Man indicted on 12 hate crime charges in attack on Boulder, Colorado demonstration for Israeli hostages
A man accused of hurling Molotov cocktails at a group of people demonstrating in Boulder, Colorado, in support of Israeli hostages has been indicted by a federal grand jury on 12 hate crime counts. Mohamed Soliman, 45, was initially charged with only one hate crime count in federal court in the June 1 attack on demonstrators.
The federal grand jury indictment, which was filed in court on Tuesday, June 25, had been expected for weeks as a formality in advancing the felony criminal case toward trial. It is routine for prosecutors to add charges beyond the crimes alleged in an initial criminal complaint.
The indictment accuses Soliman of trying to kill eight people who were hurt by the Molotov cocktails and targeting them because of their perceived or actual national origin, which prosecutors say was their perceived or actual connection and support for Israel. He was also indicted for another hate crime for trying to kill others at the event or nearby who were not injured.
Soliman was also charged with two counts of using a fire and explosive to commit a felony and one count of possessing an explosive device while committing a felony, which are also considered to be hate crimes.
Denied gun purchase
Investigators say Soliman told them he had intended to kill the roughly 20 participants at the weekly demonstration on Boulder's Pearl Street pedestrian mall, but threw just two of his over two dozen Molotov cocktails while yelling "Free Palestine." Soliman, who is also being prosecuted in state court for attempted murder and other charges, told investigators he tried to buy a gun but was not able to because he was not a "legal citizen."
He posed as a gardener, wearing a construction vest, to get close to the group before launching the attack, according to court documents.
Federal authorities say Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been living in the US illegally with his family. Soliman is being represented in state and federal court by public defenders who do not comment on their cases to the media.
At a hearing last week, Soliman's defense attorney, David Kraut, urged Magistrate Judge Kathryn Starnella not to allow the case to move forward because he said the alleged attack was not a hate crime. Instead, he said it was motivated by opposition to the political movement of Zionism. An attack motivated by someone's political views is not considered a hate crime under federal law.
Soliman is scheduled to appear in federal court on Friday for a hearing in which he may be asked to enter a plea to the charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
35 minutes ago
- Euronews
CIA chief reports 'severe damage' to Iran's nuclear Sites
The head of the CIA has said that US strikes caused "severe damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities after a leaked report and contradictory statements from US President Donald Trump cast doubt on the extent of the damage. John Ratcliffe, head of the CIA, said key sites had been destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the "course of years". He stopped short of declaring that Iran's nuclear programme had been outright eliminated. The new intelligence assessment comes a day after a leaked early assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) concluded that key components of Iran's nuclear programme could be restarted in months. It also mentioned that much of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium had been moved by Iran before the US struck the sites over the weekend — a claim the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said on Thursday was a possibility. Trump initially said that the use of US bunker-buster bombs on the Furdow and Natanz uranium enrichment sites was a "spectacular military success" that "obliterated" the key locations. He denied media reports about the assessment from the DIA, posting on social media on Wednesday that the "fake news" media had "lied and totally misrepresented the facts". On Wednesday, Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth then appeared to cast doubt over the scale of the damage inflicted on the sites. During a NATO summit in The Hague, Trump told journalists that the "intelligence was very inconclusive". "The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests," he said, later reversing his claim by saying that the Iranian programme had been set back "decades". On Wednesday, Hegseth described the damage to the facilities as "moderate to severe", although he rejected the DIA report, calling it false. US officials have also pointed to conclusions made by the Israelis. On Wednesday, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the US strike on the Furdow facility "rendered it inoperable" and that the combined effort of Israeli and US strikes had "set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years". Experts say that drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult only days after they have taken place. Jeffrey Lewis, a professor of nonproliferation at the Middlebury Institute, told AP that, "either it's too early to know, or you know" about the damage to the sites. A spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry said the facilities have suffered significant damage, although declined to elaborate in detail which facilities had sustained the most damage and to what extent. Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear body, said on Tuesday that the sites had seen "extensive damage" as a result of the conflict. The IAEA assessed that access roads close to the underground facility and an entrance at the Furdow site were hit. At the Natanz site, the IAEA said in its initial assessment that two impact holes from US strikes were found above the underground halls that had been used for enrichment and storage. As the row over the extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear sites continues, diplomatic efforts to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme are also gaining traction. Trump said that US and Iranian officials would meet soon to resume a dialogue that was interrupted by nearly two weeks of open conflict between Israel and Iran. "I don't care if I have an agreement or not," Trump said, because Iran was too badly damaged to even consider rebuilding its programme. "They're not going to be doing it anyway. They've had it." The IAEA has rejected an "hourglass approach" involving different assessments of how many months or years it would take Iran to rebuild its programme, saying that such efforts distracted from finding a long-term solution. Iran still had the "technical knowledge" and "industrial capacity" to rebuild its programme, Grossi said, adding that his priority was allowing IAEA inspectors back to the sites in order to conduct a thorough assessment.
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Fariba Adelkhah, anthropologist: 'The Western view of Iranian society is binary and ignores its increasing complexity'
The anthropologist in me – and I speak only in that capacity – is stunned by the gap between the complexity of Iranian society, which I have studied for 40 years, and the simplistic, if not ignorant, approach shown by Israeli, American, and European governments as they conduct or legitimize this war of aggression against the Islamic Republic. The confusion of the aggressors' objectives is also striking: Is their goal the destruction of the nuclear program or regime change? From the standpoint of international law, this is undeniably a war of aggression, described as "preventive," in the name of a presumed, and perhaps largely fantasized, danger. Netanyahu speaks of the "existential" Iranian nuclear threat, much as Putin invokes "Nazism" in Ukraine. As an Iranian saying goes, "When one wants to commit a crime, one puts on religious garb." And what is this "good" that is supposedly being delivered to the Iranian people, or this "evil" from which they are to be rescued? Is it worth cynically risking a nuclear accident through bombing and leaving the civilian population to suffer the consequences for decades? Does the Middle East need a Chernobyl on top of all its other misfortunes? Can democracy be imposed by foreign arms? Thus, a false dichotomy is drawn. On one hand, there's the "good" Iran – that of the "civil society," of the " Woman, Life, Freedom" movement, of the increasingly Trump-aligned opposition in exile amplified by a handful of prominent intellectuals and by most conservative media. And on the other hand, the "bad" Iran, composed of Islam, the mullahs, and the "dictatorship" of the supreme leader, who is seen as the mastermind of both repression and the nuclear program. Children of Khomeini This binary view of Iranian society ignores the ever-increasing complexity of its reality, due to its diversity, urbanization, educational level, and global reach through its diaspora. It also conceals its history. Like it or not, and whether they fought him or not, all Iranians are children of Khomeini. Most have no memory of the shah's regime and were instead shaped by an Islamic republic that molded them. This influence comes not only through coercion, but also through countless everyday interactions and ongoing co-optation within political and economic institutions. Family ties often bind people across political divides – or intensify those divisions, turning political conflicts into fratricidal ones.
France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Iranian lawmakers vote to suspend cooperation with UN's IAEA
Iranian lawmakers voted Wednesday in favour of suspending cooperation with the United Nations ' atomic energy watchdog, state TV said, after a 12-day war that saw Israeli and US strikes on nuclear sites. "The International Atomic Energy Agency, which refused to even marginally condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, put its international credibility up for auction," Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said, according to state TV. The decision still requires the approval of the Guardian Council, a body empowered to vet legislation. Should it be ratified, Ghalibaf said "the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the IAEA until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed". In parliament, 221 lawmakers voted in favour and one abstained, with no votes against from those present in the 290-seat legislature, according to state TV. Lawmaker Alireza Salimi said the suspension of cooperation would mean that IAEA inspectors would be barred from accessing nuclear facilities unless they obtained the approval of Iran's top security body, the Supreme National Security Council, according to the ISNA news agency. Later Wednesday, Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told the official IRNA news agency that cooperation with the IAEA "will definitely be affected". Baqaei blamed the agency for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing Iran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations, which he called "one of the main excuses" for the US and Israeli attacks. Israel on June 13 launched a major bombing campaign that targeted Iranian nuclear facilities and killed top military commanders and atomic scientists. On Sunday, Israel's ally the United States launched unprecedented strikes of its own on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz, before a ceasefire was agreed on Tuesday. Lawmakers chanted "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" after the vote on Wednesday, state TV reported. Since the start of the war, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA for failing to condemn the Israeli attacks.
