Housing minister vows to get answers for RAAC-affected homeowners
The housing minister has vowed to get answers for homeowners in Aberdeen whose homes are affected by the potentially dangerous concrete RAAC.
Residents met with Paul McLennan nearby to the affected homes in the Torry area of the city on Friday.
They welcomed his visit, but say they need help now.
The minister said: 'It's remembering how it's affecting not just residents but their families and the community here too. Torry is a vibrant community.
'There's been a number of actions taken today; we'll be speaking to the UK Finance who represent the banks to talk about the position that some of the residents are in.
'I'll bring some of the other issues that have been raised to me today to the local authority who I'm meeting with later today.'
In October 2023, 500 properties in the Balnagask area of Torry were found to be affected by the potentially dangerous material.
18 months on, most council tenants have been moved, and Aberdeen City Council has offered to buy houses from homeowners but for a fraction of their original value to reflect the fact they contain RAAC.
Around a hundred homeowners remain, refusing to leave, arguing the deal could leave them in financial ruin.
In August 2024, Aberdeen City Council voted to demolish and rebuild all 500 homes.
Lynn Winstanley is part of the Torry Community RAAC Campaign and said: 'It was good to speak to the minister today, I don't think he realised the strength of feeling.
'If I had a magic wand the Scottish Government will top up all the payments, so people get a fair deal for their house that would be the ideal scenario.
'Now you walk through the neighbourhoods affected and it's like a ghost town, this situation has changed the whole community.'
Ian Lippe, who's also part of the group, explained: 'I'd be out by £50,000, and looking at council options, I'd be going into a bedsit, from a three-bedroom house that I've paid for.
'The Scottish Government need to sort this out, we go back to our houses at night, not our homes, it's not home anymore.'
Residents were also joined by two of the 400 homeowners in Dundee who are facing similar challenges.
Around 800 houses there are thought to be affected by RAAC.
Wayne Hoskins, a homeowner from Dundee said: 'It's around 5,000 houses are affected across Scotland like Livingston for example.
'Our scenario isn't exactly the same as those in Aberdeen, but options to fix the situation comes down to funding which we need from the Scottish government.'
The housing minister says he'll provide answers to residents in Torry in the coming weeks and plans to meet with others affected across Scotland.
Aberdeen City Council have welcomed Paul McLennan's visit, and said they'll work closely with the Scottish Government to support those affected by RAAC.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Shoppers urged by Which? to consider protections when using ‘pay by bank'
Pay by bank allows people to quickly and securely pay money directly from their bank account without needing to enter the recipient's bank details or use a card. But Which? raised concerns that people may be unaware of a 'protection gap' if something goes wrong with a purchase. People may be familiar with using pay by bank to settle credit card balances or pay bills, and it has also become an option for retail purchases, the consumer group said. But Which? warned that the option lacks the Section 75 and chargeback protections that people may have when using some other payment methods. Under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act, a credit card company can be held jointly and severally liable for a purchase that turns out to be shoddy or does not materialise, in certain circumstances. This means that a shopper could potentially get a refund from the credit card company if they cannot recoup their costs from the retailer. People using a debit card or a credit card for purchases could also potentially get their money back via the voluntary chargeback scheme. Which? said pay by bank is a 'potential game changer' for businesses as they can sidestep card transaction fees and also benefit from receiving customer funds immediately. There is also appeal for consumers too as refunds can be processed instantly, and card details are not shared when making a transaction – eliminating the risk of them being stolen or compromised. People do have general purchase rights under the Consumer Rights Act, meaning that goods must be fit for purpose, as described and of satisfactory quality. But Which? said these protections are not always easy to enforce and in some cases may end up with people needing to go to a small claims court. People may also face difficulties in the event of a business going bust, particularly if there is an issue with a future-dated purchase such as a flight, a festival, or a household big ticket purchase such as a kitchen or a sofa, the consumer group said. Jenny Ross, Which? Money editor, said: 'Innovations like pay by bank present opportunities for businesses and consumers alike, but they're not without risk, particularly as they lack the rigorous purchase protections you get when paying by card. 'We're calling on the regulator to act to ensure consumers can use pay by bank with confidence, but in the meantime, we'd urge consumers to think carefully before using it to book events or make substantial purchases – for now, your good old-fashioned credit or debit card may be the best option.' A spokesperson for banking and finance industry body UK Finance said: 'There are a range of options for making payments online which provides customers with choice as to how they wish to pay. Different payment methods do come with different levels of protection and it's worth being aware of these when shopping online, particularly when making higher value purchases.' Riccardo Tordera-Ricchi, director of policy and government relations at the Payments Association, said: 'Pay by bank offers real advantages – from lower merchant fees to faster settlement and improved security through reduced reliance on card details. 'But as it becomes more widely used, especially for high-value or future-dated purchases, it's essential that consumers understand the protections associated with different payment methods. 'As payment options diversify, making informed choices is just as important as the technology behind them.' Mr Tordera-Ricchi described Section 75 as 'a powerful example of how regulatory frameworks can meaningfully protect consumers'. Tom Burton, director of external affairs and public policy at bank payment company GoCardless, said: 'Open banking payments are good news for British consumers: they offer bank-grade security measures, instant refunds, reduced fraud risk and, crucially, small businesses that use them don't face the same high fees as they do for card acceptance. Lower merchant costs mean shoppers get cheaper prices – a real win-win. 'There is more to do though if open banking is to genuinely compete with cards, including building on the foundations of the consumer protections that are already in place. GoCardless is working hard to make that a reality for consumers and merchants by closely collaborating with the Government, regulators and others.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
How can ‘sanction' mean two opposing things?
Sir Keir Starmer said 'he could 'not imagine' the circumstances in which he would sanction a new referendum' on Scottish independence, the Times reported the other day. The Mirror said Amazon 'has agreed to sanction businesses that boost their star ratings with bogus reviews'. So we find sanction being used with completely opposite meanings: 'give permission' and 'enact a penalty to enforce obedience to a law'. The latter sense was extended after the first world war to cover economic or military action against a state as a coercive measure. That is the use we daily find applied to action, or the lack of it, against Russia. The diverging meanings both go back to the Latin noun sanctio, deriving from the verb sancire 'to render sacred', hence 'inviolable'. Such a sanctio came to mean a decree, as in that obscure beast of history, the pragmatic sanction, which looks neither pragmatic or like a sanction. The phrase had a good run for its money, though, labelling a decree attributed to St Louis of France against the Papacy in 1268 and a decree by Charles III of Spain in 1759, granting the crown of the Two Sicilies to his son. I would describe as an anxiety dream the thought of having to write about either. Here, pragmatic meant 'to do with affairs of state', a development of the ancient Greek word that, via Latin, also gives us practical. In English pragmatic acquired the meaning 'practical' only in the mid 19th century, allowing the Americans C.S. Peirce and William James to harness pragmatism to describe a kind of philosophy. As for sanction, it is now also deployed to label the removal or reduction of social benefits. In February this year, 5.5 per cent of claimants were being sanctioned. There is, too, the architect of Dublin's Heuston station (often misprinted as Euston station): Sancton Wood (often misprinted as Sanction Wood).
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Portrait of the week: Spending review, LA protests and Greta Thunberg deported
Home Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, was the last minister to agree funding in the government spending review. Once the NHS and defence were settled there wasn't enough to go round. The police wanted more. Everyone over the state pension age in England and Wales with an income of £35,000 or less will receive the winter fuel payment after all, at a cost of £1.25 billion, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, announced. Capital spending included £39 billion on social housing over the next ten years. The government also committed £14.2 billion for the new Sizewell C nuclear power station, but did not say where the money was coming from. Rolls-Royce was selected as the preferred bidder to build the country's first small modular reactors. Unemployment rose to 4.6 per cent, its highest level since 2021, up from 4.5 per cent. Any child in England whose parents receive Universal Credit will be eligible for free school meals from September 2026, adding 500,000 to the scheme. Teachers in England can use artificial intelligence to mark homework, under government guidance. The NHS said that a blood shortage required an increase of donors from 800,000 to a million. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, announced sanctions against two Israeli ministers over comments which 'incited extremist violence', banning them from entering Britain. Zia Yusuf resigned as the chairman of Reform UK. He had criticised Sarah Pochin, the party's new MP, for urging Sir Keir Starmer to back a burqa ban, saying: 'I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.' Two days later he returned to the party in a role with the so-called Doge UK team, seeking savings in council spending. Labour won the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election for the Scottish parliament with 8,559 votes, ahead of the SNP's 7,957 and Reform's 7,088. There was rioting in Ballymena after an alleged sexual assault by two teenage Romanian-speaking boys. An audit commissioned by the secretary general of Unite found that there had been a 'pervasive fraud environment' in the union, which spent £112 million on building a hotel in Birmingham, losing £53.8 million. Last week Unite members voted to continue the dustmen's strike in Birmingham, which began on 11 March. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, agreed with US warnings against a new Chinese embassy at the former Royal Mint site on Tower Hill, fearing espionage. Marks and Spencer began taking online orders for home delivery again, six weeks after a cyber attack. Peter Easterby, the only racehorse trainer to have sent out more than 1,000 winners both over jumps and on the flat, died aged 95. Novelist Frederick Forsyth died aged 86. Abroad About 2,000 National Guard troops were deployed in Los Angeles by the federal government, against the wishes of Governor Gavin Newsom of California, to confront violent protests against the migrant deportation policy of President Donald Trump. A curfew was imposed and 700 Marines and 2,000 more National Guard were sent in. Mr Trump said he was 'disappointed' that Elon Musk had called his 'big, beautiful' budget bill a 'disgusting abomination'; Mr Musk complained of the President's 'ingratitude', declaring: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election.' He then tweeted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files.' He later deleted it. Mr Trump signed a proclamation banning entry for people from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen; a partial ban extended to Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Russia launched an attack with cruise missiles and hundreds of drones on Kyiv and other places in Ukraine; the next night Karkhiv was the target; on another night Kyiv and Odessa. Russia and Ukraine exchanged sick and badly wounded prisoners of war, those aged under 25, and bodies of 12,000 soldiers. Russia's mercenary group Wagner announced it was withdrawing from Mali after four years. A 75ft statue of Lenin in Osh, Kyrgyzstan, was quietly taken down. Eleven were killed in a shooting at a secondary school in the city of Graz in Austria, including the suspect. A yacht carrying Greta Thunberg and 11 others trying to bring aid to Gaza was towed to the port of Ashdod, after being seized by Israel, and she was put on a plane to Paris. CSH
