Trump's message to foreign students is alarming
Karishma Vaswani,
Tribune News Service
An Ivy League degree has long been central to the Asian Dream — a ticket to success and status. But President Donald Trump's message to international students is clear: Far fewer of you are welcome. The blunt statement and growing chaos across the university sector has left families wondering if sending their children to America is still worth it. The White House's immediate target is Chinese students allegedly connected to the Communist Party. On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US plans to start 'aggressively' revoking their visas. Students affected would include 'those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' The US will also enhance scrutiny 'of all future visa applications from the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong,' he added.
It's unclear how these rules will be executed; the move follows a short period of improved ties between the superpowers after they agreed to a truce in the trade war. China's Foreign Ministry on Thursday expressed its dissatisfaction, saying it had lodged a protest with the US. The impact is wider than Washington and Beijing's geopolitical rivalry. The decision to ban Harvard from enrolling international students is focusing minds in Asia, even though a federal judge has temporarily blocked the policy. Many families are wondering if other universities will be next.
The rhetoric coming out of the White House is hardly reassuring. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools; they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump said on Wednesday. This attitude, combined with a directive ordering US embassies worldwide to stop scheduling interviews for student visas sends a chilling message to Asian students: The Ivy aspiration is no longer as accessible as it once was. The worries are pouring in on my parent chat groups. Many have already spent thousands of dollars preparing children for a future at a prestigious American university — hiring expensive college counsellors, visiting campuses, and investing countless hours navigating complex application processes. That's not to mention time spent on preparing for standardised tests and extracurricular activities, all in an effort to perfect the profile for a prospective candidate. There are also legitimate concerns about what happens to deposits and scholarships, all of which are up in the air as students and their families figure out what the new rules mean for them.
It's no small cost. An average American degree can set an international student's family back approximately $100,000 over four years, excluding living costs. An Ivy League degree? It's more than triple that. Parents spend decades making sacrifices and putting aside the massive investment required to help their kids go to their dream university. The money is worth it, the thinking goes, because eventually their child will reap the rewards.
The schools get something out of this, too. Foreign applicants are more likely to pay full tuition, essentially subsidising American students who receive aid. Over a million international students studied in American universities in the 2023-2024 school year, according to data from Open Doors, an information resource for foreign students studying or teaching in the US Asians made up a significant proportion, with Indians and Chinese citizens accounting for over half.
America is not going to lose its appeal overnight. It's still a coveted place to study, both because of its world-class tertiary education and the potential to find lucrative employment after graduation. But other countries are becoming more attractive because of the Trump administration's crackdown. Some parents I've spoken to will simply go elsewhere.
Canada and the UK, already popular alternatives, are poised to scoop up disillusioned applicants. Closer to home, Australia and New Zealand are also promoting their schools. Asian universities that offer top-tier programs will appeal to anxious Asian families. Schools such as the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, and Malaysia's Sunway University are offering credit transfers and other incentives to attract ambitious students and families looking for quality education without the uncertainties tied to American foreign policy.
For many Asian students who have dreamt of studying and working in cities like New York or Los Angeles, the political gyrations affecting their futures are no doubt disappointing. But this is about more than visas and policies. It's about the hopes of a generation searching for a place to study, grow, and build their future. Trump has just made the U.S. seem like a far less inviting option.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Markets anxious as 'new cold war' turns hot: Mike Dolan
LONDON - As military spending ramps up around the world and countries rush to ringfence critical industries, political rhetoric appears to have darkened from one sketching geopolitical risks to outright preparation for war. Whether global markets should take more note is a moot point. Investors are already preoccupied with a full-blown trade war, which has aggravated international tensions and is much like the latest ratchet in U.S. steel and aluminium tariffs. But it is not hard to find the 'safety' trades thriving. Gold is less than 2% from a record close set a month ago, having climbed almost 30% so far this year. The Swiss franc , also up almost 10% this year, is pushing higher too. Most obvious of all is the nearly 50% rise in European defence stocks since January. Safety trades that have not barked are just as interesting. The dollar's haven status has been undermined by U.S. trade and tax worries and President Donald Trump's domestic institutional upheavals. And government bonds are pressured precisely because the additional defence spending associated with another generational arms race is exaggerating outsized post-pandemic debt loads even more. Global government debt indexes remain in the red for 2025. "Elevated geopolitical risk affects issuers through multiple transmission mechanisms," credit rating firm Fitch said on Friday, adding it "put upward pressure on defence spending, making fiscal consolidation more challenging for certain sovereigns." WAR DRUMBEAT But at whatever part of the market risk dial you put world war worries, there is no doubt the temperature has risen. Even in the last few days, the language surrounding future major power conflicts has been alarming. Goading Asian allies to match European moves to boost military spending, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned on Saturday that Chinese military moves to take Taiwan were "imminent". "There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent," Hegseth said, adding that any attempt by China to secure Taiwan militarily "would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world". Beijing reacted angrily and said Hegseth "vilified China with defamatory allegations". But senior U.S. officials have repeatedly briefed that they believe Chinese President Xi Jinping has ordered his military to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027, even if they say no direct decision appears to have been made. Back in Europe, the drum beat about the need to lift military spending is even louder, more fearful of a threat from Russia. Nearly a trillion euros ($1.14 trillion) of extra German and European-wide defence spending have been earmarked this year. Only last week, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany and its NATO partners were prepared to defend every inch of the alliance's territory. "Anyone who threatens an ally must know that the entire alliance will jointly defend every inch of NATO territory," Merz said on Thursday at a military ceremony in Vilnius to mark the establishment of a German brigade in Lithuania. Britain's strategic defence review on Monday also addressed threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyberattacks by outlining investment in drones and digital warfare. But the plan also expands the UK's fleet of attack submarines, which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional weapons, and will spend 15 billion pounds ($20.3 billion) by 2029 on replacement of nuclear warheads for its main nuclear fleet. And again, the rhetoric was alarming. "We are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, so we must be ready to fight and win," Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'NEW COLD WAR' TURNS HOT If securing the funding needs political alarm, then maybe that explains some of the high-octane public relations. But there is no shortage of deeply entrenched conflicts raging across the globe and threatening to spill over to varying degrees. Multilateral solutions seem distant as the globe breaks in the blocs. Even with negotiators exploring a ceasefire in Istanbul, Ukraine's forces made an extraordinary move this weekend to attack strategic bomber aircraft at bases deep inside Russia. Israel's devastation of Gaza in reprisal for the 2023 massacres by Hamas shows no sign of ending. More than 30 more Palestinians were killed and nearly 170 injured on Sunday near a food distribution site. Reports continued to circulate last week that Israel is threatening to disrupt nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran by striking Iran's nuclear facilities. And nuclear-armed India and Pakistan have just stepped back from another tense border conflict that marked the fiercest fighting in decades. The expansion of 'hot' conflicts is a mounting concern in political circles, with extraordinary territorial claims thrown into the mix. Trump's public ambition to take over Panama and Greenland have jarred allies, with the latter being part of rivalry over access to rare minerals and also amid strategic plays for the Arctic. Even J.P. Morgan boss Jamie Dimon gets the drift, reportedly telling Barron's last week the United States should not be stockpiling Bitcoin, but instead be stockpiling "guns, bullets, tanks, planes, drones, you know, rare earths." That the world is a dangerous place is not in doubt. A world at war is a different proposition. A worse case scenario is that tariff wars are just the opening act. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters ($1 = 0.8738 euros) (By Mike Dolan; Editing by Kirsten Donovan and Richard Chang)
Arabian Post
2 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Gulf States Shift Investment Focus Away from Saudi Arabia
As top Gulf leaders vied to commit trillions of dollars in investment pledges during President Donald Trump's Middle East tour, a significant shift emerged among financiers and business circles. Saudi Arabia's appeal as the region's primary investment hub is being overshadowed by the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, whose growing economic clout and more flexible policies are attracting greater international interest. Saudi Arabia's challenges stem from structural economic constraints, regulatory hurdles, and a cautious approach to foreign business engagement. The kingdom's Vision 2030 reform programme, while ambitious, has encountered delays and mixed results, limiting investor confidence. In contrast, the UAE, particularly Abu Dhabi and Dubai, has steadily expanded its financial infrastructure, diversified its economy, and cultivated a business-friendly environment that appeals to global capital. Qatar's economic growth, buoyed by its vast natural gas reserves and strategic investments abroad, adds another layer of competition. The country's increasing global visibility through initiatives in sports, technology, and finance has bolstered its reputation as a dynamic investment destination. Moreover, Qatar's emphasis on innovation and relatively streamlined regulatory framework has drawn the attention of venture capital and private equity firms. ADVERTISEMENT While Saudi Arabia remains a heavyweight in energy production and has made efforts to open sectors like tourism and entertainment, persistent issues remain. Restrictions on foreign ownership, bureaucratic red tape, and geopolitical tensions in the region have tempered enthusiasm. Investors are reportedly wary of the kingdom's slower pace in implementing reforms and the uncertain regulatory landscape, factors that influence risk assessments and capital allocation decisions. Bankers and dealmakers indicate that the UAE's stable governance, transparent legal systems, and active promotion of free zones continue to be significant advantages. Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds, alongside Dubai's status as a global trade and logistics hub, offer diversified opportunities not as readily accessible in Saudi Arabia. These factors have shifted deal flow and capital movement towards the Emirates. The dynamics between the Gulf states reflect a broader trend of economic diversification and competition for global investment dollars. Each country aims to leverage its unique strengths: the UAE with its cosmopolitan financial centres, Qatar with its resource-backed innovation drive, and Saudi Arabia with its vast scale and reform ambitions. However, the gulf between rhetoric and on-the-ground realities is increasingly apparent for Saudi Arabia. Some international investors have expressed frustration with the slow bureaucratic processes in Saudi Arabia, citing examples where permits and approvals have taken significantly longer than in neighbouring countries. Additionally, the kingdom's social and cultural restrictions create a less open environment for expatriate professionals and foreign businesses compared to the more liberal UAE. This environment has prompted some multinational corporations and financial institutions to adjust their regional strategies. Investment portfolios are being recalibrated to focus more heavily on opportunities in Abu Dhabi and Doha. The UAE's success in hosting global events and establishing itself as a gateway between East and West reinforces its appeal, while Qatar's expanding sovereign funds and infrastructure projects draw considerable interest. Saudi Arabia's leadership recognises these challenges and has announced efforts to streamline regulations and enhance transparency. New initiatives aim to attract foreign direct investment and improve the ease of doing business. Nevertheless, experts highlight that fundamental changes in governance and market openness are essential for Saudi Arabia to reclaim its position as the primary Gulf investment hub.
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Oil inches up on supply concerns and weaker dollar
SINGAPORE - Oil prices ticked up on Tuesday on concerns about supply, with Iran set to reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that would be key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer, while weakness in the dollar also supported prices. Brent crude futures gained 21 cents, or 0.32%, to $64.84 a barrel by 0437 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was up 27 cents, or 0.43%, to $62.79 a barrel, after rising about 1% earlier in the session. The oil market surged higher on Monday as rising geopolitical risks and a supply hike from OPEC+ that fell short of expectations provided a boost, said ING analysts in a note. "The strength continued into early morning trading today," ING said on Tuesday. Both contracts gained nearly 3% in the previous session after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies, known as OPEC+, agreed to keep output increases in July at 411,000 barrels per day, which was less than some in the market had feared and the same hike as the previous two months. "With the worst fears not panning out, investors unwound their bearish positions they had built prior to the weekend's meeting," ANZ analysts said in a note. Meanwhile, the dollar index, which measures its performance against six other major currencies, held near six-week lows as markets weighed the outlook for President Donald Trump's tariff policy and its potential to hurt growth and stoke inflation. A weaker U.S. currency makes dollar-priced commodities such as oil less expensive for holders of other currencies. "Crude oil prices continue to rise, supported by the weakening dollar," said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at Phillip Nova. Geopolitical tensions also supported prices. Iran was poised to reject a U.S. proposal to end a decades-old nuclear dispute, an Iranian diplomat said on Monday, saying it fails to address Tehran's interests or soften Washington's stance on uranium enrichment. If nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran fail, it could mean continued sanctions on Iran, which would limit Iranian supply and be supportive of oil prices. Adding to supply worries, a wildfire in the province of Alberta in Canada has prompted a temporary shutdown of some oil and gas production, which could reduce supply. According to Reuters calculations, wildfires in Canada have affected more than 344,000 bpd of oil sands production, or about 7% of the country's overall crude oil output.
