Florida attorney general in contempt for defying judge's order in immigration case
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier was found in civil contempt Tuesday for defying a federal judge's order in an immigration case.
In April, Judge Kathleen Williams banned the enforcement of Florida laws that make it a misdemeanor for undocumented immigrants to enter or re-enter the state while it was being challenged in court by immigrant rights groups.
Uthmeier sent out a notice to Florida law enforcement informing them of Williams' order. In the notice, the attorney general said he disagreed with the order, calling it 'both wrong on the merits and overbroad on its scope,' according to court documents obtained by The Independent. He added that his office will 'continue to press these scope-of-relief arguments in the district court and, as appropriate, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.'
In a follow-up memo a few days later, Uthmeier said Williams ordered his office to notify the agencies of her injunction, which he did, but in it, he said he 'cannot prevent you from enforcing' the challenged laws.
'It is my view that no lawful, legitimate order currently impedes your agencies from continuing to enforce Florida's new illegal entry and reentry laws,' he wrote, according to court documents.
When the court asked Uthmeier why he shouldn't be held in contempt or sanctioned, he argued he hadn't violated William's order because he did not enforce the challenged laws and he informed law enforcement of the order, court documents reveal.
The court also detailed multiple public interviews where Uthmeier shared his reaction to William's order.
'This judge is considering whether or not to hold me in contempt. But I am not going to rubber stamp her order, I'm not going to direct law enforcement to stand down on enforcing the Trump agenda and carrying out Florida's law,' the attorney general said in a May 6 interview.
Days later, he said in another interview, 'We do have a judge who is threatening to hold me in contempt because I won't follow an order she has to direct our law enforcement not to enforce a new law we passed earlier this year that says you can't be illegally in the State of Florida.'
As part of Williams' new order finding Uthmeier in contempt, he will now have to file bi-weekly reports 'detailing whether any arrests, detentions, or law enforcement actions pursuant to [the challenged laws] have occurred, and if so, how many, when, and by which law enforcement agency.'
If the attorney general learns of any arrests related to the laws, he must inform the court 'immediately.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
PEN America ‘gravely concerned' by deportation of Australian writer critical of Trump administration
A major writers' advocacy group has condemned the detention and deportation of an Australian writer from the US as 'gravely concerning', while the US administration rejected the suggestion he was targeted because of his political beliefs as 'unequivocally false'. Alistair Kitchen, a former Columbia University postgraduate student, was last week detained at Los Angeles airport before being deported back to Melbourne. He said he was 'explicitly' told by US border officials he had been held because of his writing on pro-Palestinian campus protests. A spokesperson for the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said this week Kitchen was denied entry because he gave false information about drug use on his Electronic System for Travel Authorization (Esta), which allows eligible visitors to make a short trip to the US without a visa. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'Using the Esta is a privilege, not a right, and only those who respect our laws and follow the proper procedures will be welcomed,' the spokesperson said. Kitchen had ticked 'no' on his Esta application to a question asking travellers if they have ever consumed drugs, but later told border officials he had previously bought marijuana in New York state, where it is legal, and had consumed drugs in other countries. The 33-year-old believes he was 'clearly targeted for politically motivated reasons' and said officials spent more than 30 minutes questioning him about his views on Israel and Palestine including his 'thoughts on Hamas'. PEN America, a non-profit which raises awareness for the protection of free expression in the US, said that writers, artists and scholars must be free to express their views openly without compromising their free movement across borders. 'It is gravely concerning to read an account of someone being detained and turned away at the border due to their writings on student protests, Palestine, and the Trump administration,' the organisation said in a statement. 'Kitchen's account fits a disturbing pattern, in which border agents appear to be screening visitors to the U.S. for their viewpoints. That is anti-democratic, and it must be halted,' PEN America said. This year, Kitchen published a piece on his blog, Kitchen Counter, on the Department of Homeland Security's detention of Mahmoud Khalil, the lead negotiator of the Columbia Gaza Solidarity Encampment. In the article, Kitchen said Khalil had been arrested 'on utterly specious grounds by a neo-fascist state' with the goal of 'the deportation of dissent'. He referred to the Trump administration's executive order of 30 January in which the government promised to go on the 'offense to enforce law and order' and 'cancel the student visas of all Hamas sympathizers on college campuses'. When asked by reporters about Kitchen's case on Monday, Richard Marles, the acting prime minister, would not speculate as to what took place at the US border, but said that 'we have freedom of speech in this country and that's a very important part of our nation'. A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson confirmed that consular assistance had been provided to an Australian who was refused entry into the US. The universal human right of free speech is protected in the US by the first amendment and covers both US citizens and non-citizens. Western Sydney University professor of law Chris Michaelsen suggested there was 'a grey zone' at the US border – and that the Trump administration was 'pushing the boundaries until there's resistance'. Michaelsen said that under the first amendment, there is no legal basis on which border officials can deny an individual entry to the US because of what they have said or written. But what someone has said or written could prompt immigration officials to hold an individual while investigating their background. 'What's happening is that once you say something critical, you appear on somebody's radar,' Michaelsen said. 'It's used as a pretext to basically invoke the real powers that they have.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion He said arriving visitors were particularly vulnerable because they do not have standby access to a lawyer – and any later legal challenge would be both lengthy and expensive. It was not clear that there was a systematic attempt by the US administration to profile people's speech – but even a few cases of people with dissenting views being deported could have a 'chilling effect' on public speech, he said. The director of the University of New South Wales' Australian Human Rights Institute, Prof Justine Nolan, said the right to free speech seemed to be interpreted differently for US citizens and non-citizens. 'It is somewhat of a 'moving feast' in terms of its application at the moment with priority apparently being given to 'national security' caveats as a means of not only restricting free speech but also intersecting with immigration policies,' she said. The effect is that some visitors are taking precautions before entering the US – if they are choosing to travel there at all. Guardian Australia has spoken with an Australian journalist based in the US who spoke on the condition of anonymity. He said when he was visiting Australia recently his company told him to post his smartphone to his home in the US rather than risk taking it through US immigration control. The company also advised him to carry a temporary 'burner' phone with him when he returned to the US, he said. He chose not to heed the advice and re-entered the US without issue. Anthony Loewenstein, an Australian author, journalist and film-maker who is critical of the Israeli government, said he knows of several people, including authors, who have sought legal advice before travelling to the US for work. Some have chosen to give lectures and attend book tours by Zoom rather than in person while others have taken burner phones to the US. Some have removed their social media accounts from their phones before flying – but, he said, 'you can't stop immigration officials Googling you'. The result, he said, may be a 'kind of intellectual impoverishment within the US' as scientists, writers, academics and thinkers from around the world avoid travelling to the country. 'The American government seemingly doesn't want a plurality of views,' he said. 'I think the result will be that America and American intellectual life will become poorer.' Dfat's Smartraveller website states US officials may ask to inspect travellers' electronic devices, emails, text messages or social media accounts – and if a traveller refuses, officials can deny entry.
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
US TikTok ban deadline to be extended by Trump
President Trump plans to grant another extension to TikTok 's parent company, ByteDance, to allow more time for a deal with a US-approved company. The extension comes after Congress passed a bill requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok within nine months or face a nationwide ban, which Trump has already extended twice. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the 90-day extension aims to ensure Americans can continue using TikTok with data security assurances. Trump's efforts mark a shift from his previous stance, as he had earlier signed an executive order to ban TikTok, citing national security concerns, though this was blocked by the courts. Trump acknowledged that any deal would likely require approval from China, with sources indicating China previously stalled a TikTok deal due to tariff disputes with the US.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
US energy investors juggle exposure as tax bill debate rolls on
LITTLETON, Colorado, June 18 (Reuters) - Energy equity investors are adjusting positions across the U.S. power sector in an attempt to pick winners and cut losers ahead of the final passing of President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending bill. The "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" contains aggressive cuts to several tax credits and incentives tied to clean power generation from renewable energy sources, and has sparked an aggressive selloff in stocks tied to the sector. The bill would also accelerate the phase-out of federal support for electric vehicles, clean energy component manufacturing and wind farm development. However, the latest U.S. Senate proposals - which tweaked the version previously passed by the U.S. House - preserve support for nuclear, geothermal and battery storage projects, and sparked gains in stocks tied to nuclear power. Additional adjustments to the bill proposals are likely before it can be passed into law by Congress, sparking more position jostling by energy investors in the weeks ahead. Below is a breakdown of the key energy sector exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and equities that have and will be most impacted by the proposed budget. Stocks tied to companies engaged in the production of solar panels and inverters and in the installation of solar systems stand to be among the biggest losers once the proposed bill is passed, regardless of its final make-up. The Trump administration and many Republican lawmakers are against federal subsidies for solar power for several reasons, including concerns about its intermittency and its heavy reliance on components made in China and elsewhere. The Senate's recent budget bill proposal phases out several key solar tax credits and subsidies from 2026, and would eliminate them entirely from 2028. As the solar sector has already been hit by rising interest rates - which lifted the cost of system installations - the speedy gutting of federal support has greatly dimmed the prospects for several companies in the space. Stocks in solar inverter manufacturer Enphase (ENPH.O), opens new tab and panel makers First Solar (FSLR.O), opens new tab, Sunrun (RUN.O), opens new tab and SolarEdge (SEDG.O), opens new tab have all dropped by 20% or more within the past month as ramifications of the bill proposals were digested. Shares in the Invesco Solar ETF plumbed five-year lows in April, and are down more than 50% over the past two years as investors jettisoned positions and the sector's outlook darkened under the anti-renewables Trump administration. Several energy investors looking to get out of the solar space have pivoted their funds into the nuclear power sector, which has gained support under the current Trump administration. The Global X Uranium ETF (URA.P), opens new tab has gained more than 35% in value over the past month, and recently scaled its highest levels in more than a decade. Investors have been drawn to the fund by the likelihood of a tightening in the supply of uranium - the main fuel used by nuclear power plants - should more reactors get commissioned once the tax bill becomes law. Stocks in companies tied to geothermal energy production have also rallied recently as provisions tied to supporting the sector were preserved in the latest round of bill wrangling. Shares in Nevada-based Ormat Technologies (ORA.N), opens new tab, which makes power converters for geothermal plants, are up more than 30% since early May. Energy investors have also recently increased positions in funds and companies within the traditional oil and gas sector, as the gutting of clean energy subsidies will likely increase demand for fossil fuels. Shares in the SPDR Energy Select Fund - which holds several major oil and gas producers - have rallied on the recent tensions in the Middle East and due to the brighter outlook for U.S. gas demand if renewable generation is stalled. Firms with large natural gas production businesses stand to gain further if the proposed bill slams the brakes on renewable power growth and increases the U.S. power sector's dependence on gas. Shares in the companies tied to the liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector have also fared well lately due to the Trump administration's support for expanding LNG exports. Shares in Cheniere Energy (LNG.N), opens new tab - the top U.S. LNG exporter - are up around 10% year-to-date and over 50% over the past year. Investors have also increased their exposure to ETFs and companies dedicated to upgrading the U.S. power grid, which have upbeat outlooks regardless of how the final tax bill looks. The First Trust Smart Grid Infrastructure Fund (GRID.O), opens new tab is up around 12% year-to-date, while the First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund is up about 4%. Going forward, investor interest is likely to also grow in the battery storage sector, with the iShares Energy Storage and Materials ETF (IBAT.O), opens new tab already on investors' radars. The fund has dropped around 5% in value so far this year due in part to the dimmed outlook for solar power growth, which utilities pair with battery systems to ensure round-the-clock supplies. But in the months ahead utilities will still likely increase their use of battery systems even if they slow their uptake of new solar systems, as the solar-plus-battery combination remains the fastest route to deliver new power to U.S. grids. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
