logo
How Extreme Heat Silently Accelerates Aging

How Extreme Heat Silently Accelerates Aging

Yahoo7 hours ago

What if extreme heat not only leaves you feeling exhausted but actually makes you age faster?
Scientists already know that extreme heat increases the risk of heat stroke, cardiovascular disease, kidney dysfunction, and even death. I see these effects often in my work as a researcher studying how environmental stressors influence the aging process. But until now, little research has explored how heat affects biological aging — the gradual deterioration of cells and tissues that increases the risk of age-related diseases.
Research published by my team and me in the journal Science Advances in March 2025 suggests that long-term exposure to extreme heat may accelerate biological aging at the molecular level, raising concerns about the long-term health risks posed by a warming climate.
My colleagues and I examined blood samples from over 3,600 older adults across the United States. We measured their biological age using epigenetic clocks, which capture DNA modification patterns — methylation — that change with age.
DNA methylation refers to chemical modifications to DNA that act like switches to turn genes on and off. Environmental factors can influence these switches and change how genes function, affecting aging and disease risk over time. Measuring these changes through epigenetic clocks can provide a strong predictor of age-related disease risk and lifespan.
Research in animal models has shown that extreme heat can trigger a phenomenon known as maladaptive epigenetic memory, characterized by lasting changes in DNA methylation patterns. Studies indicate that a single episode of extreme heat stress can cause long-term shifts in DNA methylation across different tissue types in mice. To test the effects of heat stress on people, we linked epigenetic clock data to climate records to assess whether people living in hotter environments exhibited faster biological aging.
We found that older adults residing in areas with frequent very hot days showed significantly faster epigenetic aging compared with those living in cooler regions. For example, participants living in locations with at least 140 extreme heat days per year — classified as days when the heat index exceeded 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32.33 degrees Celsius) — experienced up to 14 months of additional biological aging compared with those in areas with fewer than 10 such days annually.
This link between biological age and extreme heat persisted even after accounting for a wide range of individual and community factors, including physical activity levels and socioeconomic status. This means that even among people with similar lifestyles, those living in hotter environments may still be aging faster at the biological level.
Even more surprising was the magnitude of the effect – extreme heat has a comparable impact on speeding up aging as smoking and heavy alcohol consumption. This suggests that heat exposure may be silently accelerating aging at a level comparable to other major known environmental and lifestyle stressors.
While our study sheds light on the connection between heat and biological aging, many questions remain unanswered. It's essential to clarify that our findings don't imply that every additional year in extreme heat directly translates to 14 extra months of biological aging. Instead, our research reflects population-level differences between groups based on their local heat exposure. In other words, we took a snapshot of whole populations at a moment in time; it wasn't designed to look at effects on individual people.
Our study also doesn't fully capture all the ways people might protect themselves from extreme heat. Factors such as access to air conditioning, time spent outdoors, and occupational exposure all play a role in shaping personal heat exposure and its effects. Some individuals may be more resilient, while others may face greater risks due to preexisting health conditions or socioeconomic barriers. This is an area where more research is needed.
What is clear, however, is that extreme heat is more than just an immediate health hazard — it may be silently accelerating the aging process, with long-term consequences for public health.
Older adults are especially vulnerable because aging reduces the body's ability to regulate temperature effectively. Many older individuals also take medications such as beta-blockers and diuretics that can impair their heat tolerance, making it even harder for their bodies to cope with high temperatures. So even moderately hot days, such as those reaching 80 degrees Fahrenheit (26.67 degrees Celsius), can pose health risks for older adults.
As the U.S. population rapidly ages and climate change intensifies heat waves worldwide, I believe simply telling people to move to cooler regions isn't realistic. Developing age-appropriate solutions that allow older adults to safely remain in their communities and protect the most vulnerable populations could help address the hidden yet significant effects of extreme heat.
Eunyoung Choi, Postdoctoral Associate in Gerontology, University of Southern California
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The post How Extreme Heat Silently Accelerates Aging appeared first on Katie Couric Media.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When is it too dangerous to be outside? New wearable tech could tell you.
When is it too dangerous to be outside? New wearable tech could tell you.

National Geographic

timean hour ago

  • National Geographic

When is it too dangerous to be outside? New wearable tech could tell you.

Illnesses caused by heat—dehydration, cramps, and even strokes—can come on quickly and quietly. New, wearable technology could help alert wearers to lurking danger. Two people pick grapes in a vineyard near Fresno, California. Outdoor farm workers are on average 35 times more likely to experience heat-related illnesses than the general population. Photograph by Karla Gachet, Nat Geo Image Collection Globally, health experts anticipate a 370 percent rise in yearly heat-related deaths and a 50 percent increase in hours of labor lost due to heat exposure. Heat is one of the most dangerous forms of extreme weather, but symptoms can develop slowly, leading to delays in recognizing the signs of a more serious illness. That's why scientists are also developing technologies that could help save lives by telling device wearers precisely when they're overheating. Some of these same technologies are also being developed for the public, in the form of wearable watches or sweat patches that warn when dangerous outdoor conditions are present. A worker on a farm looks out at the hot summer sun from a tractor. Greenhouse gas emissions have made extremely hot days more common. Photograph by Brian L. Frank, Nat Geo Image Collection Farm laborers are facing record high temperatures while working in unshaded fields. Above, an unplanted cotton field in Brownfield, Texas, is damaged by erosion during a heat wave. Photograph by Robb Kendrick, Nat Geo Image Collection Long before recent heatwaves, scientists have been researching ways to measure heat stress in the body, without relying on an individual's perception of their own risk. What you put in your body can have a big impact on what you keep in your head. The U.S. military uses an algorithm developed by scientists in 2013 that estimates the chances of heat stroke, heat exhaustion, and debilitating heat cramps by measuring changes in heart rate, skin temperature, and gait. "This is the future," said Emma Atkinson, a biomedical researcher for the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, in a 2024 press release announcing a device worn around the chest that resulted from testing the algorithms on 14,000 soldiers. "This is a life-saving device." The army's core body temperature algorithm is the most advanced to date and is being integrated into products for the general public, said Zachary Schlader , a University of Iowa Bloomington associate professor who studies the implications of heat stress. He acknowledges there is 'no gold standard' technology for combating heat stress in work settings, but says the most promising are algorithms to estimate internal body temperature. A construction worker covered up from the sun as morning temperatures reached 92 degrees Fahrenheit at a housing development in Marana, Arizona on Friday, July 12, 2024. Photograph by Cassidy Araiza, The New York Times/Redux 'In a clinical setting or lab, to measure the internal temperature of the body requires the measurement of rectal temperature or esophageal temperature, or different blood temperatures,' he said. 'Those aren't feasible in a work setting and in a bigger population setting. But how hot you get it, hot the inside of the body gets, is largely what determines the health risks of heat, as well as the productivity risk.' For the public, Apple Watch, Galaxy Watch 5, and the Garmin watch can all detect skin temperature, primarily to track menstrual cycles. But to determine if someone is at risk of heat stress, wearable devices need to measure core body temperature, a capability they lack. Core body temperature measures the temperature of internal organs — like your heart, liver and brain, whereas skin temperature only captures your temperature on the surface. Epicore , a digital health company, has created sweat-sensing patches that let wearers see their electrolyte loss, body temperature, and body movement to inform how much they need to drink to prevent dehydration. Sony released the REON Pocket Pro , a wearable that sits between your shoulder blades and cools your body via a metal plate, in June . A separate sensor clips to your shirt to measure temperature and humidity. Testing new devices In real-world work settings, it's unclear how effectively these devices prevent serious heat-related illnesses, according to a 2024 review of research studies of devices . Early tests have shown some promise. In May, a startup called VigiLife released a heat stress sensor, costing between $100 and $300, that attaches to a bicep or forearm. It measures heart rate, along with core body and skin temperatures. It then gathers information from the wearable and environmental sensors to formulate health and safety insights. For now, the technology is only available to commercial entities. Texas-based construction firm Rogers-O'Brien adopted VigiLife's technology across its sites in mid-June. The firm saw zero heat-related illnesses and over $200,000 in savings when it piloted VigiLife's technology from May to September 2023. During a typical summer like 2023, the company might see five or six heat-related incidents that require basic on-site first aid, according to a spokesperson. Yet, for now, most smartwatches also can't run core body temperature software without draining their batteries, CEO Zachary Kiehl noted. To reduce exposure during the hottest parts of the day, many farms hire harvesters to work overnight or in the early morning hours. Left: Workers pick tomatoes in a field in the early morning in Los Baños, California. Right: Laborers in the Western Cape province of South Africa harvest Pinot Noir wine grapes overnight. Photograph by Karla Gachet, Nat Geo Image Collection (Top) (Left) and Photograph by David Silverman, Getty Images (Bottom) (Right) Some aren't sold on a wearable-only solution. One skeptic is Jason Glaser, the CEO of La Isla Network , a company that advocates for worker safety. The network pairs weather and health data to model heat strain on workers and recommend the best hours for avoiding outside work. 'A wearable is only an alarm system,' he said, adding that most farm workers can't afford it. It's also unclear if, given access to wearable technology, workers would be incentivized to listen to its alerts. Intense manual labor and piece-rate payment systems, based on the quantity of produce they harvest, encourage workers to work beyond their limits without adequate access to water, shade, and breaks. One preliminary study looking at the link between high temperatures and chronic kidney disease also found that implementing a heat safety program—added rest periods, improved access to shade and fluids, placing bathroom facilities nearby and more, at a sugar mill in Nicaragua, decreased kidney injury in workers. Some argue these company-mandated solutions might be more effective than using wearable technology. Glaser would like to integrate wearables into his research, but that is on hold until the nonprofit receives more funding. To save money and avoid pushback from workers who don't want to wear devices to avoid lost wages if the device indicates they need to be pulled off the job, Schlader of University of Iowa Bloomington recommends, based on his research , that only the highest risk workers wear devices. Traffic warden Rai Rogers mans his street corner during an 8-hour shift under the hot sun in Las Vegas, Nevada on July 12, 2023, where temperatures reached 106 degrees Fahrenheit amid an ongoing heatwave. Photograph by Frederic J. Brown, AFP/Getty Images In addition to telling individuals about their own heat risk, wearable technology can also help scientists create algorithms that model the risk of working outside on a given day. One ongoing project provides wearable biosensors that collect vital signs, measure skin hydration, and analyzes movement data from farm workers in Florida. Researchers from Emory University in Atlanta and Georgia Tech, using a National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant, feed this information to an AI algorithm that may someday accurately predict when a worker could be struck by heat illness. Experts like Schlader say it's hard to know when these heat-stress technologies will have a true impact on working conditions. It's also difficult to predict when core body temperature measurements will be easily integrated into your Apple Watch or Garmin watch by default, he said. 'To my knowledge, this is a ways off,' he said. For now, those interested in monitoring their health during periods of intense heat can look for well-documented symptoms, such as cramps, dizziness, nausea, or headaches. Go to the CDC's website for more information on staying safe.

Popular wellness trend is supposed to help with weight loss — but it may make you eat more
Popular wellness trend is supposed to help with weight loss — but it may make you eat more

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Popular wellness trend is supposed to help with weight loss — but it may make you eat more

Maybe it's better not to take the plunge. While the ostensible point of most wellness trends is to promote good physical and mental health — as opposed to purely shedding pounds — weight management is often an added perk. But a fascinating new study published in the journal Physiology & Behavior warns that the caloric dump of one popular practice might be mostly in your head. Advertisement 3 If you've ever spent time in freezing water, you've probably noticed a significant uptick in your appetite. Diana Light – Cold plunges and ice baths have made quite the splash in recent years, thanks to their purported boost in mental clarity, blood circulation and metabolism and their reduction in muscle soreness and stress. And if you've ever spent time in freezing water, you've probably noticed a significant uptick in your appetite — leading you to naturally believe you've really earned that burger. Advertisement Sadly, it seems that might not be the case. Researchers suspect that the 'after-drop' effect — where core body temperature keeps falling after cold exposure, even when you're out of the water — triggers brain regions linked to temperature and energy, boosting appetite. 3 Researchers suspect the 'after-drop' effect triggers brain regions linked to temperature and energy, boosting appetite. littlepigpower – 'Ice baths and cold dips have become really popular, with many people hoping they'll help with weight loss,' David Broom, a professor at UK's Coventry University Research Center for Physical Activity, Sport and Exercise Sciences, said in a statement. Advertisement 'But our findings show that while cold water does make your body work harder and burn more energy, it also leads to eating more afterward — possibly undoing the potential weight-loss benefits,' he continued. 'Interestingly, people didn't say they felt hungrier during or after the cold water — they just ate more.' 3 Study participants who spent 30 minutes in cold water ate a whopping 240 extra calories. Dusan Petkovic – Researchers asked 10 men and five women who were active and healthy to spend 30 minutes in cold water (60 degrees Fahrenheit), hot water (95 degrees) or room temperature water (78 degrees). Advertisement Afterwards — in what sounds like the best controlled trial ever — they were asked to eat a plate of pasta until 'comfortably full.' Of the three groups, the cold water cohort ate a whopping 240 extra calories. Depending on various factors, spending 30 minutes in a cold plunge — which is, by the way, not really recommended by experts, who advise shooting for no more than 10 minutes due to risk of hypothermia — only burns an estimated 250 to 500 calories, which is why probably why researchers say the overeating might negate the burn. For what it's worth, these findings align with what experts say about contrast therapy — the art of repeatedly alternating between hot and cold, like shvitzing in a sauna and then jumping into a cold plunge, as one does in modern bathhouses and traditional Finnish culture. Dr. Hany Demian, CEO of BioSpine and co-founder of Pain Care Clinics, previously told The Post that contrast therapy burns 'a very small amount of calories, but nothing significant.' He added that the surge in hunger has more to do with 'stomach contraction and relaxation, which stimulates the appetite.'

Ancient canoe replica recreates a 30,000-year-old voyage
Ancient canoe replica recreates a 30,000-year-old voyage

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ancient canoe replica recreates a 30,000-year-old voyage

Instead of putting the pedal to the metal, a team of scientists from Japan and Taiwan are putting the paddle to the water–for science. The team used time-period-accurate tools to create canoes and used them to test the methods that ancient people would have used to travel across the sea in East Asia 30,000 years ago. Their results of these test paddles and findings are detailed in two new studies published June 25 in the journal Science Advances. Archaeological evidence suggests that about 30,000 years ago, humans first made a crossing from present-day Taiwan to islands in southern Japan. This journey could have ranged from 138 to about 450 miles and was accomplished without metal tools, maps, or modern boats. While the timeline of when East Asia's earliest modern human populations set sail and where they landed is fairly clear, how they did it has been more difficult to pin down. That's where these replica canoes come in. A team led by anthropologist Yousuke Kaifu from the University of Tokyo created various simulations, experiments, and replica canoes to recreate how this feat may have been achieved. 'We initiated this project with simple questions: 'How did Paleolithic people arrive at such remote islands as Okinawa?' 'How difficult was their journey?' 'And what tools and strategies did they use?'' Kaifu said in a statement. 'Archaeological evidence such as remains and artifacts can't paint a full picture as the nature of the sea is that it washes such things away. So, we turned to the idea of experimental archaeology, in a similar vein to the Kon-Tiki expedition of 1947 by Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl.' One of the new studies details the construction and testing of a real boat, which the team successfully used to paddle between islands. The team constructed the 24-foot-long dugout canoe called Sugime in 2019. It was built from one Japanese cedar trunk, and with replicas of 30,000-year-old stone tools. 'A dugout canoe was our last candidate among the possible Paleolithic seagoing crafts for the region. We first hypothesized that Paleolithic people used rafts, but after a series of experiments, we learned that these rafts are too slow to cross the Kuroshio and are not durable enough,' said Kaifu. The team paddled Sugiume about 140 miles from eastern Taiwan to Yonaguni Island in southern Japan's Ryukyu group, which includes Okinawa. They navigated only by the sun, stars, swells, and their instincts. In total, the team paddled for more than 45 hours across open sea, without a lot of visibility of the island. In the six years since, the team is still unpacking some of the data they collected during the experiment, and are using it to inform or test new models about various aspects of Paleolithic sea crossings. [ Related: Southeast Asian sailors possibly mastered seafaring before Polynesians. ] 'We now know that these canoes are fast and durable enough to make the crossing, but that's only half the story,' said Kaifu. 'Those male and female pioneers must have all been experienced paddlers with effective strategies and a strong will to explore the unknown.' However, the team does not think that a return journey towards Taiwan was possible at the time. 'If you have a map and know the flow pattern of the Kuroshio, you can plan a return journey, but such things probably did not take place until much later in history,' explained Kaifu. The team also used advanced ocean models to simulate hundreds of virtual voyages, in an effort to understand if a journey like the one the modern scientists tried could have been made in different circumstances. These simulations tested several variables, including different starting points, seasons, and paddling strategies under both ancient and modern ocean conditions. Additionally, one of the new papers used numerical simulations to show how they may have crossed the Kuroshio Current–one of the strongest currents in the world. This simulation showed how boats made using tools of the time, and the right know-how, could have navigated the Kuroshio Current. 'The Kuroshio Current is generally considered dangerous to navigate,' Yu-Lin Chang, a study coauthor and oceanography student from the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, said in a statement. 'I thought if you entered it, you could only drift aimlessly. But the results of our simulations went far beyond what I had imagined. I'm pleased this work helped illuminate how ocean voyages may have occurred 30,000 years ago.' These various simulations helped fill in some gaps that a simple one-time experiment could not. They also revealed that launching a vessel from northern Taiwan offered seafarers a better chance of success than from points further south. Additionally, paddling slightly southeast instead of directly towards the destination was essential for compensating against the powerful ocean current. All in all, these findings suggest that the early modern humans in the area must have had a high level of strategic seafaring knowledge. 'Scientists try to reconstruct the processes of past human migrations, but it is often difficult to examine how challenging they really were. One important message from the whole project was that our Paleolithic ancestors were real challengers. Like us today, they had to undertake strategic challenges to advance,' said Kaifu. 'For example, the ancient Polynesian people had no maps, but they could travel almost the entire Pacific. There are a variety of signs on the ocean to know the right direction, such as visible land masses, heavenly bodies, swells and winds. We learned parts of such techniques ourselves along the way.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store