
Israel-Iran war and threats of regime change
The US attack on Iran's three nuclear facilities – Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan – has escalated tensions in the ongoing Israel-Iran war, mounting fears of a wider regional conflagration as Iran weighs its military options for retaliation. Adding to the volatility of the situation, President Donald Trump has hinted at the possibility of regime change in Iran.
Since the early morning surprise attacks by Israel on June 13 on military and nuclear targets across Iran, the two longtime foes have been attacking each other using air force, UAVs and ballistic missiles. The tit-for-tat attacks have so far led to serious casualties and injuries in Iran, with reportedly hundreds of deaths, including several high-profile military leaders and nuclear scientists.
Israel, too, has reported over 20 deaths and scores of injuries. A large number of civilians have been affected on both sides, with many civilian installations, including energy infrastructure, ports, media houses and hospitals being hit by both sides.
When Israel started the military attacks against Iran, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that the objective of the operation was to destroy Iran's nuclear programme, which has long been a bone of contention between the two regional powers. Israel has also targeted some of Iran's nuclear sites, such as in Natanz, Fordow and Arak. Meanwhile, Iran has been able to consistently breach the Israeli air defence, causing damages across Israel.
As the Israel-Iran conflict continues to escalate, the international discourse has shifted from the Iranian nuclear programme to regime change in Tehran. The issue has gained global attention mainly due to the statements of Israeli leaders, including Netanyahu, who have on several occasions articulated that a regime change in Tehran is the only way to resolve problems facing the region.
Israel has for long accused Iran of flaming fires in the region by arming proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian Territories, who have often threatened Israeli security.
Israel also suspects Iran of backing Hamas's attacks in Israel on October 7, 2023, that triggered the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip, which has continued for sixteen months now. Israel also views Iran's nuclear programme and its regional military pursuits as an existential threat. Prior to the US joining the war, there have been reports about Arab Gulf countries trying back-channel diplomacy to prevent the expansion.
With the US eventually joining the Israeli war against Iran and Trump's hint at regime change in Iran, it might be useful to recall that similar US military endeavours in the past have spelt disaster for West Asia and have proven costly for the US as well.
The post-9/11 'war on terror' had led the US to first attack Afghanistan in 2001 and then enter Iraq in 2003. On both occasions, the US military met with early success, removing the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and toppling Saddam Hussein in Iraq in quick times. However, the US got embroiled in long wars in both countries with mounting economic and human costs.
In the case of Iraq, it finally withdrew its troops in 2011 under the Obama administration, only to be drawn back due to the rise of the Islamic State in the wake of the 2011 Arab Spring. The American intervention in Afghanistan proved costlier, with the exit completed in 2021, only for the Taliban to take back control of the country.
More recently, the US-led NATO intervention in Libya in 2011 spelt disaster for the country, with Libya still facing the brunt of a civil war endangering security in North Africa. Nonetheless, the past experiences and the opposition among his support base to the US getting involved in foreign wars couldn't deter Trump.
With the US now involved in the war, the region is likely to pay a heavy price. Despite being a weaker military power compared to the US and Israel, Iran is unlikely to capitulate easily. Even in a scenario where the major regime figures perish in the war, the likelihood of the war engulfing the entire Persian Gulf and West Asia region cannot be ruled out, especially as Iran enjoys the support of armed militias in countries like Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon.
Moreover, as Iran has shown in its conflict with Israel, it can reach long-distance targets, which means the US bases in the region could come under Iranian attacks. Further, Iran may even target oil and gas installations in the area to disrupt the global energy market and leverage it to its advantage. Iran's Parliament has already approved the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, which can drastically affect the global petroleum supply chain. Additionally, all parties involved will have to pay a huge economic and humanitarian cost if the war is prolonged.
Given the above scenario, the regional countries, especially the GCC States, have been forthcoming in expressing their concerns over the possibility of escalation and expansion of the Israel-Iran war. Although none of the regional countries, including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain and others, have been comfortable with the idea of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, they have maintained that a diplomatic approach might be more fruitful instead of opening a war front.
This is mainly because the regional countries are at a critical juncture of their developmental journey, prioritising economic diversification and social opening in preparation for a post-oil future. Peace, stability, and security are prerequisites for them to achieve this. The regional countries, therefore, fear that if the Israel-Iran war spirals into a wider conflict with now the US involved in it, it will push the entire region into instability.
What do America's past interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya tell us about the risks in Iran?
Can the Israel-Iran conflict be contained, or is a wider West Asian conflagration inevitable? What role, if any, can international diplomacy play in de-escalating the crisis?
What are the risks of attacking active nuclear sites like Natanz, Fordow, and Arak?
Despite its weaker military capabilities, how is Iran attempting to deter or outmaneuver the U.S.-Israel alliance?
Read other articles from the series on Conflicts in West Asia:
Conflicts in West Asia: India's trade and diaspora at risk amid prolonged Gaza War
Conflicts in West Asia: Implications of escalating Gaza war for India
Conflicts in West Asia: Israel-Iran war of abrasion
Conflicts in West Asia: A brief history of the Israel-Palestine conflict
Conflicts in West Asia: Iraq in disarray
Conflicts in West Asia: Israel-Hamas war and the Yemen quagmire
Conflicts in West Asia: Kurds and their struggle with statelessness
Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with ashiya.parveen@indianexpress.com.
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
(The author is an Associate Professor of Middle East studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Views are personal. @MuddassirQuamar ) ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Destabilising the world: US strikes on Iran pose global security threats
Not only has the US demonstrated it intends to behave without restrictions or consultations, but its actions may also serve as the final nail in the non-proliferation coffin Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article Over the weekend, B-2 stealth bombers from the United States (US) Air Force attacked three sites within the Islamic Republic of Iran — all associated with that country's nuclear weapons programme. These installations — in the towns of Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan — are known to be buried deep underground and thus are not accessible by most munitions. When Israel launched strikes against Iranian targets last week, it was assumed that the buried nuclear sites would survive unscathed. Only the US' 'bunker-buster' bombs — officially the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators — might have a chance of penetrating the (at least)


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump in situation room: US monitoring Iran's strike on bases in Qatar, says White House
Donald Trump White House official on Monday said that defense secretary Pete Hegseth and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff general John Caine are currently in the Situation Room with US President Donald Trump, actively monitoring the escalating situation in Qatar following Iran's missile strike on the Al Udeid Air Base, as reported by Reuters. Amid heightened tensions in the Gulf region after Iran launched several missiles targeting the American base in Qatar in retaliation for US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Explosions were heard across Doha shortly after Qatar closed its airspace as a precaution. More details awaited.


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Papa Johns still reporting...'; Pentagon Pizza tracker drops new hint as Iran's bombs US airbases in Qatar
As Middle East tensions increase, an intriguing crowdsourced theory called the 'Pentagon Pizza Index' has gained popularity on the internet. Some even speculated that the US could be discreetly going into crisis mode behind closed doors when users on X (previously Twitter) reported an unexpected increase of pizza delivery near the Pentagon and Department of Defense in Washington, D.C., on June 12 and 13. Pentagon Pizza Report, a well-known X account with the handle @PenPizzaReport, claims to offer 'open-source tracking of pizza spot activity around the Pentagon (and other places).' Despite being around for decades, the theory has just now found its way into social media. Pentagon Pizza Report, a well-known X account with the handle @PenPizzaReport, claims to offer 'open-source tracking of pizza spot activity around the Pentagon (and other places).' On June 12, Pentagon Pizza Report stated in an update on X, 'nearly all pizza establishments nearby the Pentagon have experienced a HUGE surge in activity' at approximately 7 p.m. local time. Using a search engine's 'Popular Times' function, the post displayed what looked to be screen shots of four distinct pizza places that were busier than normal: We, The Pizza, Domino's Pizza, District Pizza Palace, and Extreme Pizza. The latest resurgence of the hypothesis between pizza activity and the Pentagon occurred the night when Israel's military launched a series of attacks to destroy Iranian nuclear facilities and missile infrastructure. Pentagon reacts to Pentagon Pizza Report A Pentagon spokesman told Newsweek that the tweets from the Pentagon Pizza Report 'did not align with the events.' The spokesperson told Newsweek that there 'are many pizza options available inside the Pentagon, also sushi, sandwiches, donuts, coffee, etc,' indicating that the Pentagon does not appear to be short on pizza options inside its headquarters. Also Read: Israel issues chilling '12 hours' warning to top Iranian General amid war; 'Otherwise, you're on…' Pizza tracker reports high activity at Papa John's near Pentagon Pizza tracker detected 'HIGH activity' at Papa John's near the Pentagon before US President Donald Trump confirmed that American airplanes had hit three nuclear sites in Iran. Just 30 minutes after the pizza traffic alarm, Trump declared on his Truth Social account that the US military had successfully attacked three important sites connected to Iran's nuclear enrichment program—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. Thank you for your attention to this matter,' Trump wrote. Pentagon Pizza Index later reiterated Trump's statement, 'Thank you for your attention to this matter.' The same account also mentioned 'abnormally low activity levels' at Freddie's Beach Bar, a popular spot close to the Pentagon. The account described the calm night as a 'classic indicator for potential overtime at the Pentagon,' implying that either something significant was happening or people were working late. Approximately 30 minutes prior to Trump's national address, at approximately 9:36 p.m. Eastern Time, the account also reported a 'HUGE traffic surge' at the Domino's near MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. On April 23, Pentagon Pizza Tracker wrote: 'The Papa Johns closest to the Pentagon is reporting high traffic, well above the average for a Monday at about 12:10pm ET.' In retaliation for the American assault of its nuclear installations, Iran began missile attacks on US military airbases in Qatar and Iraq on Monday. Meanwhile, Iran claimed to have targeted US soldiers based at Qatar's Al Udeid Air Base on state television. 'A mighty response to America's aggression' As martial music played, a caption on the screen described it as 'a mighty and successful response' to 'America's aggression.' According to an Iraqi security officer who spoke to The Associated Press, Iran also attacked the Ain al-Assad facility in western Iraq that houses American forces. Since the official was not permitted to make public comments, they talked on condition of anonymity. The strikes happened soon after Qatar closed its airspace in response to Iranian threats. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian posted on the social media site X just before the explosions: "We neither initiated the war nor seeking it. But we will not leave invasion to the great Iran without answer.'