Working long hours may alter brain structure, research suggests
Working 52 hours or more per week may alter the structure of the brain, research suggests.
Experts found that being 'overworked' may affect those parts of the brain related to problem-solving and memory, while also potentially affecting mental health.
The findings, published in the journal Occupational And Environmental Medicine, looked at the impact of overwork on specific brain regions in health workers who regularly clocked up a 52-hour week or more.
Researchers drew on data from a long-term study looking at worker health and used MRI scans to examine brain structure.
Some 110 workers were included in the final analysis, most of whom where clinicians.
Of these, 32 worked excessive weekly hours, while 78 worked standard hours.
Those putting in long working hours every week were significantly younger, had spent less time in work and were more highly educated than those clocking up standard hours.
The researchers, including from Yonsei University in South Korea, said: 'Overworked individuals exhibited significant changes in brain regions associated with executive function and emotional regulation.'
Analysis showed a 19% increase in left caudal middle frontal gyrus volume in the overworked group compared with the non-overworked group.
This part of the brain has a major role in various cognitive functions, particularly in the frontal lobe.
It is involved in attention, working memory, and language-related processing.
Other areas involved in attention, planning and decision-making were also changed according to the scans, plus regions involved in emotional processing, self-awareness and understanding social context.
The team concluded: 'This study provides preliminary evidence that overwork is associated with structural brain changes, particularly in regions linked to cognition and emotion.
'These findings provide novel neurobiological evidence linking prolonged working hours to structural brain changes, emphasising the need for further research to understand the long-term cognitive and emotional implications of overwork.
'The results underscore the importance of addressing overwork as an occupational health concern and highlight the need for workplace policies that mitigate excessive working hours.'
Ruth Wilkinson, head of policy and public affairs at the charity the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health, said: 'Global analysis from the World Health Organisation and International Labour Organisation has found that working long hours is on the increase and is responsible for about one-third of the total estimated work-related burden of disease.
'We believe urgent action is needed to tackle an epidemic of long working hours.
'A long hours culture can be experienced in what we've identified as the 'small print' of working life today.
'This captures those hidden or unspoken expectations placed on top of workers' contracts.
'It includes always having to be available/on duty in this digital age, stripped of the right to disconnect from work outside of normal working hours….
'Our YouGov survey, last year, showed that nearly a quarter of UK workers regularly work more than the legal maximum people should work in the UK (48 hours a week), while 44% said working more than your contracted hours is part of the culture in their organisation. More than half said they regularly check work emails and messages outside of working hours.
'We want to see employers strip away the 'small print', identify and tackle psycho-social risks as part of risk assessment processes and become more transparent in how they treat their workers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britain's vital green spaces are in grave danger unless we act now
This week, as the Chancellor announces the Government's latest spending review, we are bracing for cuts across the board. In tough times, difficult choices must be made. At such a moment it is important to remember that the numbers in the spreadsheets are not simply economic abstractions, and that some cuts can cost more than they save. World Environment Day is an excellent moment to remember that green spaces are a case in point. They are one of the most powerful and under-appreciated tools for improving public health and fostering social cohesion while sustaining wildlife. The truth is that local parks are delivering huge value and can contribute so much more. Green spaces, parks and playing fields are frontline services for the wellbeing of our communities. They are where we exercise, connect with others, improve our mental health and, crucially, where connect with Nature. At a time of rising isolation and disconnection with the natural world, these places matter more than ever. But they are vanishing. In the last ten years, more than 800 parks and playgrounds have closed across the UK. In many communities, especially those already suffering the effects of inequality, access to safe, high-quality outdoor spaces has become a postcode lottery. Seventy per cent of children in low-income areas don't meet the recommended daily exercise levels. One in five young people now face an actual or probable mental health disorder. We're seeing the consequences in our health service. Lack of physical activity and limited access to nature are directly linked to long-term conditions, ranging from obesity and Type 2 diabetes to anxiety and depression. We are spending a fortune in fixing problems which could in part be prevented at much lower cost. Regular use of parks and green spaces generates over £34 billion in health and wellbeing benefits each year. At a time when the Health Service is under extraordinary pressure, investing in green spaces is not a 'nice to have.' It is a preventive public health policy. But the benefits of green space are not just physical or economic; they are emotional and deeply formative. As someone who has spent my life seeking ways to sustain Nature, I know how critical early experiences are in shaping our relationship with the natural world. My own love of Nature wasn't sparked in some distant wilderness, but in the green areas close to home: wonderful patches of wild 'brownfield' scrub, local fields, and neighbourhood parks. These everyday encounters with Nature weren't spectacular, but they were profound. You can't foster a love of the natural world through screens or textbooks alone. It must be felt, seen, heard. That spark happens outdoors. Every child deserves that spark. Yet today, far too many children grow up without ever hearing birdsong or walking beneath a canopy of trees. Girls, ethnic minorities, and families in deprived communities face the greatest barriers to experiencing the simple, profound benefits of nature. That is not just a social failing. It is a moral one. Green spaces are where future conservationists are born. When children climb trees, build dens, or simply lie on the grass and look up at the sky, they're doing more than playing. They're forming bonds with Nature that can last a lifetime. That sense of care and wonder is what leads people to protect and preserve the wild as they grow up. Our future depends on it. This year marks the centenary of Fields in Trust, a charity that has spent 100 years quietly protecting more than 3,000 green spaces across the UK. It is a remarkable achievement, but there is still so much more to do. Fields in Trust believes that everyone should live close to a protected park. As we face the overlapping challenges of poor public health, rapid urbanisation, and the climate and Nature emergencies, that vision has never been more important. Yet green spaces continue to be at risk, and once lost they are rarely replaced. Parks are places of healing. Places where children run, families connect, and communities thrive. They are one of the few remaining spaces where people of all ages and backgrounds naturally mix. We must reframe access to quality green spaces, including wilder ones, as a right, not a privilege. We stand at a crossroads. If we want to create a future where our world's living systems are restored and thriving, we must begin by protecting Nature on our doorsteps. The next generation of conservationists and environmental stewards won't appear by magic. They will emerge from the children and families who had the chance to explore, love and connect with nature today.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
TikTok bans popular phrase and blocks its search results following concerns that it's 'harmful' and promotes eating disorders
TikTok has banned a widely used term and blocked all its search results amid concerns that it promotes eating disorders. A hashtag and also a self-proclaimed online community, 'Skinntytok' has now been censored by the social media platform for fear it promotes extreme thinness and unhealthy weight loss techniques. The video-sharing app implemented a worldwide crackdown on the term as of June 1, and took steps to restrict all search results for the hashtag. The company said the new restriction is part of a 'regular review' to 'address evolving risks' on the site, but follows concerns raised by European regulators, according to the Mirror. 'Skinnytok' posts are typically targeted at young women, and see content creators sharing weight-loss techniques and guidance deemed unhealthy by many. 'We have blocked search results for #skinnytok since it has become linked to unhealthy weight loss content,' TikTok spokesperson Paolo Ganino said in a statement last week. Now, users who search the term will be redirected to sources offering mental health support. Before the ban, content associated with the hashtag reached a problematic crescendo, with the app awash with young women glamourising eating disorders like anorexia and bulimia. Both the European Commission and French digital regulator Arcom took notice and stepped in. The European Commission investigated the trend after France's Digital Minister Clara Chappaz pushed for an in-depth exploration of the online sphere, and created a public petition titled 'Stop Skinnytok'. When news of the ban broke, Clara wrote triumphantly on X: 'Skinnytok is OVER! This is a first collective victory. I salute it. 'However, the fight to protect our children online doesn't stop there. And I won't give up. Banning social media before 15 is my priority.' The platform's ban is extensive, and even suppresses searches for the term 'SkinnierTok'. Searching for either term on TikTok prompts the message: 'You're not alone. Searching for either 'Skinnytok' or 'Skinniertok' on TikTok prompts the above message urging users to seek support 'If you or someone you know has questions about body image, food or exercise – it is important to know that help is out there and you are not alone. 'If you feel comfortable, you can confide in someone you trust or check out the resources below. Please remember to take care of yourselves and each other.' Also provided is a helpline number and a link to the platform's Eating Disorder Safety Centre page. As many app users and content creators have already been quick to point out, banning the term is a win but not an absolute measure. Similar hashtags have been suppressed for safety reasons, but users have proved savvy in dodging the guidelines and creating alternative search terms, even if it means speaking in code. Nonetheless, social media platforms are being forced to take steps to protect the welfare of young and impressionable app users. Under the Online Safety Act, coming into force this summer, social media companies will have to respond to and remove harmful content more quickly. They will have to ensure they introduce rigorous age checking and take steps to tame dangerous algorithms. And, as per Ofcom's children's safety codes which were published last week, tech companies must begin to assess the risk of harm to children on their platforms. These protections will be legally enforceable from next month, and companies that do not comply could face serious penalties. Before the ban, 'Don't reward yourself with food, you're not a dog' was one of the so-called affirmations sweeping Skinnytok. Snappy phrases, inspired by Kate Moss's controversial 'Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels' saying, have become synonymous with restrictive diets that were being promoted. And while the body positivity movement of the 2010s sought to celebrate diverse bodies, it seems Gen Z has become consumed by 'glow-up culture' reminiscent of the 90s. Hiding behind a facade of gleaming exercise gear and Tupperware salads, the hashtag associated with more than half a million posts on TikTok promotes 1000-calorie diets and extreme exercise challenges. Sophia Healy, who struggled with anorexia for six years, said social media helped fuel her eating disorder - and fears this will have a similar impact on young girls. The 27-year-old told MailOnline: 'Social media 100 per cent glamorises it. 'You get some girls on TikTok talking about staying skinny and what they eat to stay skinny, like being skinny is the be-all and end-all, you have to be skinny to be happy. 'And then you get other people that constantly show what they eat in a day but it's the bare minimum thing but obviously you see it as a consumer and think I've got to eat like them to look like them. 'There was a time where curvy was considered "better". I followed influencers who were preaching body positivity and now they've suddenly got really skinny.'
BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Birmingham clinic's mental health services require improvement
NHS mental health provision in Birmingham still requires improvement, inspectors staff at the Reaside Clinic, a mental health clinic in Rednal, had not received all the appropriate and necessary training, a report from the Care Quality Commision said, and staff did not always involve patients in assessing their needs. The overall rating for Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust was requires the trust was judged to be good for being caring, well-led and responsive. The CQC said bosses needed to do more work to ensure patients received safe and effective care that met their needs. The inspection team visited the medium secure unit to check up on improvements the trust was told to make at a previous clinic provides assessment, treatment and rehabilitation to people with severe mental health problems across seven said there had been some improvements which meant the service was no longer in breach of regulations related to governance and oversight, but inspectors found two further breaches of regulations during their inspection in related to person-centred care and qualified staffing, they inspection team also visited the forensic intensive recovery and support teams (FIRST) following a serious incident which the trust had the forensic service - and the ratings for how safe and effective the service was - was found to require improvement. Amanda Lyndon, CQC deputy director of operations in the Midlands, said people had a mixed experiences of receiving care and treatment at Reaside."Some people told us that staff weren't always kind and caring," she said."However, people felt safe on the wards and knew who to speak to if they had any concerns."She said inspectors were told staff had cancelled some escorted leave outside of the unit due to low staffing levels, and that staff were sometimes too busy to support said they were told there were fewer activities on one ward following the departure of an activity worker, but that the trust had said it had plans to address this."Leaders at Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS need to focus on improving the effectiveness of people's care by making sure their individual needs are taken into account," she said."There are many positive findings at FIRST they can look to emulate at Reaside, and build on to make care consistently safer for people at all services." Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
