logo
The courts are unlikely to end the trade war

The courts are unlikely to end the trade war

Yahoo5 days ago

Legal powerhouses section 122 and 338 offer upside
Yesterday, a U.S. court struck down President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), calling them unconstitutional and stopping 10% global tariffs and higher levies on China, Canada, and Mexico. The ruling, citing IEEPA's misuse for trade imbalances, cut the U.S. tariff rate from 27% to 17.8%.Trump has two legal, constitutional tools—Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—to push his trade agenda forward without Congress. These laws provide clear limits, removing the subjective nature of Trump's prior tariffs, which businesses will find reassuring. With upside potential, especially against China's well-documented trade abuses, these options offer a structured path forward and may help reduce the uncertainty that has been bred by the on-again, off-again policy.
Section 122: Quick, capped tariffs
Section 122 allows Trump to impose tariffs up to 15% on imported goods' value to address major trade deficits, like the U.S.'s $971 billion gap in 2024, or to prevent dollar devaluation. No congressional approval is needed and tariffs last 150 days. The May 2025 court ruling endorsed Section 122's legality, making it a fast, predictable tool to tax imports from countries driving trade imbalances, giving businesses clarity on short-term impacts while Trump plans longer strategies.Section 338: A slam dunk against China
Section 338 lets Trump tax imports up to 50% or ban them from countries that unfairly hurt U.S. businesses, with no time limit or need for Congress. Its clear 50% cap eliminates the uncertainty of Trump's earlier open-ended tariffs, a relief for businesses craving stability. China's trade abuses make Section 338 a strong fit. An investigation into China's practices—already well-documented—would justify tariffs or bans, leveraging this constitutional tool to target unfair trade head-on.
China's well-documented trade abuses
China's trade violations are clear. It slaps high tariffs on specific goods, like 25% on U.S. cars versus 2.5% on Chinese cars in the U.S., skewing competition. Subsidies, like $100 billion awarded yearly for tech firms, boost Chinese companies unfairly. Intellectual property theft, including forced technology transfers, costs U.S. firms $50 billion annually. China limits U.S. exports, controlling 80% of rare earth minerals. Its currency manipulation keeps the Yuan low, fueling a $419 billion U.S. trade deficit in 2024. These abuses, noted in U.S. Trade Representative reports, make Section 338 a straightforward, legally sound response.
Strategic upside post-rulingThe court's ruling curbs IEEPA but green lights Section 122 and Section 338. Trump could use Section 122 for immediate 15% tariffs, then investigate China for Section 338's 50% tariffs. Section 122's 150-day limit and Section 338's 50% cap provide predictability, easing business concerns in recent months about an undetermined ceiling. While Section 122 is low-risk, Section 338 could spark trade tensions, raising prices. Courts might question Section 338's disuse, but China's clear violations bolster Trump's case.
Section 122 and Section 338 give Trump legal, limited tariff tools, sidestepping the May 28 2025 ruling. With Section 122's quick action and Section 338's strength against China's abuses, these laws offer upside by stabilizing trade policy, giving businesses confidence in a more predictable tariff framework.
The post The courts are unlikely to end the trade war appeared first on FreightWaves.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Ukraine's surprise drone assault on Russia, new attention drawn to sensitive sites stateside
After Ukraine's surprise drone assault on Russia, new attention drawn to sensitive sites stateside

Fox News

time11 minutes ago

  • Fox News

After Ukraine's surprise drone assault on Russia, new attention drawn to sensitive sites stateside

After Ukraine launched a sudden drone assault on Russian installations, it brought new attention to the U.S.' own vulnerabilities, regardless of which side the U.S. stood on Kyiv's attack. In recent years, Chinese Communist Party-linked entities have commercially targeted land around the U.S., including in the vicinity of sensitive installations like the Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota. The Fufeng Group's 300-acre farmland purchase in 2021 first raised the collective antennae of Congress to such under-the-radar transactions – and even Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis swiftly banned them in his state as a result, among other efforts around the country. On Tuesday, North Dakota's senators agreed that the U.S. must remain vigilant for any malign activity, whether it be from relatively novel drone assaults to potential espionage through real estate transactions. "When adversaries can buy our land, attend our universities, photograph silos in our prairies, perform aerial surveillance, park their ships near our military bases, or even just join our PTAs, they have more opportunities to be nefarious," Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer told Fox News Digital. "Our posture must always be vigilant, never assuming foreign actors are benign or have the best intentions," he said. "Whether it's directly spying, indirectly influencing, or sending drones to blow up aircraft, the ability of the enemy increases when we allow them easy access near our national interests." Cramer's Flickertail State counterpart, Sen. John Hoeven, joined an effort to prevent such land-buys and has worked with federal partners to update the process in which foreign investment is analyzed for approval and decided upon. "We need to remain vigilant against China and other adversaries," said Hoeven, who is co-sponsoring South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds' bill banning individuals and entities controlled by China, Russia, Iran and North Korea from purchasing farmland or commercial land near sensitive federal sites. "At the same time, we're working to update the CFIUS process [which governs federal approval of foreign investments] to ensure proper reviews are taking place as well," Hoeven said. "We also are working to develop the technology we need to protect our domestic military bases from potential drone threats." Rounds' bill also has bipartisan support, including from Sen. Catherine Cortez-Masto, D-Nev., whose state also hosts sensitive government sites like Nellis Air Force Base and Area 51. "It is common sense that we should not allow our foreign adversaries to buy agricultural land next to these locations," Masto said in a statement. Rounds added in a statement that America's "near-peer adversaries… are looking for any possible opportunity to surveil our nation's capabilities and resources." Even private-sector entities have expressed concern, including the South Dakota Soybean Association, which said farmland must be protected from foreign purchase for both agricultural and national security purposes.

Scoop: DNC rents taco truck to mock Trump on 'TACO' slogan
Scoop: DNC rents taco truck to mock Trump on 'TACO' slogan

Axios

time12 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop: DNC rents taco truck to mock Trump on 'TACO' slogan

The Democratic National Committee is commandeering a taco truck to mock Trump's apparent fury at the slogan " Trump Always Chickens Out," or "TACO," Axios has learned. Why it matters: Democrats clearly think they have found a way to get under the president's skin. Trump was asked about the mantra — used by Wall Street traders to predict his response to tariff-induced market dips — at a press conference Wednesday, and he lashed out in response. "Don't ever say what you said. That's a nasty question," the president replied. Driving the news: The DNC will park a taco truck outside the Republican National Committee's headquarters on Capitol Hill with a graphic of Trump in a chicken suit and the "Trump Always Chickens Out" slogan. The truck will be there between noon and 2pm on Tuesday and will actually serve free tacos, a DNC spokesperson told Axios. What they're saying: "With his idiotic trade policy, he talks a big game, caves, and then leaves working families and small businesses to deal with the fallout," DNC chair Ken Martin said in a statement. "Trump always chickens out — we're just bringing the tacos to match." The other side: "LMFAO. A taco truck? Are they going to be giving out free vasectomies again too?" RNC spokesperson Zach Parkinson said in a statement, citing a past DNC pro-abortion initiative.

Newark mayor sues New Jersey's top federal prosecutor after arrest at immigration detention site
Newark mayor sues New Jersey's top federal prosecutor after arrest at immigration detention site

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newark mayor sues New Jersey's top federal prosecutor after arrest at immigration detention site

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — Newark Mayor Ras Baraka sued New Jersey's top federal prosecutor on Tuesday over his arrest on a trespassing charge at a federal immigration detention facility, saying the Trump-appointed attorney had pursued the case out of political spite. Baraka, who leads New Jersey's biggest city, is a candidate in a crowded primary field for the Democratic nomination for governor next Tuesday. The lawsuit against interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba coincided with the day early in-person voting began. The lawsuit seeks damages for 'false arrest and malicious prosecution,' and also accuses Habba of defamation for comments she made about his case, which was later dropped. Citing a post on X in which Habba said Baraka 'committed trespass,' the lawsuit says Habba issued a 'defamatory statement' and authorized his 'false arrest' despite 'clear evidence that Mayor Baraka had not committed the petty offense of 'defiant trespass.'' The suit also names Ricky Patel, the Homeland Security Investigations agent in charge in Newark. 'This is not about revenge,' Baraka said during a news conference. 'Ultimately, it's about them taking accountability for what they did.' Emails seeking comment were left Tuesday with Habba's office and the Homeland Security Department, where Patel works. The episode outside the Delaney Hall federal immigration detention center has had dramatic fallout. It began on May 9 when Baraka tried to join three Democratic members of Congress — Rob Menendez, LaMonica McIver and Bonnie Watson Coleman — who went to the facility for an oversight tour, something authorized under federal law. Baraka, an outspoken critic of Trump's immigration crackdown and the detention center, was denied entry. Video from the event showed him walking from the facility side of the fence to the street side, where other people had been protesting, and then uniformed officials came to arrest him. As they did, people could be heard in the video saying to protect the mayor. The video shows a crowd forming and pushing as officials led off a handcuffed Baraka. He was initially charged with trespass, but Habba dropped that charge last month and charged McIver with two counts of assaulting officers stemming from her role in the skirmish at the facility's gate. U.S. Magistrate Judge Andre Espinosa rebuked Habba's office after moving to dismiss the charges. 'The hasty arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, followed swiftly by the dismissal of these trespassing charges a mere 13 days later, suggests a worrisome misstep by your Office,' he wrote. McIver decried the charges and signaled she plans to fight them. A preliminary hearing is scheduled later this month. Delaney Hall, a 1,000-bed facility, opened earlier this year as a federal immigration detention facility. Florida-based Geo Group Inc., which owns and operates the property, was awarded a 15-year contract valued at $1 billion in February. The announcement was part of the president's plans to sharply increase detention beds nationwide from a budget of about 41,000 beds this year. Baraka sued Geo soon after that deal was announced. Then, on May 23, the Trump Justice Department filed a suit against Newark and three other New Jersey cities over their so-called sanctuary policies. There is no legal definition for sanctuary city policies, but they generally limit cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers. New Jersey's attorney general has a statewide directive in place prohibiting local police from collaborating in federal civil immigration matters. The policies are aimed at barring cooperation on civil enforcement matters, not at blocking cooperation on criminal matters. They specifically carve out exceptions for when Immigration and Customs Enforcement supplies police with a judicial criminal warrant. The Justice Department said, though, the cities won't notify ICE when they've made criminal arrests, according to the suit. It's unclear whether Baraka's role in these fights with the Trump administration is having an effect on his campaign for governor. He's one of six candidates seeking the Democratic nomination in the June 10 election to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. In a video ad in the election's final weeks, Baraka has embraced a theme his rivals are also pushing: affordability. He says he'll cut taxes. While some of the images show him standing in front of what appears to be Delaney Hall, he doesn't mention immigration or the arrest specifically, saying: 'I'll keep Trump out of your homes and out of your lives.' Trump has endorsed Jack Ciattarelli, one of several Republicans running in the gubernatorial primary. Ciattarelli has said if he's elected, his first executive order would be to end any sanctuary policies for immigrants in the country illegally. ___ Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store