Arkansas bill tightening requirements for gas well operators passes House committee
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – A bill adding requirements for gas well operator reporting passed its first committee hearing Wednesday after extensive testimony.
House Bill 1656 requires gas well operators to provide leaseholders with an itemized accounting. If it becomes law, each deduction from the leaseholder's payment will be accounted for.
Arkansas legislature bills filed Tuesday include changes to the Arkansas Constitution, water bonds, human trafficking, more
According to the bill's language, deductions not allowed by the agreement between the operator and the leaseholder must be repaid within 30 days.
The House Agriculture, Forestry & Economic Development Committee heard testimony from well operators and leaseholders. The bill ultimately passed, with five committee members voting against it.
Typically, well operators said the additional accounting requirement would lead to wells being shut down, beginning with those that are minimally producing. Leaseholders expressed frustration about payments that deductions by the operator all but wiped out.
Back and forth among legislators about Arkansas ACCESS higher education legislation
The bill will now return to the House floor for its final vote. If it passes, it will move to the Senate.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican senators mystified by $1 billion added to their megabill
A mysterious $1 billion for a law that lets the president mobilize certain industrial sectors during an emergency is tucked into the Senate's version of President Donald Trump's megabill. And Republicans told Semafor they aren't sure what the Defense Production Act money is for. The funding has become something of a mystery among Banking Committee Republicans, who said in interviews this week that they are trying to figure out what the cash is intended to do before they vote on the bill. But as one Republican senator said about the Trump administration: 'They won't tell us.' 'It's hard to be supportive of it if we don't know what it's for,' Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said. 'It's uncomfortable, for sure. A billion dollars is a billion dollars. And it would be nice if we knew what it was specifically aiming at.' Some GOP aides suspect the money could be tied to Trump's recent use of the Defense Production Act to boost US production of critical minerals, like aluminum and coal, in order to reduce reliance on supplies from less-friendly nations like China and Russia. The president signed an executive order invoking the law in March and issued a waiver of key legal requirements — including some congressional approvals — last month. A White House official said in an interview that the administration is looking at using the funding to use subsidies, grants and loan guarantees to support 'critical energy projects that have a defense nexus.' That could include shaping the production and refinement of critical minerals, boosting the US coal industry and helping develop more domestic LNG. Promoting 'private-sector activity in order to make the nation more secure and the grid more reliable, is, I think, the name of the game here,' the official said. A spokesperson for Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott, R-S.C., pointed to a hearing the committee held on the Defense Production Act in May, where witnesses testified on China's use of critical-minerals exports as leverage and the need to revamp the law. Congress will need to reauthorize the statute later this year. 'As Chairman Scott has stated, the Defense Production Act plays an important role in strengthening supply lines critical to our national defense and emergency preparedness,' the spokesperson said in a statement.'The Banking Committee's provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill will provide important funding to bolster domestic production of key national security components.' Some Republicans didn't even know the $1 billion provision was in there. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said she 'would have had a duck fit' had she known about it earlier. 'I've asked the same question; I don't have an answer yet,' Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., told Semafor. 'If you want a billion dollars, I want to know what it's being used for.' The White House official acknowledged that there's probably 'a little bit of work to do' in educating Republican lawmakers about the request: 'We want to make sure that we're clear and transparent with our colleagues on the Hill about the priorities that we're seeking.' The Defense Production Act has been used regularly since its passage, including to boost production of goods to fight the coronavirus pandemic. The then-Democratic Congress passed a provision in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act directing $500 million to increase production of energy technologies. That was in response to a Biden administration request; indeed, a Senate Banking Committee press release on its reconciliation text describes the provision as 'a priority of President Trump.' The questions around the DPA provision are just one hangup for the Banking Committee's proposed section of the megabill. Panel Republicans leaving a Thursday briefing expressed skepticism that some of Scott's proposed changes to the House bill would survive the Senate's strict budgetary rules. 'There was some weird stuff that happened on Thursday,' Lummis said. Given the stakes of the larger bill, $1 billion won't make or break its passage, but it's unusual for senators from the president's party to not know what money in their legislation is for and say they can't get answers about it. Democratic senators are, understandably, highlighting that uncertainty as they push for a hearing on the legislation. 'I have no idea' what the money is for, said the Banking Committee's top Democrat, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. 'Have you asked them? Do any of them know?' 'There's been no hearing. No briefing. Nothing,' Warren added. The Trump administration is waiving some requirements under the Defense Production Act, Reuters reported.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State House advances bill to increase minimum wage in Pennsylvania
The exterior of the Pennsylvania state Capitol. (Photo by Amanda Mustard for the Pennsylvania Capital-Star). The state House is inching closer to passing a bill to raise the minimum wage in Pennsylvania, an outcome long sought by Democrats and opposed by Republicans. House Bill 1549 would increase it to $15 per hour for most Pennsylvanians, though in some smaller counties, it would only raise it to $12. The proposal would also raise the minimum wage for tipped workers. 'We are falling far, far, far behind,' Rep. Jason Dawkins (D-Philadelphia), the bill's sponsor said when it was debated in committee last week. 'Given our economic uncertainty, I think it's our duty as elected members to give [to] families across this commonwealth who have struggled to afford basic necessities.' The commonwealth's current minimum wage matches the federal rate at $7.25. It has not increased since 2008, and remains lower than those in surrounding states – New York, Ohio, New Jersey, West Virginia, Maryland and Delaware. The timeline laid out in the bill for the proposed minimum wage, as well as the ultimate figure, would vary county by county. For employers in Philadelphia County, the minimum wage would be $15 on January 1, 2026. Elsewhere, the minimum wage would increase gradually, reaching $15 or $12 on January 1, 2028. The difference is based on population. Counties with under 210,000 people, with the exception of Centre, Pike and Monroe Counties, will only see their minimum wage rise to $12. Beginning in 2029, the minimum wage would increase annually, based on federal cost of living statistics. On the floor Tuesday, Rep. Seth Grove (R-York), criticized the bill, calling its county-based tier system a 'dumb idea.' 'I look at York right next to Adams County. We're gonna have two different rates for those two now,' Grove said. 'How do businesses operate under such draconian policies? How is anyone supposed to figure this out?' Democrats, however, have long pushed for an increase to Pennsylvania's minimum wage, with most Republicans opposing it. Gov. Josh Shapiro, however, has long endorsed a minimum wage hike. On Monday, he posted on social media that the current minimum wage is 'too damn low.' 'It's time to put more money back in Pennsylvanian's pockets and raise the minimum wage,' he wrote. The bill would also raise the minimum wage for tipped workers from the current $2.83 per hour to 60% of the minimum wage. That would be $9 where the minimum wage is $15 and $7.20 where it's $12. House Bill 1549 must still be voted on one more time on the state House floor before it can pass. It will also have to earn support in the Republican-controlled Senate. Across the country, some Republicans are calling for a hike in minimum wage. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced a bipartisan bill in the U.S. Senate on Tuesday that would raise the minimum wage everywhere in the U.S. to $15. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 dozen House Republicans urge Senate GOP against ‘budget gimmicks,' deficit increases
More than three dozen House Republicans are warning Senate GOP leaders against approving additional deficit increases or using 'budget gimmicks' to count additional savings in the 'one big, beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities. 'As the Senate considers changes, we remain unequivocal in our position that any additional tax cuts must be matched dollar-for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions,' the 37 members, led by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), said in a Tuesday letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), adding that the principle is the 'cornerstone' of the budget resolution framework passed by the House and is the 'minimum standard for our support.' The letter further asserted that the members would consider 'genuine savings only' as established by that House resolution. 'Offsets must come from permanent reforms that make the budget more sustainable, not timing shifts or other budget gimmicks,' the letter said. Among the signatories are House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), House Republican Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore (Utah), and many members of the House Freedom Caucus, including its chair, Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.). The Senate is currently considering and expected to make changes to the House-passed megabill that includes extension of tax cuts that Trump signed into law in 2017; boosts to border, deportation, and defense funding; and new restrictions on Medicaid and food assistance programs that are projected to result in millions of individuals losing their health insurance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the proposed tax cuts in the plan would decrease revenues by more than $3.6 trillion over a decade, while measures to cut federal spending — including reforms to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — would reduce outlays by $1.2 trillion over the same period, resulting in a net deficit increase of $2.4 trillion. Several matters under consideration in the Senate would add to the deficit impact of the bill. Some GOP senators are unhappy with provisions to terminate clean energy tax breaks, while others are objecting to the around $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid through provisions like increased work requirements and $267 billion in cuts to food assistance through provisions like making states share the cost of the program for the first time. 'A reconciliation bill that relaxes fiscal discipline reflected in the House-passed bill would invite higher borrowing costs and undermine the economic growth that Americans need to maximize opportunity,' the 37 House GOP members said in the letter. 'We urge Senate leadership to keep the reconciliation measure compatible with the House framework while seizing every opportunity to deepen savings.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
