
Former USDA worker says layoffs hurt Wyoming agriculture
CHEYENNE – As cuts are made across the federal government, farmers in Wyoming have been left with some uncertainties related to the work of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
On Feb. 12, Hannah (who asked that we not disclose her last name out of fear of retribution), a former USDA employee living in Wyoming, was assured by her colleagues that the agency would be safe from massive cuts being made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
On the evening of Feb. 14, Hannah joined the thousands of workers across the country to be laid off in a 'Valentine's Day massacre.'
'People are really struggling,' Hannah told the Wyoming Tribune Eagle. 'It's been a shock. I don't know what my next steps are.'
Hannah was lucky to have some savings to lean on. Some of her peers who were fired have had to re-evaluate offers made on homes or how they will take care of newborn children.
While she isn't trying to back out of a down payment on a house, Hannah will likely have to leave the state to find work.
'We've loved living in Wyoming,' Hannah said. 'I thought this job would mean that I could stay in Wyoming and continue working with Wyoming farmers, which I'm really passionate about. And with these firings, I just don't see us being able to stay in Wyoming.'
She and her peers were let go for 'poor performance,' even though Hannah had not even had a formal performance review yet and received a letter on Feb. 17 praising her high performance.
Leaving farmers vulnerable
Like many federal workers, Hannah chose to pursue a career with the USDA because of her passion for supporting local farmers. With her doctorate in soil sciences, she easily could have gotten a job in the private sector; instead, she chose to work with local farmers.
Though she is currently dealing with the shock of being fired, Hannah's concerns extend beyond herself and to the farmers with whom she previously served.
'These farmers are extremely vulnerable to things like drought, hail, high winds,' she told the WTE. 'And they really rely on government programs to stay afloat.'
The USDA uniquely offers research and support programs for Western farmers that private companies, like Monsanto and Bayer, won't, simply because of location, according to Hannah. Instead, private companies focus on large corporate farms in less drought-prone areas, like the Midwest.
'There's really nobody else giving this sort of support to small farmers,' Hannah said. 'Almost all of the farmers I work with, which are pretty much all smaller family farms, rely on some form of government assistance.'
Should the new administration follow Project 2025 promises to reduce subsidy and insurance programs, local agriculture could be hit hard, according to Hannah.
'Some of (the administration's) stated goals are to cancel the Conservation Reserve Program and greatly reduce subsidized crop insurance,' Hannah said. 'Without those programs, I see a lot of small farmers going out of business.'
Released funds
When Hannah was fired, federal funds for these programs were frozen. However, newly appointed U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins has recently begun to release some of the funds following a review.
In a statement released on Feb. 20, Rollins stated that USDA will be 'releasing approximately $20 million in contracts for the Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQUIP), the Conservation Stewardship Program, and the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program.'
'American farmers and ranchers are the backbone of our nation,' Rollins said. 'They feed, fuel and clothe our nation — and millions of people around the world. The past four years have been among the most difficult for American agriculture, due in no small measure to (former President Joe) Biden's disastrous policies of overregulation, extreme environmental programs and crippling inflation.'
Rollins said the Biden administration had rushed out hundreds of millions of dollars in IRA funds, which were supposed to be distributed over eight years.
'After careful review, it is clear that some of this funding went to programs that had nothing to do with agriculture — that is why we are still reviewing — whereas other funding was directed to farmers and ranchers who have since made investments in these programs,' Rollins said. 'We will honor our commitments to American farmers and ranchers, and we will ensure they have the support they need to be the most competitive in the world.'
Rollins was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on Feb. 13 by a vote of 72-28. She was a senior aide for President Donald Trump during his first administration, and was most recently president and CEO of the conservative think tank America First Policy Institute.
To soon to panic, local farmer says
Rollins' message has resonated with some local producers, including the owner and operator of Rabou Farms, Ron Rabou. Rabou lives and works in southeast Wyoming, one of the key areas for Hannah's previous work.
While Rabou empathized with those who had lost their jobs and acknowledged that virtually all farmers would be impacted by a reduction in subsidized crop insurance, he also stated that it's too soon to panic.
'I think that we have to let this process unfold," Rabou said. "And if there are programs that producers are noticing that have gone away, that are essential to their existence and their operation? They need to let their delegation know so that they can address that with the USDA.'
Rabou was part of a group of producers from across the nation who were recently able to speak with Rollins during a private conference.
'My personal conversations with the (congressional) delegation, and with Secretary Rollins herself, all indicate that farmers and ranchers are a major priority,' Rabou said. 'The Department of Agriculture, and certainly our delegation, wants to make sure that that remains a priority.'
For Rabou, a major overhaul for an organization can't happen overnight, and the only way to navigate it is to pay attention and speak with representatives about farmers' needs as programs are evaluated.
'I think that American farmers and ranchers can be confident in the fact that we have such a strong advocate that is leading the USDA,' Rabou said.
Support for Trump
Wyoming's representatives in Washington, D.C., echoed support for Trump's massive cuts.
'President Trump is right to rein in wasteful Washington spending and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the federal government,' U.S. Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., wrote in an email statement to the WTE. 'We need to cut wasteful and duplicative spending to protect American taxpayers.
'At the same time, we are working with the administration to make sure key personnel and programs, basic government functions, and public safety and health are not compromised. I am committed to ensuring any communities in Wyoming impacted by the proposed cuts have a seat at the table.
"I have made it my priority to make sure the administration knows how important it is to keep our national parks, forests and federal lands adequately staffed. I will continue to work with the Trump administration to make sure the right personnel and public safety officials, like our wildland firefighters, are protected and have a voice during this process.'
U.S. Sen. Cynthia Lummis and Rep. Harriet Hageman, both R-Wyo., echoed support for the president's cuts made through DOGE, saying the efforts will save Wyoming taxpayer dollars.
Hard to rehire
Though Hannah said she would likely take her job back if offered it, the process is complex.
'It takes a lot of resources to hire these positions, and it often takes over a year to find a qualified candidate,' Hannah said. 'These positions often pay less than the private sector and require pretty specialized experience.'
Even if hiring freezes are lifted and funds are released, some damage has already been done, she said.
The USDA works on addressing drought, pests and herbicide-resistant weeds. This research into major issues in this region will likely not be taken over by the private sector, according to Hannah.
From Hannah's perspective, the loss of researchers and staff will cause a lot of good research in Wyoming to go to waste.
'Now that travel is restricted because we've lost resources and support staff, a lot of our research around Wyoming is going to suffer," Hannah said.
In spite of these concerns, Rollins and the USDA have reiterated that in order to support Trump's efforts to "optimize government," the termination of probationary employees was necessary.
"We have a solemn responsibility to be good stewards of Americans' hard-earned taxpayer dollars and to ensure that every dollar is being spent as effectively as possible to serve the people, not the bureaucracy," a statement from the USDA to the WTE read. "As part of this effort, USDA has released individuals in their probationary period of employment.
"Secretary Rollins understands the array of mission critical positions and programs at the Department, and she will ensure that those areas have the resources and personnel they need to continue serving the American people.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is a $5,000 DOGE stimulus check a real thing? What we know
In February, President Donald Trump said he was considering a plan to pay out $5,000 stimulus checks to American taxpayers from the savings identified by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Are they happening? No official plan or schedule for such a payout has been released, and a decision on the checks would have to come from Congress, which has so far been cool to the idea. And there have been questions as to how much DOGE has actually saved. The idea was floated by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, who suggested on Musk's social media platform X that Trump and Musk should "should announce a 'DOGE Dividend'" from the money saved from reductions in government waste and workforce since it was American taxpayer money in the first place. He even submitted a proposal for how it would work, with a timeline for after the expiration of DOGE in July 2026. "At $2 trillion in DOGE savings and 78 million tax-paying households, this is a $5,000 refund per household, with the remaining used to pay down the national debt," he said in a separate post. Musk replied, "Will check with the President." "We're considering giving 20% of the DOGE savings to American citizens and 20% to paying down the debt," Trump said in a during the Saudi-sponsored FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach the same month. DOGE has dismantled entire federal agencies, wiped out government contracts and led the firings of tens of thousands of federal workers, leaving many agencies struggling to continue operations. DOGE checks? Elon Musk dodges DOGE stimulus check question during Wisconsin rally: Here's what he said. Fishbeck suggested that the potential refund go only to households that are net-income taxpayers, or households that pay more in taxes than they get back. The Pew Research Center said that most Americans with an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 effectively pay no federal income tax. They would not be eligible. If DOGE achieves Musk's initial goal of stripping $2 trillion from U.S. government spending by 2026, Fishback's plan was for $5,000 per household, or 20% of the savings divided by the number of eligible households. If DOGE doesn't hit the goal, Fishback said the amount should be adjusted accordingly. 'So again, if the savings are only $1 trillion, which I think is awfully low, the check goes from $5,000 to $2,500,' Fishback said during a podcast appearance. 'If the savings are only $500 billion, which, again, is really, really low, then the [checks] are only $1,250.' However, while Musk talked about saving $2 trillion in federal spending during Trump's campaign, he lowered the goal to $1 trillion after Trump assumed office and said in March he was on pace to hit that goal by the end of May. At a Cabinet meeting in April, Musk lowered the projected savings further to $150 billion in fiscal year 2026. Musk left the White House at the end of May when his designation as a "special government employee" ended. DOGE, the advisory group he created, is expected to continue without him. That depends on who you ask. On its website, DOGE claims to have saved an estimated $175 billion as of May 30, "a combination of asset sales, contract and lease cancellations and renegotiations, fraud and improper payment deletions, grant cancellations, interest savings, programmatic changes, regulatory savings, and workforce reductions." The site says that works out to $1,086.96 saved per taxpayer. However, many of DOGE's claims have been exaggerated and several of the initiatives to slash agency workforces have been challenged in court. DOGE has been accused of taking credit for contracts that were canceled before DOGE was created, failing to factor in funds the government is required to pay even if a contract is canceled, and tallying every contract by the most that could possibly be spent on it even when nothing near that amount had been obligated. The website list has been changed as the media pointed out errors, such as a claim that an $8 million savings was actually $8 billion. On May 30, CNN reported that one of its reporters found that less than half the $175 billion figure was backed up with even basic documentation, making verification difficult if not impossible. Some of the changes may also end up costing taxpayers more, such as proposed slashes to the Internal Revenue Service that experts say would mean less tax revenue generated, resulting in a net cost of about $6.8 billion. Over the next 10 years, if IRS staffing stays low, the cumulative cost in uncollected taxes would hit $159 billion, according to the nonpartisan Budget Lab at Yale University. The per-taxpayer claim on the website is also inflated, CNN said, as it's based on '161 million individual federal taxpayers' and doesn't seem to include married people filing jointly. This article originally appeared on Florida Times-Union: DOGE dividends: Will American taxpayers get a $5,000 check?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Musk and the Millers Got Cozy Outside the White House
During happier times at the White House, Elon Musk was known to spend large amounts of time with Stephen Miller and his wife, Katie, even outside of work. Katie Miller, an aide in the Department of Government Efficiency, was with Musk 'almost all the time' while he was at the White House, before opting to follow him out the door last month, The Wall Street Journal reports. Her departure is thought to have caused friction among White House officials. Miller was reportedly on Musk's payroll the entire time, even when her official role was as a special government employee, according to Politico's Playbook. 'And, like … who was she looking out for?' one unnamed administration official said. The idea that Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, was a close companion of Musk now seems far-fetched. The two have since had a public falling-out after Musk condemned President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a 'pork-filled' spending bill and a 'disgusting abomination.' Miller, one of Trump's most loyal allies, fired back with a thinly veiled attack on Musk on X on Thursday, writing: 'The only 'new' spending in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport the illegals—paid for by raising visa fees. All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises.' Musk unfollowed Stephen Miller on social media around the same time his attacked him online. The Journal highlighted the fallout between Musk and Miller as yet another example of Musk burning bridges and irritating allies during his stint in the White House. Of course, there was an even more explosive falling-out between Musk and another former close ally on Thursday. The simmering tensions between Musk and President Donald Trump reached boiling point with an extraordinary back-and-forth playing out on social media. Trump lashed out at Musk for opposing his One Big Beautiful Bill Act and accused him of going 'crazy' over his plans to eliminate the electric vehicle (EV) mandate implemented under the Biden administration. Trump also suggested that the quickest way to save billions in federal spending would be to terminate the government subsidies and contracts awarded to Musk's tech companies. Earlier in the day, Trump told reporters during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that he believes Musk has 'TDS [Trump Derangement Syndrome].' Responding with a furious post, Musk claimed on X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' and reposted in agreement a call for the president to be impeached and replaced with JD Vance. He also warned that Trump's import tariffs would trigger a recession later this year. Musk then dropped a 'really big bomb' in the spiralling feud. 'Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. It is well known that Trump and billionaire child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019, were at least acquaintances. Epstein partied with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort in the 1990s, and Trump flew on Epstein's private jet multiple times during that period. The two reportedly fell out around 2004 over a property dispute in Palm Beach, Florida. There is no evidence Trump was connected to or aware of Epstein's crimes. In a statement regarding the public falling-out, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' 'The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Top White House Aide Rails Against the Man Who Took His Wife
A livid Stephen Miller fired back against Elon Musk's criticisms of Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' without mentioning the billionaire by name. The top White House aide's voice gradually rose as he touted the sprawling piece of legislation, which Musk has repudiated, in a Fox Business interview Friday. The interview comes as rumors of a personal spat between Miller and Musk continue to swirl. On his way out the door of the White House, Musk took Miller's wife with him. Katie Miller, who had been a top aide at Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, left her post—and her husband's side—to continue working for the tech billionaire. 'Tax cuts and reforms. American energy independence. Full, complete, permanent border security and the largest welfare reform in American history,' Miller wailed. 'That's not pork. That's not waste. That's not new spending. That is the most conservative piece of legislation in my lifetime.' Miller's comments were a direct rebuke of Musk—who has described the bill as 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' The SpaceX founder's criticisms have erupted into a messy break-up with Trump, with the two heavyweights exchanging a series of blows on social media. 'There's this myth out there that we could do the DOGE cuts in this bill,' Miller said, addressing a criticism posed by supporters of the formerly Musk-led group where his wife worked. 'But that's a separate process.' Miller never mentioned Musk by name, but host Larry Kudlow—a Trump ally—made the connection for him. 'I don't think Elon understood that,' Kudlow said, referring to the nuances of legislation. 'I don't want to get into all that stuff... He's got $180 billion up on his website, okay. And God bless him for that. He's been helpful on that, that's terrific thing.' Miller smirked but said nothing. Musk became close with the Millers during his stint in government. The Wall Street Journal reported that Katie Miller was with Musk 'all the time' before following him out the door. Musk reportedly spent time with the couple even outside of work. The relationship between Musk and his underling's husband has deteriorated. 'The only 'new' spending in the bill is to defend the homeland and deport the illegals—paid for by raising visa fees,' Miller wrote on X this week in another dig at Musk. 'All the other provisions? Massive spending cuts. There is no 'pork' in the bill. Just campaign promises.' Musk unfollowed Miller on X shortly after.