All Blacks great Sir Bryan Williams calls on public to back community-driven Western Springs stadium
In a statement released today, the club said it was throwing its support behind what it described as a new community-first proposal for Western Springs.
The plan would involve the creation of a multi-purpose venue that could be used for sports, music, festivals and the wider community – all while keeping the land in public hands, the club said.
'We're not looking to build walls or gates,' Williams said.
'We're building access. Access to top-class facilities at community rates.'
The proposal being backed by the Ponsonby club would result in a 5000-8000-seat stadium that could cater for club sport, school finals competitions and community tournaments.
A permanent stage would be installed for cultural events and concerts. New clubrooms and shared changing rooms for groups such as netball, touch, basketball and fitness clubs would also be built.
A space for community gatherings – suitable for events such as local fundraisers and holiday programmes – would also be made available and all at affordable prices, the backers say.
Williams said: 'We've seen festivals like Laneway and Pasifika fill the park with joy. Will they happen in a private, locked facility?'
The other proposed idea, backed by former All Black Ali Williams, his wife and businesswoman Anna Mowbray and American billionaires Bill Foley and Bennett Rosenthal, would result in an arena including a 12,500-seat sports stadium.
It would have a 25,000-capacity concert venue and feature eight indoor basketball courts, six padel courts, four outdoor training fields, five hospitality establishments and high-performance facilities.
That arena would cost $200 million to $300m but would be privately funded.
Ali Williams said of the idea: 'Western Springs is just crying out for it to happen.'
However, Sir Bryan Williams said the privately funded idea would change the place into a concrete stadium that would likely have locked-door access.
'Let's be honest, private management means restricted access – high hireage fees and limited availability.
'That's not the Auckland we want to live in,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 hours ago
- 1News
Crusaders steamroll Reds in the rain to earn home semifinal
The Crusaders are hard to beat at home at the best of times but they go to a different level in the playoffs – their 32-12 victory over the Reds tonight in a rainy and cold Christchurch preserving their perfect record in Super Rugby's post-season. It means they have earned a home semifinal next weekend against either the Brumbies or Hurricanes, who will play in Canberra tonight. The Chiefs play the Blues in Hamilton earlier tonight in the other playoff match. The Crusaders' record in home playoffs now reads 30 from 30 and the foundations were once again laid by a dominant pack which nullified the visitors' set piece, earning five scrum penalties in total – three in the first half. Throw in the Crusaders' line speed on defence and a willingness to attack the Reds' breakdown, and it was truly one-way traffic in the first half, the red and blacks going ahead through close-range tries from lock Scott Barrett and prop Tamaiti Williams. Christian Lio-Willie of the Crusaders is tackled by Lachie Anderson of the Reds during the Super Rugby Pacific Qualifying Final (Source: Photosport) ADVERTISEMENT Williams burrowed over despite receiving treatment from a knee injury and it was an issue that forced him from the field in the first half and will raise concerns not only for Crusaders head coach Rob Penney but also his All Blacks' counterpart Scott Robertson. The big loosehead was a dominant force before his departure and Robertson will be eager to name him in his first Test squad of the year on June 23. The fact that Williams could continue after treatment may be a good sign but Penney indicated more will be known about the extent of the problem during the week. The Reds were having their own issues in terms of the casualty ward, with first-five Tom Lynagh going off for a head injury assessment, which he failed, after clashing heads with Crusaders wing Sevu Reece in a tackle. It was clearly accidental but penalties, and even cards, have been given for less. As it was, the Reds were finding it tough enough and the Crusaders should have been ahead by more than their 12-0 advantage at the end of the half but for a mistake by replacement James O'Connor, a first-five who played 68 games for the Reds, who kicked the ball dead from a penalty when going for the corner with time almost up. Jeffery Toomaga-Allen of the Reds and Ryan Smith of the Reds drive the maul during the Super Rugby Pacific Qualifying Final. (Source: Photosport) The Reds, who made only one memorable line break in the first half, were up against it from the re-start, with the Crusaders pinning them in their half, and halfback Noah Hotham was the first to make them pay with an excellent re-gather to dive over under pressure. First-five Rivez Reihana, back from passing his own HIA, pushed his side further ahead with a long range penalty before the Crusaders' first serious discipline issue of the match: a high tackle by the otherwise impressive flanker Ethan Blackadder from a defensive lineout. ADVERTISEMENT The visitors immediately capitalised with a try from the lineout drive for replacement hooker Josh Nasser and Harry Wilson and Fraser McReight, the two talented Wallabies loose forwards, then combined for an excellent try for McReight to give the scoreboard some respectability. There was still time for replacement halfback Kyle Preston to intercept a desperate Reds pass for a try in the corner for the home side. John Bryant of the Reds during the Super Rugby Pacific Qualifying Final (Source: Photosport) This was always going to be a difficult evening for a Reds team who lost in Christchurch during the regular season and who appeared to be flummoxed by the conditions. They were too passive in the contact and played too narrowly – perfect for a Crusaders team attempting to make up for their woeful season last year. All the Crusaders' forwards - Williams, Codie Taylor, Fletcher Newell, Barrett, Antonio Shalfoon, Blackadder, Tom Christie and Christian Lio-Willie played with a sense of purpose that suggests they will be very hard to beat again next Saturday. Will Jordan also looked extremely assured at fullback after his return from a knee injury. ADVERTISEMENT Crusaders 32 (Scott Barrett, Tamaiti Williams, Noah Hotham, Rivez Reihana, Kyle Preston tries; Rivez Reihana 2 cons, pen) Reds 12 (Josh Nasser, Fraser McReight tries, Filipo Dungunu con) Halftime: 12-0
Techday NZ
4 hours ago
- Techday NZ
US-China chip export debate highlights risks for AI leadership
DeepSeek. TikTok. Taiwan. And a White House shake-up on AI rules. The spiralling US-China technology rivalry landed at the heart of Johns Hopkins University last week, as a panel of top experts and policymakers took to the stage to debate whether restricting exports of advanced semiconductors to China can help the US maintain its edge in the race for artificial intelligence. The discussion, hosted by Open to Debate in partnership with the SNF Agora Institute, comes at a critical time. In Washington, the Trump administration has announced plans to roll back the Biden-era AI Diffusion Rule and introduce new chip export controls targeting China – a move seen by many as a signal that the technology contest between the two superpowers is only intensifying. On one side of the Johns Hopkins debate were Lindsay Gorman, managing director at the German Marshall Fund's Technology Program, and former CIA officer and congressman Will Hurd. They argued the answer is yes: semiconductor controls can give the US a real advantage in the AI race. Gorman pointed to DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model whose CEO has publicly lamented the impact of advanced chip bans. "Money has never been the problem for us. Bans on shipments of advanced chips are the problem. And they have to consume twice the power to achieve the same results," she quoted, highlighting how China's AI advances still depend heavily on imported hardware. "The United States has significant hard computing power advantages – the ability to produce high-end chips, designed specifically for training AI models," Gorman told the audience. She argued that, together with its allies, the US controls a "strategic choke point" on computing power. "Properly implemented controls can have an effect and also have an increasing and compounding effect over time in retarding China's AI advantages and giving the United States a head start," she explained. Will Hurd, who also served on OpenAI's board before running for US president, compared the AI contest to the nuclear arms race. "Artificial intelligence is the equivalent of nuclear fission. Nuclear fission controlled gives you nuclear power… uncontrolled, nuclear weapons can kill everybody," he said. Hurd emphasised the importance of first-mover advantage, warning that the US cannot afford to lose its technological lead. He also highlighted a lack of reciprocity in the tech relationship between the two countries. "Chinese companies like Baidu, DJI, and TikTok operate freely in the US, but American companies are not allowed to operate in China," Hurd pointed out. "If there was a level of reciprocity between our two countries, we wouldn't be here having this debate about chip controls." Yet, on the opposing side, former senior US diplomat Susan Thornton and technology strategist Paul Triolo insisted the US could not outpace China in AI simply by tightening export controls. Triolo argued that the controls are "not working and will not lead to US dominance in AI", describing them as a blunt instrument that creates confusion for industry and disrupts global supply chains. "Most experts believe that Chinese companies are only three months behind US leaders in developing advanced AI models," Triolo said, suggesting any technological gap is vanishingly slim. Thornton, who spent decades at the heart of US-China diplomacy, warned of unintended consequences. "The main thing we should be asking ourselves about this question… is what is the cost benefit of US policy actions?" she said. "We have to face the reality that China is already building AI… a third of the world's top AI scientists are Chinese. China is one third of the entire global technology market. So it's clearly a player." She cautioned that blocking China from critical technology could backfire, hurting US companies, alienating allies and raising the risks around Taiwan, the global centre of advanced chip manufacturing. "Certainly, the one thing we need to do is avoid going to war," Thornton warned. "Taiwan, the most sensitive issue in US-China relations, has now been dragged right into the middle of this AI issue because they're the place that produces all the cutting-edge chips that we're trying to control." Audience members pressed the panel on whether international collaboration on AI safety was possible, and whether the US could ever match China's data advantage, given the size of the Chinese population and its permissive data environment. Hurd conceded that "the US will always have less data because we have a little thing called civil liberties," but argued that superior algorithms and privacy-protective machine learning could level the playing field. For Triolo, the dynamic nature of the technology means that attempts to wall off China are self-defeating. "There are many ways to get to different ends. The controls have forced Chinese companies to work together, develop innovations, and become more competitive both domestically and globally," he said. Gorman, in closing, rejected what she called "a defeatism that says America can't out-compete China or slow its progress". "Our companies are doing well. There isn't an issue here with demand, it's with supply. Doing better means that we have to throw what we can at this problem now with a smart application of tools," she argued. But Thornton had the last word, urging caution. "Making the AI competition with China a zero-sum game, not only will not work, it is dangerous," she said. "We should focus on the things that are going to matter to our children and their children, which is the long-term AI competition, which if not constrained and bounded by international agreements and by cooperation among countries… it'll be a very dangerous world."
Otago Daily Times
14 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Doffing his cap to history
My oldest boy wanted to please his dad when he was young and one way to his dad's heart was through rugby. My husband never enjoyed actually playing rugby, but he had a love for the game. He would get the kids up in the early hours of the morning to watch a game or go to a game at the stadium, there was regular screaming at the screen about a losing Highlanders side, poor refereeing, or legendary All Black tries. It was a culture in our house, but it was also a wider family culture too. I was raised as if rugby were a religion, watching it but being schooled on the fact that the art of rugby surged through our veins and that we have an extensive history and ownership with the game. My great uncle was a bit of a rugby legend and, in fact, we have others who come from Ōtākou, clearly we were made for the game. Thomas Rangiwahia Ellison was born in 1866 and was to become one of New Zealand's most famous rugby sons. About 1881 he was introduced to rugby football by his cousins at Ōtākou — Jack Taiaroa, who was to become a prominent member of the first New Zealand rugby team in 1884, and Riki Taiaroa, who later joined Ellison in the touring Native team of 1888-89. In 1882, Tom was sent to Te Aute College, Hawke's Bay, where he played for the senior team in 1883 and 1884. His first international honours came with the New Zealand Native Football Team, a professional side, which toured Great Britain and Australia in 1888-89. Initially a forward and later a wing, Ellison played half-back for Pōneke in 1891, and from that experience developed the wing-forward, or flanker, position to block interference with passing from the base of the scrum. The system was quickly adopted throughout New Zealand; it was superseded by the eight-man scrum in 1932. In 1893, Ellison captained the first official New Zealand team and he proposed that the uniform be a black jersey with silver fern monogram — this was similar to the old Native team uniform — and in 1901 it became the familiar All Black uniform. In 1902 he published The Art of Rugby Football , an early rugby coaching manual. Eventually, Ellison took a keen interest in Kāi Tahu land claims: he was appointed an interpreter in the Native Land Court in 1886 and stood three times for the Southern Maori seat in Parliament. From 1891 he worked as a solicitor and, from 1902, as a barrister in the Wellington law firm Brandon, Hislop and Johnston, he was admitted to the Bar, one of the first Māori to attain that distinction. He became a familiar figure commuting to work from Eastbourne in one of the first motor cars seen in Wellington. Ellison died a young man in 1904 and was buried at Ōtākou. I grew up with these legendary stories about our great rugby players and our family have produced many more talented players. It's probably a fair call to say, it's an Ellison thing — he momo. So, circling back to my son, a descendant of all that rugby whakapapa, who, like most Kiwi lads, started playing rugby when he was 5. I will confess that I was fairly unenthusiastic about the whole thing. Cold Saturdays, injuries, intense sideline parenting and the perceived culture of it all just didn't flick my switch. However, I made all efforts to support him. The thing is, my son wasn't a natural rugby player. He struggled to keep up, he wasn't overly interested in the game and, like the rest of my children, he really doesn't have that competitive killer attitude that is required on the field ... I mean, I was just happy he was getting a run. However, apart from one year that we put him into football, he played rugby, year in, year out. Ultimately, he just loved the brotherhood, the team camaraderie, the banter, the laughs and he really got a kick out of his team winning and his team-mates doing well. I think perhaps the coaches got a laugh, too, out of coaching my son, as he was pretty entertaining. He went away to his Māori boys boarding school in the North Island a few years ago now, as he is in his last year. He continued to play the game at school, and I just assumed it was expected that he did. He naturally got taller and leaned out, he trained a bit at school and kept in it. He took on basketball too and loves the game but still played rugby. He said his life would flash before him on a Saturday as massive boys with killer attitudes would come running at him. In some regards, I am glad I have never had to watch this rugby warfare with my beautiful boy in the middle of it. Through all his rugby trials and tribulations, he said the one thing he wanted was to make his dad proud and get that 1st XV cap, and he has done it. In two weeks' time he gets his wish, presented with his cap by his pōua (grandfather) at his school. So, with that, my son gets to acknowledge the journey in the game, the injuries, the wins, the losses, the growth, his brotherhood, his tūpuna, his dad and, finally, his cousin Taiaroa, also a descendant of these Ōtākou rugby legends, whose amazing rugby talent has been halted by cancer. This is my son's salute.
