logo
It's been 84 years, but my dream of 'MagSafe' on a Pixel is almost here

It's been 84 years, but my dream of 'MagSafe' on a Pixel is almost here

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
I am an Android and a Pixel fan who has been heralding MagSafe as the coolest and most useful smartphone accessory improvement since sliced bread — or USB-C to stay within the metaphor. So when Qi2 was announced with a hint of MagSafe backwards compatibility, I was in nerd heaven. Finally — finally! — I'd be able to dip into a large ecosystem of accessories and use them on my Pixel phones.
But Qi2's announcement came and went, and the weeks, months, and years passed us by without any Android phone adding support for the standard. Then came the HMD Skyline, the first phone with built-in Qi2 charging and magnet compatibility, which made little impact besides claiming the title of 'first to market.' Google released its Pixel 9 series with good ol' first-gen Qi, letting 2024 roll into 2025 with me still twiddling my thumbs waiting for Qi2's big 'Finally!' moment.
Early 2025 didn't change much. I thought the Samsung Galaxy S25 series would take us over the hump and herald the age of Qi2, and while the phones are Qi2-ready, they don't have the built-in magnet compatibility that I really want. Instead, you have to buy a magnetic case, which solves the issue without really solving it (I'll get to the 'why' later). Similarly, the OnePlus 13 uses a magnetic case to trigger its proprietary AIRVOOC wireless charging ecosystem, and the OPPO Find X8 series followed with the same strategy.
It's easy to lose hope in this context. I was starting to think that 2025 is done for, and that I'd have to wait for 2026 to see Qi2's big moment on Android come to fruition. But lo and behold, Google, the brand less likely to innovate on hardware specs, is potentially preparing an unexpected surprise: Qi2 on the Pixel 10. And if that turns out to be true, you'll find me doing the Shia LaBeouf clapping meme in real life for a few minutes. Here's why.
Google adopting Qi2 puts pressure on everyone to adopt Qi2
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
Android brands have been fighting over small margins on spec sheets for years now, and no one wants to be left behind. If OnePlus upgrades to the latest processor, Samsung will follow, and if Xiaomi speeds up its charging, OPPO will go faster. It took ages to get the first under-display fingerprint scanner, but now almost all Android phones have them; the same happened with higher adaptive refresh rates on displays, periscope cameras, and so on. It only takes one small snowball to create an avalanche, but waiting for the snowball is the hardest part.
We're now seeing this shift with silicon-carbon batteries, and I hope that we'll soon see it for Qi2. If Google, the face of Android and the brand with some of the most significant PR exposure (especially in the US market), really added full Qi2 compatibility and created an ecosystem of magnet-friendly 'Pixelsnap' accessories, then it will definitely spearhead the online conversation around Qi2, magnets, and 'MagSafe on Android.' Reviews, YouTube videos, podcasts, ads — everything will mention Pixelsnap, and the onus will be on everyone else to follow.
That should pressure every other brand to include Qi2 in their upcoming flagship, even speeding up their plans if Qi2 wasn't part of them already. What was once a 'nice to have' feature in the spec sheet would become a real bullet point under the cons if it's missing. And no brand wants extra cons and reasons for people not to buy its phones.
What we're potentially looking at with the Pixel 10 is the snowball that starts the avalanche, and I'm all here for it.
Built-in magnet compatibility makes all the difference for Qi2
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
I'm clumsy and I'm the first one to put a case on all my phones, so why am I so staunchly against the idea of Qi2-ready phones with magnet compatibility brought in by cases? Well, it's a matter of perception in my opinion.
When the metallic array used by magnets is not built into the phone, Qi2 becomes an extra: It's not taken seriously by accessory makers who believe (rightfully so) that not all users will be interested in magnetic accessories because they likely don't know that their phones are compatible.
We've seen this with the Galaxy S25 series, where the majority of S25 case makers opted for non-magnetic cases and only offered one or two magnetic options. Meanwhile, most MagSafe accessories are still being made for and marketed at iPhone users, even if they're also compatible with the Galaxy S25 and its Qi2-ready certification. You and I, the geeks who understand the tech, will know that we can buy a MagSafe charger or stand and use it with a magnetic case on our Galaxy S25 Ultra, but not everyone will. And I think that's harmful both to the accessory ecosystem and Android's perception amongst users.
When magnetism is an integral part of the phone, it can't be ignored by case and accessory makers.
When magnet compatibility is built into the phone, it's an integral part of it. Ads will mention it, buyers will be aware of it, and the feature becomes a given, not an extra. Case makers will make sure most of their models offer it to replicate the phone's setup, and you and I, we'll have a larger choice in terms of compatible case colors and pricing. Plus, this opens up a whole world for accessory makers to adopt their accessories for Android, make special ones for different phones, or include compatible Android phones in their product images and marketing. Basically, look at the early years of MagSafe on the iPhone and copy-paste that to Android, though perhaps on a smaller scale. (It's a well-known fact that iPhone buyers pay more for accessories than Android owners, so accessory companies cater to them more.)
That is without mentioning, obviously, the small proportion of users who prefer to carry their phone case-less and could only benefit from the full Qi2 featureset if the magnetic setup was built-in.
Qi2-ready is like slapping a metallic ring on a phone and calling that MagSafe. It's not the same.
This is why I think the simple Qi2-ready certification isn't enough. It's basically the same thing as slapping a cheap metallic ring on a phone and calling that MagSafe; it's not the same.
And why magnets? Well, because they align a Qi2 wireless charger to charge up in the most efficient way possible, and also because the simplicity of snap-on and snap-off to add an accessory to your phone is unparalleled. No plugging, no clipping, no clamping, no holding; just magnets. Wallets, tripods and stands, PopSockets, external camera lights, microphones, and an entire ecosystem of unified magnet-compatible accessories exist out there, and that specific MagSafe- and Qi2-compatible metallic array opens the door for it. I want that for my Pixel phones, and I want it for all Android phones.
Bring on the magnets, I say, or to quote Jesse Pinkman…
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Download namebench (free) for Windows, macOS and Linux
Download namebench (free) for Windows, macOS and Linux

Gizmodo

time37 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Download namebench (free) for Windows, macOS and Linux

The source of slow internet connections does not always stem from either your computer system or router, but instead comes from improper DNS configuration. Domain names that include take in IP addresses through the Internet's phonebook system called DNS. Your entire browsing pace gets affected by a DNS system that operates slowly or misconfigures itself. That's where Namebench comes in. You conduct this test to identify which DNS servers provide the fastest connection because of your geographic position and internet usage patterns. It's not a one-size-fits-all situation. The speed performance of certain DNS servers differs between countries. Your DNS provider might suffer from excessive load or reliability issues that you remain unaware of at this time. The advantage of Namebench lies in its capability to perform real-world testing instead of abstract laboratory testing. Through analysis of your real browser usage or data acquired from services like Google and Alexa, it determines the best-suited DNS servers for your websites. The program generates recommendations built upon actual website usage instead of operating on predicted theoretical figures. Namebench requires no special technical expertise from its users. The application functions through both a GUI and a command-line interface before creating easy-to-read recommendations in a report format. The system requires no guessing and skips complicated logs or data searches to determine its final output. This application lets you make all decisions since it stays under your control. The system provides information without implementing changes, which certain users who prefer full visibility appreciate during the process of modification. Your online speed performance changes following a DNS switch, depending on both what you currently use and how many ways DNS selection alters your internet speed capabilities. The effect of changing DNS servers on web page speed varies between websites, yet may enhance both streaming service and game performance. People living in rural areas with poor internet infrastructure benefit greatly from finding better source routes for DNS. The built-in service of Namebench provides advanced users with a method to monitor their system efficiency. Users who desire a better understanding of internet connection functionality should consider running this program because it serves as a wise tool. The Namebench program functions as both an application and a teaching instrument. Using Namebench results in either confirmation of your existing best DNS choice or a performance improvement benefit.

Gen Z shoppers are loving Google right now. That could be bad news for Amazon.
Gen Z shoppers are loving Google right now. That could be bad news for Amazon.

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Gen Z shoppers are loving Google right now. That could be bad news for Amazon.

Amazon may have a new problem to keep it up at night: Google is increasingly popular with younger shoppers. New data from Morgan Stanley shows that 16-to-24-year-olds increasingly turn to Google for more of their online shopping journey. That's taking share away from Amazon, both when people set out to research products online for the first time and when they already have a specific product in mind. As of March 2025, 30% of those Gen Z shoppers who already know what they want to buy still go to Google first — an increase from 21% in September 2024, per Morgan Stanley's research, which analyzed behavior across Google Search, YouTube, and Gemini. While the share of other online destinations like Walmart and Facebook has shrunk, it's Amazon that's taken the biggest hit. It declined from 41% last September to 34% in March, the data showed. It's not totally clear why e-commerce Google searches are booming among younger users, though Morgan Stanley's analysts speculate Google's new generative AI tools may have something to do with it. Google has previously said it's seen higher engagement with AI Overviews from users age 18-24. During the company's Q1 earnings call in April, Google's chief business officer, Philipp Schindler, said that the volume of commercial queries on Google Search had increased with the launch of AI Overviews. Speaking on the same Q1 earnings call, Schindler also said that the number of people shopping using Google's Lens feature had grown 10%. Google has been all too aware of the risk of losing younger users. The company's former Search head, Prabhakar Raghavan, testified in 2023 that Google risked becoming irrelevant to youth, saying the company has been referred to as "Grandpa Google." While ChatGPT adoption is growing overall, it remains small when it comes to online shopping, suggesting Google may keep it at bay with its generative AI features.

Scale AI documents show Google extensively using ChatGPT to improve its AI chatbot: 'Make it BETTER than GPT'
Scale AI documents show Google extensively using ChatGPT to improve its AI chatbot: 'Make it BETTER than GPT'

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Scale AI documents show Google extensively using ChatGPT to improve its AI chatbot: 'Make it BETTER than GPT'

In 2023, Google was in a race to catch up with ChatGPT — and it turned to ChatGPT itself to do it. Hundreds of documents obtained by Business Insider reveal that Google's contractors at Scale AI systematically used ChatGPT to improve Bard, Google's own chatbot at the time. When it launched earlier that year, Bard, which has since been renamed Gemini, was internally mocked as "rushed" and "botched." Scale AI contractors generated thousands of responses from ChatGPT and compared them to their own "rewrites" of Bard's answers. They then improved their rewrites to exceed or at least match ChatGPT, feeding all the data back to Google. Scale AI managers wrote in detail how ChatGPT's answers tended to have better formatting and more interesting facts. They ordered workers to "explain why gpt4 is better" and "make it BETTER than GPT." A single spreadsheet flagged dozens of contractors for writing responses "consistently worse than GPT4." In one instance, the document said contractors could get a 15% bonus for their responses performing better than ChatGPT. Scale AI is a San Francisco startup that does crucial AI grunt work for Big Tech. It uses an army of human contractors to do things like labeling images and, as was the case with Google, rewriting chatbot responses. Meta is reportedly investing $15 billion in Scale AI as part of a blockbuster AI deal to buy almost half the company and hire its CEO, Alexandr Wang, for an in-house "superintelligence" team. The documents obtained by BI showcase how closely Google monitored its chief rival's work. OpenAI's terms of service at the time prohibited others from using its output "to develop models that compete with OpenAI." Scale AI and Google did not respond to a question about whether they got permission from OpenAI for these detailed comparisons and rewrites. Scale AI told BI that the ChatGPT outputs weren't used to train Google's or any others' models and were part of routine "evaluations," which it said are industry standards. "Scale did not, and does not, use ChatGPT responses to train Gemini or any models," a Scale AI spokesperson said in a statement. The spokesperson said that the documents describe "standard side-by-side evaluations, not the use of ChatGPT or any third-party model outputs for training." "Doing side-by-side competitive evals is standard practice for the industry and those evaluation results are not used to train models," the spokesperson said. Similarly, Google said, "Any suggestion that we have used other companies' models to train Gemini is inaccurate." Experts told BI that this kind of comparison is indeed common at some top AI labs. Open AI, which is reportedly in partnership talks with Google Cloud, didn't respond to repeated requests for comment. Project 'Bulba' Scale AI gave Bard a catchy codename, "Bulba," after the Pokémon Bulbasaur. The mission was clear: compare Bulba's answers with ChatGPT's to make them better. Scale AI never mentioned Google by name in the documents, referring instead to its anonymous "client." It references Bard over a dozen times in a private Google sheet titled "bard rewrite comparison with gpt4," and a slide in one training document includes Google's logo. In July 2023, a manager ordered workers to study GPT-4's responses closely and figure out why they outperformed Bard's. "Try to come up with feedback that we can share so that experts can write responses better than GPT4 or at least the same," the manager wrote. Scale AI also created a spreadsheet that compared 1,729 Bard rewrites directly to ChatGPT in October 2023. Each rewrite was rated with labels like "worse than GPT4" or "Needs Some Fixes." In one example, a worker rewrote a Bard review of a nursery chair that managers stamped "worse than GPT" because it "lacks detail compared to GPT4." Another contractor's review of a Charleston history museum didn't make the cut either — a manager wrote that ChatGPT's version was "much better." Scale AI also used ChatGPT to improve Bard's responses in specific domains, like engineering or physics. In an update from August 2023, Scale AI managers wrote that they would have staff "redo" Google's AI answers for engineering-related questions "with GPT4 guidance." The documents showed that Scale AI and Google barred its contractors from copying and pasting ChatGPT responses directly into their rewrites, though, an issue many contractors were flagged for. Scale AI says comparisons weren't for training The internal documents BI reviewed described the project's goal as helping "train" Bard to give it more specific and complete answers, and refer to efforts to "improve the model." Google did not answer follow-up questions on whether those comparisons influenced training. Scale AI said that there's a clear line between evaluating a model's performance and training it — and that ChatGPT outputs were only used for the former. "There is a difference between training data and evaluation data," a spokesperson said. "Evaluation data is not ingested by a model to train it, but rather used to measure how well a model is performing." Matthew Guzdial, an assistant computer science professor at the University of Alberta, says evaluation data can still influence an AI model. "Even if all they're doing is looking at those outputs and rating that information to adjust the structure of the model, you could still make the argument that it's involved in the training process," he told BI. The documents were left public Scale AI, which has not previously made public details about its work with Google, left an over 300-page Google Doc public. It contains dozens of links to other Google Docs, many of which are also public and contain sensitive information, including contractors' compensation details, personal email addresses, and performance reviews, along with still-functioning passwords to internal training sessions. Some of the Google Docs can still be edited by anyone who has the link. Scale AI told BI that it is "actively investigating" how the document "may have been accessed" and is "taking steps to ensure any inadvertent exposure is remediated." More than two days after BI told Scale AI about the public Google Doc, it was still online and available for anyone with the link to download. Google is ahead on AI again The documents don't specify how effective the comparison efforts were. Since its Bard flub in 2023, Google has rebranded Bard to Gemini and transformed into an AI shipping machine. Last month, it launched over 100 new AI products and features at I/O, its annual developer conference. Google CEO Sundar Pichai began his speech at I/O by rattling off the industry benchmarks that Gemini is topping, touting the company's latest AI achievements. "We are shipping faster than ever," Pichai said onstage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store