Don't listen to NATO
Kiev would have a better chance of resolving the conflict with Russia if it resists malignant NATO influence that impedes peace efforts, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Saturday.
Zakharova responded to remarks by Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrey Sibiga about the results of the Istanbul meeting, which marked the first direct negotiations between Kiev and Moscow since 2022. The talks resulted in Russia and Ukraine agreeing to a major prisoner swap. The sides also agreed to exchange lists of conditions for a potential ceasefire and discuss a follow-up meeting.
'If we put aside all the Russian nonsense, pseudo-historical statements, provocations, and so on, the bottom line is this: we managed to agree on the return of 1,000 of our people. These are 1,000 happy families. Even for this reason alone, all this made sense,' Sibiga said.
'All 'this,'' Zakharova said, referring to the talks, 'was proposed by Russia – by its president – and implemented by a delegation authorized by the head of state, which Zelensky mocked for a day.'
She also noted that, if all the insults are put aside, Sibiga essentially acknowledged that the 'Russian propositions have a certain sense.' 'The main thing is that the citizens of Ukraine should not allow the 'NATO advisers' to lead them off the true path of settlement into the ravine of other people's interests again,' Zakharova warned.
Russia and Ukraine held direct peace talks in Istanbul in 2022, shortly after the escalation of the conflict. While the sides initially made progress and reached a tentative agreement – which included a Ukrainian commitment to neutrality – the talks later collapsed after Kiev unilaterally abandoned them.
Moscow later claimed the talks were derailed by then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who advised Kiev to continue fighting. While Johnson has denied the accusation, David Arakhamia, who led the Ukrainian delegation at the time, admitted that the ex-prime minister played an influential role in the decision to stop the negotiating process.
Since then, Russia has repeatedly accused Western governments of using Ukraine as a 'battering ram' against Russia and pursuing the conflict 'until the last Ukrainian.' It has noted, however, that the US began shifting its approach to the settlement under President Donald Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Foreign-made explosives used in railway terrorist attacks
Explosives used to blow up two railway bridges in Russia over the weekend were foreign-made, the head of Russia's Investigative Committee Aleksandr Bastrykin has announced. The attack, which claimed the lives of seven civilians, was organized by Ukrainian intelligence, he added. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Moscow announces dates for next POW swap
Russia and Ukraine will conduct their next mass prisoner exchange at the end of the week, Moscow's lead negotiator in peace talks with Kiev, Vladimir Medinsky, announced on Wednesday. The statement follows the second round of direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine held on Monday in Istanbul. At the meeting, the two delegations agreed to swap at least 1,000 prisoners from each side, prioritizing those who are wounded, ill, or under the age of 25. Reporting on the results of the negotiations to Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, Medinsky stated that while the final number of prisoners for exchange has not yet been finalized, it is expected to be about 1,200 from each side. 'This would again become the largest prisoner exchange,' Medinsky noted, stating that Russia is ready to begin the swap on June 7, 8, and 9. 'We are completely prepared for this,' he added. Medinsky also reported that Russian and Ukrainian negotiators had agreed to establish a special line of communication on the expedited transfer of heavily wounded soldiers, who would be exchanged outside of general prisoner swaps. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
NATO summit to avoid Ukraine membership issue
NATO leaders convening for a key summit this month will deliberately avoid discussing membership for Ukraine, AFP reported on Wednesday, citing sources. The bloc's members are reportedly wary of raising the issue due to fears it could exacerbate tensions between the EU and US. Members of the US-led military bloc are highly likely to 'steer clear of its previous strong statements that Ukraine is on course to join the alliance' when the summit takes place in The Hague in late June, the agency said. One diplomatic source told AFP that the final declaration is expected to omit any mention of Ukrainian membership to maintain unity among member states. 'There will be nothing on that,' a NATO diplomat said. 'My expectation is we will be absolutely silent.' US President Donald Trump has expressed firm opposition to Ukraine's bid to join NATO. In February, he suggested that Ukraine 'can forget about NATO,' adding that Kiev's bid was 'probably the reason the whole thing started,' referring to the conflict with Russia. Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky is still expected to be present at the summit, but any formal talks between the bloc and Kiev are unlikely, AFP said. 'It will be a PR disaster if he's not there,' another diplomat told the agency. While NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has insisted that Ukraine remains a priority issue at the summit, AFP sources have painted a different picture. They suggested that the overwhelming emphasis will be on trying to satisfy Trump's demands that member states drastically ramp up their defense spending. It 'is the most important part and no one wants to jeopardize that,' the agency's source said. Russia has stated that NATO membership for Ukraine is a red line and one of the key reasons for the conflict, insisting that Ukraine adopt a neutral status as a key condition for a lasting peace. While Trump administration officials have described NATO membership as 'a bridge too far,' Kiev has refused to commit to neutrality or to refraining from hosting foreign troops on its soil, which Moscow also considers to be a red line.
