logo
Opinion: Quebec Liberals pick Pablo Rodriguez. Brace for a return to sovereignty battles in Quebec

Opinion: Quebec Liberals pick Pablo Rodriguez. Brace for a return to sovereignty battles in Quebec

Montreal Gazette10 hours ago

It was far from the spectacular coronation some were expecting. On Saturday, Pablo Rodriguez became the new leader of the Quebec Liberal Party, securing just over 52 per cent support on the second ballot against runner-up Charles Milliard.
That's quite a short margin — light years away compared to Mark Carney's stunning 86 per cent majority on the first ballot just a few months ago on the federal stage.
After a leadership race that lasted nearly a whole year, Justin Trudeau's former lieutenant inherits a party that is deeply divided. Results show that close to one in two Liberal members (47.7 per cent) didn't make him either their first or second choice in this preferential voting system. As a matter of fact, the 'Anyone but Pablo' movement nearly cost him the victory at the finish line.
So his first task, before he can begin persuading voters to trust him in the next election, will be to unite his own party — and his caucus at the National Assembly — around his leadership and vision for the QLP's future. Time will tell whether a staunch Montreal-based federalist like Rodriguez can bring nationalists and rural voters back into the Liberal fold.
Milliard, the former CEO of the Fédération des chambres de commerce du Québec, was the surprise of the race, finishing second on the first ballot and beating high-profile contender Karl Blackburn. Many saw in him as a breath of fresh air — a younger political outsider akin to Paul St-Pierre Plamondon for the Parti Québécois. For some, the choice of a seasoned politician like Rodriguez is seen as a missed opportunity for the party's renewal and for reconnecting with younger generations of Quebecers.
One thing is for sure: After an impressive campaign in which Liberal members and the broader public got to know him better, Milliard has proven his high potential and shown what he's capable of. As he confirmed again this weekend his intention to run in the next provincial election as a Liberal candidate, there's little doubt we'll soon see him again on the political stage.
Rodriguez's arrival in provincial politics also signals a potential revival of the sovereignty debate. He referenced it in his victory speech, already wielding the spectre of a third referendum on Quebec independence to dissuade voters from supporting the PQ.
After an eight-year hiatus during which Quebecers embraced the so-called 'third way' offered by the nationalist-but-not-separatist Coalition Avenir Québec, it seems like the next election will likely revolve around the question of sovereignty.
Yes, again. And the PQ is certainly thrilled at the idea of going back to these 'glory days'.
Following five decades in which provincial politics were dominated by the debate over whether Quebec should secede from Canada, many believed François Legault's rise to power in 2018 had opened a new chapter — and perhaps even put the sovereigntist movement to rest for good.
I must admit that I was one of them. And that we were probably wrong about it.
With the ultra-federalist Rodriguez now facing off against hardline sovereigntist St-Pierre Plamondon — who is openly committed to holding another referendum in his first term if he becomes the next premier — Quebec appears to be poised to return to the good old quarrels about the province's future within Canada. And in this world of wedge politics and picking sides, this divisive question may serve well both the Liberals and the PQ, eclipsing in the process other, more pressing issues such as the economy, the management public finances, health, and education, to name just a few.
All that, despite polls suggesting that roughly two-thirds of Quebecers are simply not interested in reopening this never-ending debate.
It's almost as if we're moving backwards.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conservatives vote with Carney government to rush Bill C-5
Conservatives vote with Carney government to rush Bill C-5

National Observer

time4 hours ago

  • National Observer

Conservatives vote with Carney government to rush Bill C-5

The federal Conservatives voted with the Liberals on a special order to push a massive piece of legislation on major project approvals through the House of Commons before the week's end. Three hundred and five Conservative and Liberal MPs voted in favour of the government's time allocation motion, while 30 Bloc Québécois, Green and NDP MPs voted against it. The federal government is determined to get Bill C-5 — dubbed the One Canadian Economy Act — through the House of Commons before MPs leave Ottawa for the summer recess. With the Conservatives' support, it looks like the federal government will succeed. Now, the federal Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities will have two meetings this week to study bill C-5 before it is set to report back to the House on Friday. Conservatives and Liberals voted against a Bloc Québécois amendment that would have given the committee two full days to study the legislation. The Bloc Québécois, NDP and Green Party say the Liberals' time allocation motion is undemocratic and doesn't give MPs enough time to study and fully understand the legislation. The section on major project approvals alone would give the federal government authorization to override 13 existing laws and seven regulations for projects deemed 'in the national interest.' Many of these laws and regulations are environmental. The proposed legislation would allow the federal government to conditionally approve projects it deems 'in the national interest' before an environmental or impact assessment or other regulatory processes take place. Review processes will still take place but focus on 'how' a project should be built instead of 'whether' it can be built. Liberal MPs, cabinet ministers and House Leader Steven MacKinnon justified the controversial time allocation motion by saying the government was elected on a mandate to move quickly on projects of national interest and remove federal trade barriers. Liberal MPs, cabinet ministers and House Leader Steven MacKinnon justified the controversial time allocation motio n by saying the government was elected on a mandate to move quickly on projects of national interest and remove federal trade barriers. To assuage concerns, Liberal MPs and cabinet ministers have repeatedly referred to a set of 'criteria' used to determine whether a project is deemed 'in the national interest.' Some factors the government may consider include whether a project advances the interests of Indigenous Peoples and contributes to 'clean growth.' The latter criterion was received with skepticism because Prime Minister Mark Carney touted an oilsands lobby group's proposed carbon capture megaproject as an example of one possible project in the national interest. The problem: the legislation does not require projects to meet all or any of these factors; they are merely a suggestion. Similarly, Carney said his government won't impose a project on a province. However, this is not spelled out in the proposed legislation — Carney's word is the only assurance that provinces won't have a pipeline or other project forced through their jurisdiction. This verbal commitment is not enough to protect provincial sovereignty, Bloc Québécois MPs argue. All day Monday, Bloc Québécois MPs took shots at the Conservatives for voting with the federal government, questioning whether the official opposition is still willing to stand up for democracy. To this, Conservative MP Chris Lewis pointed out that the NDP and Bloc Québécois have both voted with the Liberals previously. If all goes according to the federal government's plan, Bill C-5 will pass third reading on Friday and be sent to the Senate where it goes through a similar process of study and possible amendments. The Senate got a headstart studying the bill on Monday. In the afternoon, senators heard testimony from Transport and Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland on the first portion of the bill which aims to eliminate federal barriers to interprovincial trade. The Senate sits for one week longer than the House of Commons; its last possible sitting day is June 27, compared to June 20 for MPs. Senator Paul Prosper said he plans on putting forward an amendment to slow C-5 down if and when it gets to the Senate in 'hopes that more rational minds prevail in terms of consulting with Indigenous groups.' 'Looking at all options' At a non-partisan news conference on Monday morning, Green Party MP Elizabeth May, Indigenous leaders, Senator Paul Prosper, NDP MP Gord Johns and two environmental lawyers urged the federal government to slow down and not rush the bill. 'This legislation is certainly something all Canadians should be concerned about,' said Abram Benedict, Regional Chief for the Chiefs of Ontario, referencing similar legislation in Ontario that is 'undermining democracy' and First Nations rights holders. Chiefs of Ontario is not opposed to development or projects, Benedict said. 'But First Nation rights holders must be involved from the beginning, not given three weeks' notice that legislation will be coming forward, and given two weeks' notice of what it looks like,' he said. Benedict said the Chiefs of Ontario will 'be looking at all options,' including protest and legal options to slow the federal government down in the courts to ensure rights-holders are heard. This includes a rally planned for Tuesday afternoon outside Parliament. The bill 'is an assault on science and democracy,' Anna Johnston, a staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said at the press conference. Johnston said the bill will shut the public out of decisions that affect them and allow cabinet to withhold 'virtually all' information about projects from the public, including the project details, scientific reviews and the advice of responsible ministers. Public comment periods would still take place, but after a project has already been listed and received conditional approval, according to the legislation. 'If a highway were designated for fast-tracking just blocks from your home, the minister wouldn't have to give you any information beyond the name and a brief description of it, and you would have no say in whether, where, or how the highway was built,' Johnston said. Ecojustice staff lawyer Joshua Ginsberg is concerned about the federal government giving itself powers to override existing laws to get projects built. Some of the 13 laws the federal government could override under the proposed legislation include: the Fisheries Act, Indian Act, Canada Marine Act, Species at Risk Act and the Impact Assessment Act. 'For example, today, the federal government cannot issue permits, by law, for activities that would jeopardize the survival and recovery of a threatened species, but under this bill, the government could be compelled to approve activities causing that kind of harm, even if science warns of catastrophic consequences,' Ginsberg said. The legislation also empowers ministers to override laws passed by Parliament. This 'extraordinary mechanism' concentrates decision-making authority in the executive and weakens democratic oversight, he said. This bill is worse than Stephen Harper's omnibus bill C-38 which famously 'destroyed 70 environmental laws,' May said. 'It appears to me, and it remains to be seen, that Mr. Carney's new majority coalition is Liberal-Conservative, delivering Pierre Poilievre policies with a more friendly face,' May said. The bill has a five-year sunset clause, meaning that if the bill becomes law, there will be a five year period during which projects can be listed for conditional approval. May pointed out that one Liberal MP, Patrick Weiler, wants a shorter sunset clause because of the sweeping powers it affords to government. 'Allowing cabinet to decide which projects proceed before reviewing them is like jumping off a cliff and then asking for the parachute,' Johnston said. The Bloc Québécois wants no part of projects based on 'energy of the past,' MP Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay said during debate on his party's motion on Monday evening. This is just economic and environmental common sense, he said, referencing scientific reports that a vast majority of fossil fuel reserves must remain in the ground if the world has any hope of limiting global warming in line with the Paris Agreement. Canada's oilsands produce 'some of the most heavily polluting oil in the world,' he said.

Jury finds MyPillow founder defamed former voting equipment company employee
Jury finds MyPillow founder defamed former voting equipment company employee

Toronto Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Jury finds MyPillow founder defamed former voting equipment company employee

Jury finds MyPillow founder defamed former voting equipment company employee Photo by Jack Dempsey / AP Article content DENVER — A federal jury in Colorado on Monday found that one of the nation's most prominent election conspiracy theorists, MyPillow founder Mike Lindell, defamed a former employee for a leading voting equipment company after the 2020 presidential election. Advertisement 2 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account or Sign in without password View more offers Article content The employee, Eric Coomer, was awarded $2.3 million in damages. He had sued after Lindell called him a traitor and accusations about him stealing the election were streamed on Lindell's online media platform. Article content tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Jury finds MyPillow founder defamed former voting equipment company employee Back to video tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Play Video Article content Coomer was the security and product strategy director at Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems, whose voting machines became the target of elaborate conspiracy theories among allies of President Donald Trump, who continues to falsely claim that his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in 2020 was due to widespread fraud. Dominion won a $787-million settlement in a defamation lawsuit it filed against Fox News over its airing of false claims against the company and has another lawsuit against the conservative network Newsmax. Your Midday Sun Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. There was an error, please provide a valid email address. Sign Up By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Thanks for signing up! A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Your Midday Sun will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Article content Advertisement 3 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article content Newsmax apologized to Coomer in 2021 for airing false allegations against him. Coomer said during the two-week Lindell trial that his career and life were destroyed by the statements. His lawyers said Lindell either knew the statements were lies, or conveyed them recklessly without knowing if they were true. Read More Election denier and 'MyPillow Guy' Mike Lindell confirms he's out of money, can't pay legal bills MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell banned from Twitter once again Lindell's lawyers denied the claims and said his online platform, formerly known as Frankspeech, is not liable for statements made by others. Lindell said he went to trial to draw attention to the need to get rid of electronic voting machines that have been targeted in a web of conspiracy theories. He said he used to be worth about $60 million before he started speaking out about the 2020 election and is now $10 million in debt. Advertisement 4 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article content Reviews, recounts and audits in the battleground states where Trump contested his loss in 2020 all affirmed Democrat Joe Biden's victory. Trump's attorney general at the time said there was no evidence of widespread fraud, and Trump and his allies lost dozens of court cases seeking to overturn the result. Lindell stuck by his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen during the trial, but did not call any experts to present evidence of his claims. Lindell said his beliefs that the 2020 election was tainted by fraud were influenced by watching the 2020 HBO documentary Kill Chain and by the views of Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. In an interview for a documentary Lindell made in 2021, Flynn said foreign interference was going to happen in U.S. elections, and Lindell said he had no reason to doubt the claim since Flynn had worked for both political parties in intelligence. Advertisement 5 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article content Lindell distanced himself from an account by a Colorado podcaster who claimed to have heard a conference call from the anti-fascist group Antifa before the 2020 election. The podcast claimed that on the call someone named Eric from Dominion said he would make sure that Trump would not win, a story that was recounted on Frankspeech during a 2021 event. Lindell said he only learned about that during the trial. RECOMMENDED VIDEO tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Play Video Lindell said he never accused Coomer of rigging the election, but he did say he was upset because he said Newsmax blocked him from being able to go on air to talk about voting machines after it apologized to Coomer. Coomer denied there was any such deal to block Lindell under his agreement with the network. Advertisement 6 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Article content Coomer's lawyers tried to show how their client's life was devastated by the conspiracy theories spreading about him. Lindell was comparatively late to seize on Coomer, not mentioning him until February 2021, well after his name had been circulated by other Trump partisans. Coomer said the conspiracy theories cost him his job, his mental health and the life he'd built and said Lindell's statements were the most distressing of all. He specifically pointed to a statement on May 9, 2021, when Lindell described what he believed Coomer had done as 'treason.' Lindell's attorneys argued that Coomer's reputation was already in tatters by the time Lindell mentioned him. They said that was partly because of Coomer's Facebook posts disparaging Trump, which the former Dominion employee acknowledged were 'hyperbolic' and had been a mistake. Lindell denied making any statements he knew to be false about Coomer and testified that he has called many people traitors. His lawyers argued the statements were about a matter of public concern — elections — and therefore protected by the First Amendment. But Coomer's lawyers said the statements crossed the line into defamation because Lindell accused Coomer of treason, a crime. Article content Share this article in your social network Read Next

Saskatchewan premier pitches 'port-to-port corridor' to connect northern Pacific and Arctic coasts
Saskatchewan premier pitches 'port-to-port corridor' to connect northern Pacific and Arctic coasts

Vancouver Sun

time6 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Saskatchewan premier pitches 'port-to-port corridor' to connect northern Pacific and Arctic coasts

CALGARY — Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is pitching the idea of a 'port-to-port corridor' that would connect energy and other goods to Canada's northern Pacific and Arctic coasts. Moe made his remarks Monday alongside Alberta Premier Danielle Smith at an event focused on both provinces' ambitions to double oil and gas production. 'I know we are not going to be entirely reliant on the U.S for that marketplace,' Moe said. 'We are going to have access to the world.' Moe, who leads the right-of-centre Saskatchewan Party government, said he likes what he's been hearing out of the Liberal federal government about making Canada an 'energy superpower' and the strongest economy in the G7. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. He admits that means going against his political stripe to some degree. 'Far be it for me to be accused of being chair of the Liberal booster club the last decade or so, but there are some comments from this Prime Minister that I think we can truly get behind,' Moe told the event hosted by energy services industry advocacy group Enserva. Prime Minister Mark Carney's government has introduced legislation that would fast track certain infrastructure projects deemed in the 'national interest' as U.S. President Donald Trump upends what until recently has been a reliable cross-border trading relationship. Carney has heard pitches from the premiers about what projects they think should be chosen, but has not said which have made the cut. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wants a bitumen pipeline to be the 'anchor tenant' of a corridor to the Port of Prince Rupert, B.C., enabling exports to Asia above and beyond what the operating Trans Mountain pipeline can ship from the Vancouver area. She has said that project should be built in tandem with another one she'd like to see considered in the national interest: the Pathways proposal to capture and sequester carbon emissions from Alberta's biggest oilsands producers. Smith and Moe also voiced support for a pipeline to the Port of Churchill, Man., which would enable exports to Europe via Hudson Bay. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has been keen on the idea, too. 'One thing the prime minister seems to want is a project and a proponent,' Smith said. 'So we are working to get a proponent or a consortium to put a project on the table, and then we're going to test out this two year timeline that he has.' Smith said Carney has asked conservative premiers to reach out to people they know in the federal Conservatives to help the Liberals' project approval bill pass in the minority Parliament. Despite being encouraged by the new tone in Ottawa, Smith and Moe said they both want the repeal of numerous federal environmental policies that they say have stymied resource investment. 'Policies do matter and we need a significant policy shift and we need it very quickly,' Moe said. The event coincided with the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., where leaders from the United States, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and Italy, as well as the European Union, are meeting. The confab of world leaders puts Alberta on the map at a time when the approach to energy security is being 'recalibrated,' Smith said. 'I know that, especially with the world turmoil, the energy security needs of our international partners has never been more important. And I think this really does drive a focus about how Alberta can be the solution.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store