logo
Trump Legal Fees: Why Georgia Taxpayers Could Soon Pay President's Bills

Trump Legal Fees: Why Georgia Taxpayers Could Soon Pay President's Bills

Forbes16-05-2025

Georgia taxpayers could be on the hook for millions of dollars of President Donald Trump's legal fees from the racketeering trial that saw Fani Willis tossed from the case, after Gov. Brian Kemp (R) signed a bill into law this week that allows criminal defendants to recover attorneys fees if the prosecutor overseeing their case is disqualified.
President Donald Trump looks on during a press conference on May 12 in Washington, DC.
Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney who charged Trump and others for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, was disqualified from the case due to alleged misconduct in having a romantic relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade, though the Georgia Supreme Court still could overturn the ruling.
Attorney Steven Sadow, who represents Trump in the Georgia case, told Forbes in a statement Friday that Kemp's decision to sign the bill into law 'represents a major turning point in holding unethical, opportunistic and deceitful prosecutors accountable for their misconduct,' but the lawyer did not respond to questions regarding whether he would seek to use the law to recoup Trump's costs, or how much the president could ask to have reimbursed.
Kemp signed Senate Bill 244 into law on Wednesday, which states criminal defendants are 'entitled to an award of all reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred' if the prosecutor overseeing the case against them is disqualified due to misconduct, and the charges against the defendant are subsequently dismissed.
Georgia state Sen. Bradley Beach, who sponsored the legislation, said he was specifically motivated by Trump's case to back the bill, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports.
Any costs reimbursed to defendants will be paid for by the district attorneys' office that prosecuted the case, which means taxpayer funds in Fulton County, Georgia, would be used to recoup Trump's legal costs, though the charges against him would need to be dismissed for him to pursue reimbursement.
Willis appealed the ruling disqualifying her to the Georgia Supreme Court in December, but the court still has not yet ruled on whether it will take up the case. If the high court doesn't hear the case, or if it does and agrees Willis should be disqualified, that won't necessarily kill the case against Trump and his allies, though it will make it significantly harder for it to move forward. The executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of the State of Georgia will then have to appoint a new prosecutor to oversee the case, a process that could take years to complete. That prosecutor could then either proceed with the case, or decide to have the charges dropped altogether. If the case does move forward—either with Willis or another prosecutor—it's still all but certain Trump would not go to trial until after he leaves office in 2028, and the president has already asked for his charges to be dismissed due to his election to the White House. The charges against him would need to be dismissed entirely for Trump to seek attorneys fees under Senate Bill 244.
While Georgia taxpayers may ultimately foot the bill for Trump's Georgia case, the billionaire president hasn't been using his own personal funds to pay his lawyers in the meantime. To pay his legal bills while he was out of office, Trump used his political action committee Save America, which relied on donations from political supporters, as the Trump campaign routed a percentage of campaign donations to the PAC. Save America still had $6.4 million in cash on hand as of the end of 2024, but it's unclear how the fund is operating now that Trump has taken office and whether it's still being used for the president's legal fees. The PAC has not yet filed any disclosures since his inauguration. Many private attorneys representing Trump whom the president previously paid through Save America now have jobs within his administration, including now-U.S. Attorney Alina Habba, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and Solicitor General Dean John Sauer.
$4.2 million. That's how much Trump has paid attorneys representing him in the Georgia case through the end of 2024, according to public filings. The president paid a combined $2.7 million to Sadow and attorney Drew Findling, who resigned from the case in August 2023, prior to Trump's formal indictment. Trump also paid attorney Jennifer Little $1.5 million through a separate fund he used for campaign and personal expenses, Make America Great Again PAC.
The Georgia case was one of four criminal cases that were brought against Trump in the years after his first term, and one of two specifically concerning his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Willis indicted Trump in August 2023, accusing him and his allies of participating in an alleged racketeering scheme to overturn Georgia's election results. Trump has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. The case is now the only one of Trump's criminal cases that remains active, as the two federal cases against the president were dropped due to the Justice Department's policy of not prosecuting sitting presidents. Trump was convicted in Manhattan on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records—the only case against him to go to trial—but did not receive any punishment for his crimes, thanks to his election.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fire at Boyd Hotel in San Francisco caused by lithium-ion battery; 2 injured
Fire at Boyd Hotel in San Francisco caused by lithium-ion battery; 2 injured

CBS News

time9 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Fire at Boyd Hotel in San Francisco caused by lithium-ion battery; 2 injured

A fire at a San Francisco building was caused by a scooter's lithium-ion battery, the San Francisco Fire Department said. San Francisco Fire said they were alerted to the fire at 7:31 a.m. The fire was at the Boyd Hotel, which is a seven-story, mixed-use building with residential units above commercial space. Crews arrived just before 8 a.m. and rescued two adults on the sixth floor. Both had serious injuries and were taken to a local burn center. UPDATE: The structure fire at a seven-story mixed-use building, which includes residential units over commercial spaces, is now contained and under control. Two adults were rescued by San Francisco firefighters and transported to a local burn center by paramedics from the San… — SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTMENT MEDIA (@SFFDPIO) June 8, 2025 The fire was extinguished and contained to the one-room apartment. The San Francisco Fire Department advises residents not to charge lithium-ion batteries while sleeping. "Always be present, and don't leave it alone," SF Fire said.

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

Washington Post

time11 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump's new travel ban set to take effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries is set to take effect Monday amid escalating tension over the president's unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday , applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban , his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado , saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas . The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa . The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store