DOJ indicates Trump admin not obligated to return man deported to El Salvador, pushing back on judiciary
While a court ordered the U.S. government to pursue "steps to facilitate the return" of a Salvadoran man removed from the U.S. last month, the Justice Department asserted that federal courts do not have the authority to dictate to the executive branch how to handle foreign relations and that the order only requires removal of "domestic obstacles" that would hinder the man's ability to return to the U.S.
The legal wranglings concern Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, who had been living in Maryland, but was removed from the U.S. last month.
"Defendants understand 'facilitate' to mean what that term has long meant in the immigration context, namely actions allowing an alien to enter the United States. Taking 'all available steps to facilitate' the return of Abrego Garcia is thus best read as taking all available steps to remove any domestic obstacles that would otherwise impede the alien's ability to return here," a DOJ court filing declared.
"On the flipside, reading 'facilitate' as requiring something more than domestic measures would not only flout the Supreme Court's order, but also violate the separation of powers. The federal courts have no authority to direct the Executive Branch to conduct foreign relations in a particular way, or engage with a foreign sovereign in a given manner."
Federal Judge Hammers Doj On Whereabouts Of Alleged Ms-13 Gang Member Following Scotus Order
Abrego Garcia has been accused of being an MS-13 gang member, but his legal challenge has denied that allegation.
Read On The Fox News App
"On March 15, although ICE was aware of his protection from removal to El Salvador, Abrego Garcia was removed to El Salvador because of an administrative error," according to a DOJ court filing.
Evan Katz, who identified himself as "Assistant Director for the Removal Division, within the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO)," addressed the issue in a court filing.
"Although Abrego-Garcia has an order of removal issued by an immigration judge, I understand that he should not have been removed to El Salvador because the immigration judge had also granted Abrego-Garcia withholding of removal to El Salvador. However, I also understand that Abrego Garcia is no longer eligible for withholding of removal because of his membership in MS-13 which is now a designated foreign terrorist organization," Katz declared.
Federal Judge Calls Deportation Of Salvadoran Man In Maryland 'Wholly Lawless'
After the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland ordered the U.S. "to facilitate and effectuate" Abrego Garcia's return to the U.S., the Supreme Court called for the lower court to clarify the instruction.
"The order properly requires the Government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador. The intended scope of the term 'effectuate' in the District Court's order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court's authority. The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs," the Supreme Court noted.
The lower court then called for defendants to "take all available steps to facilitate the return of Abrego Garcia to the United States as soon as possible."
Trump Invites El Salvador's Bukele To White House For 'Working Visit'
Abrego Garcia, whose wife is a U.S. citizen, is being held in El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center.
"It is my understanding based on official reporting from our Embassy in San Salvador that Abrego Garcia is currently being held in the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador. He is alive and secure in that facility. He is detained pursuant to the sovereign, domestic authority of El Salvador," Michael Kozak, senior bureau official in the bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs of the State Department, noted in a filing.
Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele is visiting President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday.Original article source: DOJ indicates Trump admin not obligated to return man deported to El Salvador, pushing back on judiciary
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Iran Responds to U.S. Strikes - The Arena with Kasie Hunt - Podcast on CNN Audio
Iran Responds to U.S. Strikes The Arena with Kasie Hunt 48 mins A member of the House Armed Services Committee who served four tours in Iraq responds to Iran's retaliatory strikes at U.S. bases in the Middle East. Plus, the latest news of the Supreme Court on deportations.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
U.S. Supreme Court allows Trump to deport migrants to 'third countries'
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday it will allow the Trump administration to resume rapid deportations of convicted criminals to "third countries." The decision temporarily lifts an injunction, requiring advance notice of deportations to other countries, as the administration appeals the case. File Photo via Department of Homeland Security/UPI | License Photo June 23 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday it will allow the Trump administration to resume swift deportations of convicted criminals to "third countries," even if they have no ties. The high court's decision temporarily lifts an injunction, issued in April by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy of Massachusetts, that required the administration give those being deported "meaningful" advance notice before being sent to countries other than their own. The Supreme Court's order will remain in effect as the Trump administration appeals the case. President Donald Trump ordered the quick deportations of convicted criminals in an executive order immediately after taking office in January. "Fire up the deportation planes," Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement Monday as she called the ruling a "victory for the safety and security of the American people." "The Biden administration allowed millions of illegal aliens to flood our country and now the Trump administration can exercise its undisputed authority to remove these criminal illegal aliens and clean up this national security nightmare," McLaughlin added. "DHS can now execute its lawful authority and remove illegal aliens to a country willing to accept them." While the Supreme Court's conservative-majority offered no explanation for its ruling, the three liberal judges dissented. "I cannot join so gross an abuse of the court's equitable discretion," wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who accused the court of "rewarding lawlessness" by the Trump administration in violation of immigrants' due process. "In matters of life and death, it is best to proceed with caution," Sotomayor warned. "Rather than allowing our lower court colleagues to manage this high-stakes litigation with the care and attention it plainly requires, this court now intervenes to grant the government emergency relief from an order it has repeatedly defied." After Murphy's preliminary injunction last month, the Trump administration attempted to deport seven men to their non-native South Sudan with less than 24 hours notice. Murphy halted the deportation flight and threatened to hold officials in criminal contempt. The Trump administration denounced Murphy and appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. "The United States is facing a crisis of illegal immigration, in no small part because many aliens most deserving of removal are often the hardest to remove," the Department of Justice argued in May, as some countries refuse to take back their own citizens. Despite Monday's ruling by the Supreme Court, other judges could continue to block third-country deportations on a case-by-case basis.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
House panel recommends Garcia to lead Dems on Oversight panel
A key Democratic committee voted Monday night to recommend Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) to lead the party on the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, lending a good deal of momentum to the second-term Californian heading into a vote of the full caucus on Tuesday. Huddled in the basement of the Capitol, the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee sided with Garcia over three other Democrats on the panel: Reps. Stephen Lynch (Mass.), Kweisi Mume (Md.) and Jasmine Crockett (Texas). The seat had been held by Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), 75, who died last month after a short battle with esophageal cancer. Lynch was the runner-up, followed by Mfume and Crockett. The vote is not binding. While the Steering and Policy Committee is an influential panel, its votes are merely recommendations to the broader caucus, which will meet to decide the ultimate winner. That vote, by secret ballot, is scheduled for Tuesday morning. In one prominent race in 2014, former Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) won the Steering panel's nod to lead Democrats on the Energy and Commerce Committee, but it was Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) who won the contest when the full caucus weighed in. Pallone remains in that seat more than a decade later. Still, the Steering Committee is led by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), and it's stocked with leadership allies, lending the panel outsized sway in the process of choosing committee heads to work with party leaders. In winning Monday's vote, Garcia bested two much more veteran members of the Oversight Committee — Lynch and Mfume — striking a blow to the seniority system that's long guided Democrats in picking committee heads. Lynch, 70, has been the interim ranking member of the panel since Connolly stepped out of that role in April, and he's made the case that his long experience of investigative work on the panel makes him the best fit for the permanent position. Garcia, 47, has been given a boost by an endorsement from the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, of which he is a member. He also has the advantage of hailing from California, which boasts the largest Democratic delegation in the House. From the minority, Democrats are powerless to steer the Oversight Committee, which has broad jurisdiction over the federal government and the subpoena power to advance investigations. But the winner of Tuesday's vote for the permanent ranking member spot would be in line to take the committee gavel in 2027 if Democrats can flip control of the House in next year's midterms — a scenario that would lend the new chairman enormous powers to investigate the many controversies of President Trump's second term. Leaving Monday night's vote, Garcia thanked his supporters but acknowledged that there was still one more vote remaining to seal the position. 'There's still an election tomorrow, and there's still obviously an important case to be made in the morning. And that's the case I'm planning on making,' he told reporters. 'And so we're going to run through the tape.'
