IHC orders restoration of Children's Park in two weeks
The Islamabad High Court has ordered the restoration of the Children's Park in Sector E-11 to its original condition within two weeks. According to residents, green areas or public parks cannot be converted into commercial areas. The land grabbers had dismantled the children's swings at the park and started illegal constructions with heavy machinery. Justice Muhammad Asif of the Islamabad High Court heard a petition from local residents against the illegal constructions at the Children's Park in E-11.
The residents of E-11 had approached the Islamabad High Court to challenge the encroachment and occupation of the park. The petitioners, led by Advocate Kashif Ali Malik along with other lawyers, argued that under the CDA Ordinance, green areas or public parks cannot be converted into commercial zones. Armed individuals had entered the Children's Park with heavy machinery, removed the children's swings, and started illegal construction, which violated the rights of the petitioners and other residents of E-11. Among the affected residents is a senior judge from the Lahore High Court.
Despite bringing the matter to the attention of the CDA, the authority failed to stop the illegal constructions and encroachments.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
IHC orders abolition of CDA
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Saturday ordered the federal government to dissolve the Capital Development Authority (CDA) and transfer all its powers and assets to the Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI). In a detailed verdict, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani ruled that the CDA has no legal authority to impose taxes. The court further declared that any amount collected by the Authority from individuals or institutions under the guise of "Right of Way" or direct access charges must be refunded. The federal government was instructed to initiate and complete the process of dissolving the CDA and transfer all its powers and assets to the Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI). The judgment emphasised that the rights of Islamabad's citizens must be protected under the law. The ruling was issued in response to a petition filed by Taj Residencia Housing Society and its residents. The court also declared SRO dated June 9, 2015 — regarding CDA's right-of-way and access charges — null and void, along with all actions taken under it, labeling them as illegal. Any funds collected under this SRO must be returned. Justice Kayani noted that the CDA Ordinance was originally enacted to establish the federal capital and oversee its development, but due to evolving governance structures and new laws, its practical relevance has ended. The original objectives of the CDA have been fulfilled, and it is now appropriate for the government to formally dissolve the authority. The court also directed that following the transfer of powers, the Islamabad administration must operate in a transparent and accountable manner. The judgment reaffirmed that Islamabad's entire administrative, regulatory, and municipal framework is governed by the Local Government Act, which mandates that no tax could be imposed without the approval of the elected local government. Therefore, CDA lacks any legal authority to levy taxes. It is worth noting that CDA had imposed right-of-access charges on petrol pumps and CNG stations, and direct access taxes on private housing societies for connecting to main roads. These charges were challenged in the IHC, resulting in this significant decision. Rains prompt monsoon action On the other hand, the CDA has finalised a special action plan for the monsoon season and issued a notification outlining the responsibilities of all relevant departments to ensure effective implementation. On the instructions of CDA Chairman, Member Administration Talat Mehmood has been assigned to oversee the plan. According to the notification, special teams will be deployed following a survey of illegal basements and low-lying areas. Flood relief camps and other safety measures will be established to handle any emergency situations. A Flood Relief Cell will remain operational from July 1 to September 30, headed by the Director of Emergency and Disaster Management. A dedicated helpline will also be set up, and assistance will be available via rescue and fire brigade services. Heads of relevant departments will appoint focal persons at the relief camps. The sanitation department will operate under the authority of the relief camps. A special operation will be launched against makeshift houses and illegal constructions.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Ex-senator secures bail in murder case
Additional District and Sessions Judge Rawalpindi, Majid Hussain Gadhi, Saturday approved the bail on medical grounds of Chaudhry Tanveer Khan, a former Senator from the Pakistan Muslim League-N (PML-N). Tanveer was arrested in the murder case of Chaudhry Adnan, a former PTI MPA and ex-provincial parliamentary secretary. The court ordered his immediate release, subject to the submission of two surety bonds worth Rs1 million each, which were promptly furnished. Despite being under arrest, Tanveer was admitted to the Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology (RIC) due to a serious heart condition, with a police guard stationed outside his hospital ward. Following the court's approval of bail, jail officials and police personnel were withdrawn per the instructions of the Superintendent of Adiala Jail, effectively restoring former legislator's status as a free citizen. Chaudhry Tanveer had voluntarily surrendered on June 17 before the Lahore High Court (LHC) Rawalpindi Bench by withdrawing his pre-arrest bail application. Police took him into custody from the courtroom and obtained a two-day physical remand, after which he was sent to judicial custody but admitted to the hospital due to his heart condition. He had been accused of conspiring and planning the targeted killing of Chaudhry Adnan, who was shot dead near the Police Lines gate in Rawalpindi. The FIR was registered on February 12, 2024, at Civil Lines Police Station, naming Chaudhry Tanveer, Osama Chaudhry, Daniyal Chaudhry, and Chaudhry Changez as suspects. During the bail hearing, the court observed that evidence regarding the conspiracy allegation was insufficient, leading to the approval of bail. The defence was led by advocate Malik Waheed Anjum, while co-counsel Chaudhry Yasir Advocate stated that the surrender was made voluntarily to ensure a fair and transparent investigation, and they would continue to pursue the case to prove their client's innocence. On the other hand, the complainant's lawyer, Shehzad Bhatti, announced that the bail decision would be challenged in the Lahore High Court (LHC).
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
LHC explains how a govt servant absent from duty can be sacked
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has held that a government servant who remains absent from his duty for less than one year cannot be removed from service without cogent reasons. The court said Section 4 of Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act (PEEDA) manifests that where absence from duty is for more than one year and same is proved, the authority has no option but to impose penalty of compulsory retirement or removal or dismissal from service. However, where absence from duty is less than one year, the authority under Section 4 of PEECA has discretion to impose penalty of compulsory retirement or removal or dismissal from service supported by cogent justification, in accordance with principles of proportionality, structured discretion and administrative fairness, the court added. The court passed this order on a petition of a government employee, Abusar Ghaffary, who was working as computer operator with the Punjab Emergency Services Department. The court allowed the petition and reinstating the petitioner into service and set aside impugned order and observed that no reasons are recorded to impose major penalty of removal from service against the petitioner. The court; however, held that the petitioner will not be entitled for back benefits as per the law. The petitioner's counsel submitted that under Section 7 (f) (ii) of PEEDA, where charge of absence of duty is less than one year, major penalty including removal or dismissal from service cannot be imposed. Admittedly, the regular inquiry against the petitioner was dispensed with under Section 5 (1) of the PEEDA and petitioner was removed from service under Section 4 (1) (b) (v) of PEEDA for being absent from duty for 63 days, the court observed. Where the regular inquiry is dispensed with, the procedure prescribed under section 7 of PEEDA is to be followed, the court added. The court also observed that the respondent keeping in view the principles of proportionality has not exercised discretion in structured manner. No doubt, in the impugned order, the petitioner's previous service record and penalties have been referred to; however, the said record was neither confronted to the petitioner nor petitioner was charge sheeted in show-cause notice on account of poor previous service record, the court added. The court said, when petitioner was already penalised previously, his current removal from service order on the basis of said previous penalties will amount to double jeopardy. The court; however, observed that the petitioner's reinstatement shall be subject to a fresh determination by the competent authority regarding the imposing of penalty against the petitioner, which must commensurate with the gravity of misconduct and after giving cogent reasons. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
