Post Office scandal: Government must 'step up' on redress scheme
A Surrey sub-postmaster has said the government must "do a considerable amount more" to compensate Post Office scandal victims.Chirag Sidhpura took over Farncombe Post Office in 2013 and says he was falsely accused of stealing more than £50,000 due to the faulty Horizon IT system.He told BBC Radio Surrey that he was offered 26% of his original compensation claim and still had to "battle and fight" for the rest.The government said it had paid out over £1bn to postmasters and launched an appeal process for anyone unhappy with their offer.
Between 1999 and 2015 the Horizon IT system incorrectly made it appear that money was missing from branch accounts.More than 900 sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted, but many victims are still waiting for financial redress.Mr Sidhpura's comments come the same day as the Public Accounts Committee said in a report that many wrongly-accused or convicted sub-postmasters were yet to receive "fair and timely" redress.
Mr Sidhpura put "hundreds of hours of work" into his compensation claim, he said, but the Post Office "still want more and more evidence".The father of three has now retained a solicitor but has "no idea how long it's going to take" to resolve his claim, and is calling for the government to "step up"."I'm just not sure how much more evidence we can provide," Mr Sidhpura said.
'Recognise the suffering'
The Post Office said Mr Sidhpura "should have received a letter explaining how to appeal the offer" of compensation.It added it was "sincerely sorry for past failings" and "focused, alongside government, on paying redress as quickly as possible".The Department for Business and Trade said: "We pay tribute to all the postmasters including Chirag who have suffered from the Horizon scandal and recognise the suffering that this has caused."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The 'useful idiots' in the Prime Minister's ranks who blew up the law to prevent the hounding of veterans
A former Conservative minister has described military veterans in the Labour Party as 'useful idiots' after they tore up his law to protect soldiers. Johnny Mercer, the architect of the Legacy Act, took aim at the former troops who have left Northern Ireland veterans exposed. The former Veterans Minister brought in the first legislation to shield service personnel from historical witch hunts. Mr Mercer, who served in Afghanistan, blamed veterans who joined the Labour Party for undoing his work. The current Veterans Minister is Al Carns, a former Royal Marines officer. Action to remove protections for troops has happened on his watch. Yesterday, the Mail launched a campaign to stop the betrayal of British troops hounded by the threat of legal action decades after their service. The newspaper is demanding ministers U-turn on their bid to repeal the Legacy Act or produce a proper alternative. Last night, a petition calling for the protections of Northern Ireland veterans had reached just under 150,000 signatures. There will be a full parliamentary debate on the issue on July 14. It comes as former SAS soldiers face possible murder charges after a judge in Northern Ireland ruled the shooting of four IRA terrorists in 1992 was unlawful. Yesterday, the Mail's campaign received fulsome backing from MPs, including Sir David Davis and Tory defence spokesman Mark Francois. Last night Mr Mercer, who is no longer an MP, said: 'Veterans in the Labour Party should hang their heads in shame. 'They have become modern day useful idiots in a party determined to shout about veteran credentials then roll back all the important advances made by the previous government. 'None more so than legislation to protect our people from vexatious prosecutions in Northern Ireland. I made promises to veterans and I kept them. It took almost ten years. To repeal what we fought so hard for is frankly unconscionable. The hounding of these veterans is fundamentally unjust. So we kept going to produce the Legacy Act. 'I am proud of that and I fully support what the Mail is doing to ensure soldiers are protected.' The Labour manifesto at last year's general election included a pledge to repeal the 'unlawful' act. This followed a ruling by a court in Northern Ireland on clauses in the act providing conditional immunity from prosecutions for Troubles-era crimes. The act also introduced a ban on inquests and future civil actions related to the same period. In February 2024, the High Court in Belfast found these were in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 2 of the ECHR places an investigative duty on the state where its agents may have been involved in causing death or serious injury. In such circumstances, countries that are signatories to the convention are obliged to conduct an effective and independent investigation. In parliament yesterday Mr Francois said: 'The present Labour government intends to use a Remedial Act to remove key provisions within the Act. 'This will open the endless cycle of investigation and re-investigation, often by coronial inquests. This policy is a disaster for recruitment and retention and we vigorously oppose it. In that context, we warmly welcome the Daily Mail's campaign, launched this morning, to defend our veterans.' Mr Francois, who served as a defence minister in a previous Conservative government also quoted the Mail's editorial which said it was 'profoundly unfair that frail ex-servicemen will continue to live in dread of a knock on the door by the authorities, while IRA murderers sleep easily, with letters of immunity handed to them by Tony Blair'. In the same debate, Sir David said: 'This is not just about Special Forces, it is about all of the armed forces. There are about 20 inquests into actions by government agencies that could be restarted after the end of the legacy legislation. 'If we continue down this path we will betray our past and jeopardise our future. The Mail's campaign has received fulsome backing from MPs, including Sir David Davis and Tory defence spokesman Mark Francois 'This campaign of persecution sends a chilling message to the next generation: serve your country, risk your life and face prosecution in your old age. Why would any young man or woman sign up for that.' The case at the centre of the campaign involved 12 SAS soldiers facing possible murder charges over the 1992 shooting of four IRA terrorists. Police concluded at the time there should be no prosecutions. But earlier this year a coroner ruled their use of force was excessive, despite the terrorists being armed with a heavy machine gun and other weapons. Files have been passed to the Director of Public Prosecutions in Northern Ireland. A move which could trigger a criminal investigation. Last night, the Northern Ireland Secretary, Hilary Benn, said: 'The Legacy Act has been found by our domestic courts to be unlawful. 'Any incoming government would have to repeal unlawful legislation and it is wrong for anyone to suggest otherwise. 'The Defence Secretary and I are engaging with our veterans community and with all interested parties over future legislation and we will ensure there are far better protections in place. 'We owe it to all who were affected by the Troubles across the United Kingdom to be honest about the unworkability of the Legacy Act and to get this new legislation right.'
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
Inside the £6 million London home with a link to Whitbread brewery
C hiswell Street in Islington sits between the cultural offerings of the Barbican and the tech hub around Old Street's Silicon Roundabout. Not long ago though, it was the centre of one of the largest breweries in the world. Samuel Whitbread produced more than 200,000 barrels of porter a year in the late 18th century, rising to 330,000 by the mid-19th century. The site was nicknamed 'Whitbread's Giant' and beer was brewed there for more than 200 years. The house historian Melanie Backe-Hansen says: 'By 1796 Whitbread was the largest producer of beer in London. They continued to grow and by the 1890s they took over space in Garrett Street, constructing a purpose-built stables to house their working horses' which pulled the delivery wagons. 'White's Yard and Basket Alley had been connected to create Garrett Street, which was named after a member of the parish vestry works committee, in 1898.'
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK prepares to announce ‘one in, one out' migrant deal with France
A migrant removals deal between the UK and France involving a 'one-in, one-out' exchange agreement is reportedly close to being announced. Under the plan, a person being deported from the UK would be exchanged for another individual sent from France who has a right to be in Britain. Those arriving the UK would include people with a legitimate case for family reunification. According to a report in The Times, Sir Keir Starmer and President Emmanuel Macron are preparing to announce the agreement next week in a bid to break the model of smuggling gangs using small boats for English Channel crossings. A government source told the newspaper: 'It'll start as a pilot but it's to prove the point that if you pay for your passage on a boat then you could quite quickly find yourself back in France.' The UK agreed a £480 million deal with France to beef up its efforts to stop migrants in 2023 under former prime minister Rishi Sunak. And on coming to power last year, Sir Keir vowed to 'smash the gangs' behind people-smuggling operations to bring down crossings. But according to Home Office figures, 17,817 people have made the crossing so far this year. This compares to 12,313 by the same date in 2024 and 10,518 in 2023 while 11,690 had made the crossing by June 20 in 2022. The migrant exchange plans previously surfaced in April when transport minister Lilian Greenwood said there were discussions 'ongoing' with the French government, but did not say what a future deal could look like. She told Sky News: 'I can confirm that there are discussions ongoing with the French government about how we stop this appalling and dangerous trade in people that's happening across the English Channel.' She later said that 'where people don't have a right to be here, they need to be returned'.
