logo
These birds carry a toxin deadlier than cyanide

These birds carry a toxin deadlier than cyanide

New Guinea is home to some of the world's most toxic birds. Why they contain poison, and how they withstand the it is still a source of scientific mystery. The variable pitohui, a poisonous bird, captured in mist net on the outskirts of Wanang Village in Papua New Guinea in 2018. Photographs By Knud Jønsson
In the summer of 1989, Jack Dumbacher was a fresh-faced ornithologist-in-training on his maiden expedition to the lush rainforests of Papua New Guinea. One sticky afternoon, he noticed an unusual bird with gaudy black-and-orange feathers entangled in his mist nets. But as Dumbacher tried to set it free, the hooded pitohui scratched him.
'They're jay-sized birds with needle-sharp claws and bills,' says Dumbacher, who instinctively put the cut to his lips. 'My mouth started to tingle and burn, and then went numb, lasting until the night.'
When Dumbacher consulted his local guides, they nodded knowingly, telling him how villagers would avoid the 'rubbish birds,' eating them only if they were 'skinned and specially prepared.' Curiosity piqued, the then-graduate student at the University of Chicago spent the next year collecting pitohui samples and searching for a chemist back home who could pinpoint the source of the peculiar sensations.
In 1992, Dumbacher and his collaborators announced their astonishing findings: hooded pitohuis carry batrachotoxin. The toxin is deadlier than cyanide and is among the most lethal substances in the animal kingdom. It's the same substance found in certain poison dart frogs halfway round the world.
Since then, at least a dozen other avian species, out of more than 10,500 known to science, have been identified as toxic. Some members of this select group—such as the European quail, North American ruffed grouse, and European hoopoes —are found outside of New Guinea and contain different toxins. The majority, however, are batrachotoxin-carrying and endemic to the world's second largest island, including at least five other pitohui species and the blue-capped ifrit.
But 35 years on from Dumbacher's serendipitous discovery, much remains a mystery about New Guinea's poisonous birds. 'There's a ton that we don't know—from the ecology of the birds to how they use batrachotoxin for defense and where they get it from,' says Dumbacher, now California Academy of Sciences' curator of birds and mammals.
He last visited the island in 2011, and another team of scientists—led by ecologist Knud Jønsson from the Swedish Museum of Natural History and evolutionary and community biologist Kasun Bodawatta at the University of Copenhagen—are continuing Dumbacher's research. Already, they've made inroads, identifying two new toxic bird species in 2023, the first discovery in nearly two decades. They plan to visit Papua New Guinea annually until 2028.
They hope to answer a key question: where does the toxin—believed to protect the birds from predators and parasites—come from?
One theory for the origin of this poison is the birds' diet.
'It's been put forth that they eat these Choresine beetles and that's how they get their toxin,' says Jønsson. 'But in reality, we don't know.'
Dumbacher—who, in 2004, was the first to describe how batrachotoxin is present in both birds and beetles—doesn't believe the toxin originates in the tiny rice-sized insects.
'Most of the information suggests that beetles can't produce such steroidal alkaloids,' he says. 'So it's very possible that the beetles are getting it from some other source like soil mites or even a plant.'
To track batrachotoxin's origin, the researchers plan to collect poisonous birds and compare their stomach contents to insects caught in nearby traps. 'The idea is to try and home in on potential prey items that have the toxin,' explains Jønsson. 'It's very much looking for a needle in a haystack, but that's the very first step that we can take.'
They've also teamed up with Christine Beemelmanns, a chemist at Germany's Saarland University to pinpoint batrachotoxin and molecularly similar toxins in the samples already collected.
Tests have shown that poisonous birds contain a mixture of toxic derivatives—Beemelmanns' lab has identified six so far—which can vary in concentration between individuals and species. The hooded pitohui is one of several poisonous birds that have been documented in Papua New Guinea. While poisonous birds have been documented in North America and Europe, the majority known to science are found in the this South Pacific region. Photographs By Knud Jønsson How do birds remain immune?
Another enduring mystery is how the birds protect themselves from the deadly toxin they carry.
Batrachotoxin binds to sodium ion channels in nerve, muscle, and heart cells, resulting in numbness, convulsions, paralysis, and even death. 'It sits on these channels and keeps them open, so the nerves just go on twitching,' says Jønsson.
Poisonous birds contain far less toxin than the golden poison frog, which carries enough batrachotoxin to kill 10 grown men. The hooded pitohui—the most toxic avian species—isn't lethal when handled or consumed.
The longstanding theory that explains how the birds 'aren't killing themselves' is that they, like poison dart frogs, contain mutations in their sodium channels, which prevents the toxin from binding, says Daniel Minor, a biophysicist at the University of California, San Francisco, who's not involved with Jønsson and Bodawatta's upcoming research expeditions.
The same trait is found in the fugu pufferfish, blue-ringed octopus, and other poisonous animals that remain impervious to the toxins they carry.
Indeed, when Jønsson and his collaborators compared the genomes of six toxic bird species with their non-toxic cousins within the same families, they discovered that poisonous birds contained multiple mutations in a gene encoding a specific sodium channel.
However, when Minor's team conducted electrophysiological tests on genes cloned from the southern variable pitohui in a separate set of experiments, they 'were distraught' to discover that the sodium channels remained sensitive to batrachotoxin—despite their mutations.
Minor now believes that the birds' resistance lies in an as-yet-unidentified protein which acts as a 'toxin sponge,' binding to batrachotoxin and sequestering it. He and his colleagues' work on saxitoxin, another protein that binds to sodium channels, provided this insight.
'Our lab showed that saxiphilin, a protein found naturally in poison dart frogs, can scoop in and bind to saxitoxin with high affinity,' he explains. 'So maybe it's the same for batrachotoxin.'
Jønsson and Bodawatta think the two mechanisms might be complementary. 'Birds, anyway, need to transport batrachotoxin from the gut to the skin,' says Bodawatta. 'So they must have a transporter protein that facilitates this.' Are there more?
Scientists' are keen to know whether more toxic birds exist.
Jønsson thinks it's highly likely. "New Guinea's poisonous birds belong to the Corvides super-family of birds, which comprise roughly 700 species worldwide,' he says. New Guinea is home to 140 of them, and his team has so far studied just a fifth of them.
Starting this November, his team will collect 'as many Corvides samples as possible' from different parts of the island and screen them for batrachotoxin. They also plan to sequence as least one individual per species to identify sodium channel mutations.
A more comprehensive genomic dataset will also allow scientists to identify possible toxin sponge proteins, adds Bodawatta.
More broadly, the researchers want to study 'the super cool and crazy convergent evolution' that's allowed for this special toxin resistance in both frogs and birds, as well as unrelated avian species within New Guinea and elsewhere in the world, Bodawatta says.
'Understanding convergent adaptations by natural selection is a central goal in evolutionary biology,' adds Jønsson.
The more scientists learn about what exists, the more questions they'll be able to ask about why they do.
'Maybe in two to three years, we'll have some new insights to share,' says Bodawatta. 'This is just the beginning.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ancient Romans snacked on deep-fried songbirds
Ancient Romans snacked on deep-fried songbirds

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ancient Romans snacked on deep-fried songbirds

Fast food didn't start with McDonald's—quick, convenient meals have been a dietary staple of busy societies for millennia. Across the Roman empire, roadside shops known as popinae and tabernae often served up inexpensive, affordable dishes to hungry locals and travelers alike. But after scouring ancient garbage piles near one such popina in Mallorca, Spain, archeologists are better understanding how certain entrées transcended class divisions more often than previously thought. According to findings recently published in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Roman commoners frequently enjoyed dining on thrushes—small songbirds once thought to be a luxury dish. Birds were prominent figures in ancient Rome. Certain owls and eagles were considered powerful divinatory omens, while smaller avian species like thrushes were popular as both pets and meals. In the latter case, however, ancient texts suggest thrushes were primarily eaten by wealthier Romans. 'Classical sources frequently describe these small birds as a delicacy served in elite banquets, often prepared with elaborate culinary techniques,' the study's authors write. They also cite recipes documented by Pliny the Elder and Apicius that described fattening songbirds with figs before roasting and serving them with complex sauces. These assumptions were recently challenged by finds at an excavation in Mallorca, Spain. There, archeologists from the Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies (IMEDEA) uncovered a large cesspit beside a roadside popina snack bar. The building also featured six amphorae (large vats) embedded in its countertop in a configuration like the one seen in Pompeii's famous street food court, or thermopolia. Amid the refuse were 165 thrush bones alongside other common food remains like sea shells as well as fish and pig bones. The condition of the songbirds' broken bones suggest that they were flattened and cooked whole with oil in the amphorae. In addition to the thrushes, archeologists also documented remains from domesticated chickens and European rabbits. These point to a wider menu tailored to everyday customers. Taken altogether, it appears that thrushes were served up similar to today's sports bar chicken wings. The food shop in Mallorca isn't the only example of deep-fried songbirds across Rome. As Arkeonews notes, additional finds in Pompeii and Britain indicates a widespread culture of ancient Roman fast food. 'Thrushes, though a minor component of the Roman diet compared to livestock, represent an important facet of urban food consumption,' the study's authors conclude. 'Ultimately, this research highlights the need to move beyond elite-centric narratives and consider the diverse ways in which food practices shaped the lived experiences of ancient urban communities.'

SpliceBio lands $135M for a new kind of eye gene therapy
SpliceBio lands $135M for a new kind of eye gene therapy

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

SpliceBio lands $135M for a new kind of eye gene therapy

This story was originally published on BioPharma Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily BioPharma Dive newsletter. SpliceBio, a Spanish biotechnology company working on next-generation gene therapies, said Wednesday it raised $135 million in a Series B round to advance its lead program in Stargardt disease into further clinical testing. The startup is built around a technology that's meant to overcome a key limitation of current gene therapies. Scores of gene therapy developers use adeno-associated viruses, or AAVs, to deliver genetic cargo into the body. But because of their small size, AAVs can't carry larger corrective genes, leaving many diseases out of reach or forcing companies to come up with creative solutions. One example is in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Because of the large size of the gene coding for the muscle-protecting protein dystrophin Duchenne patients lack, several companies, like Sarepta Therapeutics, have developed gene therapies that make a shortened form. The approach comes with drawbacks, however, as a truncated version of the protein might not work as well as the original. SpliceBio has a different workaround. The company is using two separate AAVs to send pieces of a large gene into cells. Once inside, specially engineered splicing molecules help reassemble their cargo into full-length proteins. Stargardt disease, for example, is caused by mutations to the ABCA4 gene, which is too large to stuff into an AAV. SpliceBio says its method can help the body produce a functional version of the protein that gene produces. Its lead program, SB-007, is in a Phase 1/2 trial. SpliceBio isn't the only biotech pursuing this type of approach to treat Stargardt, an inherited eye condition that causes progressive vision loss. Another European company, AAVantgarde, has a similar type of program in early-stage testing. SpliceBio's technology is based on research conducted at Princeton University, where co-founder and CEO Miquel Vila-Perelló was studying protein design and engineering. Launched in 2014 under the name ProteoDesign, the biotech is also working on additional programs in ophthalmology, neurology and other undisclosed therapeutic areas. Its Series B round was co-led by EQT Life Sciences and Sanofi Ventures, and involved seven other backers including Roche Venture Fund, New Enterprise Associates and Novartis Venture Fund. "The support from such high-quality investors underscores the strength of our programs and our unique protein splicing platform and its potential to unlock gene therapies for diseases that remain untreatable today,' Vila-Perelló said in a statement. The company raised €50 million in a Series A round in 2022. Gene and cell therapy startups backed by the roughly two dozen investment firms BioPharma Dive tracks have secured a little over $1.1 billion in venture dollars so far in 2025. Half of those fundings have come in the form of 'megarounds' exceeding $100 million apiece, continuing an ongoing trend. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

18th gray whale washes up dead on California coast — and experts are stumped
18th gray whale washes up dead on California coast — and experts are stumped

Miami Herald

time5 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

18th gray whale washes up dead on California coast — and experts are stumped

A body of a gray whale found on a San Francisco Bay Area beach marks the 18th death of 2025 for the marine mammals in the region, experts reported. The dead male gray whale washed up at Lands End on Saturday, June 7, the California Academy of Sciences said in a June 9 news release. No necropsy was performed, so the cause of death remains unknown, the academy said. It's the 18th such death reported in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2025, the academy and The Marine Mammal Center reported. One minke whale also died in the Bay Area this year. Nine whales recently died in the region in about a two-week span, experts said. Four of the gray whale deaths are suspected to be due to vessel strikes, the academy said. But experts aren't sure what's causing the spike in deaths, which is comparable to the 14 deaths reported in 2019 and 15 deaths reported in 2021. Researchers have found a rise in reported sightings of gray whales inside San Francisco Bay, with 33 individual whales confirmed by photo identification, the academy said. 'By comparison, only six gray whales were sighted in the bay in 2024,' the academy said in the release. The whales also are spending more time in the bay, with one-third staying at least 20 days, experts said. 'It is expected that gray whales will be in the bay for another one to two weeks before continuing their annual northern migration to arctic feeding grounds,' the academy said in the release. What to know about gray whales Adult gray whales can reach up to 49 feet in length and weigh up to 90,000 pounds, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said. They make one of the longest migrations of any mammal, moving up to 14,000 miles round-trip each year. They are protected under the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store