North Korea says military ties with Russia to ensure ‘peace'
SEOUL: North Korea on Monday defended its military cooperation with Russia, saying ties were aimed at 'ensuring peace and stability' in Europe and Asia.
The two countries have strengthened military cooperation in recent years, with Pyongyang supplying arms and troops to support Moscow's war against Ukraine.
Around 600 North Korean soldiers have been killed and thousands more wounded fighting for Russia, according to South Korean lawmaker Lee Seong-kweun, citing the country's intelligence service.
A multilateral sanctions monitoring group including South Korea, the United States, Japan and eight other countries on Friday condemned those ties as 'unlawful'.
In response, Pyongyang said its cooperation with Moscow was 'aimed at protecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and security interests of the states' as well as 'ensuring peace and stability in the Eurasian region'.
The statement by a foreign ministry official described ties with Russia as the 'cream of inter-state relations'.
Pyongyang and Moscow, they added, could 'establish a multi-polar world order based on genuine respect for sovereignty, equality and justice'.
The Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team, launched last October, monitors and reports violations of UN Security Council sanctions on North Korea, though it operates independently of the UN.
Its creation followed Russia's veto of a Security Council resolution that effectively ended the system in place to monitor Pyongyang's compliance with UN sanctions first implemented in 2006 and subsequently strengthened several times.
According to the group, Russian-flagged cargo vessels delivered as many as 'nine million rounds of mixed artillery and multiple rocket launcher ammunition' in 2024 from North Korea to Russia.
In return, 'Russia is believed to have provided North Korea with air defence equipment and anti-aircraft missiles', it said.
North Korea in April confirmed for the first time that it had deployed troops to Russia to support Moscow's war in Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
26 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Chicago wheat turns higher
PARIS/SINGAPORE: Chicago wheat rose on Tuesday to reverse an earlier fall as news of further Ukrainian strikes against Russian targets kept attention on war escalation and offset supply pressure from better-than-expected US crop ratings. Corn and soybeans rebounded after hitting six-month and seven-week lows, respectively, that were also linked to good crop conditions. The most-active wheat contract on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) ended the overnight trading session up 0.9% at $5.43-3/4 a bushel. The contract had risen sharply during Monday's session as a Ukrainian drone attack in Russia shifted attention back on the war between the two grain exporters. Prices pared their gains by Monday's close and then fell earlier on Tuesday as immediate fears of war escalation subsided and higher than anticipated scores for wheat conditions in a weekly US Department of Agriculture crop progress report. However, news that Ukraine had hit the road and rail bridge linking Russia and the Crimean peninsula, as well as also knocking out power in parts of other Russian-held territory in southern Ukraine, later revived concerns about a hardening conflict between the two grain exporting countries. 'It looks like the Ukrainians are pursuing their attacks,' a European trader said. Favourable Northern Hemisphere supply prospects, slow international demand and a bounce in the dollar index, which makes US grain dearer overseas, nonetheless kept a lid on wheat prices, traders said. CBOT corn added 0.9% to $4.42 a bushel, after reaching its lowest since early December at $4.34-1/4 earlier in the session. Soybeans rose 0.6% to $10.39-3/4 a bushel to hold above Monday's seven-week low of $10.32-1/2. The USDA rated 67% of US soybeans in good to excellent condition in its initial ratings of the 2025 soy crop, while for corn, the agency's rating improved to 69% good-to-excellent.
Business Recorder
26 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Oil: War, wildfires and weak demand
Crude oil prices are once again caught between two conflicting narratives—tightening supply risks and weakening demand signals. As of Tuesday, Brent was hovering near $65 per barrel, having rallied nearly 3 percent since Monday. The bullish momentum is underpinned not by fundamental demand-supply imbalances, but by heightened geopolitical risk and constrained supply expectations. The sharp escalation in the Russia-Ukraine conflict is pushing markets to reassess the risk premium on crude. The possibility that hostilities may soon target energy infrastructure, including Russian oil exports, has reawakened fears that had gone dormant in recent months. With Ukraine stepping up drone strikes and Russia intensifying retaliatory measures, the spectre of energy supply disruptions is no longer remote. A direct hit to Russian oil logistics—or even the credible threat of it—could upend already delicate global supply chains. Adding fuel to the rally is Iran's likely rejection of the latest U.S. nuclear deal proposal. According to diplomatic leaks cited by Reuters, Tehran is preparing a "negative response" to Washington's terms, which would have required a halt to all uranium enrichment. The failure of negotiations all but cements Iran's pariah status in oil markets. With U.S. sanctions still in place, Iranian crude will largely remain sidelined, with China continuing to be the only major importer of its discounted barrels. Meanwhile, Canada's oil sands are feeling the heat—literally. Wildfires in Alberta have reportedly taken about 350,000 barrels per day offline, or 7 percent of the province's output. While the volume is modest in global terms, it adds to the bullish mix in a market hypersensitive to disruption headlines. Ironically, the OPEC+ meeting over the weekend was itself a bullish trigger. The cartel and its allies chose to stick with a planned 411,000 barrels-per-day increase for July—smaller than many market participants feared. With expectations of a larger hike failing to materialize, the post-meeting relief triggered a short-covering rally. As ANZ's Daniel Hynes noted, 'investors unwound their bearish positions they had built prior to the weekend's meeting.' Yet, even as supply-side anxieties dominate headlines, demand-side realities offer a sobering contrast. China's oil demand—a major pillar of global consumption—has shown unmistakable signs of cooling. According to data highlighted by Energy Tracker Asia, China's oil imports fell to a six-month low in April, reflecting sluggish industrial activity and refinery maintenance. Despite Beijing's stimulus pledges, domestic economic momentum has yet to match expectations. With petrochemical margins squeezed and exports under pressure, refiners are dialling back on crude intake. The contradiction couldn't be starker: on one hand, geopolitical risk threatens to choke supply; on the other, the world's largest importer of crude is signalling demand fatigue. Add to that a weakening U.S. dollar, which mechanically boosts commodity prices, and markets are left with a volatile, sentiment-driven setup. In the near term, the price direction of crude will be dictated more by geopolitics than by fundamentals. Any material escalation in the Russia-Ukraine war, particularly one targeting energy assets, could send prices surging above $70. Similarly, confirmation of Iran's rejection of the nuclear deal could lock out nearly 1.5 million barrels per day from re-entering the market. But lurking beneath the surface is the fragile state of global demand, especially from China. If industrial sluggishness persists and Beijing's fiscal pump-priming fails to gain traction, demand projections for H2 2025 may need to be revised downward. For now, oil sits at a precarious junction—geopolitical flames are fanning the bulls, but macroeconomic gravity may soon pull the rug from under them.
Business Recorder
33 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Bilawal urges UN to press India for comprehensive dialogue
KARACHI: PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Tuesday urged the United Nations and the international community to push India towards a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where the two countries could address their outstanding issues and achieve peace in the wake of their recent military conflict in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack. Bilawal was addressing a press conference at the UN Headquarters in New York on recent regional developments after the military conflict. The address came amid the visit of a high-level team — consisting of three former foreign ministers, two former foreign secretaries, two former ambassadors to the US, and a serving federal minister — for consultations at the United Nations. The team arrived in New York on Sunday FO condemns remarks of Indian leaders Ex-FMs Bilawal, Hina Rabbani Khar and Khurram Dastgir; Senators Sherry Rehman, Musadik Malik, Faisal Sabzwari and Bushra Anjum Butt; and Jalil Abbas Jilani and Tehmina Janjua are members of the delegation. Bilawal said Pakistan's position was to hold a 'comprehensive dialogue' with India that would include the issue of terrorism as well. Bilawal said Pakistan was the country where the 'single largest number of terrorist attacks' occurred and was also the country with the single largest number of victims of terrorism. Bilawal said the Pakistani delegation was concluding its visit to New York and the UN and had appealed to the international community to assist the country in its pursuit of peace. 'Just as the international community played its role in encouraging India to agree to a ceasefire, it should also encourage engaging in a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan so that we can address our issues and achieve peace,' he added. Bilawal said he wanted to use the opportunity to share Pakistan's perspective on the recent military conflict with India in the wake of the Pahalgam attack, as well as the way forward. Reiterating the 'illegal strikes' launched by India as part of its 'Operation Sindoor' 'in violation of the UN Charter, international law', Bilawal said the attacks had targeted civilian infrastructure, places of worship, energy infrastructure and innocent women and children. He said India had used the April 22 terrorist attack in IIOJK's Pahalgam as a premise for the strikes. 'We expressed our sympathy with the victims of terrorism and Pakistan has consistently and unequivocally condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations,' he said, adding that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had immediately expressed Pakistan's willingness to India and the global community to be part of any impartial international investigation. He said India subsequently launched missile strikes into Pakistan in the next two days and the latter 'responded in kind'. 'Due to the intervention of the international community, and I'd like here to particularly mention the role of US President Donald Trump and his team led by Secretary of State [Marco] Rubio, we did manage to achieve a ceasefire,' Bilawal added. 'The military and political leadership of Pakistan and the country are not the caricature that India would like to paint of us,' he said, adding that politicians had fought terrorists on the frontline and paid a heavy cost while the military had confronted them on the battlefield and earned their honours and promotions. He also pointed out that the Financial Action Task Force — the international watchdog against money laundering and financing of terrorism — had endorsed Pakistan's taking measures to combat terror financing. 'It's become too easy for wannabe hegemons to use the wolf whistle of terrorism to justify illegal actions and violent actions in Muslim countries and communities,' Bilawal said, adding that terrorism could not be confronted by India while using it as a political tool to demonise Muslims within, in IIOJK and Pakistan. Despite that, he said Pakistan would still like to cooperate with India in combatting terrorism and the fate of the region's people could not be left in the hands of non-state actors and terrorists for them to decide that two nuclear-armed powers go to war. In addition, he said the most recent front opened by India was the weaponisation of water, adding that the violation of the Indus Waters Treaty must be condemned across the board and the precedent must not be allowed to be set. He said the threat to cut Pakistan's water supply was a violation of the UN Charter and any action on it would be seen as an act of war by Pakistan. He said Trump had a unique opportunity to deliver on his commitment to peace, enjoying good relations with both countries. He added the delegation would be beginning its engagements in Washington DC from tomorrow and encourages US lawmakers and government officials to play their role in facilitating the peace process. The Pakistani delegation is scheduled to arrive in Washington today, where it plans to engage with Rubio, other senior officials, lawmakers, and think tanks till June 6. The team will also visit London and Brussels. The visit coincides with the arrival of an Indian delegation in Washington on June 3, led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor. Earlier, the team met officials from the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) officials to brief them on Pakistan's stance. Bilawal, while addressing the OIC Permanent Representatives, 'categorically rejected India's attempt to link Pakistan to the Pahalgam incident without any credible investigation or evidence', according to a press release by Pakistan's Mission to the UN. He highlighted that the blame was 'used as a pretext for unlawful military actions, including cross-border strikes, which targeted civilians and civilian infrastructure'. During his meeting with the OIC envoys, PPP chairman expressed concern at India's move to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty, which Pakistan considered 'a blatant act of weaponising water and a violation of international and treaty obligations'. 'He [Bilawal] made it plainly clear that we cannot allow this to become a new normal,' the statement read. It continued that the PPP chairman stressed that 'due to India's belligerent aggression, the world has become a less safe place, with real and present implications for peace and security in South Asia'. The former foreign minister went on to thank the OIC for its efforts and role aimed at mediation to de-escalate tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, highlighting that the 'only path to peace is dialogue, engagement and diplomacy'. 'He [Bilawal] reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to peace, restraint, and diplomacy, and called for the restoration of the Indus Waters Treaty, full respect for the ceasefire, and the resumption of a comprehensive dialogue with India, with the resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute at its core,' the statement read. Meanwhile, the permanent representatives of the OIC countries expressed their 'appreciation for Pakistan's transparent and timely briefing and reaffirmed their solidarity with Pakistan and the people of Jammu and Kashmir'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
