schools, the new emerging schooling models. I don't even know if micro schools will be the word we use in five years from now. I'm not convinced those are like zero to a hundred thousand student businesses. Diane Tavenner: Yeah. Michael Horn: And so I don't know, can you make a venture style business out of them? Venture might be funding the AI software that sort of makes those things go round and certainly the infrastructure that we've talked about. Diane Tavenner: Right, right. Michael Horn: But I, but I guess I think that's going to be the really interesting hotbed of activity to look at. And we had this dichotomy on the first show, teacher facing versus student facing. I think that's less present in my mind at the moment. But the student facing stuff I think will be in these new models, not the traditional ones. Diane Tavenner: Fascinating. Michael Horn: What about you? Diane Tavenner: Well, I think that, you know, when. Michael Horn: I feel free to disagree with me also I think. Related Diane Tavenner: Well, I think my confirmed belief is sort of a dimension of what you're talking about, maybe the flip side of what you're talking about or connected to it and I can't decide if it's in conflict with what you're saying or not. So let me just put it out there and we'll see. I will say that I think of myself almost as always an optimist, but I am a skeptic in one area and I believed coming into this that we weren't going to hear that schools were being redesigned or that even had been. And so it sort of confirmed my belief that I don't know what is going to bring about this kind of change. And so you are saying it's going to happen outside of the. Yes, because that's the only place that. Michael Horn: It's the only place for transformational use cases. Diane Tavenner: And it may be yet. Michael Horn: And it may be yet. And I think the confirmed belief for me at the moment, it's great when you're wrong and you learn something new. I will say. But at the moment, it confirmed my sense that it will, look at our field, they tend to be consumed with the hardest, most intractable problems at the center of the field. And this is gonna be the periphery. It's not gonna be the bulk of it. So there's a little bit of a cognitive dissonance if you. Diane Tavenner: I think you're right. And it's. It's so interesting. The story in America is truancy and absenteeism. So data tells a story along that. But if you're processing that, that is the biggest problem. And then you're creating, using AI to create a solution structure. And what is happening in the school day is the problem. Families are voting with their feet. Michael Horn: So it's so interesting you say that. I'm rereading Bob Moesta's book, Five Skills of Innovators. I almost mailed you a copy over the weekend. They're solving a problem rather than asking, what is the system supposed to do and how do you tighten the variance around that? And as he says, you can solve the problem, but create five others. Or you say, what is the system supposed to do now? Yeah. And so that's why I think we got to bust out. So let me ask you, Let me ask you the next question. Where did it change your mind or beliefs? Anything that we learned? Diane Tavenner: Well, I do. I do think it changed my mind. And I'll point to our episode with John Bailey. That's how we kicked off this series. And I think I've talked to so many people who love that episode, and they're like, oh, my gosh, I had no idea all the different ways that I could use ChatGPT or Claude or whatever AI I'm using. And it's true. I mean, John, you know, talked about how we now have an expert in our pocket on every possible topic. And so it really pushed me to think about how I was using it in my life, both in. In my personal life, in my professional life, and in our product. Now there's Some challenges with this expert idea that I think came up for both of us. Michael Horn: Yeah. And maybe that's where I, maybe that's where it changed my beliefs. I think I had a sense and you can read my quotes in newspapers and stuff like that. That or newspapers exist. Ed weeks, stuff like that. That. I think this series really gave me a much deeper set of questions around what kinds of students will actually be able to take advantage of these types of tools. I won't go into it again. Did it the last episode around this novice expert, unknowing, knowing, sort of two by two. Related Michael Horn: And so I think that's like something that I'm really wrestling and revising in my head coming out of this. I think along those lines, it gave me a much deeper concern over a lot of the things that could go wrong if we're not super intentional and thoughtful about that game. But I think it's like how we leaned into it. And I, I will say, I don't know if this is a revision for me. You may tell me I'm leaving my principles behind, but I sort of scoffed a couple years ago when districts would say, we need an AI strategy. And I was like, no, that's focusing on the inputs, not the outcomes you want. But I think I've revised my stance in that I do think that there needs to be more thoughtfulness around what are our beliefs and values and so forth in an era of AI, and what does that mean for what we think about teaching and learning? And maybe that's your AI strategy. Diane Tavenner: Well, and this harkens back to the episode with Rebecca Winthorp. Will AI provoke schools to go back and have the real conversations about what is the purpose of education? What are we trying to do? What matters now? How are we using this new, very powerful tool to further our purpose? Michael Horn: Look, I would hope that they would, but, I mean, I think this is the answer, you know, see number one, where I think it's more likely that these conversations happen in embryonic education communities than the traditional, despite how broken this could look in five years if we go down this road. But that's, I left with a lot of concerns. Diane Tavenner: Yeah. And I'm curious in my own use of AI, if I'm missing out or losing anything, because I'm not, like, processing some of my thinking and work in the way that I used to, like, no doubt more efficient, certain brain work during that process. Michael Horn: So was it creating cognitive laziness that. Diane Tavenner: I have no evidence that that's true. But I do wonder. Related Michael Horn: And on my other podcast, Future U, Jeff Salingo talked about how his daughter, one of his daughters, asked what you did when you didn't have phones. And her visual image wasn't like, oh, you memorized stuff and had to learn a lot. Her visual image was literally like, we have a phone in front of us, navigating us. We must have had a large fold out map. She couldn't imagine that we would write down the directions and so forth and then. And occasionally you pulled over and had to recalibrate, but. And so he was like, oh, so this is an example of cognitive laziness. And I was like, I actually think that's an example of freeing up the brain to do other things that I think is. Diane Tavenner: Well, and in a whole other part of our lives. We both care a lot about longevity and the science and whatnot. And so there's certainly some evidence over there that we are not helping our brains when we're taking all those tasks out of our life. So I want to switch gears and name something else that it changed for me, and that's curiosity. I think we both came to this. And for me, here was the big aha, like I have for years. Like, I built the summit model with the habits of success, and curiosity was one of the parts of that. But curiosity has always gotten sort of shortchanged, if you will, because everyone's like, well, that's great, but how do you teach it and how do you assess it? And it's sort of sitting up there and to me, like, curiosity comes roaring back in. It is having its shining moment. Michael Horn: Like the habit. Diane Tavenner: Yes. Michael Horn: That you will need to be a thriving adult in this world. So you don't take things on face value. So you are inquisitive, so you ask. So you're always needing to use this, I think, to figure out what is truth, if you will. That's perhaps a real skill that we will need to be better at developing. Diane Tavenner: You know, I would probably call it more of a habit, but it is a skill. It's one of those weird ones because I feel like we're born naturally curious, not feel like there's a lot of evidence of that. I sadly believe that our education system actually rings that curiosity out of us. Michael Horn: It doesn't reward it. Right? Diane Tavenner: It doesn't reward it. And you know what's interesting? In my current work, you ask employers, you know, who would you provide job shadow opportunities for, who would you have as an intern, those sorts of things. And when you talk to them, curiosity rises to the top. What do they want? A young person who comes in, who's a signal that you do have a growth mindset and you are interested in growing and you do want to learn and you're just. Yeah, it's just such an important quality, I think. Michael Horn: Yeah, I think that's right. And it. And it connects all these things. My own worry is that if people don't have enough foundational knowledge, they'll actually be far less creative in this world of AI where they're just doing what is sort of told to them and unable to ask big questions. If I ask you to learn how to ask really big questions that break out of status quo systems and things of that nature. Diane Tavenner: Exactly to that point. I think the other thing that I've been thinking differently about is throughout this series, as you know, my biological son is a history guy. Michael Horn: Someone after my heart, I know, said. Diane Tavenner: To me, the other one is obsessed with AI, so it's an interesting combo. Michael Horn: But yeah, the other one I have no chance of understanding. Diane Tavenner: But yes, yeah, she said to me, you know, mom, because we're talking about the speed of how the development of the innovation, but the human part is still really real. And so one of the things he said to me is, you know, do you know how long it took for America to fully adopt electricity after it was invented? Michael Horn: It was like rebuilding of models around it that are native to that at the center. Diane Tavenner: Yes. And I just think it's so interesting. Like I had a conversation with ChatGPT about why did it take so long. And so some of the things I learned and my kiddo is like, there's infrastructure. In the case of electricity, there was a cost. I would argue there's like hidden costs to it. Michael Horn: I think there's huge costs. This is not the zero marginal cost world anymore of Silicon Valley. Diane Tavenner: Right, right. Michael Horn: It's different. Diane Tavenner: Right. There was a lack of immediate need or use. Why are you getting on AI like, and even the two of us saying, you know, we now almost never go on Google and search Google anymore because we've transformed our behavior over. But it took a minute even for us to sort of figure that out, change our behavior. Michael Horn: Interesting. So this guy Horace Dediu, I was not going to go here until you just brought this up. Who runs the Asymco sort of community podcast, speaks a lot about Apple. He was with the Christensen Institute for a hot minute. Diane Tavenner: OK. Michael Horn: And he was doing his research around the adoption of refrigerators and dryers. Adoption of refrigerators was relatively fast, but the adoption of dryers was really, really slow. Oh, and dryers were really, really slow adoption because you had to change the component into which it fit in the house. Right. Diane Tavenner: And so it requires a different plug. Michael Horn: Infrastructure. Tells you how fast it will go. Diane Tavenner: Yeah. Michael Horn: And we don't ever ask, have that conversation right around thinking about, you know, how much do you have to redesign huge parts to make really it useful. Diane Tavenner: And I would assume the case with dryers to households across the country. And I. I think that when people look back on this moment in history, they'll probably blur the time period it takes. But we're going to live through, I think, a much longer time period. Michael Horn: It's interesting, a lot of my early funders at the Christensen Institute, people like Gisèle Huff, who I adore, they would get annoyed with me. I mean, when I said patience is going to be required because we have an install base, we have a system. Diane Tavenner: Right. Michael Horn: I, on the last one, expressed my belief that some of these dynamics could change around disruptive innovation actually now being welcomed for the first time. Diane Tavenner: So I'm laughing at us a little. Michael Horn: Bit because of our naivete. Diane Tavenner: 2020 to do a little. Well, back in 2020, but then we thought we were going to do a little AI miniseries and then we'd figure it all out. But I think that as we wrap this season, season six, we actually have even more questions and curiosity ourselves. Michael Horn: Well, and we'd love to hear from folks who are tuning in. This is a welcome invitation to just pester us less with your pitches and more with, like, what are you curious about? Diane Tavenner: Yes. Michael Horn: Who would you like to hear from? Not in your orbit, but, you know, people that would further both your understanding and ours. Diane Tavenner: Yes. And what are you doing and what are you seeing and how can we sort of come along on this journey together? Michael Horn: So let me end with this one question. Will AI have an impact on young people? If so, when and how? Diane Tavenner: Yes. Michael Horn: My answer to that question is like, despite what at least one of our guests said is, I can't imagine it will not have a big impact on individuals. I think AI is going to be much more pervasive, in fact. And look, I'm not one of those people that says just because it's in the working world, they need to use it now because we're preparing them for that world. Diane Tavenner: It's already impacting them. So it is having an influence on the work that's available to them. The way employers think about work. The what, what. Where it's going to have an impact on. Michael Horn: Particularly in high school, I think it's going to be like the old world of like, here's the curriculum. Go learn. It, I think, is massively thrown out the window. Right. Like, Maybe K through 8th is a little bit more constant because it is foundational. I, I don't think it should change as much, but high school, I think, is different. It already should be much more experiential and exploratory in my view. But I, I think it'll be, I think it should be extremely so now. All right, let's wrap. What are you reading, watching, listening to that I should be clued into. Diane Tavenner: Well, I'm still on all of the ancient Greek fun, so I have gotten a lot of very polarized reactions to this, but hear me out. So Gavin Newsom has a new podcast. Michael Horn: He does. Diane Tavenner: I've been reading about it and lots of people have been reading about it. I live in California, as you know. Michael Horn: So he's your Governor. Diane Tavenner: He is my governor. You have to listen to this. The first episode where he interviewed Charlie Kirk. And for those who don't know, the premise is he's talking to people who he really disagrees with. Here's why I'm going to promote it. I love it. These are, they're getting into the nuance of policy and how things work. And I am learning a lot and I want to be able to make my own decisions. Diane Tavenner: So I want to hear the full scope of things and feel like. And I don't. So this is the kind of conversation I want to exist out there. Michael Horn: Well, so you're learning from that and I'm learning from you. I, I am, I'm, I'm not just reading non fiction. I've also been embracing some fiction books. I'll name one. Yeah, there you go. Right. I'll name one which is Paradise. And I'm gonna mess up the author's name. Michael Horn: I'm gonna apologize, but Abdulrazak Gurnah. And I'm reading this book Paradise, because I'm, I'm learning from you that it's nice to read fiction from the country where you're about to travel. And as you know, I'm headed to Tanzania with Imagine Worldwide. I'm on the board there. Diane Tavenner: Are you enjoying it? Michael Horn: I'm still trying to make sense from it. Diane Tavenne: Yeah. Michael Horn: It's less. The fiction that I read around Sierra Leone in particular was like very of the Civil War moment and like I could really figure out where that is. But in Paradise, there are a lot of currents going on in this book. I'm trying to sense make. And it's really interesting. Diane Tavenner: How beautiful. Michael Horn: And thank you to all of our listeners once again. And thank you, of course, to the 74 for distributing this. And it's how so many of our listeners connect with us. And so to all of you, we will see you next season on Class Disrupted.

Satellite NTN Market worth $2.79 billion by 2030 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™
Satellite NTN Market worth $2.79 billion by 2030 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Satellite NTN Market worth $2.79 billion by 2030 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™

DELRAY BEACH, Fla., June 11, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The satellite NTN market is projected to grow from USD 0.56 billion in 2025 to USD 2.79 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of 38.0% according to a new report by MarketsandMarkets™. The satellite NTN (non-terrestrial network) market is growing rapidly due to its integration with 5G technology. This means people can get strong, more reliable connections in remote areas or even when traveling. The older satellites were away from the Earth and often delayed. However, the new Leo (Low Earth Orbit) satellites are very close and can handle video calls and online games. Download PDF Brochure: Browse in-depth TOC on "Satellite NTN Market" 177 – Tables71 – Figures235 – Pages Satellite NTN Market Report Scope: Report Coverage Details Market Revenue in 2025 $ 0.56 billion Estimated Value by 2030 $ 2.79 billion Growth Rate Poised to grow at a CAGR of 38.0% Market Size Available for 2020–2030 Forecast Period 2025–2030 Forecast Units Value (USD Million/Billion) Report Coverage Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends Segments Covered By Orbit, Frequency, End Use Sector, Technology, Hardware, Application, and Region Geographies Covered North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Rest of World Key Market Challenge Complex integration of NTNs and terrestrial networks Key Market Opportunities Development of multi-orbit hybrid network architectures for enhanced global connectivity Key Market Drivers Standardization of 3GPP to drive investments in direct-to-device and IoT satellite connectivity Improvements in satellite equipment, like lighter antennas that can point more accurately, make satellite networks more flexible and reliable. Additionally, reusable rockets have made a large number of satellite launches reasonable. These satellite networks are becoming critical in areas like driverless cars, smart farming, and secure military communication. All these factors point toward the progress the satellite NTN market has made in the past few years. As governments create new rules to manage satellite signals, the satellite NTN industry is expected to expand beyond traditional uses. By application, the mMTc segment is projected to be the fastest-growing segment in the satellite NTN market during the forecast period The mMTC (Massive Machine-Type Communications) segment is projected to be the fastest-growing segment in the satellite NTN market during the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to the rampant use of IoT devices and the increasing demand for ubiquitous, low-power, wide-area connectivity. Additionally, the need for environmental monitoring and precision agriculture, smart logistics, and infrastructure management demanding continuous data transmission in remote areas where terrestrial networks can't reach is also driving the mMTC applications of satellite NTNs. Satellite NTN enables global reach with minimal latency and high scalability, ideally enabling millions of connected devices and sensors. LEO constellations and advancements in small, low-power satellite terminals accelerate the adoption of mMTC systems even more. The maritime, oil & gas, and transportation sectors rely on robust, real-time data from dispersed assets, making satellite NTN the foundation for robust global IoT ecosystems. By frequency, the L-band segment is projected to lead the satellite NTN market during the projected period. The L-band segment is projected to lead the satellite NTN market during the projected period due to the ideal combination of coverage, penetration, and reliability in satellites operating on L-band frequencies, which offer improved signal propagation through barriers like buildings and vegetation compared to higher bands and are suited for mobile and remote applications like maritime, aviation, and emergency communications. The L-band system also requires a simple and small antenna design, which reduces terminal expenses and enables universal distribution in IoT and MMTC applications. The signal frequently connects to the tape's immune environment for declining weather conditions. Regulatory support and investment in the existing infrastructure of L-band frequencies also translate into rapid distribution and inter-revolution. Inquiry Before Buying: North America is projected to lead the satellite NTN market during the forecast period During the forecast period, North America is projected to dominate the satellite NTN industry, with its robust technology ecosystem, government support, and large industry players. The US is particularly driving growth, with massive LEO satellite launches by SpaceX and Amazon's Project Kuiper, supported by friendly FCC regulations that facilitate spectrum allocation and licensing. Additionally, substantial investments from the private and public sectors fuel innovation in satellite technology, basic infrastructure, and 5G integration. Also, North America's advanced telecommunication networks and an early 5G adoption enable seamless terrestrial satellite connection, which extends cases of NTN use in commercial, defense, and emergency areas. This combination of regulator bank, state-of-the-art innovation, and market demand ranks North America as a global satellite NTN market leader. Airbus (Netherlands), Thales Alenia Space (France), Kongsberg (Norway), Analog Devices, Inc. (US), and NEC Corporation (Japan) are the major key players in the satellite NTN companies. These companies have strong distribution networks across regions like North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Rest of the World. Get 10% Free Customization on this Report: Browse Adjacent Market: Aerospace and Defence Market Research Reports &Consulting Related Reports: Small Satellite Market by Mass (Small, Mini, Micro, Nano, Cube), Subsystem (Satellite bus, Payloads, Solar Panels, Satellite Antennas), Orbit (LEO, MEO, GEO, Other Orbits), Application, End Use, Frequency and Region - Global Forecast to 2029 Satellites Market by Satellite Mass (Small, Medium, Large), Application (Communication, Earth Observation & Remote Sensing), Orbit (LEO, MEO, GEO), End User, Sub-systems, Frequency and Region - Global Forecast to 2030 About MarketsandMarkets™ MarketsandMarkets™ has been recognized as one of America's Best Management Consulting Firms by Forbes, as per their recent report. MarketsandMarkets™ is a blue ocean alternative in growth consulting and program management, leveraging a man-machine offering to drive supernormal growth for progressive organizations in the B2B space. With the widest lens on emerging technologies, we are proficient in co-creating supernormal growth for clients across the globe. Today, 80% of Fortune 2000 companies rely on MarketsandMarkets, and 90 of the top 100 companies in each sector trust us to accelerate their revenue growth. With a global clientele of over 13,000 organizations, we help businesses thrive in a disruptive ecosystem. The B2B economy is witnessing the emergence of $25 trillion in new revenue streams that are replacing existing ones within this decade. We work with clients on growth programs, helping them monetize this $25 trillion opportunity through our service lines – TAM Expansion, Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategy to Execution, Market Share Gain, Account Enablement, and Thought Leadership Marketing. Built on the 'GIVE Growth' principle, we collaborate with several Forbes Global 2000 B2B companies to keep them future-ready. Our insights and strategies are powered by industry experts, cutting-edge AI, and our Market Intelligence Cloud, KnowledgeStore™, which integrates research and provides ecosystem-wide visibility into revenue shifts. To find out more, visit or follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook. Contact: Mr. Rohan SalgarkarMarketsandMarkets™ INC. 1615 South Congress 103, Delray Beach, FL 33445USA: +1-888-600-6441Email: sales@ Our Web Site: Insight: Source: Logo: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE MarketsandMarkets Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données

Telesat, Vocus to build Telesat Lightspeed Low Earth Orbit Laning Station
Telesat, Vocus to build Telesat Lightspeed Low Earth Orbit Laning Station

Business Insider

timea day ago

  • Business Insider

Telesat, Vocus to build Telesat Lightspeed Low Earth Orbit Laning Station

Vocus and Telesat (TSAT) announced that Vocus will build Australia's first Telesat Lightspeed Low Earth Orbit Landing Station. Vocus will construct and operate the new Landing Station in New South Wales, Australia and provide fiber connectivity to Telesat's point of presence, connecting Telesat's advanced LEO satellite constellation, called Telesat Lightspeed, to terrestrial networks, providing secure, low-latency satellite services across the region. Confident Investing Starts Here:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store