
To some students, the Declaration of Independence feels a lot like a breakup letter
Across Massachusetts, teachers are trying to breathe new life into the teaching of the
Lessons on the events leading up to the birth of the nation have been evolving over the generations as classroom instruction has expanded from emphasizing the teaching of battles, heroes, and the principles of democracy to including more discussion about the role of public activism and the experiences of
Teachers also are lecturing less. Instead, they are turning their students into sleuthing historians with assignments that have them digging through historic documents, biographies, and a host of other texts.
Advertisement
Getting students engaged can be a challenge.
'They kind of roll their eyes when we say we are going to talk about the American Revolution,' said Gorman Lee, social studies director for Braintree Public Schools and education committee chair of
Related
:
Advertisement
At Lynn Classical, the class ultimately decided to write two different versions of the Declaration of Independence. One was about a couple breaking up and the other was about an individual choosing independence from another.
'What happened then and how the Founding Fathers came to be is very inspiring,' Ny said. 'It's important to learn and know the history behind where we are now.'
Concerns about whether schools are
National data indicate the teaching of US history and the principles of democracy are in deep trouble:
US history exam. Those scores, which were not broken down by state, represented a decline from the 2018 exam.
F. Anderson Morse, executive director the American Revolution Institute of the Society of the Cincinnati, said the state of teaching of the American Revolution is a mixed bag.
'The bad news is they spend a lot less time talking about the Revolution in most schools today … than any of us growing up,' he said. 'There are some textbooks where you will see no more pages devoted to the American Revolution than to the story of Marilyn Monroe.'
He added, 'The good news is at least today people are starting to understand more — those who study it — that the American Revolution wasn't just an elitist war. … It's really a citizen's war.'
Advertisement
Kaylin Gangi, a third grade teacher at Drewicz Elementary School in Lynn, peppered her students with questions about Phillis Wheatley, an African American poet who wrote about the American Revolution.
Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff
Robert Allison, a history professor at Suffolk University in Boston, said he has seen Boston Public Schools pull back on the American Revolution and other history.
In the years following the bicentennial celebration in the 1970s, Allison said, BPS and the city's historical organizations started a partnership that enabled students to see famous landmarks from the American Revolution and other historic sites, but the program faded due to busing costs.
'It became this scramble every year and it essentially killed the program,' said Allison, who is chair of
Sujata Wycoff, a BPS spokesperson, said the district provides robust instruction on the American Revolution in Grades 5 and 8 and in high school, with an emphasis on having students learn about historical figures from marginalized communities. BPS also is expanding partnerships with historic sites and museums to create more field trips, especially ones focused on the 250th anniversary.
'The BPS History/Social Studies department has worked greatly since the COVID pandemic to bring back place-based learning opportunities ... ones focused on the American Revolution and various other topics in history,' she said in a statement.
Related
:
Massachusetts standards for social studies instruction call for the teaching of the American Revolution in the third, fifth, and eighth grades and in high school.
In third grade, lessons on the American Revolution often dovetail with broader units on local communities, which in Massachusetts often have deep roots in the American Revolution, and also emphasize the teaching about people from diverse backgrounds and perspectives, including enslaved and formerly enslaved people, and Native Americans.
Advertisement
Eighth grade is where the American Revolution is taught more deeply, when students study key ideas about equality, representative government, limited government, rule of law, and natural rights. The pressure on students to grasp those concepts is even more critical now with the arrival of a long anticipated MCAS civics exam for that grade level.
Students then receive another dose of the Revolution in high school in US History 1, although teachers say this often is a review since students take the course so soon after the eighth grade.
Third-graders Daniel Alvarado Amaya, Carolina De Faria Almeida Ferreira, and Jimena Perez Esteban at Drewicz Elementary School in Lynn worked on a poster about the American Revolution.
Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff
Beth Greenwood, a third grade teacher at Brookline's Lincoln School, said early lessons on the American Revolution and the plight of Colonists often resonate with young students.
'Third-graders are so aware of issues of fairness that is where they connect emotionally,' such as when laws were imposed on the Colonists, Greenwood said. 'They just get so engaged in the American Revolution as a story and the suspense of what will happen next.'
At Drewicz Elementary School in Lynn one recent morning, teacher Kaylin Gangi circulated around her third grade classroom as her students created posters about historic figures. Leaning over the shoulders of one group of students sitting at a cluster of desks as they tried to figure out what to write, she attempted to prod them along: 'Tell me a little bit about Phillis Wheatley.'
'She wrote poems,' one student replied.
When Gangi eventually asked them about what her poems were about and why she was famous, they struggled with their responses. So she suggested they do a little more research. Eventually, they learned that Wheatley wrote about the American Revolution (siding with the Colonists) and the plight of enslaved people, and was the first African American author to have a book of poetry published.
Advertisement
'She's brave,' Olivia Sanh Tarantini, 8, said later on in an interview. 'It would be very scary for me.'
The assignment was part of a new 'inquiry-based' curriculum,
'They always groan when I say we are studying social studies and then they get into it,' she said.
James Vaznis can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
We Now Know the Meaning of 'Religious Enough'
Back in 1959, the chief administrative officer of the United Presbyterian Church warned that churches wielded too much 'economic power' due to their tax-exempt status. Unless religious groups were taxed like everyone else, the nation might soon face 'revolutionary expropriations of church property.' Well, the revolution hasn't yet come for the churches. But regulatory creep has nevertheless nibbled at the margins of religious freedom, with states finding one activity or another to deem not truly religious and therefore subject to tax.

USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
I'm a Florida teacher. My passion to teach could be in violation of the law.
I'm a Florida teacher. My passion to teach could be in violation of the law. | Opinion This is the real damage: When fear begins to replace curiosity, and when silence replaces speech. Show Caption Hide Caption What we know now about President Trump's reshaping of education Education, especially higher education, has been a major focus of President Trump's term. Here is what we know now about his changes to education. As I prepare to teach a new literature course at Palm Beach State College (PBSC) this term, I find myself hesitating over something that, until recently, would have been routine: Selecting the works I assign to my students. The anthology adopted by our department includes powerful selections from African American, Latino, Asian American and LGBTQ+ writers – voices that capture the richness, contradiction and struggle of the American experience. These are voices I have taught for decades. But now I ask myself: Am I allowed to? Florida's 2023 legislation – most notably, Senate Bill 266 – prohibits instruction that espouses theories suggesting systemic racism, sexism or privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and that they were created to maintain social or economic inequities. The language is broad, and the intent seems clear: Restrict the way educators discuss identity, history and power. But what is less clear is what this means in practice for teachers like me, particularly in college classrooms. I am a lifelong educator. I spent 36 years in the New York City Department of Education as a teacher, department chair and supervisor. For the last 12 years, I have taught English literature at PBSC. Does my passion to teach violate the law? My passion has always been to encourage students to read deeply, think critically and reflect honestly – especially about the kind of country we live in and the lives we each bring to the table. That requires a broad and inclusive literary canon. It requires teaching James Baldwin and Langston Hughes not only for their artistry, but also for the searing truths they offer about race and belonging in America. It means examining the cultural double-consciousness in Sandra Cisneros, the generational trauma in Ocean Vuong, the gender defiance in Audre Lorde. Literature becomes real when it speaks both to and through the student reading it. That is the essence of education. Opinion: We desegregated schools 71 years ago. We still have more work to do. But now, when I consider assigning those same texts, I worry: Will presenting such works – even neutrally, even for discussion – be seen as violating this law? If I ask students to consider the historical roots of injustice in a work by August Wilson or Toni Cade Bambara, could that be construed as "promoting a theory" rather than simply exposing students to a reality reflected in literature? Worse, the chilling effect has begun to erode the classroom itself. Faculty colleagues increasingly wonder whether they should self-censor – not out of agreement with the law, but out of a desire to avoid trouble. This is the real damage: When fear begins to replace curiosity, and when silence replaces speech. I do not seek to indoctrinate my students. I never have. I seek to challenge them, to open doors through literature that lead into the complicated, layered and sometimes uncomfortable questions that make up life in a pluralistic democracy. That is not political. That is educational. Opinion: As a college professor, I see how AI is stripping away the humanity in education Forbidding certain materials only limits our understanding Let us be clear: Removing or discouraging the inclusion of marginalized voices in the classroom does not eliminate discomfort. It only eliminates understanding. If our students cannot engage with difficult truths in college classrooms, where are they to encounter them? If we cannot safely present a range of American experiences through our literary heritage, what remains of our intellectual freedom? I do not write this out of defiance, but out of love – for teaching, for literature and for the role education plays in shaping thoughtful citizens. The danger of this legislation is not only in its enforcement but also in its ambiguity. It turns teachers into second-guessers. It turns students into cautious bystanders. And it risks turning Florida's classrooms into places where only the most neutral, safest voices are heard. But the world is not neutral. Literature is not safe. And education, at its best, is a form of illumination, not erasure. Carmine Giordano is an adjunct lecturer in English at Palm Beach State College. This column originally appeared in the Palm Beach Post.

12 hours ago
Ahead of WorldPride, US Park Police, NPS close off key Pride gathering spot
There are no known credible threats to the nation's capital as tens of thousands gather in Washington this weekend to celebrate WorldPride, Capital Pride's 50th anniversary, officials told ABC News. But despite that, the U.S. Park Police and National Park Service have temporarily closed Dupont Circle Park, long the site of unofficial Pride parties and gatherings in the city, and that decision is drawing objections. Preparations for the international celebration have been years in the making, and at least one party promoter already advertised an event in the park before the closing was announced. After a debate between federal officials, city police and LGBTQ+ activists, the U.S. Park Police announced the park would close from 6 p.m. on Thursday, June 5, through approximately 6 p.m. on Sunday, June 8. Closing the park, federal officials say, is part of a broader federal security plan amid what they say are concerns about crowd control and potential disruptions. In recent years, the space has seen several incidents that that officials say prompted concern from law enforcement. According to authorities, in 2019, a person was arrested after gunshots caused crowds to flee. In 2023, the park was vandalized, resulting in $175,000 in damage to the historic fountain. In 2024, a group of minors was found drinking, smoking marijuana and fighting in the park. They later ran into nearby businesses and reportedly stole items. In a letter obtained by ABC News, the U.S. Park Police wrote that the closure is necessary to "secure the park, deter potential violence, reduce the risk of destructive acts and decrease the need for extensive law enforcement presences." Both the U.S. Park Police and the Metropolitan Police Department cited unsafe conditions and property damage during Pride weekend festivities in 2019, 2023 and 2024. MPD initially requested in April that the park be closed for Pride weekend. However, MPD Chief Pamela Smith, the first African American woman to lead the U.S. Park Police in its 200-year-plus history, attempted to get the closure rescinded after public backlash, saying, "D.C. is no stranger to high-profile gatherings. We have a proven track record of hosting them safely and successfully, and this year will be no different." But the U.S. Park Police and the National Park Service denied the request. The agencies said the request "does not provide any remedy or solutions to the significant amount of criminal activity and resource destruction that has historically been committed in Dupont Circle Park during DC Pride weekend, or the large strain on law enforcement resources that would be remedied by a park closure with anti-scale fence." MPD will have an increased presence throughout D.C. during WorldPride and Capital Pride. It will coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions and activate special units to assist with crowd management and traffic. Police will also increase patrols in high-crime areas starting this weekend through the end of August. "MPD, alongside all of our district agencies and public safety partners, have been working for many months to plan for these large-scale events that are happening this summer, and our joint planning efforts have included site visits, tabletop exercise, intelligence coordination and layered security strategies tailored uniquely to these events to ensure that we can keep our city safe for World Pride 2025," Smith said. "We have been planning for over a year." Days after WorldPride, the nation's capital will host a June 14 military parade marking the 250th anniversary of the Army, though officials said there aren't any known credible threats for that event either. That Army parade will be the sixth National Special Security Event that Washington has hosted this year. "There's no place more experienced than the District of Columbia in executing these large-scale events," Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice Lindsey Appiah said last week.