
Trump's bunker-buster claims challenged by Pentagon report as Israel–Iran ceasefire begins with nuclear secrets still buried
The United States airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have only set the country's programme back by months, not destroyed it, according to an early
Pentagon intelligence review
. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim that the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's key enrichment sites.
The assessment, prepared by the
US Defense Intelligence Agency
(DIA), was shared with Reuters and CNN by sources familiar with the matter, all speaking anonymously. It found that while damage was substantial at Fordow,
Natanz
and Isfahan, much of Iran's nuclear infrastructure—including stockpiled uranium and underground centrifuges—remained intact or had been relocated before the strikes.
'The strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,' Trump said in a televised address.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
모공각화증, 집에서 결국 이렇게 하니 해결되더라구요
현명한소비자
Undo
DIA warns of Iran's nuclear recovery
According to the DIA, Iran's programme might be delayed only by one to three months. The agency also noted that Iran's highly enriched uranium—400kg of it at 60% purity—was likely shifted in advance and could now be at unknown sites.
Vice President JD Vance admitted, 'We are going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel.'
Live Events
Meanwhile, the
International Atomic Energy Agency
's director general Rafael Grossi said, 'The IAEA can no longer account for Iran's stockpile.'
Military Strikes: Big bombs, limited impact
The US mission included 12 GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs dropped on Fordow and two more on Natanz by B-2 bombers. A US submarine also launched around 30 Tomahawk missiles at Isfahan. Despite this, much of the damage remained above ground.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Dan Caine, said, 'All three of the nuclear sites had sustained severe damage and destruction,' but added that it was 'way too early' to determine whether Iran's core nuclear capabilities were neutralised.
The
Pentagon
had already been briefed earlier this year that bunker busters might not fully destroy the heavily fortified Fordow, buried beneath 45 to 90 metres of bedrock.
Weapons expert Jeffrey Lewis concluded, 'The ceasefire came without either Israel or the United States being able to destroy several key underground nuclear facilities.'
White House rejects report, stands by Trump
The White House dismissed the DIA assessment. Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt called it 'flat-out wrong' and said, 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.'
At a press conference, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed Trump: 'Based on everything we have seen—and I've seen it all—our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.'
Ceasefire brokered, but tempers flared
Following 12 days of war, both Israel and Iran signalled that the fighting had paused. President Trump brokered the ceasefire with help from Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani.
Still, tensions ran high. Trump lashed out at both parties, saying, 'They don't know what the fuck they're doing.' He added, 'I've got to get Israel to calm down now.'
Israel confirmed it hit a radar site near Tehran in retaliation for an alleged Iranian missile barrage after the ceasefire had begun. Iran denied violating the ceasefire and said Israeli attacks continued an hour and a half beyond the agreed time.
Civilians feel the cost, Markets react
In both countries, there was widespread exhaustion. 'The war is over. It never should have started in the first place,' said Reza Sharifi, a resident returning to Tehran.
In Tel Aviv, software engineer Arik Daimant said, 'It's a bit too late for me and my family, because our house was totally destroyed. But… I hope this ceasefire is a new beginning.'
The war left 610 Iranians dead and nearly 5,000 injured. In Israel, 28 people died, marking the first time that Iranian missiles overwhelmed its air defence.
Oil prices tumbled and global stock markets rallied as fears of regional escalation eased.
Classified briefings in Washington were cancelled, raising further questions about the credibility of the official narrative. 'Trump just cancelled a classified House briefing on the Iran strikes with zero explanation,' Rep. Pat Ryan posted online. 'His team knows they can't back up his bluster.'
Sources inside the US intelligence community say it's too early for a final judgment. But with enriched uranium unaccounted for and fortified nuclear sites still standing, the picture remains murky.
Whether the ceasefire holds or not, experts say Iran could restart its programme from hardened facilities like Parchin and Isfahan at any time. As one official summarised: 'The US set them back maybe a few months, tops.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
FM rebuts US claim of high tariffs on imports
New Delhi : Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday refuted United States president Donald Trump's charge that India is the 'tariff king' in imposing high duties on American goods, contending that effective levies in India are far lower than the notified rates. Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, (File photo) (PIB) Continuing reforms to encourage domestic value-addition, India on February 1 announced removing seven tariff rates on industrial goods in the FY26 budget, leaving only eight rates in place that include the zero duty, she said at the Trade Conclave 2025 organised by the Exim Bank in New Delhi. Referring to the Union budget 2025-26, she said it rationalised customs tariff structure for industrial goods and removed seven tariff rates. Without any specific reference to the US president, she said: 'For all of us, or those of us who still believe in the commentary which was made in the US that India may be the tariff King. No, I want two things to be remembered. Given as system of things we seek Parliamentary approval for deciding on the tariff rate. You obtain from the Parliament the permission to go up to a certain level, but effectively, you are at a far lower level.' 'Effective rate is at a far lower level. But what gets published in the gazette would be that level for which you obtain permission from the Parliament. And it is that level which appears everywhere…,' she said, explaining that the levies notified in the gazette are the upper limit while effective duties are often less than the cap. Articulating reforms in customs duty structure in her budget speech on February 1, Sitharaman said: 'As a part of comprehensive review of Customs rate structure announced in July 2024 Budget, I propose to: (i) remove seven tariff rates. This is over and above the seven tariff rates removed in the 2023-24 budget. After this, there will be only eight remaining tariff rates including 'zero' rate.' An official who did not wish to be named said customs duty rationalisation is one of the key reforms of the government. 'Average customs duty in India has come down to 10.66%, which is closer to the rates prevailing in Asian countries. So, the narrative that India's customs duties are very high is wrong. In fact, most of the American goods enter India within the effective customs duty band of 0-10%,' he said. 'President Trump's remark about India is not new. He used the tag of 'tariff king' for India even in his first term. Since then, India undertook several customs reforms and even reduced tariffs on specific items of American interests such as automobiles, pharmaceuticals and Bourbon whisky. Seems, he is fixated in his opinion,' the official mentioned above said. According to a Hindustan Times report from Washington, published on October 2, 2018, Trump made his comments referring to India imposing 100% duty on iconic motorcycle, Harley-Davidson. Since then, import duties on bikes up to 1,600 cc and above 1,600 cc have been slashed to 40% and 30%, respectively. Union finance minister's comments came at a time when India and the US are negotiating an early harvest deal within a comprehensive Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) and talks are mainly focused on reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers for mutual benefit.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Andrew Cuomo educational qualification and career path: How this law graduate rose to Albany and became New York governor
Image credits: Getty Images Andrew Cuomo, former New York Governor, lost the Democratic primary for New York City mayor to Zohran Mamdani on June 24, 2025, halting his political comeback. With 91% of votes counted, Mamdani led with 43% to Cuomo's 36%. Cuomo, who qualified for an independent run on the "Fight and Deliver" ballot line, has not confirmed his next steps. Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Indian-origin Muslim, emerged as a progressive star. Born in Kampala, Uganda, to Indian parents, he immigrated to New York at age seven. A state assemblyman since 2021, Mamdani's campaign emphasized affordability, with proposals for free buses, rent freezes, and universal childcare. Endorsed by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, his grassroots momentum outpaced Cuomo's establishment support. Early education and family roots Born December 6, 1957, in Queens to Italian-American parents Mario and Matilda Cuomo, Andrew graduated from Archbishop Molloy High School in 1975. He earned a bachelor's degree from Fordham University in 1979 and a Juris Doctor from Albany Law School in 1982. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 40세 넘고 PC만 있으면? 이 게임 완전 내 거임! Hero Wars 플레이하기 Undo His political exposure began early, assisting his father, Mario, a three-term governor, in campaigns from his teens. Political career beginnings Cuomo's career ignited as his father's 1982 gubernatorial campaign manager. After Mario's win, Andrew served as a senior advisor, earning $1 annually. In 1984, he worked briefly as a Manhattan assistant district attorney and joined the law firm Blutrich, Falcone & Miller. In 1986, he founded the Housing Enterprise for the Less Privileged (HELP), a nonprofit tackling homelessness, which became a national model for transitional housing. Federal and state-level roles From 1993 to 1997, Cuomo was Assistant Secretary at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under President Bill Clinton, rising to HUD Secretary from 1997 to 2001. Back in New York, he lost the 2002 gubernatorial race but won as state attorney general from 2007 to 2010, targeting corruption and environmental violations. Elected governor in 2010, he served until 2021, resigning amid sexual misconduct allegations. His achievements included legalizing same-sex marriage, launching the Excelsior Scholarship for tuition-free college, and steering New York's Covid-19 response. Mayoral campaign and election loss Cuomo's 2025 mayoral bid proposed a 25-point education reform plan, increased police presence, and affordability measures. Despite endorsements from Bill Clinton and Michael Bloomberg's $8 million super PAC, Mamdani's progressive coalition prevailed. Cuomo's potential independent run could reshape the November 4, 2025, general election, challenging Mamdani, incumbent Eric Adams, and Republican Curtis Sliwa. His career reflects resilience, though controversies cloud his legacy. Future prospects and independent path Though defeated in the primary, Cuomo remains eligible for an independent mayoral run under the "Fight and Deliver" line. His next move could significantly impact the 2025 general election, as his resilience continues to define his turbulent political legacy. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Trump's F-bomb, Biden's son of b**ch... When US presidents swore in public
Donald Trump is known for doing things differently. On Tuesday (June 24), he became the first US president to swear on 'live' TV when he used the F-word to express his frustration with Iran and Israel for violating the ceasefire just hours after it came into effect. However, American leaders have been caught using expletives in the past read more US President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House. It is during this interaction that he dropped the F-bomb. AP What does one do when one is frustrated? Usually, one swears or curses, using the F-word. But what if you are the president of the United States of America? Well, Donald Trump on Tuesday showed he's no different from us when he too used the swear word to express his frustration that Israel and Iran appeared to be violating the ceasefire that he just celebrated going into effect. But, despite the hoopla over Trump swearing on live camera, it is not unheard of. There have been many instances of the US commander-in-chief showcasing their inner potty mouth. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's F-bomb heard around the world The world's media dedicated much of Tuesday (June 24) covering the ceasefire in the war between Israel and Iran and Donald Trump's role in brokering it. But before Trump could even celebrate the breakthrough, Israel and Iran appeared to have violated it. Just two-and-a-half hours after the ceasefire came into effect, Tel Aviv accused Tehran of launching missiles at the Jewish nation. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said he had directed Israel's armed forces to 'respond forcefully' to what he called Iran's 'violation of the ceasefire'. And when asked to respond to the two warring nations' actions, Trump appeared agitated. 'There was one rocket that I guess was fired overboard after the time limit and now Israel is going out. These guys [have] got to calm down,' he said, speaking to reporters before heading to the Nato summit in The Hague. The US president added that he didn't like 'plenty of things' he saw. 'I didn't like the fact that Israel unloaded right after we made the deal,' he said, referring to the ceasefire he announced earlier. 'They didn't have to unload.' 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they're doing,' Trump added, dropping the f-bomb . President Trump on Israel and Iran: "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing." — CSPAN (@cspan) June 24, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Presidential hot-mic moments Trump's use of a swear word on live cameras surprised many; American presidents have typically refrained from using it publicly, even when angry or frustrated. But it isn't the first time that an American president has been caught swearing. In 2018, Trump referred to Haiti and African nations as 's**thole countries', asking why the US would accept more immigrants from there rather than places like Norway. Unsurprisingly, his remarks spurred anger; Haiti's government said Trump's comments shows a 'racist view of the Haitian community', while El Salvador sent a formal letter of protest to the US saying the president had 'implicitly' accepted the use of 'harsh terms detrimental to the dignity of El Salvador and other countries'. In March 2010, then Vice President Joe Biden was caught out by an amplified microphone, telling his boss, Barack Obama, that passing the Affordable Care Act was a 'big f***ing deal'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD And 12 years after that incident, Biden once again let it rip when he called Fox News reporter Peter Doocy a 'stupid son of a b**ch.' The incident when happened Doocy called out to Biden saying, 'Do you think inflation is a political liability going into the midterms?' 'No, it's a great asset,' Biden snarked. 'More inflation. What a stupid son of a b**ch.' Biden: What a stupid son of a bitch — Acyn (@Acyn) January 24, 2022 Later, Doocy said that President Biden called to apologise shortly after the briefing ended. And Biden's predecessor, Barack Obama, too had his own hot-mic moments. In 2009, he referred to rapper Kanye West as a 'jacka**' after the rapper interrupted Taylor Swift's acceptance speech at the MTV Video Music Awards. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Obama called Kanye West a 'Jackass' in 2009. As always, President Obama was right. — Jack Cocchiarella (@JDCocchiarella) December 2, 2022 Obama also referred to his 2012 presidential rival, Mitt Romney as a 'serial bullshi***r' in a Rolling Stone magazine. Republican presidential candidate George W Bush with his vice presidential candidate Dick Cheney. File image/Reuters And just like Biden and Obama, George W Bush also had a hot-mic moment. While campaigning to be president in 2000, Bush leaned over to his running mate, Dick Cheney, and commented on the presence of New York Times reporter Adam Clymer. He, unknowingly, called the journalist a 'major-league a**hole.' Bush later joked about the incident, referring to Clymer as a 'major-league ass…et' in a taped message played at a press corps dinner. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But many believe that no other US president cursed and swore as much as Harry Truman. He once called General Douglas MacArthur a 'dumb son of a b**ch' and Richard Nixon a 'shifty-eyed god***ed liar.' In most of these cases, the US leader has apologised for abusing. But, Russell Riley, a presidential historian at the Miller Center at the University of Virginia, told NPR that it is highly unlikely that Trump would show any remorse for his use of the swear word. 'The question is whether you brazen it out or you apologise,' Riley said. 'And I'm sure in this case the president will just brazen it out.' With inputs from agencies