HC orders action under Wildlife Protection Act against people dumping, burning waste at Sabarimala
Taking note of the indiscriminate dumping of garbage at Sabarimala, the Kerala High Court has ordered initiation of action under the Wildlife Protection Act against those responsible for dumping and burning waste at the hill temple during the Mandala-Makaravilakku season.
This followed the death of two elephants and a deer after consuming plastic waste dumped on the temple premises. Periyar Tiger Reserve officials had submitted a report that elephants were coming in herds to eat garbage, especially empty plasticbags in which jaggery had been stored. Other wild animals too were often seen consuming this waste.
Stating that the Sabarimala Sannidhanam was situated in a core and critical area of the Western Ghats, a biodiversity hotspot recognised as a world heritage site by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, the court directed the Deputy Director of the tiger reserve to take action under the provisions of the Act.
It is estimated that the average quantity of waste generated at Sabarimala during the Mandala-Makaravilakku festival season is 24 tonnes a day. Many hotels fail to segregate food and plastic waste into biodegradable bags for disposal.
The court also directed that the ban on use of plastic and other bio-hazardous materials at Sabarimala and along the trekking path from Pampa to the Sannidhanam ought to be implemented scrupulously by all concerned and appropriate action be taken against those who violated it.
For stocking or dispensing plastic in any form by commercial establishments at Sabarimala and surrounding areas, including the trekking path to the Sannidhanam, a fine of ₹2,000 shall be levied by forest officials for the first offence, ₹5,000 for the second offence, and closure of the establishment for subsequent offences.
The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), through the Executive Officer, Sabarimala, must close down the establishment which committed such an offence for the third time, it said.
The court directed the TDB to politely inform pilgrims, including those coming from other States, to exclude plastic materials during the pilgrimage. An advisory to this effect must be published on the virtual-Q platform, for the information of the pilgrims, it added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
Jharkhand to set up its first tiger safari: The plan and concerns around it
The Jharkhand government plans to establish the state's first tiger safari in the fringe area of the Barwadih Western Forest Range in Latehar district, which falls under the Palamau Tiger Reserve (PTR). The government believes that the project will help boost tourism in the state, and serve as a conservation and education centre for wildlife, offering experiential learning and nature-based recreation. However, experts have raised numerous concerns about the project, including the potential displacement of local communities. Tiger safari is not defined under The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 which says 'no construction of commercial tourist lodges, hotels, zoos and safari parks shall be undertaken inside a sanctuary except with the prior approval of the National Board' [for Wild Life] constituted under the Act. The concept was first envisaged in the Guidelines for Tourism issued by the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) in 2012, which provided for such establishments in the buffer areas of tiger reserves 'which experience immense tourist influx in the core/ critical tiger habitat for viewing tigers'. The idea was to build an enclosure within tiger reserves where animal sightings are not left to chance, unlike in the case of traditional wild safaris that are undertaken, for example, in the Jim Corbett National Park. This would be done by housing animals in large naturalistic enclosures within a tiger reserve. In 2016, the NTCA issued guidelines for establishing tiger safaris in the buffer and fringe areas of tiger reserves for rescued, conflict-prone, or orphaned tigers with the clear restriction that no zoo-bred animals would be introduced. Three years later, however, the NTCA made an amendment that allowed tigers from zoos to be housed in safari parks. The authority to identify and approve such zoo animals was delegated to the Central Zoo Authority (CZA), which also became responsible for overseeing animal welfare, enclosure design, and compliance with zoo standards in safari projects. In March 2024, the Supreme Court directed that tiger safaris should be established outside the core and buffer areas of tiger reserves. It said that such initiatives should not disturb natural habitats or compromise conservation goals. Keeping in line with the apex court's directive, the Jharkhand government plans to create the safari in the fringe area of the Barwadih Western Forest Range, beyond the protected core and buffer zones of PTR. The safari will be set up in around 150 hectares of forest land. The project will not feature any wild animals — it will house only conflict, injured, or orphaned animals rescued from tiger reserves and zoos across India. The Jharkhand government believes that the safari would not only increase tourism but also generate direct jobs for at least 200 locals in the tourism sector. People would be required for the roles of guides, support staff, and maintenance crews. Currently, the project is in the ideation stage. Once the state Forest Department gives the go-ahead, the Deputy Director of PTR will prepare a Detailed Project Report (DPR) and send it to the NTCA and CZA. The CZA will evaluate the proposed area and the selection of species. The entire approval and clearance process could take up to five to six months, followed by a construction period of around 18 months. Speaking to The Indian Express, Madhe Gowda, a Soliga tribal leader and conservationist based at Karnataka's BRT Tiger Reserve, says that although tiger safaris attract tourists, they tend to erase the presence and contributions of forest-dwelling communities, portraying them as a threat rather than stewards of biodiversity. As a result, such initiatives often lead to the displacement of local tribal communities. Speaking on the concerns pertaining to displacement of people, state officials have clarified that the project site falls under forest administration and no relocation or displacement is expected. Tiger safaris also threaten the disruption of local economies. The projects restrict livestock grazing and collection of forest produce, which severely impacts the livelihoods of Adivasis. George Monippally, a senior activist and member of Van Adhikar Manch (VAM) in Latehar, tells The Indian Express that before establishing the tiger safari the Jharkhand government should ensure that the project has the consent of local communities. 'If this tiger safari is planned on forest land, the Forest Department must consult the Gram Sabha and allow them to deliberate on all details — location, impact, and plan. Otherwise, it's a clear breach of law,' he said. Shubham Tigga hails from Chhattisgarh and studied journalism at the Asian College of Journalism. He previously reported in Chhattisgarh on Indigenous issues and is deeply interested in covering socio-political, human rights, and environmental issues in mainland and NE India. Presently based in Pune, he reports on civil aviation, other transport sectors, urban mobility, the gig economy, commercial matters, and workers' unions. You can reach out to him on LinkedIn ... Read More
Time of India
6 days ago
- Time of India
Adani proposes uniform charges for Mumbai, Navi Mumbai airports
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel New Delhi: Adani Airport Holdings Ltd (AAHL) has asked the government to consider Mumbai and Navi Mumbai airports as a single entity for calculation of tariffs for passengers and airlines, show documents reviewed by proposal, if accepted by the government, will bring parity in charges for both the airports, likely resulting in more traffic at Navi Mumbai, the success of which is crucial for AAHL, having invested Rs 16,700 crore in building the both airports are owned by AAHL, passenger user fees, landing and parking charges will be significantly higher at Navi Mumbai, which could deter airlines from shifting to the new airport that's expected to start commercial operations in company has cited a 2021 amendment of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority ( AERA ) Act allowing grouping of airports and designating them as a single entity. This was done to privatise smaller, loss-making airports--clubbing them with a larger one in the same region to make them attractive to investors.'Since there has been a large capital invested in Navi Mumbai, which is a green field airport, naturally tariff at the airport will be significantly higher than Mumbai, which is an established airport where capex is low and there are depreciating assets,' said a person aware of the development.'If both the airports' tariffs are calculated as one unit, the charges at both airports will be average of the two, bringing parity.'Tariff regulator AERA fixes airport charges for five years based on capital expenditure by the operator. It takes into account the airport's revenue and expenditure based on capital expenditure, operating costs, depreciation and non-aero revenue, determining tariffs so that the operator makes a reasonable has faced opposition from airlines on shifting to the new airport. The International Air Transport Association ( IATA ), an airline lobby group, said in March that the Adani group was using its ownership of both airports to forcibly move traffic to kickstart operations at Navi Adani group and the Ministry of Civil Aviation didn't respond to company announced plans to start the revamp of Mumbai airport 's Terminal 1 in October, due to which around 15 million passengers will have to be shifted to Terminal 2 and Navi difference in revenue share is another reason why AAHL wants more airlines operating from Navi Mumbai, said people involved in the to the concession agreement, Mumbai International Airport Ltd (MIAL), the company that operates the airport, has to pay 38.7% of its gross revenue with the Airports Authority of India (AAI) whereas Navi Mumbai International Airport Ltd (NMIAL) has to pay only 12.6 % of its revenue to the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO).'If there is high traffic at low revenue share at Navi Mumbai airport as compared to less traffic at higher revenue share at Mumbai airport, the company will have more revenue for operating the airports,' a senior airport official said. 'So, it makes financial sense to consider them as a single entity.'Government officials said deliberations are ongoing with AAI and CIDCO on the company's proposal that would set a precedent for future cases. With as many as 15 cities having dual airports, it's necessary to establish a tariff calculation process that promotes the development of newer facilities while not burdening passengers, they a former AERA official warned that such a move may be seen as conferring an unwarranted advantage as they have different agreements and ownership structures. 'Currently, this is the only case where a single company owns both the airports in the same geography,' he said.
The Hindu
7 days ago
- The Hindu
Mt. Khangchendzonga ascent hurtful to indigenous communities: Sikkim CM to Amit Shah
Sikkim Chief Minister Prem Singh Tamang has urged the Centre to ensure that Mt. Khangchendzonga, the world's third-highest peak, regarded as sacred by the people of the State, is made out of bounds for mountaineers. In a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah, the Chief Minister said the recent ascent of the peak by a five-member team from the National Institute of Mountaineering and Adventure Sports (NIMAS) from the Nepal side on May 18 hurt Sikkim's indigenous communities. India's tallest peak, at 8,568 metres above sea level, Mt. Khangchendzonga straddles the Sikkim-Nepal border and is considered one of the most difficult Himalayan mountains to ascend. Climbing activities are banned in Sikkim, where the mountain is worshipped as a guardian deity, but are allowed from the Nepal side. The mountain was scaled for the first time in 1954 after several mountaineers made futile attempts for more than half a century, some losing their lives. 'The letter comes amid rising local sentiment that the sanctity of Mt. Khangchendzonga must not be compromised in the name of adventure or tourism, regardless of which side the expedition originates from,' Mt. Tamang wrote on May 24. 'It is with deep reverence and concern that we bring to your kind attention the recent reports regarding the scaling of Mt. Khangchendzonga from the Nepal side,' he said. The Chief Minister said the act of scaling the 'sacred' peak by the team from NIMAS based in Arunachal Pradesh's Dirang was 'a violation of both the prevailing legal provisions and the deeply held religious beliefs of the people of Sikkim'. Living deity Mr. Tamang said Mt. Khangchendzonga – the name translated into 'five treasures of the high snows' – holds profound spiritual and religious significance for the people of Sikkim. According to the Sikkimese belief system, he explained, these divine treasures remain hidden and would be revealed to the devout when the world is in grave peril. 'The mountain is revered as the abode of the principal guardian and protector-deity of Sikkim, known as Dzoe-Nga. This sacred being is worshipped as the Pho-lha, or the chief of the entire assemblage of supernatural entities of Sikkim. These deities were recognised and anointed as the guardian deities of the land by Ugyen Guru Rinpoche, also known as Guru Padmasambhava, the Patron Saint of Sikkim,' the Chief Minister said. He pointed out that the Sikkim government banned all climbing activities on Mt. Khangchendzonga through notifications in 1998 and 2001 under the Sacred Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. Nudge Nepal Mr. Tamang urged Mr. Shah to diplomatically dissuade the Nepal government from allowing mountaineers to scale Mt. Khangchendzonga in deference to the deeply held spiritual values of the indigenous communities of Sikkim. Organisations such as the Sikkim Bhutia Lepcha Apex Committee have been pursuing a complete ban on scaling Mt. Khangchendzonga, specifically from Nepal.
