What caused the powerful Myanmar earthquake?
Myanmar has been hit by a magnitude 7.7 earthquake, which also affected neighbouring Thailand, its tremors felt as far afield as Cambodia and India.
Much of the devastation caused by Friday's quake appeared to be in Myanmar's ancient capital of Mandalay, close to the epicentre in the Sagaing region, where buildings toppled and infrastructure buckled. More than 140 people were killed in the country, according to state media.
Myanmar has been struck by several quakes since a magnitude 7.3 earthquake in the southern city of Bago in 1930, which killed at least 550 people, according to a United Nations seismic risk assessment.
So, what makes this Southeast Asian country, which has been blighted by nearly four years of civil war, so vulnerable to earthquakes and how big was this one?
First of all, a quick explanation of what an earthquake actually is. The Earth is made up of three parts: a molten, mostly metallic core at the centre, surrounded by a hot, nearly solid layer of rock called the mantle, with a jigsaw-like crust on the outside that is made up of constantly shifting tectonic plates.
This movement of the plates on the slippery mantle, at different speeds and in different directions, causes energy to build up. The release of this energy causes the intense shaking of the planet's surface that we call an earthquake. When the energy is released below the ocean, it creates a series of huge waves known as a tsunami.
Aftershocks are triggered 'because of changes to stress in the Earth from the main shock,' according to Will Yeck, a seismologist with the US Geological Survey (USGS).
Myanmar's location between two tectonic plates – the India and Eurasia plates – places it at particular risk of earthquakes.
The boundary between the two plates is called the Saigang Fault. Experts describe it as a long, straight line running approximately 1,200km (745 miles) from north to south through cities such as Mandalay and Yangon, placing millions of people at risk.
According to the USGS, the Myanmar earthquake occurred because the India and Eurasia plates were rubbing sideways against each other, a motion described as 'strike-slip faulting'.
Dr Rebecca Bell, a tectonics expert at Imperial College London, cited by the London-based Science Media Centre, compared the boundary between the two plates to the famous San Andreas Fault in California, which caused the deadly Northridge earthquake in 1994.
'The straight nature means earthquakes can rupture over large areas – and the larger the area of the fault that slips, the larger the earthquake,' she was quoted as saying.
The strength of the earthquake is measured on the Moment Magnitude Scale, which largely replaced the famous Richter scale in the 1970s.
Friday's quake of 7.7 was considered powerful, unleashing chaos in Myanmar and Thailand.
In Thailand's capital, Bangkok, a 33-storey high-rise that was still under construction crumbled, killing at least eight and trapping dozens of construction workers under the rubble.
In Myanmar's Mandalay, buildings were toppled, the royal palace was damaged, and the road-and-rail Ava Bridge collapsed. There was also damage in the modern capital, Naypyidaw, and the former capital, Yangon. State media said at least 144 people had been killed across the country.
The USGS estimates that nearly 800,000 people in Myanmar may have been within the zone of the most violent shaking, with the death toll expected to rise sharply over the coming days.
The earthquake took place at a relatively shallow depth – just 10km (six miles) deep.
Dr Ian Watkinson, from the Department of Earth Sciences at Royal Holloway, University of London, was cited by the Science Media Centre as saying that shallow earthquakes can create a lot of damage, given that 'the seismic energy is not dissipated much by the time it reaches the surface'.
While some regions of the world along active fault lines, including California and Japan, have building codes designed to withstand earthquakes, the infrastructure in the region hit by Friday's quake is less well equipped.
As Watkinson puts it, Myanmar has gone through 'rapid urbanisation', with 'a boom in high-rise buildings constructed from reinforced concrete'.
He believes Friday's earthquake could create levels of destruction comparable to the 2023 magnitude 7.8 quake in southern Turkiye, where many buildings collapsed after years of unregulated construction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran increases stockpile of enriched Uranium by 50 percent, IAEA says
The United Nations nuclear watchdog says Iran has increased its stockpile of highly enriched, near weapons-grade uranium by 50 percent in the last three months. The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Saturday comes as nuclear deal negotiations are under way between the United States and Iran, with Tehran insisting its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only. The IAEA said as of May 17, Iran had amassed 408.6kg (900.8 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60 percent – the only non-nuclear weapon state to do so, according to the UN agency – and had increased its stockpile by almost 50 percent to 133.8kg since its last report in February. The wide-ranging, confidential report seen by several news agencies said Iran carried out secret nuclear activities with material not declared to the IAEA at three locations that have long been under investigation, calling it a 'serious concern' and warning Tehran to change its course. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, however, reaffirmed the country's longstanding position, saying Tehran deems nuclear weapons 'unacceptable'. 'If the issue is nuclear weapons, yes, we too consider this type of weapon unacceptable,' Araghchi, Iran's lead negotiator in the nuclear talks with the US, said in a televised speech. 'We agree with them on this issue.' But the report, which was requested by the IAEA's 35-nation board of governors in November, will allow for a push by the United States, Britain, France and Germany to declare Iran in violation of its non-proliferation obligations. On Friday, US President Donald Trump said Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon'. 'They don't want to be blown up. They would rather make a deal,' Trump said, adding: 'That would be a great thing that we could have a deal without bombs being dropped all over the Middle East.' In 2015, Iran reached a deal with the United Kingdom, US, Germany, France, Russia, China and the European Union, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. It involved the lifting of some sanctions on Tehran in return for limits on its nuclear development programme. But in 2018, then US President Trump unilaterally quit the agreement and reimposed harsh sanctions. Tehran then rebuilt its stockpiles of enriched uranium. In December last year, the IAEA said Iran was rapidly enriching uranium to 60 percent purity, moving closer to the 90 percent threshold needed for weapons-grade material. Western nations say such intensive enrichment should not be part of a civilian nuclear programme, but Iran insists it is not developing weapons. Hamed Mousavi, professor of political science at Tehran University, told Al Jazeera the IAEA findings could indicate a possible negotiation tool for Iran during its ongoing nuclear talks with the US. 'I think both sides are trying to build leverage against the other side. From the Iranian perspective, an advancement in the nuclear programme is going to bring them leverage at the negotiation table with the Americans,' he said. On the other side, he said, the US could threaten more sanctions and may also refer the Iranian case to the UN Security Council for its breach of the 2006 non-proliferation agreement. However, he added that Iran has not made the 'political decision' to build a possible bomb. 'Enriching up to 60 percent [of uranium] – from the Iranian perspective – is a sort of leverage against the Americans to lift sanctions,' Mousavi said.
Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Police clash with Gaza war protesters at London university
NewsFeed Police clash with Gaza war protesters at London university Video shows police confronting students protesting against Israel's war on Gaza outside King's College London. At least one student was arrested.
Al Jazeera
5 days ago
- Al Jazeera
‘US, China, India can all fit into Africa': On a quest to fix the world map
When Abimbola Ogundairo saw a pretty wooden map she thought would be great decor for her walls, she did something most regular buyers wouldn't think of: She messaged the manufacturers with a simple, yet charged question. 'Which map projection did you use?' she asked, referring to the method of representing maps on a flat plane. The sellers never responded, but Ogundairo suspected they used a problematic projection. Discouraged, she refused to place an order. Ogundairo's obsession with map projections is not random. The 28-year-old is leading an African-led campaign to get more of global institutions and schools to immediately stop using the Mercator Map projection – the most common version of the world map that is generally recognised – because it shrinks Africa, and much of the Global South, while disproportionately enlarging the rich and powerful regions of the world. Greenland, for example, is shown to be relatively the same size as Africa, but, in reality, can fit in the continent 14 times over. Europe, portrayed as bigger than South America, is actually half its size. Advocates like Ogundairo are pushing instead for 'equal area' map projections, which they say more accurately represent the prominence of the African continent. Since early May, Ogundairo, as lead campaigner at Africa No Filter, a nonprofit working to change negative perceptions of Africa, has hassled big institutions like the United Nations with a 'Correct the World' campaign. People are encouraged to sign an online petition to pressure their governments into compliance. Most people, Ogundairo said, don't know about the distortions and react with surprise and outrage. 'We've had a lot of, 'Oh my God, I didn't even know this was happening,'' Ogundairo told Al Jazeera. 'I have an uncle who decided to support this because I told him you can fit the US, China, and India into Africa, and he felt so betrayed. He was like 'Oh my God, I had no idea.'' Institutions have been harder to crack, Ogundairo said, but she expected some resistance to this sensitive, controversial topic. For centuries, experts have debated the question: Can anyone accurately depict a three-dimensional, spherical world on a flat surface? Is it possible to take a rounded object, like a football, for example, cut it up, paste it on a board, and have a precise representation? Many experts conclude the answer is a resounding no. Maps, they say, are inherently a lie, always compromising on something: Area, distance, or something else. Others, though, argue that near-perfect maps exist and must be believes the commonly used Mercator map affects Africa and Africans negatively, and that its widespread use for centuries is connected to the many decades of colonialism the continent endured. Now, she said, some 70 years after independence from colonial masters, is the time to press for change. 'We live in a world where size is often equated with power,' Ogundairo said, adding that the Mercator map feeds tropes that Africa is a country. 'It has a damaging impact on the way we make decisions in our everyday lives, on how we make business decisions, the way we dream, and even the way non-Africans view the continent as a tourist destination and an investment destination. It's the most lingering lie about Africa,' she said. Cartographers as far back as the early 20th century knew the Mercator projection was problematic. Developed by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1599, the projection was one of the first ever to represent arched, imaginary sailing courses as visible, straight lines. Its simplicity for sea navigation cemented its popularity at the time, but its huge errors soon became hard to ignore. 'It preserves shapes and angles, and that's good for navigation, but it's terrible for scale,' geography professor Lindsay Frederick Braun of the University of Oregon said of the Mercator map. The map is most suitable for local area mapping and is used by digital platforms like Google Maps. When enlarged into a world map, though, Mercator becomes problematic, Braun said. The map's mistakes were not likely to be a conspiracy against Africa or the Global South, but its continued use, he added, is inherently political. 'Part of the reason Mercator got wide use is because it was widely available for nautical charts, but also because it rings true as a vision of the world to the people who were looking at it, the people whose countries are a little bigger.' Several map projections over time have tried to fill Mercator's gaps, but all of them compromise on one or more factors. That has made it hard for social justice crusaders looking to support a projection that better represents the Global South. One cartographer's claims, though, shook the cartography world in 1973, causing an outpouring of condemnation on the one hand, and on the other, a loyal cult following. German activist Arno Peters declared his Peters Projection as the 'only' precise map, and the true alternative to the Mercator model. Peters, whose parents had been imprisoned by Nazis and who focused on social inequalities as a journalist and academic criticised the Mercator projection as 'Euro-centred'. The fervour with which he and his supporters promoted the projection as a scientific feat and a social justice breakthrough bordered on what some called propaganda. It caused concerned groups like the United States National Council of Churches to take notice and immediately adopt the map. Critics, though, were quick to call out Peters on two things. The map, observers pointed out, was only distorted differently: Where the Mercator projection makes areas near the poles appear much larger, the Peters projection relatively represents accurate sizes throughout, but slightly stretches areas near the equator vertically, and areas near the poles horizontally. 'There was also the fact that this map had already been presented by another cartographer decades ago,' Braun said, explaining the second problem. Scottish scientist James Gall indeed first published an identical projection in a science journal in 1855, but it went unnoticed. There is no proof, some researchers say, that Peters outrightly plagiarised Gall, but critics say his failure to credit the earlier researcher is still problematic. In 2016, the debate resurfaced with renewed vigour after public schools in the US city of Boston switched to what many now refer to as the 'Gall-Peters' projection. Officials said the move was part of a three-year effort to 'decolonise the curriculum'. Teachers said they were amazed to see students questioning their view of the world after the switch. However, many experts and map enthusiasts were annoyed by the fact that Boston chose Peters, and as such, gave the projection renewed relevance. Al Jazeera reached out to the Boston Public Schools (BPS) for comment. Amid the Boston schools' drama, one group of researchers decided they'd had enough of Peters and set out to do something. Cartographer Bernard Jenny, who teaches immersive visualisation at Australia's Monash University, said he was approached by Tom Patterson, a retired cartographer with the UN National Parks, for the task. Together with software engineer Bojan Savric, the team in 2018 created an equal area map they called the 'Equal Earth' projection. That version, which sees Africa expand impressively, is increasingly seen as the closest thing to a perfect area map. It's the same one Ogundairo's team is pushing for. 'But that's maybe a slightly pretentious name,' Jenny laughed over a Zoom call, explaining that Equal Earth is still not a perfect representation of the Earth. 'We were just tired of the Peters resurgence and wondered why people would go with that when it's not even the best in terms of anything,' he new projection tries to correct the Robinson projection, created in 1963 by American Arthur H Robinson. Many scientists use Robinson's map because it is more visually balanced, although it compromises on area, size and scale, and particularly enlarges areas close to the north and south poles. 'We tried to come up with a version of Robinson that does not distort area,' Jenny explained. 'So we stretched it in a way such that the different areas are not enlarged or shrunken. So Greenland is 14 times smaller than Africa on the globe, and it's also 14 times smaller on the Equal Earth map.' Jenny said the team never set out specifically to correct some of the most highlighted errors of the Mercator projection. Subconsciously, though, he said, they knew they wanted their map to better represent historically distorted regions like Africa. 'I would guess any reasonable geographer would support that idea,' the scientist said. Equal Earth rose in popularity after a NASA scientist saw it online right after it was published, and the organisation immediately switched to it. The World Bank, too, has picked it up. The institution, since 2013, has experimented with different projections, including the Robinson map, but in 2024 settled on the Equal Earth map. 'The World Bank Group is committed to ensuring accurate representation of all people, on all platforms,' a spokesperson told Al Jazeera. Progress is slow but steady, Ogundairo of Africa No Filter said. Prominent organisations changing their stances means a universal pivot is possible, she said. Yet, there's much more work to be done by Africans, she added. Just as Mercator painted an image that prominently represented his part of the world, Africans, too, need to lead the way in pushing for what they want, Ogundairo said. One missing factor is that Africans have not insisted enough on change, in her view. It's why her campaign is also urging African countries and the African Union to be particular about how they are represented on the map. 'It's always going to start with us,' Ogundairo said. 'Unless you learn to tell your story, someone else will tell it for you. We need to say, regardless of why they choose to do whatever it is they did, we see the truth. This is the story we want to tell now. This is how we want to show up visually on a map.'
