logo
'Our home is not respected because of Trainspotting'

'Our home is not respected because of Trainspotting'

Yahoo13-02-2025

When tour buses drove past the Banana Flats on the way to Edinburgh's Port of Leith, guides with microphones would describe it as the "Trainspotting building".
Cables Wynd House gets a passing mention as the childhood home of Simon "Sick Boy" Williamson in Irvine Welsh's 1993 novel, but for modern tenants, issues are far from fictional.
They have accused City of Edinburgh Council of breaching their human rights over the condition of the A-listed block, citing damp, mould, pests and broken lifts ahead of a delayed "retrofit" due to start next year.
The authority says the multi-million pound investment will "address concerns" but residents are sceptical and worry the building's fearsome reputation means they have been "forgotten".
The Cables Wynd House Residents Group presented a report to the council last month.
They said rights including the right to adequate housing, children's rights and the rights of people with disabilities were being breached by the condition of the building.
All but four of the 212 flats in the block, which celebrates its 60th anniversary this year, are owned by the council.
The bus tours have now halted their stop outside the flats after complaints from tenants.
Kirsty Chatwood said the notoriety of the building meant residents' voices "were not listened to".
Ms Chatwood, 48, experienced severe issues with black mould in her flat from a botched bathroom repair.
She said the block "did not deserve" its reputation.
"Because of Trainspotting and the reputation of the building, we are not respected, our voices are not respected," she said.
"We're seen as all being drug addicts, like we all have ASBOs, when in fact we are basically a small village.
"If the refurbishment goes through, if they fix everything they say they are going to fix; the building is going to be amazing, but promises here are rarely kept".
Tenants have also complained about anti-social behaviour, drug use and human waste in communal stairwells.
Some are scared to use any of the four "creaking and claustrophobic" lifts in the building due to "violent shaking" and fears of becoming trapped inside.
But they also claim there is a "severe lack of accountability" when it comes to requesting work to be carried out by Repairs Direct, the council's in-house maintenance service.
Stacey Panda spent six years fighting to have her daughter's bedroom replastered after discovering black mould covering parts of the wall and floor.
Ms Panda, 37, said she noticed the "smell of damp" when she moved in to her flat in 2015.
She was forced to sleep on a mattress in her living room with her youngest daughter for several months until the issue was eventually resolved in 2021.
But by then, mould had been found on the legs of her daughter's cot, in a wardrobe and a box of family memories including pictures and outfits worn by her two children.
She said she was "repeatedly dismissed" by the council during that process and given incorrect advice on how to deal with the problem.
She said: "There has been a lot of times where I feel I have failed my kids.
"My youngest refuses to go in the lift because she was trapped in one for a short period once. The noise absolutely terrifies both my children and we hear it all the time.
"It feels like they are banking on the retrofit fixing every single problem, but how? How are they going to ensure that? There has been nothing that makes us feel comfortable about it."
The flats were seen as an innovative solution to Edinburgh's post-war housing challenges when they were completed in 1965.
Properties are accessed by open decks, inspired by similar housing schemes in France, which aimed to mimic the experience of living on a tenemented street in the sky.
Their unique, curved architecture, designed to make use of limited space, earned them the "banana flats" nickname.
In 2017, they were given category A-listed status by Historic Environment Scotland as a leading example of Scottish brutalism.
Allan Mackie said there was a "community" around the flats when he and late wife Betty first moved there in 1968.
Mr Mackie, 80, said two bus-loads of families from the block, including their three sons, would leave for a trip to Butlins in Ayr every summer.
But he said that had been lost as the condition of the flats was allowed to deteriorate.
He has been plagued by problems with mice, which he believes stem from a kitchen refit in 2011.
He said broken window seals have also left his bedroom "like an igloo" at night.
On Mr Mackie's landing, a two-foot (60cm) long crack in the wall and a window held in place by duct tape mean it regularly floods when it rains.
He has also repeatedly complained about rusting, corroded metalwork and plaster in stairwells peeling off the walls.
Mr Mackie said he has "no faith" in the planned refurbishment.
"The retrofit is a waste of time," he said.
"As far as we are concerned, the council is non-existent. They talk about the retrofit like it is the be all and end all. But in the meantime, the building is just allowed to fall apart.
"It is like the council are trying to ignore us into submission."
The council is due to meet the residents' group on 27 February to issue an official response to their report, compiled with the help of Inspiring Leith, part of the Bethany Christian Trust.
Hannah Kirby, community development worker at Inspiring Leith, said the issues were affecting residents' health.
She said: "The work residents have done is incredible, we just wish they didn't have to spend so much time campaigning for adequate housing in the first place."
The retrofit project, which was due to get under way this year, will see a new heating system installed and new kitchens fitted.
Roofs, foyer areas, entrances, fire doors, stairwells and communal landings will also be upgraded.
Lift upgrades and repairs were not included in the original retrofit plans until the group pressured the council.
Three of the building's four lifts will now be replaced as part of the project, but that will take a year to complete.
The council's housing convener, Lezley Marion Cameron, said: "We are committing a significant investment of £69m in Cables Wynd House to address the concerns of our tenants, as set out in this report.
"Our commitment to our tenants is to make sure everyone is kept informed about when the works start and importantly, what it means for them.
"Our priority as a council and as a landlord must be and is that all our tenants have a safe, comfortable, and well-maintained home."
'Banana flats' in listed building plan
Scotland's 50 post-war A-listed buildings

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to Watch ‘RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars' Season 10 Online
How to Watch ‘RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars' Season 10 Online

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How to Watch ‘RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars' Season 10 Online

All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes. Who will take the crown? RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars tenth season premieres on Paramount+ on Friday (May 9). More from Billboard Every Lip Sync From 'RuPaul's Drag Race' Season 16, Ranked You Have to See Light Wire, the Brazilian LED Dance Team That Earned Simon's Golden Buzzer on 'America's Got Talent' Premiere 'America's Got Talent': How to Watch Season 20 Premiere For season 10, the show is switching up the usual formula. This season will not only feature more All Stars than any other season – 18 to be exact – it will also debut an all-new bracket-style competition. This time around, queens will be divided into three groups of six and will compete within their brackets over the course of three episodes. When the group period ends, the three queens with the most points will move on to the semifinals round where they will continue to compete against each other to make it into the Drag Race Hall of Fame and win the $200,000 cash prize. Alongside the increased amount of queens, this season will also features many surprised guests judges, including Wicked co-stars Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo, Chappell Roan, and Sarah Michelle Gellar. Read on to find out how to watch the new season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars for free. Season 10 of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will premiere with two all-new episodes on Friday, May 9. The show will stream exclusively on Paramount+. This season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will feature the largest group of queens in the show's history, including: Acid Betty (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 8) Aja (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 3) Alyssa Hunter (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Bosco (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Cynthia Lee Fontaine (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 8, RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9) Daya Betty (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) DeJa Skye (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Denali (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) Ginger Minj (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 7, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 2, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 6) Irene the Alien (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 15) Jorgeous (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 9) Kerri Colby (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Lydia B. Kollins (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 17) Mistress Isabelle Brooks (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 15) Nicole Paige Brooks (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 2) Olivia Lux (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) Phoenix (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 3) Tina Burner (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) A new season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will be available exclusively on Paramount+ starting on Friday, May 9. If you're not already subscribed, join today and receive a free trial for the first week to stream Drag Race All Stars and other programs on the platform, including RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars: Untucked. The streaming service costs $7.99/month for the ad-supported, Essential plan. Paramount+ with Showtime usually costs $12.99/month. Get: paramount+ free trial Here What else is streaming on Paramount? Subscribers can enjoy tens of thousands of episodes of hit shows and must-watch movies, including Knuckles, The Good Fight, Mayor of Kingstown, Star Trek: Discovery, Star Trek: Picard, Why Women Kill, and Before I Forget, in addition to NFL on CBS, local CBS stations (with Paramount+ Premium) and 24-hour news with CBSN. Want more ways to stream? Paramount+ is also on Prime Video! You can stream episodes from the current season and earlier seasons of Drag Race All Stars with a free trial from Paramount+ on Prime Video. Get: paramount+ on prime video here And if you're looking for Drag Race merch to celebrate the current season, check out the adorable RuPaul Little People Collector's set, The Official Trixie and Katya Coloring Book and RuPaul's Drag Race Monopoly. $23.95 Buy Now On Amazon $12.69 $18.00 30% off Buy Now On Amazon $34.97 Buy Now on walmart Watch the trailer for the new season of Ru-Paul's Drag Race All-Stars below.

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview
Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

Bill Belichick is one of the greatest football coaches of all time. His P.R. instincts leave much to be desired. Beyond entrusting his personal brand to his 24-year-old girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, Belichick has a bad habit of not letting sleeping dogs lie and/or dead horses go unbeaten. Case in point, now reports that Belichick's book publicist assured Belichick that the disastrous CBS interview would be only about Belichick's book. Advertisement The report emerged today, more than a month after the CBS interview aired. And it has reanimated a dormant issue. The article cites an April 9 email from Simon & Schuster's senior director of publicity David Kass to Belichick. Wrote Kass: "I can assure you that the conversation [will be] about the book." Kass also reportedly told Belichick the CBS interview would be a "puff piece . . . designed to make everyone look good and sell books." (Somewhat surprisingly, the new report doesn't blame Kass for suggesting that Belichick wear an old football jersey with a giant hole in the neck to the CBS interview.) Per Belichick was "furious" when the CBS interview strayed beyond book topics. Then there's this: "Sources say Belichick had actually shot down several interview opportunities Kass had put in front of him over concerns the media outlets would use his book promotion as a way to pry into subjects not related to the actual book." Advertisement It's a fascinating development, for several reasons. First, the story is smeared with Belichick's (or Hudson's) fingerprints. Which means that one or both decided to dredge up a dead story, weeks after the fact. Which also means that one or both believed the new story would cause people to say, "Well, now we understand why she weirdly refused to let him answer the basic question of how they met." Second, one or both decided to throw Kass under the bus, both directly and by potentially instigating a stray, conspiracy theory-inducing remark that Kass "once helped Jeff Benedict's Robert Kraft-themed book, The Dynasty, reach the New York Times' bestseller list." Kass is painted as the villain in this, the one who lied to Belichick about what the CBS interview was going to be. Third, Belichick did other interviews in which questions unrelated to the book were asked — after the CBS sit-down. Michael Strahan asked a few personal questions on Good Morning America. Ryan Clark asked questions about Hudson on The Pivot Podcast. (Then again, those questions apparently were scripted to help Belichick undo the CBS-related P.R. damage.) Advertisement Fourth, Belichick and/or Hudson apparently have decided to try to get on their side by spoon-feeding information to the outlet. Given the extent to which had been hammering all things Belichick and Hudson, a subtle quid pro quo that gets to play nice in exchange for current and future information would be a smart move by Belichick. Make no mistake about it. The issue is back on the front burner because Belichick and/or Hudson decided it would be a smart move to point a finger at Kass, weeks after the fact. And it's just the latest time Belichick and/or Hudson have blamed others for their own blunders. He/she/they have blamed CBS for editing the interview to create a "false narrative." He/she/they have blamed North Carolina for not having a sufficient P.R. function in place when he arrived. He/she/they now blame Kass for failing to (wait for it) "do his job" properly. It's always someone else's fault. It's never their fault. And they presumably think people will buy the idea that they're the victims of widespread incompetence and malfeasance.

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview
Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

NBC Sports

time2 days ago

  • NBC Sports

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

Bill Belichick is one of the greatest football coaches of all time. His P.R. instincts leave much to be desired. Beyond entrusting his personal brand to his 24-year-old girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, Belichick has a bad habit of not letting sleeping dogs lie and/or dead horses go unbeaten. Case in point, now reports that Belichick's book publicist assured Belichick that the disastrous CBS interview would be only about Belichick's book. The report emerged today, more than a month after the CBS interview aired. And it has reanimated a dormant issue. The article cites an April 9 email from Simon & Schuster's senior director of publicity David Kass to Belichick. Wrote Kass: 'I can assure you that the conversation [will be] about the book.' Kass also reportedly told Belichick the CBS interview would be a 'puff piece . . . designed to make everyone look good and sell books.' (Somewhat surprisingly, the new report doesn't blame Kass for suggesting that Belichick wear an old football jersey with a giant hole in the neck to the CBS interview.) Per Belichick was 'furious' when the CBS interview strayed beyond book topics. Then there's this: 'Sources say Belichick had actually shot down several interview opportunities Kass had put in front of him over concerns the media outlets would use his book promotion as a way to pry into subjects not related to the actual book.' It's a fascinating development, for several reasons. First, the story is smeared with Belichick's (or Hudson's) fingerprints. Which means that one or both decided to dredge up a dead story, weeks after the fact. Which also means that one or both believed the new story would cause people to say, 'Well, now we understand why she weirdly refused to let him answer the basic question of how they met.' Second, one or both decided to throw Kass under the bus, both directly and by potentially instigating a stray, conspiracy theory-inducing remark that Kass 'once helped Jeff Benedict's Robert Kraft-themed book, The Dynasty, reach the New York Times' bestseller list.' Kass is painted as the villain in this, the one who lied to Belichick about what the CBS interview was going to be. Third, Belichick did other interviews in which questions unrelated to the book were asked — after the CBS sit-down. Michael Strahan asked a few personal questions on Good Morning America. Ryan Clark asked questions about Hudson on The Pivot Podcast. (Then again, those questions apparently were scripted to help Belichick undo the CBS-related P.R. damage.) Fourth, Belichick and/or Hudson apparently have decided to try to get on their side by spoon-feeding information to the outlet. Given the extent to which had been hammering all things Belichick and Hudson, a subtle quid pro quo that gets to play nice in exchange for current and future information would be a smart move by Belichick. Make no mistake about it. The issue is back on the front burner because Belichick and/or Hudson decided it would be a smart move to point a finger at Kass, weeks after the fact. And it's just the latest time Belichick and/or Hudson have blamed others for their own blunders. He/she/they have blamed CBS for editing the interview to create a 'false narrative.' He/she/they have blamed North Carolina for not having a sufficient P.R. function in place when he arrived. He/she/they now blame Kass for failing to (wait for it) 'do his job' properly. It's always someone else's fault. It's never their fault. And they presumably think people will buy the idea that they're the victims of widespread incompetence and malfeasance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store