Seventeen years later, Brood XIV cicadas emerge in US
The last time these thrumming, red-eyed bugs burrowed out of the ground across America's suburbs and woodlands was the early summer of 2008.
Global financial jitters were mounting, iPhones were a luxury item, and George W. Bush was still president.
Now, reports from the citizen-science app Cicada Safari show the first insects of Brood XIV -- which emerges every 17 years -- surfacing in the US South. As ground temperatures warm across the North, millions more are expected to follow.
Cicadas belong to the insect order Hemiptera, which includes stink bugs, bed bugs, and aphids.
But they are often mistaken for locusts, a confusion that dates back to early English settlers who likened the mass emergences to Biblical plagues. Brood XIV itself was first documented in 1634.
There are roughly 3,500 species of cicadas globally, many still unnamed.
But periodical cicadas -- which emerge en masse after 13 or 17 years -- are unique to the eastern United States, with two additional unrelated species found in northeastern India and Fiji, says Chris Simon, a leading cicada expert at the University of Connecticut.
"Everybody's fascinated by them, because you see nothing for 13 or 17 years, and then all of a sudden, your house and car are covered in these insects," Simon told AFP.
"This is a marvelous phenomenon that you can take your kids to see and marvel at, watch them come out of their shells and wonder about how they evolved," she added, urging the public to appreciate, not fear them.
"The world wouldn't survive without insects."
Because their emergence years are staggered, different periodical cicada broods appear in different years. In 2024, a rare "double whammy" occurred when the 13-year Brood XIX overlapped with the 17-year Brood XIII.
That's not the case in 2025, but excitement remains high around these mysterious critters, which continue to intrigue scientists -- especially given that the evolutionary logic behind their prime-numbered life cycles remains unresolved.
Cicadas are often thought of as "creatures of history," conjuring memories of past life chapters -- what you were doing when this brood last emerged.
They spend nearly their entire lives underground, passing through life stages called instars, before tunneling to the surface for a brief few weeks to molt, mate, and die -- while their newly hatched offspring drop from trees and burrow into the soil, beginning the cycle anew.
Males produce their deafening mating calls using tymbals, sound-producing membranes on either side of their abdomens, creating a chorus that's been likened to sirens or power tools.
They don't bite or sting, and they don't eat solid food in their adult form, though they drink water.
Instead, their defense is overwhelming abundance -— swarming in such numbers that they satiate predators like birds, raccoons, foxes, and turtles, playing a crucial role in the ecosystem.
But their survival strategy is increasingly challenged by human-caused changes.
Widespread deforestation and urbanization have destroyed habitat. And now, climate change is triggering more frequent occurrences of "stragglers" -- cicadas that emerge four years too early or too late, often in numbers too small to survive, which could threaten long term population numbers.
Simon added that in areas like the capital Washington, these asynchronous emergences are forming "a patchy mosaic" of overlapping broods.
Then there's the political climate. Under President Donald Trump, the federal government has fired scientists en masse and frozen funding for new research.
Simon submitted a grant proposal last August to the National Science Foundation for a major genetic study into cicadas' internal clocks -- biological mechanisms that somehow track the passage of years, unlike humans' 24-hour circadian cycles.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
25-05-2025
- The Age
What we can learn from Lily Allen's apology to Katy Perry
After journeying to space for 11 minutes on the all-female Blue Origin flight in April, Katy Perry was quickly brought back down to earth. Olivia Munn called the flight 'gluttonous', Emily Ratajkowski said it was 'beyond parody', and Olivia Wilde jeered at its 'meme-ability'. Several stars were quick to judge the singer and her Blue Origin crew, but only one was willing to apologise for the pain their words may have caused. Singer-songwriter Lily Allen described the space flight as 'so out of touch' in an episode of her podcast, Miss Me. However, she later softened her stance. 'There was actually no need for me to bring her name into it, and it was my own internalised misogyny,' said Allen on the April 28 episode of the podcast. 'It was just completely unnecessary to pile on with [the others]. I disagree with what it was that they did, but she wasn't the only person that did it. I'm just sorry. I would have been hurt if it had been me and someone in my industry used me and my name, and I saw that, and I'm sorry.' Many other celebrities have made public apologies before Allen – Justin Timberlake, Tiger Woods, Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis just to name a few. But not every apology is created equal. This is because there's an art to saying sorry. Here's how to master it. What's the point in apologising? 'I'm sorry' are two of the most healing words in the English language, says clinical psychologist and author of Why Won't You Apologize?, Dr Harriet Lerner.

Sydney Morning Herald
25-05-2025
- Sydney Morning Herald
What we can learn from Lily Allen's apology to Katy Perry
After journeying to space for 11 minutes on the all-female Blue Origin flight in April, Katy Perry was quickly brought back down to earth. Olivia Munn called the flight 'gluttonous', Emily Ratajkowski said it was 'beyond parody', and Olivia Wilde jeered at its 'meme-ability'. Several stars were quick to judge the singer and her Blue Origin crew, but only one was willing to apologise for the pain their words may have caused. Singer-songwriter Lily Allen described the space flight as 'so out of touch' in an episode of her podcast, Miss Me. However, she later softened her stance. 'There was actually no need for me to bring her name into it, and it was my own internalised misogyny,' said Allen on the April 28 episode of the podcast. 'It was just completely unnecessary to pile on with [the others]. I disagree with what it was that they did, but she wasn't the only person that did it. I'm just sorry. I would have been hurt if it had been me and someone in my industry used me and my name, and I saw that, and I'm sorry.' Many other celebrities have made public apologies before Allen – Justin Timberlake, Tiger Woods, Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis just to name a few. But not every apology is created equal. This is because there's an art to saying sorry. Here's how to master it. What's the point in apologising? 'I'm sorry' are two of the most healing words in the English language, says clinical psychologist and author of Why Won't You Apologize?, Dr Harriet Lerner.


The Advertiser
22-05-2025
- The Advertiser
Surprise as Australians found swearing less than others
Australians are surprisingly swearing less online than other countries but researchers suspect the nation is saving it for face-to-face interactions. The University of Queensland study examined more than 1.7 billion words of online content across 20 English-speaking countries, specifically looking for 597 vulgar words. Using computational methods with linguistics, researchers narrowed down which country was swearing the most online. Even though Australia holds a reputation for swearing regularly, the US came out on top followed by the UK. "Some may find it disappointing," said Martin Schweinberger, lead researcher from the university's School of Languages and Cultures. "Australians really see vulgarity, swearing and slang as part of our culture - we're very invested in it." Swear words are normalised in Australia's everyday language with even tourism campaigns featuring them, including the famed slogan "so where the bloody hell are you" asked by model Lara Bingle. The ad was banned in Canada, from TV and billboards in the UK and censored in Singapore. Australia also used a road safety campaign with the phrase, "If you drink, then drive, you're a bloody idiot", that has been running since the 1980s. Australia may have failed to win the top gong for online profanities due to being more conservative when writing online and instead preferring to swear face-to-face, Dr Schweinberger suggested. "Our study suggests Australians might still live up to our popular image of having unusually rich and inventive 'bad' language," he said. "Especially thanks to our very public and colourful airing of swear words - this is something that's often remarked upon by overseas visitors to the country." Dr Schweinberger said this is the first large-scale analysis of its kind to determine how offensive language was used in English-speaking countries. The research was published in science journal Lingua. Australians are surprisingly swearing less online than other countries but researchers suspect the nation is saving it for face-to-face interactions. The University of Queensland study examined more than 1.7 billion words of online content across 20 English-speaking countries, specifically looking for 597 vulgar words. Using computational methods with linguistics, researchers narrowed down which country was swearing the most online. Even though Australia holds a reputation for swearing regularly, the US came out on top followed by the UK. "Some may find it disappointing," said Martin Schweinberger, lead researcher from the university's School of Languages and Cultures. "Australians really see vulgarity, swearing and slang as part of our culture - we're very invested in it." Swear words are normalised in Australia's everyday language with even tourism campaigns featuring them, including the famed slogan "so where the bloody hell are you" asked by model Lara Bingle. The ad was banned in Canada, from TV and billboards in the UK and censored in Singapore. Australia also used a road safety campaign with the phrase, "If you drink, then drive, you're a bloody idiot", that has been running since the 1980s. Australia may have failed to win the top gong for online profanities due to being more conservative when writing online and instead preferring to swear face-to-face, Dr Schweinberger suggested. "Our study suggests Australians might still live up to our popular image of having unusually rich and inventive 'bad' language," he said. "Especially thanks to our very public and colourful airing of swear words - this is something that's often remarked upon by overseas visitors to the country." Dr Schweinberger said this is the first large-scale analysis of its kind to determine how offensive language was used in English-speaking countries. The research was published in science journal Lingua. Australians are surprisingly swearing less online than other countries but researchers suspect the nation is saving it for face-to-face interactions. The University of Queensland study examined more than 1.7 billion words of online content across 20 English-speaking countries, specifically looking for 597 vulgar words. Using computational methods with linguistics, researchers narrowed down which country was swearing the most online. Even though Australia holds a reputation for swearing regularly, the US came out on top followed by the UK. "Some may find it disappointing," said Martin Schweinberger, lead researcher from the university's School of Languages and Cultures. "Australians really see vulgarity, swearing and slang as part of our culture - we're very invested in it." Swear words are normalised in Australia's everyday language with even tourism campaigns featuring them, including the famed slogan "so where the bloody hell are you" asked by model Lara Bingle. The ad was banned in Canada, from TV and billboards in the UK and censored in Singapore. Australia also used a road safety campaign with the phrase, "If you drink, then drive, you're a bloody idiot", that has been running since the 1980s. Australia may have failed to win the top gong for online profanities due to being more conservative when writing online and instead preferring to swear face-to-face, Dr Schweinberger suggested. "Our study suggests Australians might still live up to our popular image of having unusually rich and inventive 'bad' language," he said. "Especially thanks to our very public and colourful airing of swear words - this is something that's often remarked upon by overseas visitors to the country." Dr Schweinberger said this is the first large-scale analysis of its kind to determine how offensive language was used in English-speaking countries. The research was published in science journal Lingua. Australians are surprisingly swearing less online than other countries but researchers suspect the nation is saving it for face-to-face interactions. The University of Queensland study examined more than 1.7 billion words of online content across 20 English-speaking countries, specifically looking for 597 vulgar words. Using computational methods with linguistics, researchers narrowed down which country was swearing the most online. Even though Australia holds a reputation for swearing regularly, the US came out on top followed by the UK. "Some may find it disappointing," said Martin Schweinberger, lead researcher from the university's School of Languages and Cultures. "Australians really see vulgarity, swearing and slang as part of our culture - we're very invested in it." Swear words are normalised in Australia's everyday language with even tourism campaigns featuring them, including the famed slogan "so where the bloody hell are you" asked by model Lara Bingle. The ad was banned in Canada, from TV and billboards in the UK and censored in Singapore. Australia also used a road safety campaign with the phrase, "If you drink, then drive, you're a bloody idiot", that has been running since the 1980s. Australia may have failed to win the top gong for online profanities due to being more conservative when writing online and instead preferring to swear face-to-face, Dr Schweinberger suggested. "Our study suggests Australians might still live up to our popular image of having unusually rich and inventive 'bad' language," he said. "Especially thanks to our very public and colourful airing of swear words - this is something that's often remarked upon by overseas visitors to the country." Dr Schweinberger said this is the first large-scale analysis of its kind to determine how offensive language was used in English-speaking countries. The research was published in science journal Lingua.