Government to toughen laws that allow people to buy suicide drugs online
The Government has said it will tighten up laws which allow people to buy drugs online that can be used to take their own life.
Justice minister Sarah Sackman said the Government will also focus on ensuring that existing laws are enforced, as MPs heard about a 21-year-old from Southampton who was able to buy substances online to end their life.
Labour MP Darren Paffey said: 'A constituent of mine in Southampton Itchen, aged just 21, tragically died after accessing pro-suicide online forums that not only encouraged self-harm but advertised how to get lethal drugs and how to exploit loopholes that allowed this.
'The substance used in her death can still be bought on Amazon today. What steps will the minister take to close these loopholes on those who enable criminality, and ensure that the law is actively keeping our young people safe?'
Ms Sackman said: 'I'm sorry to hear about that tragic case in his constituency. Encouraging or assisting suicide is an offence under the Suicide Act 1961 and sending communications that encourage or assist serious self harm is an offence in the Online Safety Act 2023.
'But we are going to be tightening up the law to ensure that the situation that he's described is addressed. And of course it's just about the law, it's the enforcement of the law as well.'
In 2023 the then-Conservative government set up a suicide warning system in an attempt to stop people selling or accessing lethal substances. It meant ministers and the National Police Chiefs' Council could get data in real-time on deaths, to help see if trends emerged.
It comes as Canadian chef Kenneth Law is facing a trial for murder in his home country for supplying a poisonous chemical to people around the world who have ended their lives. He is linked to dozens of suicides in the UK, according to the National Crime Agency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOGE can access sensitive Social Security records, Supreme Court rules
The Department of Government Efficiency can have unimpeded access to sensitive Social Security records for millions of people, the Supreme Court ruled Friday. The justices granted the Trump administration's emergency request to lift a lower-court order that had blocked a DOGE team assigned to the Social Security Administration from viewing or obtaining personal information in the agency's systems. The court's majority provided no detailed explanation for its ruling, but in a three-paragraph unsigned order, the majority wrote: 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work.' The three liberal justices dissented. In a 10-page dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that the decision creates 'grave privacy risks for millions of Americans.' Trump administration lawyers claimed the DOGE team members needed unfettered access to Social Security's data in order to detect and halt fraudulent payments, but a federal judge in Maryland ruled that the breadth of DOGE's access violated federal law and put the data at risk of intentional or unintentional disclosure. The legal fight over DOGE's access to Social Security data is one of several that broke out in the early weeks of Trump's second term as the budget-slashing team overseen by Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk fanned out across the federal government. In response to lawsuits, federal judges also limited DOGE access to sensitive databases at the Treasury and Education departments, as well as the Office of Personnel Management. Some of the restrictions have been eased over time as the Trump administration convinced the judges that adequate safeguards were in place to avoid disclosure of personal information. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, a Baltimore-based Obama appointee, blocked DOGE's access to Social Security's databases, which include tax and wage reports as well as retirement and disability payments. In her March ruling, she concluded that the access granted to the cost-cutting team violated the Privacy Act because agency officials did not show that it was necessary to include identifying information in order to carry out the search for fraudulent payments. Justice Department lawyers defending the move offered only 'cursory, circular statements' to justify the DOGE team's access, the judge said. However, Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court that the limits Hollander imposed interfered with President Donald Trump's ability to carry out his 'critically important' agenda to eliminate wasteful spending and update archaic systems at federal agencies. 'Employees charged with modernizing government information systems and routing [sic] out fraud, waste, and abuse in data systems plainly need access to those systems,' Sauer wrote. 'District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government's 'needs' for that of the President and agency heads.' In her dissent Friday, Jackson said the government had presented 'next to nothing' to explain what harm the DOGE operation or the Social Security Administration would suffer if the limits the lower-court ordered remained in place. The Biden-appointed justice also contended that her conservative colleagues were bending the court's usual standards to allow the Trump administration to pursue its favored course of action. 'It seems as if the Court has truly lost its moorings,' Jackson wrote, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. 'The Court is … unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration.' Justice Elena Kagan also dissented from the court's order, but did not provide any explanation of her views. Among the projects DOGE staffers were working on at Social Security was one targeting improper payments to dead people. Trump has frequently falsely claimed that large numbers of deceased people receive Social Security checks, including earlier this year during a high-profile address in March to a joint session of Congress. 'One person is listed at 360 years of age … More than 100 years older than our country,' Trump said. 'But we're going to find out where that money is going, and it's not going to be pretty.' Musk also made staggering claims, suggesting in a social media post that 20 million people over 100 years of age were receiving Social Security. However, computer experts said most of the outlandishly implausible ages were the product of a default setting in the 60-year-old COBOL programming language, which interprets incomplete or missing age data as the system's oldest possible date in 1875. Musk's term as a special government employee ended last week with Trump hosting an Oval Office send-off for the tech entrepreneur. While the pair were upbeat and complimentary there, Musk's escalating attacks on Trump's budget bill currently before Congress led to a spectacular flame-out of the relationship in recent days, with Trump threatening to cut government contracts to Musk's businesses and Musk accusing Trump of delaying the release of FBI records that could be embarrassing to him.
Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Supreme Court Grants DOGE Access to Social Security Systems
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Supreme Court handed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) a win on Friday, granting them access to Social Security Administration (SSA) systems and records. Newsweek reached out to the SSA via email for comment. Why It Matters Since his January inauguration, President Donald Trump has enacted sweeping change across the federal political landscape, mainly through executive orders and implementing DOGE. The task force has been spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk in Trump's second term in the Oval Office before he left at the end of May. The Tesla CEO has pushed for DOGE to have access to numerous departments, and the process has led to numerous legal battles nationwide. What To Know In the 6-3 ruling, the Court wrote in part, "We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." Justice Elena Kagan would deny the application, the ruling notes. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented with the ruling, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed with her dissent. "Today the Court grants 'emergency' relief that allows the Social Security Administration (SSA) to hand DOGE staffers the highly sensitive data of millions of Americans. The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now—before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful," Jackson wrote in part in her dissent. This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data of millions of Americans
A divided Supreme Court on Friday sided with the Trump administration for now in a pair of cases involving the U.S. DOGE Service, whose efforts to slash government agencies and obtain data about Americans have been mostly shrouded from public view. The justices cleared the way in the first case for DOGE representatives to access sensitive data and internal systems at the Social Security Administration while litigation on the matter continues.
