Two men accused of attempting to set fire to Sydney synagogue denied bail
The two men accused of attempting to light a Newtown synagogue on fire have been refused bail.
Adam Moule, 33, and Leon Sofilas, 37, who are co-accused, appeared via video in Downing Centre local court on Thursday when their individual solicitors made applications for them to be released on bail.
The pair are alleged to have spray-painted 10 swastikas on a synagogue in Newtown on 11 January. They also allegedly sprayed an 'unknown liquid' on 'sticks and branches bundled together' and lit a fire that quickly burnt out, the court heard. Both have been charged with destroying property using fire.
Magistrate Greg Grogin denied the pair's application for bail, saying there was an unacceptable risk they would commit a further offence.
'It is said that this offence was a hate-motivated crime,' the magistrate said. The attack was 'random' in nature but 'planned insofar as there was liquid there and taken to the location', Grogin told the court. 'The random nature of this offence is of great concern to the court.'
Sofilas's lawyer, Steve Mav, said his client denied the allegations. He had since been moved to protective custody.
'If my client remains in custody we're talking about him potentially being there for one to two years in a very unsafe environment,' Mav told the court.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Mav told the court Sofilas was Tasered 11 times during his arrest. The magistrate noted that was not mentioned by police in their outline of the facts.
Earlier in the proceedings, the court also heard an application for Sofilas's co-accused, Moule. Jenni Bridges, a lawyer from the Aboriginal Legal Service who was acting on behalf of Moule, argued he should be released on bail due to his mental health challenges.
'He is an Indigenous man with significant mental health issues,' she told the court.
The court heard that Moule had not been given the medication he takes to treat his anxiety, depression and PTSD since being in custody. The magistrate ruled he should be given his medication.
'He has not been able to speak to his mother or his family,' his lawyer said, adding his mother found out he was in custody via the media.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'He was in custody at the time [his father died] and could not attend the funeral or participate in sorry business.'
The court also heard that Moule lives in social housing and, under the rules, if he is absent from that home for more than six months, he will lose it.
'If he is not granted bail he will lose housing and once again become homeless,' she said.
The police prosecutor, Peter Boctor, opposed bail, arguing there was an unacceptable risk to the community and the objective seriousness of the crime.
In responding to Sofilas's application, Boctor said there was a risk he would interfere with witnesses and fail to appear at future court dates.
Moule and Sofilas were due in court again on 3 April.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
3 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
'It shouldn't be illegal for men to buy sex' Ash Regan bill won't work
The details of his crimes are harrowing and heartbreaking. The case exposed just how deeply seated the police's systemic bias towards sex workers was. Just how vile and entrenched its institutional racism towards Indigenous people was – many of the missing women were Indigenous. Read more The failures in this case made one thing crystal clear. To the police in Vancouver, sex workers had no value. Pleas from families and the community to trace missing women were ignored over and over again. To say the results were devastating is an understatement. It is for this reason that I do not think sex workers or the people (men) who buy sex should be criminalised. Because the involvement of police with prostitution historically does not bode well for the women involved. It also ignores the agency of women in sex work and ensures the industry remains stigmatised. And marginalises those within it further. This week, Alba MSP Ash Regan introduced her 'Unbuyable Bill'. The Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill would see the buying of sex criminalised and the selling of sexual services decriminalised. It hinges on the principle that prostitution is a form of male violence against women. The Bill would also quash historic convictions and create a statutory right to support for those in and exiting prostitution. Essentially following the Nordic model. Though, will those statutory support services be funded properly? If not, they are redundant. Right now, in Scotland, the sale of sex is not illegal, but it might as well be. Running a brothel and soliciting or loitering in public to sell sex are against the law. In Canada after the Robert Pickton trial concluded, outrage over the way the way the missing women were ignored led to the Missing Women Commission of Inquiry. A direct result of the inquiry was a new policing strategy in Vancouver that effectively decriminalised sex work. Alba MSP Ash Regan (Image: free) The result was meaningful change, and sex workers were safer for it. But despite recommendations to replicate the Vancouver approach nationwide, in 2014, Stephen Harper's Conservative Government introduced Bill C-36, which followed the Nordic model. Buying sex became illegal. Advertising someone's sexual services was criminalised. So was accepting money to place those ads and profiting from someone's sexual services. It has been more than ten years since the Nordic Model was introduced in Canada, and sex workers have argued that it still polices sex work, and they still face harassment from the force. They also say that it makes it more difficult to screen clients, which pushes the industry further into the shadows. The other issue is that the model does not recognise the autonomy of sex workers. Not all sex work is survival sex work, and no abolitionist policy will be able to control the fact that consensual sex work does exist. Bill C-36, like the 'Unbuyable Bill', is rooted in radical feminist and abolitionist views. The law claims to address gender inequality and coercion, but it paradoxically limits women's ability to choose sex work, keeps their circumstances criminalised and fails to provide viable alternatives. A paper published in the Melbourne Journal of International Law found that if you separate Bill C-36's rhetorical claims from its actual effects, the law in reality 'is exposed as little more than a moralising condemnation of female sex workers, designed to limit their freedoms and capacity for self-determination, in order to induce their exit from sex work, in a manner which is wholly irreconcilable with the pursuit of 'gender equality'.' Legislating sex work is inherently difficult. It's crucial to make sure that the most vulnerable are protected, but it's contentious to paint everyone with the same brush. In Ireland, where buying sex was criminalised in 2015, sex workers reported that demand actually increased following the introduction of the new legislation. A report on the new law by the Department of Justice published in 2019 found that the law had a 'minimal effect' on demand. Sex workers also reported a heightened fear of crime, and it contributed to a climate where they felt even more marginalised and stigmatised. READ MORE MARISSA MACWHIRTER Scotland has a history of institutionalised abuse of working-class women and girls that is intertwined with its view of the 'social evil' of prostitution. The Glasgow System of the mid-nineteenth century saw the systemic policing of women and girls. Aged from seven to 39, they were plucked off the streets by police officers at will and taken to places like the Magdalene Asylum or the Lock Hospital for brutal and intimate examinations (often carried out by men) and barbaric treatments for venereal disease that often killed them. The Lochburn Magdalene Institution closed in 1960. Not that long ago. The case of Emma Caldwell, a 27-year-old woman murdered in 2005 by serial rapist Iain Packer, highlights how stigma against sex workers remains a serious issue in Scotland, just as it does in Canada. Failures in the police investigation have led to a forthcoming independent public inquiry. It took 19 years for Packer to be brought to justice. Regan's Bill is good in the sense that it has sparked fresh debate about the rights of sex workers. Though the reality of it becoming law before Scottish Parliament elections in 2026 is pretty unlikely. As in Canada, decriminalising sex work does not win as many votes as clamping down on it. And the Nordic model, as far as I am concerned, is still a crackdown. Shifting the burden of criminality does not constitute gender equality. Marissa MacWhirter is a columnist and feature writer at The Herald, and the editor of The Glasgow Wrap. The newsletter is curated between 5-7am each morning, bringing the best of local news to your inbox each morning without ads, clickbait, or hyperbole. Oh, and it's free. She can be found on X @marissaamayy1
Daily Mail
5 days ago
- Daily Mail
How the Greens' Dorinda Cox was slammed as a 'bully rat' for defecting to Anthony Albanese's Labor - but her past is coming back to haunt her
She's the Greens senator who defected to Labor in a move that sent a jolt through Canberra and now Dorinda Cox's past attacks on the ALP have come back to haunt her. Cox surprised the minor party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, by announcing on Monday that she was jumping ship to Labor - revealing that she approached the PM to join the party in the wake of its landslide election win. Cox had only recently missed out on a leadership role in the Greens and was at the centre of controversy in her party over allegations surrounding her treatment of her staff. At one point, she was so divisive in the Greens that she was labelled a 'bully rat' by some fellow members. And now her past comments about Labor have come back to haunt her, with Cox - who is Indigenous - having previously slammed the ALP as having 'dropped our people like a hot potato after the Voice referendum', and described Labor as a 'puppet' of the fossil fuel industry and liars. Senator Cox only informed party leader Larissa Waters of her decision about an hour prior to the announcement. The Yamatji-Noongar woman was elected to the upper house in 2021 to fill a Greens vacancy and had been the party's Indigenous affairs spokesperson. Despite having last year suggested the Albanese government was 'not interested' in closing the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, Cox said she felt her values and priorities were better aligned with Labor than the Greens. 'I've worked hard to make Australia fairer and much more reconciled, but recently, I've lost some confidence in the capacity for the Greens to assist me in being able to progress this,' she told reporters. 'I feel reassured with my experience, my skills and my knowledge, I can continue to collaborate and build on the existing relationships with an already amazing team of Labor MPs across the country.' Waters said the party was disappointed but wished Cox well. 'Senator Cox has said that her values align with the Labor party. This is the same Labor party who this week approved the climate wrecking North West Shelf gas project, which UNESCO advises will destroy significant First Nations heritage and ancient rock art,' she said in a statement. 'Senator Cox would have had more chance of effecting change by continuing to work with the Greens in the sole balance of power.' Cox, who was a member of the Labor Party before joining the Greens, will be formally admitted into Labor on Tuesday. She was not required to run in this year's federal election as she was elected for a six-year term in 2022. Mr Albanese said Cox, the first Indigenous woman to represent WA in the upper house, had approached him about the switch and would be a welcome addition to the government benches. 'She wants to be part of a team that's delivering progress for this country by being a part of a government that can make decisions, to make a difference,' he said. 'Dorinda Cox is someone who's a former police officer. She's someone who has a lot to offer in terms of policy development.' Cox was accused of bullying Greens staffers in 2024, with as many as 20 employees leaving in three years and complaints made to parliament's workplace support service. The allegations surrounding Ms Cox, a former WA Police officer, were aired by the Sydney Morning Herald in October 2024. In one complaint sent to the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service (PWSS) in 2021, a former staffer claimed to have witnessed 'disturbing behaviour' from Ms Cox towards colleagues. 'These experiences made me concerned for my safety and for the safety of others in the office,' the staffer told the publication. 'I spent much of the time feeling like I was walking on eggshells just waiting for Dorinda to explode at me.' A draft complaint by another staffer, which was not formally lodged, claimed Ms Cox would apologise for her actions 'but the behaviour would continue'. Some of Dorinda Cox's past attacks on Labor... 'Often times becoming aggressive, persistently negative and sometimes vicious which ultimately resulted in my mental health declining to the point of having daily panic attacks, thoughts of suicide and an almost complete loss of self-esteem in my professional ability,' the former staffer wrote in the draft complaint. 'I felt at the time that if I didn't resign from my position that my mental health would deteriorate to such a state to require medical intervention in a hospital setting, something I articulated to the chief of staff in Adam Bandt's office.' It's understood four formal complaints were submitted to the PWSS and five referred to the office of Greens leader Adam Bandt. Mr Albanese said the allegations had been examined and dealt with. 'They were all dealt with in Senator Cox's case and dealt with appropriately,' he said. Cox said improvements for Indigenous people would be more achievable within the government than from the crossbench. 'I made that (decision) based on some deep reflection,' she said. 'It was one that I considered both at a professional level, but also at a personal level. So this wasn't a decision that I did on the hop or based on emotion.' Cox last week spoke out against the Albanese government's decision to allow fossil fuel giant Woodside to continue operating its North West Shelf gas project until 2070. Although her X page has been made private, several of her posts criticising Labor have resurfaced. 'Labor and the Coalition have shamefully declared their intention to pass the Sea Dumping Amendment Bill,' she wrote in one. 'Make no mistake, this will show Labor and the Coalition are puppets for the fossil fuel industry and enablers of continuing state capture and climate destruction.' In another post, Cox wrote: 'This Labor government needs to get serious. 'Stop lying and stop the 114 coal and gas projects in the pipeline. 'It's time to put your money where your mouth is.' Pressed on her previous opposition to the North West Shelf project, Cox said she did not want to comment on the issue as the extension was still being provisionally approved. Cox last year accused the Albanese government of being complicit in 'war crimes' carried out by Israel in Gaza. Labor still requires the support of either the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation despite gaining a 29th senator.
The Guardian
7 days ago
- The Guardian
Student protesters face expulsion from University of Melbourne over pro-Palestine office occupation
Two University of Melbourne students have been recommended for expulsion and two for suspension for taking part in a pro-Palestine demonstration at the university's Parkville campus last October. If the decisions are upheld, the students will become the first pro-Palestine student activists for whom suspension and expulsion have been enforced in Australia since the waves of student demonstrations against Israel's assault on Gaza began in 2023. The students intend to appeal against the decision, with one telling Guardian Australia she believed the outcome had been 'prejudged' by the university, which has implemented anti-protest rules that critics have characterised as 'repressive' and an 'authoritarian' overreach. The students were referred to the institution's disciplinary committee after reports they were part of a group of about 20 who, for about 90 minutes on 9 October, occupied the office of an academic they believed was integral to the university's partnerships with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The protesters were calling on the university to disband its joint programs with Israeli universities, which have been a target of the global boycott, divestment and sanctions movement since 2004. Footage of the occupation, distributed on social media at the time, showed protesters entering the office with their faces covered by keffiyehs, hoods and masks. The university alleged the students had harassed and intimidated staff who worked in the office, damaged property by placing signs and stickers on some university-owned items including a monitor screen, and writing on and placing stickers on personal items of the academic, including a photo. The students said their demonstration had been peaceful and clearly political, that they had informed people working in the office and nearby that they were protesting and had even offered to turn down the music they were playing so others could keep working. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email One student facing expulsion, Niamh*, who spoke to Guardian Australia on condition that her real name not be used, was found by the disciplinary committee to have been present at the demonstration for no longer than 10 minutes. Documents seen by the Guardian state she was not found to have performed any of the specific actions listed by the university as 'harassing or intimidating' the staff, such as placing stickers or graffiti, but that her presence in the room with others was itself harassment and intimidation, and also constituted improper and unsafe use of university property. The committee said they were recommending Niamh be expelled on the basis of 'the seriousness of the breaches and the nature of the behaviour' and her past alleged breaches of the student conduct code. Niamh said she believed this was a reference to her participation in the 'Mahmoud's Hall' occupation of the Arts West building, a demonstration that led to the university agreeing to additional disclosures about its research project grant arrangements. Niamh appeared to have been identified as being involved in the protest in part by the university tracking her location on campus through her wifi login, a tool that has been the subject of an investigation by the office of the Victorian information commissioner. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion She said she believed the activists had been 'prejudged' by the university council, beginning with the then vice-chancellor, Duncan Maskell, circulating a university-wide email the day after the protest characterising it as 'an attempt to harass and intimidate' the academic. Maskell's email was criticised in an open letter signed by 174 university staff members, which said the comments risked impeding procedural fairness and 'enabled the action to be incorrectly framed by major media outlets as antisemitic'. Maskell did not respond to the open letter. In May last year he implemented new university rules banning 'protest that is not peaceful' and prohibiting protesters who were not university staff or students from entering university grounds. On 3 March his successor as vice-chancellor, Emma Johnston, implemented another suite of rules against protests, including that they may not be held indoors and must not obstruct entries or exits of university buildings. The rules would apply to students and staff and also to 'individual forms of action'. The student union and the National Tertiary Education Union have called the new rules 'an authoritarian approach' that erroneously conflates staff and student discomfort with lack of safety. The Human Rights Law Centre, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have urged the university to rescind them. Niamh said Johnston's rules were 'particularly disturbing and hypocritical' and 'a massive betrayal of the values and history of student unionism' given Johnston's own history as the university's student union president in the 1990s, when she advocated for direct action protests including sit-ins. 'Her words are irreconcilable with her actions when some of the worst anti-protest rules are being pushed through under her leadership,' Niamh said. 'I would love to see the university take more of an approach of wanting to sit down with their students and wanting to really hear from where their students are coming from and why students around the world feel this urgent moral necessity to stand against … the horrible atrocities we're witnessing in Gaza as well as the West Bank and all of occupied Palestine,' she said. A spokesperson for the University of Melbourne said it would not comment on individual cases 'to protect the integrity of our disciplinary processes''. 'The University of Melbourne has followed its disciplinary processes in accordance with University policy in response to an incident that took place in October 2024,' the spokesperson said. 'This process has not concluded. The University is communicating directly with individuals involved in disciplinary proceedings. Students have the right to appeal decisions made through the University's disciplinary processes.' Last year an Australian National University student who was expelled and a Deakin University student who was suspended for Palestine-related activism had those decisions overturned on appeal. *Name has been changed
