Iran launches another wave of attacks on Israel as conflict widens
Iran launched another wave of attacks on Israel early Saturday, state media reported, after Israel's military said it detected missiles inbound from Iran.
'New round of Honest Promise 3 attacks,' state television reported, referring to the name of the Iranian military operation against Israel, following deadly Israeli strikes on the Islamic republic.
Waves of missiles against Israeli cities amount to the most forceful step yet by Tehran since Israel's overnight raids killed senior Iranian military leaders and damaged military infrastructure.
Israel said it identified missiles launched from the Islamic Republic and reported explosions from interceptions and falling debris from projectiles. There was video of at least one large explosion in Tel Aviv, and reports of blasts across Jerusalem.
An Iranian rocket has killed one person and injured more than 20 when it hit near homes in Rishon Lezion, south of Tel Aviv, according to Israel 's emergency services.
A number of people were reported to be trapped under the rubble, it said.
'This is a difficult and complex scene and we are still continuing to scan and ensure that there are no additional victims inside the buildings,' said Rami Musher, deputy director of the Ayalon region's emergency services.
Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Iran had crossed a red line by targeting civilian areas.
Mr Katz said Iran will "pay a heavy price for it" as three have been killed and over 64 people injured by Iranian missiles.
US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said that he went to shelters five times following Iran's missile strikes.
'Been rough night in Israel. Had to head to shelter five times during the night,' Mr Huckabee wrote on X. 'It's now Shabbat here. Should be quiet. Probably won't be. Entire nation under orders to stay near shelter.'
The extent to which Israel's air defences were breached is unknown. US forces assisted by firing on Iranian missiles.
In Iran, state media reported that air defences were reactivated in expectation of a response.
Fate of Iran-US nuclear talks in doubt
Following Friday's attacks, Iran said it was withdrawing from the sixth round of nuclear negotiations that were due to take place in Oman on Sunday with US special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.
The talks were supposed to forestall military action against Iran by forcing it to give up all uranium enrichment capabilities and abandon its drive to develop a nuclear weapon.
Tehran considered the dialogue with the US over the Iranian nuclear programme 'meaningless' after Israel's biggest military strike yet, which it accused Washington of supporting.
'The other side [the US] acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime [Israel] to target Iran's territory,' the semi-official Tasnim news agency quoted foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei as saying.
He said Israel 'succeeded in influencing' the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without Washington's permission.
US President Donald Trump told Reuters on Friday that he and his team had known the attacks were coming – and still believed there was room for an accord.
'We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out,' Mr Trump said. 'They can still work out a deal, however, it's not too late.'
Mr Trump said he had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay an attack to give diplomacy more time, though the US President himself had threatened to bomb Tehran if nuclear talks failed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli defense minister warns its 'turning Tehran into Beirut', as explosions rock Iranian capital
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that military operations against Iran are "operating as usual and even beyond that". "The attack on Tehran and its nuclear systems, weapons production systems, air defense, and missiles is a powerful attack," Katz said during a briefing with Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir. He went on to threaten that Israel is "essentially turning Tehran into Beirut now". Shortly after Katz's remarks, a new wave of explosions rocked the Iranian capital, an Al Jazeera correspondent reported.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump warns Iran: US military will unleash 'full strength' if it attacks
US President Donald Trump warned Iran on Sunday that any attack on the United States would trigger a military response of unprecedented force, while distancing Washington from Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear and intelligence sites. Writing on social media, Mr Trump said the United States 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran tonight,' referring to Israel's military operations against Tehran. He acknowledged prior knowledge of the strikes but emphasised American non-involvement. Iran's UN envoy Amir Saeid Iravani accused the US on Friday during an emergency session of the Security Council of providing full political and intelligence support to Israeli strikes on Iranian territory, calling the attacks a 'declaration of war'. 'We will not forget that our people lost their lives as a result of the Israeli attacks with American weapons. These actions amount to a declaration of war,' he said. Mr Trump warned that if the US were to be 'attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before'. 'We can easily get a deal done between Iran and Israel and end this bloody conflict!!!' he added. A round of US-Iran nuclear talks that was due to be held in Oman on Sunday was cancelled. Mr Trump on Friday urged Tehran to reach a deal with the US on its nuclear programme, or face 'even more brutal' attacks by Israel. The Middle East teetered on the brink on Friday after the Israeli military launched Operation 'Rising Lion,' targeting Iran's nuclear and military sites. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the operation was launched to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival'. 'This operation will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat,' he said on Friday. Israel said its strikes have killed top generals and also senior scientists and experts involved in Iran's nuclear programme. During his first term as President, Mr Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the landmark 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, dismantling an agreement brokered three years earlier under his predecessor Barack Obama and reimposing sanctions.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear
US President Donald Trump's decision to allow Israel to attack Iran is the worst miscalculation a US president has made since George W Bush invaded Iraq. Bush's decision heralded eight years of conflict in Iraq, killed at least 655,000 people, according to The Lancet, spawned an extreme group of Takfiri militants in the Islamic State group and brought a major state to the verge of collapse from which it has yet to recover 14 years on. Trump's decision could yet prove to be more calamitous. Allowing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Iran, when US envoys were engaged in negotiations with Tehran, places the US presidency on the same level of trustworthiness as Al Capone or Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. This is the way you behave if you are in charge of a drug cartel, not a global power. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Who now will trust the word of America? Sooner or later, a power in decline like the US will find it needs the trust of others. True to form, Trump and his coterie have no inkling of what they have just done. They are gloating in the act of deceit they have just performed, laughing about duping Iranian diplomats while rushing hundreds of Hellfire missiles to the Israeli army and supplying it with real-time intelligence. Israel's drones caught their targets at home in bed or lured them to their headquarters, where they were wiped out. This is regarded in Tel Aviv and Washington as a coup. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington provided Israel with "exquisite intel". After bragging about their act of deception, Trump lectured Iranians to get back to the negotiating table or face even worse. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. This is the dumbest thing the US president could say to a nation 92 million-strong with thousands of years of history behind them. Yesterday Saddam, today Netanyahu It is even more stupid if you consider what Iran went through for eight years when it was attacked by the late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein with western support. It is this bitter experience, no less than the Islamic Republic's ideology, that has fashioned Iran's foreign policy. Its nuclear enrichment programme and its rocket arsenal were all burnished in the fire of the Iran-Iraq war. Like Netanyahu, the Iraqi dictator launched a war when he deemed his neighbour to be at its most vulnerable. On 22 September 1980, Iran's then-supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, was still grappling with the post-revolutionary chaos. He did not have an army, much of which was dissolved when the Shah was toppled. These questions are often ignored in the Israel-Iran story. We asked a panel of experts Read More » Iran had a combination of regular forces and the newly formed, untested Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), but it was so short of weapons that they were passed from one soldier to another as they fell in waves on the front line. Saddam's forces initially made rapid advances, but they were slowly pushed back at a huge cost in lives. Like Netanyahu today, Saddam was supported by the US and Europe. He got the means to manufacture the chemical weapons from German companies, which provided the technology and precursor chemicals needed to manufacture mustard gas, sarin, tabun and other chemical agents. Western cover for Saddam continued even after the gassing of Kurds in Halabja. My late and much-missed colleague Richard Beeston of The Times recounted how two British diplomats attempted to persuade him that nothing really happened there. Three years into the war, late US President Ronald Reagan sent his then-bright young thing, Donald Rumsfeld, to shake hands with Saddam. National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 114 of 26 November 1983 stated the US objective. It only wanted to protect its military forces and its oil supplies in the Gulf. Saddam's chemical weapons were of no concern to Rumsfeld or Reagan. But an entire generation of Iranians will never forget those gas attacks from which veterans suffer to this day. Deep defence strategy And it was this bloody and savage war, which Iran eventually won, that forged the determination of Tehran to train and build a network of armed groups from the Mediterranean to its borders as a form of deep defence. Plainly, Iran's "axis of resistance" may be weaker today than it was two years ago. The senior leadership of the Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah, along with their homes and families, were mapped and selected for targets by Mossad long before the Hamas attack on 7 October. Neither Iran nor Hezbollah's leadership wanted to get into a full-blown war with Israel after the Hamas attack... Their moderation was interpreted by Netanyahu as weakness Some of that took place in Syria, where Hezbollah exposed its ranks to agents working for Israel in the Syrian and Russian military intelligence. But not all of it. The fact that Hezbollah is today unable to come to Iran's aid in the darkest hour of the mother ship is the clearest testimony to the defeat it suffered at Israel's hands. Its units on the border fought bravely and kept the elite Israeli commando units like the Golani Brigade pegged down to a few kilometres of the border. Nonetheless, the ceasefire it signed in November of last year signalled a defeat unlike anything it has suffered before. But by the same token, what has come to be viewed in Lebanon today as Hezbollah's and Iran's strategic mistakes - by not replying to Israel's attacks earlier and more forcibly, or by maintaining the belief that Hezbollah could achieve some sort of balance of power with Israel - could equally be read now as strategic restraint. Neither Iran nor Hezbollah leadership wanted to get into a full-blown war with Israel after the Hamas attack, and its leaders said so plainly. Their moderation was interpreted by Netanyahu as weakness. The lack of a heavy response by Iran was read as an encouragement to go for the jugular. Which is where we are now. A long war? Like Saddam in 1980 or Bush in 2003, Netanyahu is placing all his bets on a short war and an early capitulation by Iran. But unlike any war Israel has fought since 1973, Israeli warplanes are attacking a real army and a real state. Iran has strategic depth. It has its enrichment centrifuges buried half a mile underground at some of its five sites. It could close the Straits of Hormuz, through which 21 percent of the global petroleum liquids transit, within the blink of an eye. It also has powerful allies in Russia and China. Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran Read More » The Ukrainians say that Russia has launched over 8,000 Iranian Shahed drones since the war broke out in February 2022. The time may soon come when the Iranian leadership asks Russia to return the favour by supplying it with S-400 air defence batteries, especially in light of statements by the Israeli army declaring its jets had operational freedom over the skies of western Iran. Russian President Vladimir Putin already believes he is at war with the West, his relationship with Trump notwithstanding, and that MI6 was responsible for the Ukrainian attack on Russian long-range bombers. Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, all but said as much. Putin's relationship with Netanyahu, which was once so close that the Israelis stopped the supply of Russian air defence systems to Iran, is shot to pieces. When a delegation from Hamas arrived in Moscow after the 7 October attacks, Putin passed a message of thanks for this "birthday gift", my sources tell me. Putin was born on the same day in 1952. Would Russia allow Israel, supplied by the US, to topple Iran after the loss of Bashar al-Assad in Syria? It's a question that Netanyahu and Trump should consider. Trump had a 50-minute talk with Putin over the weekend. Netanyahu should also consider what he would do if the war lasts more than two weeks and Iran does not wave the white flag. So should those Gulf states that spent $4.5 trillion on US arms contracts and bungs into Trump's own pockets, thinking they had dissuaded America from attacking Ansar Allah (the Houthi movement) in Yemen. The longer the war goes on, the greater the risk of the fire spreading throughout the supremely vulnerable oil and gas installations of the Gulf. Israel has just attacked Iran's installations at Fajr Jam Gas Refinery and South Pars gas field in Bushehr province. Iran replied by hitting the oil refineries around Haifa. Dragging the US into war In Israel itself, a mood of euphoria at having wiped out Iranian military and nuclear leadership has quickly dissipated, as Iran has inflicted on parts of central Israel the sort of destruction Israel has visited on Gaza and Lebanon. For the second night running, Israelis have been experiencing the sort of terror they have inflicted on their neighbours. They are quickly discovering what it is like to lose the impunity they have assumed was their birthright. Even if this war stops, the price of peace and the stabilisation of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme has just gone up If Israel continues to be battered by Iranian missiles night after night, Netanyahu will increasingly think of how he can get the US directly involved in the war. A false flag drone attack on a US base in Iraq would be a tempting option for Netanyahu and one which he has doubtless already considered. Trump so far has been putty in his hands. As far as the future of nuclear enrichment in Iran is concerned, Netanyahu and Trump's unilateral attack, if successful, will provide the biggest incentive Iran can possibly have to get a viable bomb as quickly as possible. The relative weakness of Tehran's conventional arms and its vulnerability to F-35s will provide the same logic to a battered Iran, as it did to Putin, who thought - at one stage in the war in Ukraine - he was on the verge of losing Crimea. He threatened to use a tactical nuclear missile, and Joe Biden's team took that threat seriously. If Trump and Netanyahu think they are dissuading Iran from getting a bomb by dismantling their conventional means of self-defence, they are sorely mistaken. Any nuclear strategist who has war-gamed these scenarios will tell you that the weaker and less reliable conventional forces are, the more reliant a nuclear power is on its nuclear bombs and the readier it is to use them as a weapon of first resort. There is no indication yet that this is the thinking of Iran's supreme leader or the government, but public opinion in Iran - even before the attack - is turning to a clear majority in favour of getting the bomb. Trump said the US would not tolerate a North Korea in the Gulf, but that is what he might achieve by allowing Israel to bomb Iran. Even if this war stops, the price of peace and the stabilisation of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme has just gone up. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
