logo
Fortuna Reports Voting Results of its 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

Fortuna Reports Voting Results of its 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

Yahoo6 hours ago

VANCOUVER, June 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fortuna Mining Corp. (NYSE: FSM | TSX: FVI) announces the voting results from its 2025 annual general meeting of shareholders held earlier today.
A total of 188,888,907 common shares were represented at the meeting, accounting for 61.54% of Fortuna's issued and outstanding shares as of the record date. Shareholders voted in favor of all matters of business, including the appointment of auditors and the election of all director nominees listed in the Company's Management Information Circular dated May 1, 2025.
Detailed results of the vote for the election of directors are as follows:
Nominee
Votes For
% For
Votes Withheld
% Withheld
Jorge A. Ganoza
159,475,985
99.48
%
831,198
0.52
%
David Laing
154,870,542
96.61
%
5,436,641
3.39
%
Mario Szotlender
154,344,778
96.28
%
5,962,405
3.72
%
David Farrell
148,807,290
92.83
%
11,499,893
7.17
%
Alfredo Sillau
158,876,299
99.11
%
1,430,884
0.89
%
Kylie Dickson
159,252,340
99.34
%
1,054,844
0.66
%
Kate Harcourt
159,513,569
99.50
%
793,615
0.50
%
Salma Seetaroo
159,228,957
99.33
%
1,078,227
0.67
%
The Company's Voting Results Report has been filed under Fortuna's profile on SEDAR+ and will be filed immediately after under Fortuna's profile on EDGAR.
About Fortuna Mining Corp.
Fortuna Mining Corp. is a Canadian precious metals mining company with three operating mines and exploration activities in Argentina, Côte d'Ivoire, Mexico, and Peru, as well as the Diamba Sud Gold Project located in Senegal. Sustainability is integral to all our operations and relationships. We produce gold and silver and generate shared value over the long-term for our stakeholders through efficient production, environmental protection, and social responsibility. For more information, please visit www.fortunamining.com.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
Jorge A. Ganoza President, CEO, and DirectorFortuna Mining Corp.
Investor Relations: Carlos Baca | info@fmcmail.com | fortunamining.com | X | LinkedIn | YouTube
PDF available: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/93f795cf-33a5-4d4f-b13f-974253259afe

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jefferies Maintains a Buy on Avantor (AVTR) With a $20 PT
Jefferies Maintains a Buy on Avantor (AVTR) With a $20 PT

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jefferies Maintains a Buy on Avantor (AVTR) With a $20 PT

Avantor, Inc. (NYSE:AVTR) is one of the . In a report released on June 9, Tycho Peterson from Jefferies maintained a Buy rating on Avantor, Inc. (NYSE:AVTR) with a price target of $20.00. The company's fiscal Q1 2025 results reflected a continued focus on cost management amid concerns about the dynamic macroenvironment, along with disciplined execution. A team of scientists working together to develop a new lab product or process. Net income for the quarter reached $64.5 million, while adjusted EBITDA was $269.5 million. Avantor, Inc. (NYSE:AVTR) also reported an expansion in its cost transformation initiative and anticipates $400 million in gross run-rate savings by the end of 2027. Avantor, Inc. (NYSE:AVTR) is a life sciences tools company that provides mission-critical services and products to the advanced technology and life sciences industries. The company's portfolio includes education and government, biopharma, healthcare, and applied materials and advanced technologies industries. While we acknowledge the potential of AVTR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

RBC Capital Reaffirms Their Hold Rating on Nike (NKE)
RBC Capital Reaffirms Their Hold Rating on Nike (NKE)

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

RBC Capital Reaffirms Their Hold Rating on Nike (NKE)

RBC Capital analyst Piral Dadhania maintained a Hold rating on Nike (NKE – Research Report) today and set a price target of $65.00. The company's shares closed today at $62.54. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter According to TipRanks, Dadhania is an analyst with an average return of -5.7% and a 36.07% success rate. Dadhania covers the Consumer Cyclical sector, focusing on stocks such as Kering SA, adidas AG, and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton. In addition to RBC Capital, Nike also received a Hold from TD Cowen's John Kernan in a report issued yesterday. However, on June 24, Evercore ISI maintained a Buy rating on Nike (NYSE: NKE). Based on Nike's latest earnings release for the quarter ending February 28, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $11.27 billion and a net profit of $794 million. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $12.43 billion and had a net profit of $1.17 billion

Global Aerospace's SM4 Aviation Safety Program on Leadership Traits that Foster Safety, Trust and Compliance in Aviation
Global Aerospace's SM4 Aviation Safety Program on Leadership Traits that Foster Safety, Trust and Compliance in Aviation

Business Upturn

time3 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Global Aerospace's SM4 Aviation Safety Program on Leadership Traits that Foster Safety, Trust and Compliance in Aviation

Morris Plains, NJ, June 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Aviation operations, and by default, safety, are based on the idea that regulatory requirements are fundamental to establishing a framework to achieve safe operations. Advertisement However, regulations do not guarantee safety! That is why voluntary standards and best practices continue to emerge as aviation operations become more complex and intertwined with other operators and environments. The fundamental reason we investigate accidents, incidents, quality escapes and near-misses is to determine the root cause so that corrective action and mitigations can be developed, implemented and validated to ensure the 'event' or 'quality escape' does not occur again. There is a symbiotic relationship between events and best practices, as history has proven the former begets the latter. Recent Failures and the Focus on Leadership Within aviation, there have been numerous recent events where quality, quality assurance and safety have been tested and, in many cases, failed. Like other industries where failure is not an option, the words oversight, quality system oversight (formal auditing enhanced by ongoing surveillance) and internal audit (internal evaluation program or IEP) have taken on an entirely new meaning among enlightened managers, forward-thinking operational professionals and the public at large. When the people begin questioning our ability to self-regulate quality and ensure safety, faith in our systems and, dare I say it, leadership comes to the forefront. We look to leadership to lead and management to manage, which, as active verbs, should inspire action. Regrettably, leadership can be shortsighted and unaware of the formidable tools available to identify hazards, resultant risks and compliance or conformance issues that may impact performance and quality assurance. Additionally, leadership may not have the training, proper experience or awareness to lead and manage effectively. Often, they are entirely unaware of the tools at their fingertips and their full value if used effectively. QM and SM: Delivering Critical Benefits Organizations that have embraced quality management (QM) and safety management (SM) systems benefit from these most effective diagnostic tools applicable to all of aviation, from air carriers to airports, ground handlers/FBOs to airframe (OEM) and component manufacturers and repair facilities (MROs). If your company is ISO-accredited, an IS-BAO/BAH-registered operator or IOSA-registered, the terms quality management and safety management are well known. For this article, we are focusing on leadership and its ability to manage as a means to evaluate compliance and conformance to its stated regulatory and company operational goals, objectives and standards, respectively. The word 'standards' will encompass company policy and procedures as well as regulatory standards you are required to comply with. Quality Systems and Oversight Defined So, what are quality systems and quality system oversight? For the best description, we turn to the European Commission's civil aviation regulations, commonly known as EU-OPS 1 (formally JAR–OPS). EU-OPS 1.035 states that a quality system shall be established by an operator 'to monitor compliance with, and adequacy of, procedures required to ensure safe operational practices and airworthy aeroplanes. Compliance monitoring must include a feed-back system to the accountable manager (see also OPS 1.175 (h)) to ensure corrective action as necessary.' 'The quality system must include a quality assurance programme that contains procedures designed to verify that all operations are being conducted in accordance with all applicable requirements, standards, and procedures.' For those operators with a quality system in place, such as the one outlined in EU OPS 1.035, you could assume that the operator oversees the technical functions that support flight or maintenance operations. Going one step further, OPS 1.175(h) states, 'The operator must have nominated an accountable manager acceptable to the Authority who has corporate authority for ensuring that all operations and maintenance activities can be financed and carried out to the standard required by the Authority.' This statement predicates that the accountable manager has the responsibility and accountability to ensure that everything can be financed and carried out to the standard required by the authority. These tools become the most effective means to determine an operator's level of compliance when applied to the regulations it operates to and conformance to company-mandated policies, procedures or processes it has developed. But leaders and managers must understand, embrace, finance and mandate by policy that these tools are to be fully implemented. Then and only then do they become a leader's most effective insight into the health of the organization's safety and quality performance. Leaders must demonstrate accountability by providing clarity of the task at hand, commitment to providing the necessary resources to meet the objective and, most importantly, courage to lead and direct to meet stated goals, objectives, and expectations. Leadership Engagement Is Essential Today's operating environment demands engaged leaders to resource and direct quality/safety programs with well-thought-out policies, procedures, accountabilities and responsibilities. These are often memorialized in an organization's safety and quality policies, goals, objectives and even mission statements. If you think your programs are comprehensive, you may wish to test them via a two-pronged approach: A safety/quality all-employee survey An independent safety/quality system evaluation The results of these inquiries will be enlightening. The benefits derived from effective leadership and management of the organization's safety and quality oversight programs will be extremely valuable to your customers, employees and shareholders. It may also keep you out of the news! Quality system oversight is the most effective tool enabling executive leadership to determine the operation's health in real time. For systems like quality (QMS) and safety (SMS) management to perform as intended, leaders must lead, and management must actively manage these programs. Without active, engaged management, you have to ask yourself this question: Are we that good or just that lucky? About Global Aerospace SM4 Aviation Safety Program The Global Aerospace SM4 Safety Program has revolutionized the way insurance specialists help their clients achieve higher levels of operational safety. SM4 was built on the concept of integrating four critical safety components: planning, prevention, response and recovery. Its mission is to help organizations manage risk, enrich training efforts, strengthen safety culture and improve safety management systems. Global Aerospace SM4 Aviation Safety Program Media Contact Suzanne Keneally Vice President, Group Head of Communications +1 973-490-8588 Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store