Don't trust Pakistan to counter Iran: Ex-Pentagon official to Donald Trump
As tensions escalate between Israel and Iran, President Donald Trump's meeting with Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir to discuss a potential US-Pakistan alliance against Iran is drawing sharp criticism from defence experts, including Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official and senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.Rubin dismissed the reported Trump-Munir meeting as 'a dangerous and misguided strategy rooted in historical amnesia,' warning that trusting Pakistan to counter Iran amounts to a replay of past US foreign policy failures.advertisement"Pakistan has a long and consistent history of 'two-faced' behaviour," Rubin said. "They've taken billions in US aid while supporting terrorist proxies and pursuing their own malign interests — from Afghanistan to a clandestine nuclear programme."
Rubin questioned the very premise of incentivising Pakistan to oppose Iran's nuclear ambitions, saying the geopolitical rivalry between Tehran and Islamabad already creates that incentive.#WATCH | Washington, DC | Former Pentagon official and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Michael Rubin, says, "President Trump is enamoured with Generals. We've known that since his first term. Second, it's a reality that Asim Munir has more power than the pic.twitter.com/Z1uooVc6Ue— ANI (@ANI) June 18, 2025"If Iran's nuclear program is going to be eradicated, it may take the infiltration of US forces," Rubin said. "But if we're going to truck out Iran's nuclear supplies after a conflict, and they end up in Pakistan, let's be clear — we shouldn't pay Pakistan a single dollar for doing what is in their own interest."advertisementRubin also warned of China's indirect influence, calling Pakistan "a Chinese proxy" and suggesting that Gen. Munir may be carrying messages not just from Islamabad, but from Beijing."China is the real loser if oil (nearly 44%) flows from the Persian Gulf are disrupted. It wouldn't surprise me if messages were being passed from Trump to Munir and back to China," Rubin said. "Pakistan is hardly an independent country anymore," Rubin said.The defence expert did not spare Trump personally, accusing him of lacking historical depth and being too easily swayed by strongmen.#WATCH | Washington, DC | Former Pentagon official and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Michael Rubin, says, "The problem with Donald Trump is that he doesn't have a full sense of history. He's prone to more equivalence; he will put other countries' national pic.twitter.com/lvMSXxlpmM— ANI (@ANI) June 18, 2025"Trump is enamoured with generals. He reflects reality without diplomatic polish," Rubin said. "But his rhetoric about Pakistan being a 'friend' is insincere. He risks moral equivalence, putting America's security behind his Nobel Prize ambitions."Rubin concluded with a warning that unless the US starts calling out "who is right and who is wrong" in the region, conflicts such as India-Pakistan and Israel-Iran could escalate dramatically.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25 minutes ago
- First Post
'Fully satisfactory agreement': Nippon seals final deal with US Steel
Under the December 2023 transaction, Nippon agreed to pay $55 per share for US Steel – an all-cash deal that included a 40 per cent premium and pitched the combined company as the 'best steelmaker with world-leading capabilities' read more This photo shows signage on the exterior of a blast furnace building during a media tour by Japanese company Nippon Steel at their East Nippon Works Kashima Area facility in Kashima, Ibaraki prefecture, north of Tokyo on December 6, 2024. File Image; AFP Nippon Steel and US Steel said Wednesday they had completed a long-debated transaction granting the US government a 'golden share' – a veto-like power over the Japanese company's strategic decisions. The agreement modifies a transaction originally announced in December 2023, in which Nippon Steel agreed to acquire US Steel for $14.9 the outright buyout of the iconic US company sparked bipartisan political opposition, including from President Donald Trump. Trump, who railed against the proposed deal throughout the 2024 presidential campaign, last month announced a pivot, branding the revamped venture as a 'planned partnership.' And the US government will now have a say on Nippon's plans for US infrastructure and jobs through its golden share. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Nippon Steel CEO Eiji Hashimoto said Thursday in Tokyo that this 'won't hinder activities that we hope to conduct.' A national security agreement between the companies and Washington also provides that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028. 'The agreement is fully satisfactory to us, as it ensures the management freedom and re-producibility that are essential for business investment,' Hashimoto told reporters. 'We intend to start implementing measures for revitalisation and development as soon as possible,' he said, promising not to 'transfer jobs and production sites elsewhere.' Nippon Steel shares surged 4.6 per cent Thursday morning, even as Tokyo's benchmark Nikkei index slumped 0.7 per cent. Pennsylvania Senator Dave McCormick, a Republican, thanked Trump on X and called the outcome 'a massive victory for working families in the Mon Valley, our economy, our national security, and America's manufacturing future!' But the United Steelworkers (USW) union, which vigorously fought the deal, vowed to 'continue watching, holding Nippon to its commitments,' according to a statement. 'And we will use the most powerful tool workers have against global corporations: collective bargaining.' 'World-leading capabilities' Under the December 2023 transaction, Nippon agreed to pay $55 per share for US Steel – an all-cash deal that included a 40 per cent premium and pitched the combined company as the 'best steelmaker with world-leading capabilities.' While the agreement included a pledge to maintain the name US Steel and the company's Pittsburgh headquarters, industry watchers expected an exodus of executives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But the deal sparked bitter opposition from the USW and a broad range of politicians, including then-president Joe Biden and former Ohio senator JD Vance – now Trump's vice president. So Nippon stepped up its lobbying efforts in Washington and Pittsburgh to win support for a transaction that appeared for months to be on life support. Biden blocked the transaction in early January, shortly before leaving office. He said that placing 'one of America's largest steel producers under foreign control' could 'create risk for our national security and our critical supply chains.' But backers of the deal had been hoping the political climate shift following Trump's election victory over Biden's vice president Kamala Harris might help revive it. Besides agreeing to keep US Steel's Pittsburgh headquarters and to maintain US production, the revamped deal's national security agreement calls for a majority of US Steel's board to be US citizens, as are key leaders, including the CEO. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The government's 'golden share' will allow it the right to appoint one independent director and grant it consent rights for proposed capital budget cuts, the redomiciling of activities outside the United States and on acquisitions in the country. The 'golden share' does not entitle the US government to dividends, nor does it require Washington to make investments in the company.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump questions Juventus on women in men's team; players exchange awkward glances- Watch video
Screengrab During a White House visit on Wednesday, Juventus football players and staff found themselves in an awkward moment when US president Donald Trump turned their ceremonial visit into a political talking point. The Italian club, currently in Washington, DC, for the Club World Cup, was invited to the Oval Office ahead of their match against Al Ain of the UAE. With players, including US internationals Weston McKennie and Timothy Weah, standing behind him, Trump shifted from general remarks to controversial territory—transgender participation in women's sports. Turning to the team, Trump asked, 'Could a woman make your team, fellas?' The players stayed quiet, exchanging awkward glances. He repeated the question, this time directing it at Juventus General Manager Damien Comolli. Trying to steer clear of controversy, Comolli replied, 'We have a very good women's team,' referring to Juventus Women, the reigning Serie A champions. Trump pressed again: 'But they should be playing with women?' Comolli did not respond. 'See, they're very diplomatic,' Trump quipped. The incident comes hours after the US Supreme Court allowed Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors to stand—a ruling seen as a major blow to transgender rights. Trump has made restricting transgender participation in women's sports a key focus of his second-term agenda. In February, he signed an executive order titled 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,' which has triggered policy changes at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and lawsuits in several states.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Israel-Iran conflict: Trump approves strike plans against Tehran but no final order yet; report claims Fordow nuclear facility is prime target
US President Donald Trump has privately approved military attack plans against Iran but has withheld issuing a final order to proceed, pending Tehran's response regarding its nuclear programme, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal. Trump reportedly informed senior advisors on Wednesday that he had approved attack plans targeting Iran's nuclear facilities but stopped short of giving a final order to launch strikes. Trump has emphasised his demand for Iran's unconditional surrender regarding nuclear development, stating he is looking for "total and complete victory" rather than a ceasefire. What is the attack plan? When asked about the decision to strike, Trump said, "I may do it, I may not do it," highlighting the fluidity of the situation and his preference to make final decisions "one second before it's due" because "things change, especially with war". He, however, addded: "The next week is going to be very big, maybe less than a week." The approved plans reportedly include strikes on critical nuclear sites such as the Fordow enrichment facility, which is built deep underground and is considered difficult to destroy. Experts note that only the most powerful bombs could effectively target such fortified locations. The military buildup and the approval of attack plans indicate that the US is prepared for a significant escalation if Iran does not comply with demands to halt its nuclear program. Tensions high as Trump mulls intervention The development comes amid escalating tensions in the Middle East following Israeli airstrikes on Iranian targets. The situation intensified after Israel launched a series of airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites, including locations in Tehran and the deeply fortified Fordow and Nantaz uranium enrichment facilities. Iran has long maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, but the international community, including the US and Israel, fears it could be used to develop nuclear weapons. The strikes have resulted in significant casualties, with reports indicating over 450 dead in Iran and 24 in Israel. Trump's administration has been closely monitoring the conflict. While publicly the US has stated it is not participating directly in Israel's offensive, intelligence and defense sources reveal that the US has helped Israel intercept retaliatory missile strikes from Iran. The US military has also increased its presence in the region, with additional naval forces deployed to the eastern Mediterranean and Arabian Sea, a move described as defensive but also positioning the US for potential direct involvement. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has rejected Trump's demands and warned of 'irreparable consequences" should the US proceed with military action.
