Willingness to switch to EVs fades faster in Europe than US, Shell survey shows
Drivers are becoming more reluctant to switch to
electric vehicles
from combustion engines and the trend is more pronounced in
Europe
than in the
United States
, a survey published by Shell on Tuesday showed.
The main obstacle is cost, according to the survey of 15,000 drivers across the world, including Britain, China, Germany and the United States.
"Europe surprised us," said David Bunch, Shell's chief for mobility and convenience. "The single biggest barrier to entry is the cost of the vehicle. Range anxiety is still there but it's diminishing."
Electric vehicles are on average up to 30 per cent more expensive than internal combustion engine cars.
This year, 41 per cent of respondents in Europe said they would consider switching to an electric car compared with 48 per cent last year, while in the United States the number fell three percentage points to 31 per cent, the survey showed.
In terms of the pace at which the charging experience is improving, only about half of European drivers said public charging had improved in the last year, below China's 74 per cent and 80 per cent in the United States.
Only 17 per cent of European drivers asked said public charging offered value for money, compared with 69 per cent in China and 71 per cent in the United States.
Shell runs 75,000 charging points and focuses its EV strategy on fast, on-the-go charging points rather than home-charging. Its core EV markets are China, Britain, Germany,
Switzerland
, Singapore, the Netherlands and the United States.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Mysuru-based biotech company ties up with firms in Italy and Oman for biodiesel production
Labland Biodiesel, a biotechnology company based in Mysuru, has announced its tie-up with companies in Italy and Oman to establish large-scale bioenergy crop plantations abroad for biodiesel production. The company has been engaged in bioenergy and plant tissue-culture for more than three decades. 'Backed by extensive research in Jatropha, a non-edible, high-yield biodiesel crop, Labland Biodiesel owns proprietary, high-performing seed varieties recognised globally,' said a statement. The partnership with an Italian firm, formalised in February 2025, has kickstarted with pilot plantations in Italy, Spain and Greece, targeting a total expansion of 10,000 acres in each country. 'The partnership will establish a robust supply chain network and collaborate with oil distribution companies in these countries,' the statement said. The agreement with Oman-based partner signed in September 2024 aims at developing plantations of Jatropha and other biofuel crops across the Middle East. The partnership includes joint research and development efforts to identify high-yield biofuel crops suited to the region, along with improvements in processing technology, waste utilisation, and carbon capture initiatives, the statement said. Emphasising the importance of biodiesel, which presents a cleaner and sustainable alternative to petroleum diesel, founder chairman of the Labland Group of Companies Sudheer Shetty said India imports 88.2% of 95 million tonnes of its projected diesel requirement for 2025-26. 'Our vision is to produce 1.5 million tonnes of biodiesel annually. 'We focus on developing plantations across 100,000 acres under Phase 1 with a projected outlay of ₹6,500 crore with an annual production capacity of 500 tonnes a day,' he said in the statement. Managing director of Labland Biodiesel Meghana Bhat said the project is expected to reduce carbon footprint. 'The company will play a major role in carbon capturing that could reshape the regional clean energy landscape. We are strengthening our clean energy capabilities with deeper technologies and production integration to tap the unlocked potential of carbon revenue,' she said in the statement. 'It focuses on improving the economics of biodiesel production. We have received a Letter of Intent for an investment of €500 million from a leading European firm. Further discussions are under way with government of Bahrain and companies in Kenya, Spain and Greece,' the statement added.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Irish Club Excluded From Conference League Due To Non-Compliance With UEFA's Multi-Club Rules
The Court of Arbitration for Sport dismissed Drogheda United's appeal against their exclusion from the Conference League by UEFA, due to non-compliance with regulations on multi-club ownership. The League of Ireland club, which won the FAI Cup last season, is owned by Trivela Group, a multi-club football organization that also holds a majority stake in Danish side Silkeborg. Both clubs qualified for the upcoming Conference League, creating a conflict with UEFA's regulations. According to the rules, the higher-ranked team, Silkeborg, will stay in the competition. Drogheda received notification of their removal last week and subsequently appealed to CAS but will miss out on European football for the first time since 2013. Drogheda mentioned their significant efforts to collaborate with UEFA to make the necessary ownership and governance changes to allow both clubs to compete. They also pointed out that rule changes, in their view, were inconsistently communicated and enforced. CAS determined that the change in assessment date was properly communicated by UEFA and that the club should have been aware of the change. CAS also rejected Drogheda's claims of unequal treatment by UEFA. In a statement, the club expressed strong disagreement with the decision, stating they had hoped for fairness and common sense to prevail. They described the decision as unjust, asserting that rules should protect opportunity rather than prevent it, while also accepting responsibility and apologising. Last season, UEFA permitted Manchester City and Girona to compete in the Champions League and Manchester United and Nice to participate in the Europa League, noting that investors had made necessary changes to avoid conflicts with the regulations. UEFA's Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) is currently investigating FA Cup winners Crystal Palace's participation in the Europa League, due to majority owner John Textor's involvement with Olympique Lyonnais, who also qualified for the competition. Last month, CAS rejected an appeal by Club Leon after the Mexican club was removed from the Club World Cup by FIFA for failing to comply with multi-club ownership regulations.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Local firms' global aspirations: Can India birth the next big four?
Recent reports suggest that the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) is actively exploring how India can nurture the next generation of global accounting and consulting giants. This is a bold and welcome step one that aligns perfectly with the ambition of Atmanirbhar Bharat and recognises the strategic potential of homegrown professional services firms to compete globally. To appreciate the significance of this moment, we must first understand how the existing Big Four firms Deloitte, PwC, EY, and KPMG rose to global prominence. Their ascent wasn't accidental it coincided with the post-war expansion of American and European multinationals. As clients went overseas, audit firms followed, building an international presence out of necessity. Over time, they evolved from audit specialists to multi-disciplinary giants, leveraging trust in their audit work to offer services in tax, technology, human capital, and beyond. In India today, less than 25% of the Big Four's revenues come from audit work, the rest flows from taxation services, advisory, digital transformation, government projects, and technology consulting. What began as compliance partners became transformation enablers. There was a critical moment in the last two decades when Indian firms could have seized this space. As Indian IT and pharmaceutical companies went global, they required international credibility to access capital markets. Naturally, they turned to the global Big Four for audits and certifications, often overlooking Indian firms even for domestic work. This created a paradox: Indian companies powered global markets, but Indian professional services firms were left behind. The question is no longer whether Indian firms should go global. It is how quickly they can. India's IT sector offers a clear blueprint. Firms like TCS, Infosys, and Wipro started as cost-efficient service providers and evolved into global consulting leaders. Today, consulting and systems integration drive over 40% of TCS's revenue, thanks to consistent investments in capabilities, leadership, and scale. This transformation was driven by a sharp focus on quality, bold scaling strategies, and strategic brand-building. Indian IT firms exceeded global standards, expanded through global delivery centres and acquisitions, and built strong reputations by engaging in thought leadership and global partnerships. To replicate this success in the accounting and advisory space, Indian firms must embrace three imperatives. Firstly, global trust comes from global standards. Indian firms must invest in training, governance, and cutting-edge technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) for audits, predictive analytics in tax advisory, or ESG benchmarking. Only then can they inspire the same confidence as their global peers. Secondly, the Indian professional services ecosystem remains fragmented. Many firms stay small by choice due to governance challenges, reluctance to share leadership, or legacy thinking. But scale is not optional. It brings depth, diversity, and staying power. Consolidation, collaboration, and strategic investment are the need of the hour. Thirdly, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), while rightly focused on ethics, must re-evaluate some of the restrictions. Indian firms are still barred from advertising, even from having prominent name boards. In a global digital economy, such rules are not merely antiquated; they would be counterproductive. Visibility is not vanity; it is a prerequisite for credibility. The PMO's support for Indian firms is laudable, but to create lasting impact, this support must be institutionalised. Just as the IT sector thrived in the 1990s with SEZs, tax breaks, and export incentives, Indian consulting firms now need structured support to scale globally. This could take the form of a Global Indian Firm programme offering financial and logistical aid for international expansion, along with simplified pathways for cross-border operations—including regulatory clarity on foreign affiliations and the mobility of Indian professionals. India already has the market size, talent, and credibility to build global consulting powerhouses. What's needed now is an enabling environment and the will to make it happen. We now stand at a crossroads. The convergence of government intent, regulatory reform, and firm-level ambition can change the game. If we seize this moment, India will not just be a marketplace for global consulting firms. It will be their birthplace. The next Big Four can and should have Indian names. Let's not miss this moment. This article is authored by Dinesh Kanabar, CEO, Dhruva Advisors LLP.
