Trump admin threatens to unleash alligators on immigrants in preview of new ICE facility
The Trump administration is barreling ahead with plans to build a colossal immigration detention camp in the depths of the Florida Everglades - a compound dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.'
The Department of Homeland Security brazenly stoked fear with an AI-generated meme showing snarling alligators in ICE baseball caps patrolling the swampy grounds of the future facility.
The meme, posted on Saturday to X with the tagline 'Coming soon!', sent shockwaves through immigrant advocacy groups who denounced it as state-sponsored psychological warfare.
Former US diplomat Brett Bruen slammed the stunt as a 'horrendous lack of humanity,' while national security expert Christopher Burgess called the post 'disgusting.'
The plan for the $450 million-a-year complex envisions housing up to 1,000 migrants on a remote, 39-square-mile plot of marshland surrounding a defunct pilot airstrip in the Everglades, a habitat crawling with thousands of hungry pythons and an estimated 200,000 alligators.
Supporters of the project, including Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, insist the swamp's lethal wildlife will function as a budget-friendly security measure to deter escape attempts.
Uthmeier, a 37-year-old hardliner dubbed 'Bulldog' by allies, made no apologies in a slick, rock-music-laced promotional video touting the terrifying natural 'moat.'
'No one's getting out,' he declared triumphantly, describing the snake- and gator-infested perimeter as a 'force multiplier' to keep detainees in line.
The Department of Homeland Security brazenly stoked fear with an AI-generated meme showing snarling alligators in ICE baseball caps patrolling the swampy grounds of the future facility dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.'
'Virtually escape-proof,' he boasted on X, claiming the plan would save taxpayer dollars on fencing and guards. 'If you get out, there's not much waiting for you except alligators and pythons.'
The dystopian blueprint evokes President Trump's own suggestions during his first term of digging a medieval moat filled with deadly creatures along the southern border wall.
Now, his administration appears to be giving that idea fresh legs (and scales) by threatening to move vulnerable migrants into a swampy no-man's-land patrolled by apex predators.
Democrats and immigrant rights organizations erupted in outrage, accusing the administration of pushing a sadistic spectacle straight out of a horror film.
'This is not a joke - this is state-sponsored intimidation,' one activist fumed online. 'We are treating human beings like prey.'
Meanwhile, environmental defenders have raced to file lawsuits against what they see as an ecological nightmare.
The Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity argue the project could devastate a fragile wetland ecosystem that taxpayers have spent billions to protect, including habitat critical to the endangered Florida panther.
'The site is over 96 percent wetlands, surrounded by a national preserve, with incredible biodiversity,' warned Eve Samples, head of Friends of the Everglades to CBS News. 'This plan is not only cruel, it's an environmental disaster waiting to happen.'
Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava also fired off a letter warning that construction would proceed without adequate study of environmental impacts, financial risks, or public safety.
Yet the Trump-aligned forces behind the proposal appear determined to push forward, brushing off criticism as left-wing hysteria.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis's office insisted the swamp-based facility would be a 'force multiplier' for mass deportations, while hawking 'Alligator Alcatraz' T-shirts, baseball caps, and beverage coolers online for between $15 and $30.
State and federal officials have pointed to the abandoned airstrip as a key logistical benefit, making it easier to fly detainees straight into the swamp instead of busing them from facility to facility.
'This is the best one,' Uthmeier boasted. 'It's the one-stop shop for President Trump's mass deportation mission.'
The idea has sparked fierce backlash, with critics condemning it over environmental risks and calling out the inhumane conditions of detaining people in such camps, not to mention being surrounded by dangerous wildllfe
Civil rights groups say the plan amounts to turning the Everglades into a weapon of fear.
'They are literally weaponizing nature against migrants,' a former immigration official said in disbelief. 'This is not a security measure. This is a grotesque form of punishment.'
For now, court challenges have slowed the project, but Uthmeier and DeSantis remain defiant, promising they will bulldoze ahead in the name of 'warrior culture' and border security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
These are the most sought-after workers in the UK right now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference. Healthcare support workers are currently the most sought-after professionals in the UK job market, new research reveals, signalling key areas of demand within the economy. Data from jobs site Adzuna indicates that social care workers, sales assistants, and warehouse staff are also experiencing high demand from employers. Other roles attracting significant interest include software developers, cleaners, healthcare assistants, labourers, and project managers. Andrew Hunter, co-founder of Adzuna, said: "May reinforced the sense that the job market in the UK is gradually regaining its footing." He highlighted a positive shift, noting: "While overall vacancies dipped slightly, we've now seen three straight months of annual vacancy growth – a clear shift after more than a year of decline." Mr Hunter also pointed to rising remuneration. 'Advertised salaries continue to climb, too, with average pay up nearly 9 per cent compared to last year, comfortably outpacing inflation,' he said. Software developers, sales assistants, cleaners, and project managers are all in high demand (Getty Images) Despite the overall positive outlook, Mr Hunter expressed a watchful concern for specific sectors. "While certain sectors remain in strong demand and provide a backbone of stability, we will be keeping a close eye on the decline in roles for the previously steady healthcare and nursing sector, and how that may play out over the coming months." The research also found that the average time to fill a job stands at approximately 35 days, with a ratio of two jobseekers for every available vacancy. Business activity picks up Activity across the UK's private sector has grown in June as some easing of US tariff policy helped lift business sentiment, data from a separate survey shows. The volume of new business returned to growth in June, ending a six-month period of contraction, the survey found. This was primarily driven by the service sector – the largest part of the UK's economy, spanning industries including hospitality, entertainment and culture, finance and real estate. A further slight expansion of activity in the sector was contrasted by another drop in production for manufacturers, led by a decline in overseas export orders. Concerns over the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs on US imports were partly behind the slump, despite some businesses saying confidence had improved as a result of the president striking new trade deals with countries including the UK.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Senate megabill would explode debt and kick 11.8 million off Medicaid: ‘Our fiscal house is basically on fire'
New estimates from the Congressional Budget Office have revealed that Senate Republicans' version of Donald Trump's spending package would lead to more Americans losing health coverage than the version of the president's flagship legislation that passed the House last month. The legislation would push 11.8 million Americans off insurance by 2034, according to the report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Over the same period, federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare would be cut by $1.1 trillion. More than $1 trillion of the cuts would be made to Medicaid. The estimates confirm the concerns of some Republicans who are worried about cuts to Medicaid, which amount to the steepest cuts to the federal healthcare program in history. Some Republicans, worried about the deficit and national debt, have pressed for further cuts, while others fear what deep cuts mean for their constituents. The estimates also clash with Trump's promise not to cut Medicaid apart from removing what he describes as fraud and waste. Washington Democratic Senator Patty Murray slammed the bill in a speech on the Senate floor on Sunday,. 'If you think you can look the American people in the face and tell them we have to bring down the debt after passing what might be the most expensive bill in history, if you think you can do that and then be taken seriously, you know what, if you believe that, maybe you are foolish enough to think that zero and a trillion are the same,' she said. 'I can tell you right now, if this happens, we will all laugh you out of the room because we have never seen anything like this, not in my time here in the Senate, not in my time on this planet,' she added. 'We are not going to let anyone forget that you're trashing the rules in order to pass this egregious bill.' Over a decade, the bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt, according to the CBO. The version passed by the House would have added $2.4 trillion. The public currently holds about $29 trillion in debt, with the CBO expecting the government to borrow a further $21 trillion over the next 10 years, leading to the assessment that the Republican legislation would worsen an already bad fiscal forecast. The $3.3 trillion estimate is also an undercount, as it doesn't include further borrowing costs, which would push the legislation's full addition to the debt closer to $4 trillion. 'Our fiscal house is basically on fire,' Democratic Senator Gary Peters said in remarks on the Senate floor on Sunday. 'But if our Republican colleagues jam through this bill, it's not going to pour water on that fire. It's going to pour gasoline on those flames.' Trump's 2017 tax cuts are also driving the costs. The president's 2017 tax cuts are set to expire this year, but Republicans want to extend them — amounting to another $3.8 trillion hit to the budget. Republicans have also added further tax cuts, including Trump's pledge not to tax tips and overtime, resulting in an overall Senate tax cut of about $4.5 trillion. Steep cuts to Medicaid and other parts of the social safety net are intended to offset those tax reductions. 'The national debt is at an all-time high, $36.2 trillion. Just in the last 16 years, it has tripled,' Peters noted in his remarks. 'Our annual deficits frequently exceed $1.5 trillion, including a record $3.1 trillion deficit in fiscal year 2020,' he said. 'Within the next decade, our country will spend more on servicing the debt than we do on any other federal account outside of Social Security,' Peters added.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Senate opens debate on Trump's bill estimated to add $3.3tn to US debt
The US Senate opened debate on Donald Trump's sprawling domestic policy legislation on Sunday, the package of tax cuts, increased spending on immigration enforcement, and drastic reductions in funding for healthcare and nutrition assistance that the president calls his 'big beautiful bill'. Formal debate on the measure began after Democrats forced Senate clerks to read the entire 940-page bill aloud, to underscore their argument that the public is largely unaware of what the package Trump branded 'beautiful' actually contains, and to delay a final vote until Monday. After the debate, amendments could be brought up for consideration in a marathon session colloquially known as a vote-a-rama. The changes made to the bill in the Senate would pile trillions on to the nation's debt load while resulting in even steeper losses in healthcare coverage, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said in a new analysis, adding to the challenges for Republicans as they try to muscle the bill to passage. The CBO estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3tn from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1tn increase over the House-passed bill, which CBO has projected would add $2.4tn to the debt over a decade. The analysis also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, an increase over the scoring for the House-passed version of the bill, which predicts 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage. The stark numbers are yet another obstacle for Republican leaders as they labor to pass Trump's bill by his self-imposed 4 July deadline. After the new cost of the bill was released, Trump used his social media platform, Truth Social, to cajole and threaten lawmakers from his own party. In a Sunday evening post, the president urged Republicans concerned about adding to the debt not to 'go too crazy', and reminded them that elected officials who cross him tend not to stay in office long. 'REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected', the president wrote. Wavering Republicans probably understood Trump's comment loud and clear, coming just hours after one of their number, Thom Tillis, a North Carolina senator, voted against advancing the bill on Saturday and was subjected to a torrent of threats and attacks from the president. Tillis announced on Sunday that he would not stand for re-election in the 2026 midterms. Even before the CBO's estimate, Republicans were at odds over the contours of the legislation, with some resisting the cost-saving proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid and food aid programs, even as other Republicans say those proposals don't go far enough. Republicans are slashing the programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8tn in Trump tax breaks put in place during his first term. The push-pull was on vivid display on Saturday night as a routine procedural vote to take up the legislation in the Senate was held open for hours as Vice-President JD Vance and Republican leaders met with several holdouts. The bill ultimately advanced in a 51-49 vote, but the path ahead is fraught, with voting on amendments still to come. Still, many Republicans are disputing the CBO estimates and the reliability of the office's work. To hoist the bill to passage, they are using a different budget baseline that assumes the Trump tax cuts expiring in December have already been extended, essentially making them cost-free in the budget. The CBO on Saturday released a separate analysis of the GOP's preferred approach that found the Senate bill would reduce deficits by about $500bn. Democrats and economists decry the GOP's approach as 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. In addition, Democrats note that under the traditional scoring system, the Republican bill would violate the Senate's Byrd Rule that forbids the legislation from increasing deficits after 10 years. In a Sunday letter to Jeff Merkley, an Oregon senator and the top Democrat on the Senate budget committee, CBO director Phillip Swagel said the office estimates that the finance committee's portion of the bill, also known as Title VII, 'increases the deficits in years after 2034' under traditional scoring.
