logo
Exclusive: Trump administration disbands group focused on pressuring Russia, sources say

Exclusive: Trump administration disbands group focused on pressuring Russia, sources say

Reuters5 hours ago

WASHINGTON, June 17 (Reuters) - The Trump administration shelved in recent weeks an inter-agency working group it had set up to formulate strategies for pressuring Russia into speeding up peace talks with Ukraine, according to three U.S. officials.
The effort, which was established earlier in the spring, lost steam in May as it became increasingly clear to participants that U.S. President Donald Trump was not interested in adopting a more confrontational stance toward Moscow, said the officials.
Despite pledging during his campaign to end the war in Ukraine on the first day of his presidency, Trump in recent months has grown increasingly frustrated that his push has yielded no breakthroughs. He has begun saying that the United States may abandon its efforts to broker peace altogether.
In light of that threat, the working group's task seemed increasingly irrelevant, added those officials, who requested anonymity to describe sensitive internal discussions.
"It lost steam toward the end because the president wasn't there. Instead of doing more, maybe he wanted to do less," one of the officials said.
The death of the working group, the existence of which has not been previously reported, is likely to deepen European allies' concerns over Trump's at-times conciliatory tone toward Russia and his reluctance to express full-throated support for Ukraine ahead of a pivotal summit of NATO allies later this month.
On the first day of a meeting of Group of Seven leaders in Canada on Monday, the Republican president said removing Russia from the former Group of Eight over a decade ago had been a mistake.
The final blow for the working group came roughly three weeks ago, when most members of the White House National Security Council - including the entire team dealing directly with the Ukraine war - were dismissed as part of a broad purge, according to the three officials.
The effort was set up and coordinated by high-ranking NSC staffers, the officials said, though it included participants from the State Department, Treasury Department, the Pentagon and intelligence community. Among those working on the effort was Andrew Peek, the top NSC official for Europe and Russia, who was removed in May.
It is unclear precisely who gave the order to discontinue the effort, but the officials suggested the depth of the NSC cuts made its continuation largely untenable.
Since the effort's dissolution, Trump's broader peacemaking efforts, which had been a central element of his campaign pitch, have hit a challenging stretch. Despite some successes - such as a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between India and Pakistan - Trump has made little tangible progress in achieving a ceasefire in Gaza and the risk of a full-blown regional war in the Middle East has risen rapidly with the Israel-Iran conflict.
The dissolution of the group also follows a March suspension of work by some U.S. national security agencies on a coordinated effort to counter Russian sabotage and disinformation operations, Reuters reported at the time.
Nevertheless, Trump could choose to adopt a firmer stance toward Russia regardless of the fate of the working group, which was set up to develop options for the president "if he wanted to get tougher on Russia," one of the officials said.
Some Trump allies, including Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, have publicly advocated for an expansive new round of sanctions directed at Russia, citing Moscow's effective rejection of U.S. ceasefire proposals and the Kremlin's continual attacks on civilian targets as proof of Putin's recalcitrance.
Trump has said he is considering such measures, but he has also regularly faulted both sides for the ongoing hostilities.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment, nor did the Treasury Department, the State Department or the Pentagon.
The Ukrainian and Russian embassies in Washington also did not respond to requests for comment.
The working group was formed in March or April at a time when some close Trump advisers were growing increasingly skeptical of the Kremlin's willingness to reach a deal, while Trump's rhetoric suggested he might be interested in modifying his accommodating stance toward Putin.
In an interview with NBC News in late March, he said he was "very angry" and "pissed off" at the Russian leader for raising questions about the legitimacy of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
NSC spokesman James Hewitt said in an April 1 statement to Reuters that there was a "deep frustration with the Russian government over negotiations."
Among the topics discussed within the working group was how the U.S. could incentivize or pressure former Soviet states, as well as other Eastern European and Asian nations, to limit the flow of goods and energy into and out of Russia, said the officials.
It is unclear if Trump was aware of the working group's formation or subsequent dissolution.
The NSC removals left few high-ranking people on the Russia file, complicating the prospects for any robust inter-agency debate on the topic.
While reluctant to discuss the details of the options drawn up by the group due to the sensitive nature of the work, U.S. officials said the group was still brainstorming ideas when it was dissolved. The group's work was unrelated to the Russia sanctions package in the U.S. Senate.
Ideas ranged from tailored economic deals designed to peel some countries out of Russia's geopolitical orbit to covert special operations efforts, the officials said.
One official mentioned the possibility of creating an incentive structure to push Kazakhstan to more vigorously crack down on sanctions evasion. The country, like other post-Soviet states, has been used by traders to bypass some Western-imposed import restrictions on Russia since Moscow's expanded invasion began in 2022.
The Kazakhstani embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer: US not poised to intervene in Middle East conflict
Starmer: US not poised to intervene in Middle East conflict

The Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Starmer: US not poised to intervene in Middle East conflict

Sir Keir Starmer has played down the prospect of imminent US intervention in the Middle East after Donald Trump abruptly left a major global summit amid raging conflict between Israel and Iran. The Prime Minister said 'nothing' he had heard from the US president suggested Washington was poised to get involved as western leaders continue to press for de-escalation between the two long-time foes. Mr Trump departed the G7 conference in Canada a day early for 'big stuff' and urged Iranian citizens to evacuate Tehran, which triggered speculation that American forces might join Israel. Asked whether the US could get involved as the conflict threatens to spiral into all-out war, Sir Keir told reporters with him at the conference in Kananaskis: 'There is nothing the President said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict, on the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation.' In a statement on Monday before Mr Trump's departure, leaders had reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. The Prime Minister said the wording 'faithfully reflects' the discussions of allies around the table. 'I don't think anything that the President said either here or elsewhere suggests that,' he said when pressed on the prospect of imminent US involvement. 'I think that the statement really speaks for itself in terms of the shared position of everybody who was here at the G7.' The Prime Minister was asked whether Britain would potentially support the US if it took action to limit Iran's nuclear programme, which leaders have condemned. 'On nuclear, Iran's nuclear programme, I've been very clear. We are deeply concerned about the programme. I certainly do not want Iran to have a nuclear weapon,' he said. 'But the thrust of the statement is in accordance with what I was saying on the way out here, which is to de-escalate the situation, and to de-escalate it across the region rather than to escalate it.' Hours after signing the Middle East agreement, Mr Trump has suggested that he was not interested in a truce while also attacking French President Emmanuel Macron, who had told French media that the US leader was leaving early to negotiate a ceasefire. Asked whether he was disappointed in the apparent US move to act unilaterally in relation to the conflict amid concerns the G7 could be sidelined, Sir Keir played down divisions. He told reporters: 'I think what (the president) said was he wanted to go beyond a ceasefire effectively and end the conflict. 'And I think he's right about that. I mean, a ceasefire is always a means to an end.'

Only US has weapons capable of halting Iran's nuclear program, say experts
Only US has weapons capable of halting Iran's nuclear program, say experts

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Only US has weapons capable of halting Iran's nuclear program, say experts

Experts suggest that only the US possesses the weapons capable of halting Iran 's nuclear program – particularly the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a 13.6-tonne bunker-busting bomb. Israel has launched "Operation Rising Lion," striking near Iranian nuclear facilities and assassinating military commanders, but Iran's underground facility at Fordow remains unaffected. Iran's most fortified nuclear site, Fordow is deeply embedded within a mountain, potentially beyond the reach of even the MOP, raising concerns about the effectiveness of military intervention. Analysts suggest the deployment of B-2 bomber jets to the UK-US military base in the Chagos Islands would signal US action. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi warned against military action jeopardizing nuclear facilities, citing grave consequences, while Israel claims to have contingencies to deal with Fordow, including potential commando operations.

White House 'MAHA' efforts need farm industry input, 250+ agriculture groups tell Trump administration
White House 'MAHA' efforts need farm industry input, 250+ agriculture groups tell Trump administration

Reuters

time19 minutes ago

  • Reuters

White House 'MAHA' efforts need farm industry input, 250+ agriculture groups tell Trump administration

WASHINGTON, June 17 (Reuters) - More than 250 groups representing farmers, ranchers and agrochemical companies urged the Trump administration on Tuesday to seek their input on future activities of the Make America Healthy Again commission, after the body's first report pointed to pesticides as a possible health risk. The farm sector has been pushing for more involvement in the work of the commission, established by President Donald Trump in February and named for the social movement aligned with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The commission is tasked with identifying the root causes of chronic disease, and Kennedy has pointed to highly processed food and chemicals like food dyes as contributing to poor health outcomes. The MAHA report released in May was produced without adequate input from the farm sector and as a result, "contained numerous errors and distortions that have created unfounded fears about the safety of our food supply," said the letter sent Tuesday morning to Kennedy, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin. "The MAHA Commission would benefit from inviting public comment and formally including representatives from food and agriculture in any future reports," said the letter. Its signatories included the American Farm Bureau Federation and trade groups for corn, soy, livestock and other farm products. The USDA, HHS and EPA did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Before the release of the MAHA report, the farm industry had pressed the administration not to mention pesticides, which industry groups say are critical tools for maintaining a competitive American farm sector. The report, whose errors included the citation of nonexistent studies, pointed to crop protection tools like pesticides and insecticides as possible contributors to negative health outcomes, but noted that agrochemicals are subject to robust EPA review. Trump directed the MAHA commission to produce a second report in August that contains a strategy for tackling childhood chronic disease. Rollins and Kennedy have been working together to advance other MAHA priorities, including urging states to bar junk food and sodas from the nation's largest food aid program and revising the dietary guidelines that make recommendations on what Americans should eat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store