DWP disability benefits cuts could be stopped as MPs rebel
Some 108 MPs signed their names to a Commons bid to halt the Government's welfare reforms in their tracks - crucially, that's enough to threaten Sir Keir Starmer's majority.
The rebellion, the Prime Minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. The signatures appear on a reasoned amendment declining to give the welfare reform Bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1.
The amendment calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 'because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children'.
The Government published its UC & PIP Payment Bill today.
Wales already has the highest poverty rates among disabled people in the UK - this will push them deeper into hardship.
We wrote to the DWP urging the cuts be abandoned.
I will be voting against this Bill. pic.twitter.com/LY6tY5mF1S — Steve Witherden MP (@switherdenMP) June 18, 2025
There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said.
They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn.
Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including chairwoman of the Treasury committee Dame Meg Hillier, and Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee.
Once again I'm having to say that PIP has such a low occurrence of fraud that the DWP in 2024 said it considered PIP to have a 0% fraud rate. PIP isn't the issue, it's extremely hard to be awarded and it's an in work benefit. Surely if they must look at any benefit they look at… pic.twitter.com/c4jNwTBTYV — 🐈🪴🍄✨Pickle✨🍄🪴🐈 (@FlopsyPickle) June 24, 2025
The MPs who signed the amendment 'want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill', Ms Abrahams said.
She added: 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.'
Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed the amendment.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading.
Under the proposals in the Bill, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC).
Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall spent Monday night speaking to backbench MPs about the reforms at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).
Recommended reading:
Those leaving the meeting insisted there was broad consensus in the room, with only few MPs standing up to make their opposition known.
The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'.
She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it.
Ms Kendall added: 'Above all, they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support.
'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
PM to announce ‘biggest strengthening of UK nuclear posture in a generation'
Sir Keir Starmer is set to announce a strengthening of the UK's nuclear deterrent at this week's Nato summit with the purchase of 12 new fighter jets. Billed by Downing Street as 'the biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation', the move will see the UK purchase 12 F35A jets and join Nato's airborne nuclear mission. The jets, a variant of the F35Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons, but can also be equipped with nuclear bombs. Sir Keir said: 'In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted, which is why my government is investing in our national security, ensuring our armed forces have the equipment they need and communities up and down the country reap the benefits from our defence dividend.' The decision represents a victory for the Royal Air Force, which has long pushed for a return of its nuclear capabilities since the last British air-dropped nuclear weapon was withdrawn from service after the end of the Cold War. Since then, the UK's nuclear deterrent has been carried exclusively by the Royal Navy's submarines, which the Government has also promised to invest in renewing with four new vessels. Sir Keir added: 'Supporting 100 businesses across the country and more than 20,000 jobs, these F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our Allies.' Defence Secretary John Healey said the decision followed a strategic defence review that 'confirmed we face new nuclear risks, with other states increasing, modernising and diversifying their nuclear arsenals'. The review, published earlier this month, recommended beginning discussions with the US and Nato on 'enhanced UK participation' in the alliance's nuclear mission, and raised the possibility of acquiring F35As. Nato's nuclear mission involves allied aircraft being equipped with American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe. Seven nations currently contribute so-called 'dual capability aircraft' to Nato's nuclear mission, but a the use of nuclear weapons would require the authorisation of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the US president and British prime minister. The alliance's secretary-general Mark Rutte welcomed the announcement, saying it was 'yet another robust British contribution to Nato'. Alongside the nuclear announcement, the UK is set to provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine as Sir Keir and Mr Healey push for Nato to provide Kyiv with further support. The delivery will be funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets. Sir Keir said: 'Russia, not Ukraine, should pay the price for Putin's barbaric and illegal war, so it is only right we use the proceeds from seized Russian assets to ensure Ukraine has the air defence it needs.' Wednesday is also expected to see Nato allies formally sign up to a target of spending 5% of the GDP on defence and security. The figure includes 3.5% on 'core' defence spending, with another 1.5% being spent on wider security and resilience measures such as critical infrastructure, border security and intelligence.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Foreign prisoners to be deported earlier under law change
Fresh legislation is set to be laid in Parliament on Wednesday as the Government grapples with jail overcrowding. The move will apply to foreign criminals subject to the early removal scheme, when prisoners are serving fixed-term sentences. It will mean prisoners with no right to stay in the UK could be deported after serving 30% of their sentence, instead of 50% currently. Those serving sentences for terror-related offences are excluded from the scheme. According to the Ministry of Justice, foreign offenders make up around 12% of the prison population and removing them from the country earlier could free up around 500 jail cells a year. A prison place costs on average £54,000, the department added. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: 'With prisons close to bursting, I'm clear we shouldn't be giving bed and board to foreign criminals with no right to be here. 'These changes will get more of them on planes out of the country much sooner, saving taxpayers' money and keeping our streets safe as part of our Plan for Change. 'This Government's message is crystal clear – if you come here and break our laws, you'll be sent packing in record time.' The window to deport foreign nationals from 18 months before the end of their jail term has also been increased to 48 months. Once deported, offenders are banned from re-entering the UK and any attempt to return will re-activate their original prison sentence. The move comes after the Government agreed to implement a raft of reforms following an independent sentencing review by former justice secretary David Gauke. The new legislative measures were among the recommendations. Criminals could also be eligible for deportation earlier after sentencing reforms yet to be introduced into legislation. The changes being introduced on Wednesday, if approved by Parliament, are expected to come into force by September.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money. The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand. It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly. However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified. The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently. The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began. It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers. Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million. But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach. 'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said. 'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach. 'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.' The DBT has been approached for comment.
