Polar bears are greasier than you think. Here's why
Polar bears might be greasier than widely believed.
The bears' greasy fur is the secret to the popular species' survival in one of Earth's most punishing climates. The grease, also known as sebum, is made up of cholesterol, fatty acids and compounds that make it hard for ice to attach to the animals' fur.
'The sebum quickly jumped out as being the key component giving this anti-icing effect, as we discovered the adhesion strength was greatly impacted when the hair was washed,' Trinity College Dublin PhD candidate Julian Carolan said in a statement following new research.
'Unwashed, greasy hair made it much harder for ice to stick. In contrast, when the polar bear fur was washed and the grease largely removed it performed similarly to human hair, to which ice sticks easily whether it is washed or greasy,' he explained.
Carolan is the first author of the new research, which was published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances.
A group of international researchers analyzed the fur of six wild polar bears. They then performed a chemical analysis of the grease.
In addition, they measured how well ice sticks to fur, whether water can be shed before it freezes, and how long it takes for water to freeze at temperatures on a given surface, comparing the performance of polar bear fur to human hair and specialist human-made 'skins.'
The analysis revealed a surprise: Polar bear sebum did not have an ingredient found in human hair and in the hair of other aquatic animals, like sea otters.
The finding suggests sebum's presence in polar bears is very important from an anti-icing perspective, they said, shedding new light on our understanding of the species.
'This work not only represents the first study of the composition of polar bear fur sebum, but it also resolves the question of why polar bears don't suffer from ice accumulation,' noted assistant Professor Dr. Richard Hobbs, who is also a Royal Society-Science Foundation Ireland University research fellow in Trinity's School of Chemistry and the AMBER Research Ireland Centre.
In the future, Hobbs, the senior author of the journal article, said the sebum could help humans to develop anti-icing coats that could replace toxic 'forever chemicals' like PFAS.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
15 hours ago
- The Guardian
Scientists warn against attempts to change definition of ‘forever chemicals'
A group of 20 internationally renowned scientists have issued a strong warning against attempts to narrow the definition of 'forever chemicals' in what they describe as a politically or economically motivated effort to weaken regulation of the potentially harmful chemicals. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (Pfas) are a large group of synthetic chemicals used for their oil-, water- and stain-resistant properties in a range of consumer and industrial products from waterproof clothing and non-stick cookware to firefighting foams and electronics. Their molecular structure makes them resistant to degradation, earning them the nickname 'forever chemicals'. In the last few years there has been growing awareness of the problems associated with Pfas, and a push for more stringent regulation, resulting in the banning of certain forms. A group of scientists are now raising the alarm about efforts, including by some individuals and groups in the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUpac), to narrow the current international definition of Pfas in ways that could exclude certain chemical subgroups. Last year IUpac launched a project aimed at providing 'a rigorous definition … and a harmonised communication on Pfas'. A paper authored by the chair of the project gives credibility to narrower classification proposals and says it is necessary to find 'a balance among scientific rigour, economic considerations, and social perspectives for effective Pfas regulation'. But in a paper published this week in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, the group of scientists defends the current definition, calling it 'scientifically grounded, unambiguous, and well-suited to identify these chemicals'. The effort to change the definition is 'politically and/or economically, rather than scientifically, motivated', the authors write. 'They are mixing up the chemical definition of Pfas with a regulatory definition of Pfas,' said Prof Ian Cousins from the University of Stockholm. 'The OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] definition was not intended to be a regulatory definition … the confusion it causes will also be damaging and I suspect that causing confusion is one of their objectives.' The authors warn: 'An IUpac-endorsed and potentially narrower Pfas definition could confer undue legitimacy … and influence regulatory bodies and others to adopt less protective policies.' If the definition of Pfas were narrowed, it could drastically reduce the scope of regulation regimes currently being worked out in the EU and UK, limiting the number of substances subject to control, undermining monitoring efforts and potentially weakening public health and environmental protections, according to the scientists. Prof Pierangelo Metrangolo, co-chair of the IUpac project, said 'the scientific rationale was the vibrant debate in the literature – reflecting differing opinions – and the fact that various regulatory agencies use different definitions. Therefore, we believed an IUpac project was timely. 'Currently, the TG [task group] has not finalised any conclusion, yet, and there are no indications that certain subgroups of chemicals would be excluded. More importantly, the IUpac has not 'endorsed' anything, yet.' Prof Alex Ford from the University of Portsmouth, said: 'Chemical industries and their lobbyists have used deny, deflect, sow doubt and delay tactics in the past to prevent and slow regulation on chemicals. 'The UK is still in the process of deciding how it will deal with Pfas compounds. Past experience has shown that confusion over the definition of harmful contaminants can cause substantial delays in their scrutiny and regulation.' The Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs said it generally followed the OECD definition but that it did not discount the need for narrower definitions in certain contexts. In their paper, the scientists conclude by urging policymakers to continue using the OECD definition as the basis for harmonised regulation. 'Justified exemptions can be made … without changing the general definition of what constitutes a Pfas,' they write.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Scientists baffled after finding 6,000 year-old skeletons with no link to humans
The discovery, made in the Bogotá Altiplano of Colombia, has complicated the already-debated story of South America's first inhabitants - who were thought to have crossed from Siberia into North America A mysterious group of ancient hunter-gatherers has left researchers puzzled after DNA analysis revealed they were genetically unlike modern humans. The discovery, made in the Bogotá Altiplano of Colombia, has complicated the already-debated story of South America's first inhabitants. While some theories once proposed that humans reached the continent through transoceanic voyages from Africa or Australia, the dominant view holds that early settlers crossed from Siberia into North America via an Alaskan ice bridge roughly 20,000 years ago. From there, successive waves of migration are believed to have moved southward. The earliest confirmed human remains in South America, including 'Luzia' - a 12,000-year-old skeleton found in Brazil - show ancestry linked to this migration. A second wave of migrants arrived around 9,000 years ago, and a third about 5,000 years after that. However, Colombia, the gateway between Central and South America, has been largely overlooked in ancient DNA studies - until now. Researchers analysed the remains of 21 individuals buried across five archaeological sites in the Bogotá highlands, with skeletons dating from 6,000 to 500 years old. The results, published in the journal Science Advances, were unexpected. 'We show that the hunter-gatherer population from the Altiplano dated to around 6000 yr B.P. lack the genetic ancestry related to the Clovis-associated Anzick-1 genome and to ancient California Channel Island individuals,' the study reports. 'The analysed Preceramic individuals from Colombia do not share distinct affinity with any ancient or modern-day population from Central and South America studied to date.' This means the group that first settled the high plains around Bogotá did not descend from the Clovis people, nor did they contribute genetically to later South American populations. Their DNA appears unique - and then it disappears entirely. The group seems to have vanished roughly 2,000 years ago, possibly as a result of incoming migration. DNA evidence shows that by this time, a new population had taken over the region - one that brought with it agriculture, pottery, and Chibchan languages still spoken in parts of Central America today. 'The genes were not passed on,' said Kim-Louise Krettek of the University of Tübingen. 'That means in the area around Bogotá there was a complete exchange of the population.' This genetic turnover coincides with the cultural shift from the Preceramic period to the Herrera period. The study describes this as a 'seemingly complete replacement' of the region's original inhabitants. 'That genetic traces of the original population disappear completely is unusual,' added Andrea Casas-Vargas of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Scientists see amazing star explosion like never before
Astronomers have discovered some of the largest explosions ever recorded in the in the journal Science Advances, experts say the blasts give out ten times as much energy in one year that our Sun will put out during its entire very advanced telescopes, scientists were able to see this new rare cosmic explosions which they have called 'extreme nuclear transients'. (ENTs).The explosions happen due to massive stars getting ripped apart by black holes. How do these huge explosions happen and how big are they? Extreme nuclear transients (ENTs) explosions occur when a supermassive black hole eats a huge star. The massive star is torn to pieces as it goes too close to the black hole. When this happens a huge amount of energy is released. One of these ENTs, which astronomers have named Gaia18cdj, released over 25 times more energy than the most powerful supernova ever discovered. The amount of energy it released is the same as 100 suns release in their entire lifetime! The project to discover what these explosion actually are has been years in the making. ENTs are rare and hard to find, but it is hoped that new upcoming equipment will help more of them be findings not only set a new record for cosmic explosions, but also open up exciting possibilities for future discoveries in the vast universe.
