logo
‘A step too far': Malians protest military gov't moves to hold on to power

‘A step too far': Malians protest military gov't moves to hold on to power

Al Jazeera08-05-2025

When Mali's Colonel Assimi Goita first seized power in a coup in 2020, the West African nation erupted in joy. His promises to hold elections and bring stability to parts of the country troubled by armed groups were tantalising for a nation under siege.
Nearly five years later, however, Goita has repeatedly reneged on those promises. The security situation has only marginally improved, with violence and killings – sometimes by government forces – reported regularly in areas outside the capital, Bamako, while elections have been postponed.
Somehow, popular support for Goita has largely held – until now.
Public anger at the military government was evident on May 3 when hundreds of people gathered in Bamako with defiant fists raised in protest. The demonstrations – a visible first against the military – came after government officials 'proposed' at a national conference last week that Goita lead the country until 2030 and that political parties be dissolved.
On Wednesday, the government suspended political parties 'until further notice for reasons of public order', before mass protests slated for Friday.
The rare revolts signal a reawakening by Malians, whose popular protests against previous rulers built the vacuum that allowed the military to seize power. Many had promised to return to the streets if the regime held on to power indefinitely.
'For many people, even those who supported the government at first, this is a step too far,' Ousmane Diallo, Sahel researcher at Amnesty International, told Al Jazeera. 'They see it as Goita trying to consolidate and hold on to power, and they have resolved to stand against it.'
The protests almost turned into an all-out brawl at the central Cultural Palace in downtown Bamako, as pro-transition youth armed with green-, gold-, and red-coloured Malian flags launched counter-rallies. Violence might not be far off, Diallo said, as more Malians are likely to react to the military government's decrees. In July 2020, protests against the previous government were met with violent crackdowns by security forces, and at least 14 people were killed.
'There's a real backlash now, and things could get more heated, especially if factions of the military decide to ally with the streets,' Diallo said, referring to possible mutinies within the army.
Goita's coup in August 2020 came during a wave of mass antigovernment protests in Bamako because of advancing swarms of armed groups from the north. The groups – which are still active and aim to build caliphates – rendered huge swaths of the country ungovernable, sacking villages, killing civilians and displacing hundreds. ISIL affiliate in the Greater Sahara (ISGS) and al-Qaeda-linked Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) are two of the most active ones.
At the time, Malians blamed the civilian government for failing to deal with the threat. This despite assistance from a United Nations peacekeeping mission and former colonial power France, both of which had deployed more than 15,000 soldiers in northern Mali. So when young soldiers appeared on state television and declared a coup, most were in support.
Goita, 36 at the time, struck a visionary image with his promises of elections and peace. He installed a civilian-led transition government, while he stayed on as vice president. Under pressure from the regional body, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), to hold elections, Goita presented a transition charter spelling out that the military vice president could in no case be president, and that elections would be held in 18 months.
Signs that he would go back on his word came early, however. Goita staged another coup in May 2021, kicking out the civilian president and installing himself as leader. Then, in 2022, when the transition was meant to expire, the military rulers postponed elections and instead presented a five-year transition plan. ECOWAS, which had initially suspended the country, refused the deal. Opposition political parties protested in statements, but the military government has not changed track.
Meanwhile, several opposition politicians have been arrested, tried, and sentenced on charges such as taking part in an 'unauthorised demonstration' or 'opposition to legitimate authority' since Goita took power. Last July, the government suspended political parties and banned media coverage of 'all political activities' for three months.
Analysts say even if Goita were to step down now and hold elections as initially promised, extensive damage to the country's democratic institutions has already set in during his five-year term.
Mali, along with neighbouring militart-led Burkina Faso and Niger, defied ECOWAS sanctions for failing to hold elections, and have since left the regional group. Together, they've formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). The military leaders in Burkina Faso and Niger have already extended their rule by five years.
'The damage is not irreversible, but it's going to be very difficult to get back on track [for elections] because things have gone very far from what was initially promised,' Diallo said.
One reason why Goita has enjoyed popular support thus far, analysts say, is because of recent gains recorded over armed groups and a secessionist coalition in the north.
Many people are also happy that Bamako has distanced itself from France, a former colonial power increasingly disliked across Francophone West Africa for what some see as its exploitative business interests. Some of the biggest French-owned companies in Mali include oil company Total and telecoms provider Orange.
French troops exited Mali in 2022 because Paris refused to back the military government. Bamako has since cut diplomatic ties and sent UN peacekeepers packing. In their place are Russian fighters from the Wagner mercenary group, known for their ruggedness and reported ruthlessness towards civilians.
Ulf Laessing, director of Sahel research at Germany-based think tank, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, told Al Jazeera that while Russian fighters have helped stabilise parts of the north, the victory is far from complete as the armed groups have simply spread out into central and southern Mali.
'The capital is safe and parts of the north, but outside that, it's still difficult,' Laessing said. 'In areas like [northern] Timbuktu, government control is still very weak, and the Russians haven't been able to make a difference to that. There are only about 1,500 of them when even the French were 5,000.'
Although they have suffered deadly ambushes, Wagner fighters helped secure the military's biggest win in 2023 when Kidal, a rebel stronghold in the north, fell under government control for the first time in 10 years.
Back in 2012, Tuareg rebel groups who were fighting for an independent Azawad state seized Kidal and declared independence. They involved armed groups like JNIM, which later took over the campaign and spread into neighbouring countries, contributing to the current security crisis.
In 2015, a UN-mediated peace agreement with the secessionists was meant to see Tuareg fighters integrate into the army and Kidal return to government control. However, it was never implemented. Goita has since cancelled the agreement, pledging to restore all of Mali's 'territorial integrity'.
When Kidal fell in August 2023, it was both a tactical and symbolic win for the military. Goita's supporters cite that as one example of why the strongman should stay on to secure the entire country. However, opponents say that argument is a pretext for the military leaders to stay in power for longer.
The military's relative gains have also come at a cost for civilians, rights groups say. Russian fighters and Malian soldiers have been accused in numerous reports of extrajudicial killings of suspected 'militants', some of whom are wrongly profiled.
Ethnic groups like the Fulani and Dogon – perceived by the Malian army to be supporting armed groups – have been targeted in particular. In reality, experts say villagers themselves are often controlled against their will by powerful armed groups that have set up their own tax and judicial systems. There are reports of armed groups forcibly recruiting men from villages they occupy, while others join armed groups to avenge military attacks on their homes, experts say.
In December, Human Rights Watch (HRW) noted that the Malian army and Wagner fighters 'deliberately killed' at least 32 civilians and burned 100 homes in central and northern Mali in 2024. JNIM and ISGS summarily executed at least 47 civilians, burned more than 1,000 homes, and displaced thousands of people between June and December alone, HRW said, adding that those numbers were conservative, at best.
Since Kidal fell, ethnic Tuareg have also been met with increasing levels of violence from the military, although it initially promised that civilians would be safe. Hundreds of people have fled into neighbouring Mauritania, dreading Wagner fighters or the 'white men with masks' who burn homes and execute those they suspect of being rebel fighters, according to reporting by The Washington Post.
Some 3.3 million people are now believed to be displaced across Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger due to the violence, according to the UN's refugee agency. The number of newly displaced people last year in Mali alone reached nearly 400,000.
As the political climate in Bamako becomes more restrictive, experts say Malians far from the centre are suffering the worst effects of the crisis. With the armed groups changing locations and continuing attacks, the purely military approach Goita insists on may no longer be sufficient, analysts warn, and dialogue might be necessary.
'When you intensify fighting, you will, of course, see more attacks; it is just logical,' Diallo said. 'And it's ordinary civilians who are bearing the brunt of that.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are the anti-Trump, ‘No Kings' protests planned across the US?
What are the anti-Trump, ‘No Kings' protests planned across the US?

Al Jazeera

time7 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

What are the anti-Trump, ‘No Kings' protests planned across the US?

Americans are taking to the streets on Saturday to protest United States President Donald Trump's policies in thousands of locations across the country. The 'No Kings' protests will coincide with a military parade in Washington, DC, marking the US Army's 250th anniversary, and with Trump's 79th birthday. The demonstrations are planned after days of protests against immigration arrests in multiple US cities. Protesters planning to take part in the No Kings demonstrations said they oppose the Trump administration. The organisers' website said the administration has 'defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services'. Since Trump's inauguration, the administration has sent immigrants to foreign prisons, set immigration arrest quotas, clashed with courts, slashed government jobs and proposed reductions to social services. The website describes the protests as a 'national day of defiance'. The name of the protests is derived from opposition to one-person rule. 'The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings,' the website said. The protests are planned in more than 2,000 cities and towns in all 50 US states as well as in Mexico, Australia, Malawi and some European countries, the organisers' map shows. The protesters plan to gather at a range of meeting spots, such as parks, community centres and public landmarks. Major rallies are planned in Philadelphia, Charlotte, Atlanta, Houston, Chicago and New York. However, the organisers have deliberately left Washington, DC, off the map and protests will not be held there. The reason they provide on their website is: 'Instead of allowing this birthday parade to be the center of gravity, we will make action everywhere else the story of America that day: people coming together in communities across the country to reject strongman politics and corruption.' The protests are organised by a social media movement called 50501, which stands for '50 states, 50 protests, one movement'. Times vary according to location and can be found on the organisers' map. Some locations will begin protesting early, such as Norman, Oklahoma, where the protest is to begin at 9am (14:00 GMT). Others will start demonstrations in the evening. In Big Sur, a rugged region on California's central coast, protests are to begin at 4:30pm (23:30 GMT). On Saturday, the military parade and celebration in Washington, DC, are to begin about 6:30pm (22:30 GMT). Tanks will roll through the streets of the US capital in the first military parade to be staged in the US since 1991 when a parade marked the end of the Gulf War under President George HW Bush. Thousands of soldiers will take part in the parade along with hundreds of military aircraft and vehicles. Army officials have estimated the cost of the parade to be $25m to $45m. The No Kings website said the protests are intended to be peaceful. 'Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events,' it said. However, the No Kings demonstrations are planned after days of protests in multiple US cities against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids and Trump's use of the military to quell protests. The anti-immigration protests began on June 6 in Los Angeles after military-style ICE raids on several locations across the city, resulting in the detention of 44 people. While the protests in all cities have reportedly been largely peaceful, occasional clashes have led to injuries and further arrests. The immigration raids continue, and National Guard soldiers have been deployed in multiple cities. Trump has also sent Marines to Los Angeles. Ahead of the No Kings protests, some Republican leaders have threatened demonstrators with prosecution if protests become violent, some even going as far as to mobilise National Guard forces in advance of the protests. This approach has attracted a large amount of criticism. 'Protests are tumultuous, and military forces are trained to kill,' Gregory Magarian, professor of law at Washington University's School of Law in St Louis, Missouri, told Al Jazeera. When asked about the protests, Trump said at a White House news briefing on Thursday: 'I don't feel like a king, I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.' The president's allies and Republican lawmakers responded with laughter to his response. 'We're not a king at all, thank you very much,' he said. However, Trump has made use of this terminology himself in the past. In February, he posted on his Truth Social platform: 'CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!' Congestion pricing refers to fees levied on motorists entering cities. It is aimed at reducing road traffic and increasing the use of public transport. Trump wrote the post after Sean Duffy, his transportation secretary, wrote a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul ending the US Department of Transportation's agreement with the state for congestion charging in Manhattan. Shortly after, the White House shared a computer-generated photo of Trump wearing a crown on a fake Time magazine cover. Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced on Thursday that he ordered the deployment of more than 5,000 National Guard soldiers and 2,000 state police officers to help manage the anti-ICE protests in the state on the border with Mexico. Abbott also deployed National Guard soldiers in San Antonio during protests against immigration enforcement actions there. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said during a news conference on Tuesday: 'The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you.' Republican South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson released a video on his X account warning 'extremist left-leaning groups' against causing disruptions in South Carolina. 'If you attack our officers, destroy property, or threaten innocent lives in South Carolina – you will be arrested, charged, and prosecuted. No excuses. No second chances.' Radical leftist groups and outside agitators are threatening to bring violence and chaos to our communities on June 14 — Flag Day and President Trump's birthday. Let me make this crystal clear:If you attack our officers, destroy property, or threaten innocent lives in South… — Alan Wilson (@AGAlanWilson) June 11, 2025Anti-ICE protests are continuing in Los Angeles and other cities. Civil and human rights attorney Robert Patillo told Al Jazeera that the protests could be expected in 'more than 30 cities, met with a familiar response: more riot gear, more barricades'. 'The protests are spreading because what's happening in Los Angeles isn't unique – it's a mirror,' Patillo said. 'Communities across the country see themselves in the images coming out of LA: the same painful encounters with police, the same racial disparities, the same struggle to make ends meet in a system that feels stacked against them. These aren't isolated incidents. They're part of a deeper, shared experience of injustice that stretches from coast to coast.'

US Marines arrive at Los Angeles federal sites as court battle unfolds
US Marines arrive at Los Angeles federal sites as court battle unfolds

Al Jazeera

time20 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Marines arrive at Los Angeles federal sites as court battle unfolds

The United States Marines have deployed to Los Angeles following criticism and legal battles over whether President Donald Trump had the authority to use the military to quell civilian protests without state approval. On Friday, Major General Scott Sherman of the US Army confirmed that 200 Marines were arriving in southern California to protect a federal building. A total of 700 Marines have been authorised for deployment to the region. 'I would like to emphasise that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities,' Sherman said during a briefing. The Marines join National Guard troops already in the Los Angeles area following the eruption of protests on June 6, when residents took to the streets to express their displeasure with President Trump's immigration raids, some of which targeted local hardware stores and other workplaces. While many of the demonstrations were mostly peaceful and limited to a small part of the city, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) did experience tense clashes with some protesters, who hurled objects and set driverless Waymo vehicles on fire. Police responded with flashbangs, tear gas and rubber bullets. Trump, meanwhile, dubbed the protesters 'bad people' and 'insurrectionists' and announced the deployment of the National Guard on the evening of June 7. The president cited Title 10 of the US Code, which allows a president to call up the National Guard if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' against the federal government. Trump and his allies framed the demonstrators as part of a migrant 'invasion' imperilling the US. 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,' Trump wrote in a presidential memorandum. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president had authorised the National Guard's deployment to a state without the governor's permission. The last time was to protect civil rights protesters who were marching through segregated Alabama and faced threats of violence. Presidents have called up the National Guard to address domestic unrest in the years since, but only with the cooperation of local authorities. In 1992, for instance, then-President Bill Clinton answered a request from California's governor at the time to send National Guard members to address the Rodney King protests in Los Angeles. Trump's decision to circumvent the authority of California's present-day governor, Gavin Newsom, has led to a legal fight over whether he exceeded his powers as president. Newsom filed a lawsuit to block the use of military troops outside of federal sites, and on Thursday, a pair of court decisions left the future of the recent deployment unclear. First, on Thursday afternoon, District Court Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco sided with Newsom, calling Trump's actions 'illegal' and a violation of the US Constitution. In his 36-page decision, Breyer ruled that the Trump administration had failed to show a danger of rebellion in Los Angeles. 'While Defendants have pointed to several instances of violence, they have not identified a violent, armed, organized, open and avowed uprising against the government as a whole,' he wrote. 'The definition of rebellion is unmet.' He added that he was 'troubled' by the Trump administration's argument that a protest against the federal government could be tantamount to rebellion, warning that such logic could violate the First Amendment right to free speech. 'Individuals' right to protest the government is one of the fundamental rights protected by the First Amendment, and just because some stray bad actors go too far does not wipe out that right for everyone,' Breyer said. He called for an injunction against Trump's use of National Guard members, saying 'it sets a dangerous precedent for future domestic military activity' and 'deprives the state for two months of its own use of thousands of National Guard members'. Nearly 4,000 members of the California National Guard have been authorised for deployment to Los Angeles under Trump's command. But the Trump administration quickly appealed Judge Breyer's injunction. By late Thursday, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals had temporarily blocked the injunction, allowing Trump to continue using the National Guard until a hearing could be held on the matter next week. On Friday, Trump celebrated that decision on his social media platform, Truth Social. 'The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe,' Trump wrote. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now. We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!' Newsom, meanwhile, has continued his call for Trump to end what he framed as illegal control of the National Guard. He has also accused the military presence of heightening tensions with protesters, not dissipating them. '@RealDonaldTrump, you must relinquish your authority of the National Guard back to me and back to California,' Newsom wrote on social media Thursday. He has called the Republican president's federalisation of the National Guard an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'. The California governor is seen as a possible Democratic contender for the presidency in the 2028 election cycle.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store