
Swiss populist politicians demand Paris Agreement exit: Could it follow the US out of the door?
Just hours after he took office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to withdraw the US from the Paris Agreement.
The process will take a year to complete but the decision to leave has emboldened other political leaders to put forward the possibility of an exit.
Following a vote which overwhelmingly rejected an environmental responsibility initiative, Switzerland's biggest political party has called for the country to follow the US.
Dubbing the accords a collection of 'utopian climate targets' the Swiss People's Party wants the country to exit the Paris Agreement. But how realistic is this demand and what would it mean for Switzerland's future climate obligations?
Swiss People's Party calls for Paris Agreement exit
On 9 February, a referendum saw Swiss voters reject an 'environmental responsibility initiative' - more than 60 per cent voted no.
The right-wing Swiss People's Party celebrated the result, claiming that the initiative wanted to 'catapult Switzerland back into the Stone Age'. In a press release, they said restrictions on housing, heating, food and clothing would have all been on the agenda.
'Driving would have been made impossible. Prices would have skyrocketed, jobs and training would have been destroyed. Poverty would have become the norm,' it adds.
The Swiss People's Party also used the statement to demand that Switzerland withdraw from the Paris Agreement. 'Utopian climate targets only lead to new bans and billions of francs in additional costs for the Swiss population,' they said.
In an interview with Swiss public television RTS, party leader Marcel Dettling claimed that the government 'ratified this agreement without asking parliament or the Swiss people.'
'The government can independently decide to withdraw from this agreement,' he added.
Could Switzerland leave the Paris Agreement that easily?
Switzerland's Federal Council ratified the Paris Agreement in 2017 after it was approved by parliament earlier that year.
It was then subject to something known as an optional or facultative referendum. This gives Swiss citizens the opportunity to challenge the decision over a 100-day period. Because no such challenge was launched, it is then assumed that it has been implicitly approved by the Swiss people.
Regardless of Dettling's comments, an initiative to withdraw Switzerland from the Paris Agreement would have to be approved by parliament through a federal decree. This would also mean it would be subject to a referendum and, therefore, the approval of the Swiss public.
'Leaving the Paris Agreement would not absolve Switzerland of its legal obligations to pursue science-based climate action – it would merely strip the country of its influence in shaping future global climate decisions,' adds Sébastien Duyck, senior attorney and Human Rights & Climate Campaign manager for the Centre for International Environmental Law.
'Diplomatically, it would be the equivalent of scoring an own goal.'
Do Swiss voters want a Paris Agreement exit?
Switzerland's second largest party, the Social Democratic Party of Switzerland, said following the vote that the initiative was simply 'the wrong solution to current climate policy challenges'.
But, the party added, the most recent votes show that the need for climate action is still a priority for the population.
It is a sentiment shared by Environment Minister Albert Rösti, who, despite being a member of the Swiss People's Party, has rejected the party's demands.
At a press conference following the result of the referendum, he told reporters that this 'no' was 'certainly not a 'no' to protecting the environment'.
Rösti also pointed out that in June 2023, 60 per cent of voters approved a new climate law that seeks to speed up Switzerland's shift to renewable energy and reach net zero by 2050.
He told Swiss news site Nau.ch that he still supports the Paris Agreement despite his party's criticisms.
'The population has clearly passed the Climate and Innovation Act 2023. The population has thus committed itself to the Paris climate goals,' Rösti said.
'While some Swiss populists have voiced support for following Donald Trump's decision to exit the Paris Agreement, the majority of the Swiss public remains firmly in favour of climate action, as reaffirmed in the 2023 referendum,' says Duyck.
'Switzerland's government has also just submitted its latest commitment under the agreement.'
This national climate plan, known as a Nationally Determined Contribution, commits the country to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 65 per cent by 2035. It was one of just 15 countries to submit its updated NDC by the 10 February deadline.
What other countries want to leave the Paris Agreement?
So far the US is the only country to have initiated the process of leaving the Paris Agreement. But outside of Europe, other world leaders have also floated the idea of pulling their countries out.
Argentine President Javier Millei has been entertaining the idea since Trump won the US election last year. He was the first head of state Trump saw at Mar-a-Lago in Florida after his victory and has previously described international climate efforts as a 'socialist lie'.
Indonesia, too, has been questioning a Paris Agreement exit since Trump's victory.
'If the USA does not want to comply with the international agreement, why should a country like Indonesia comply with it?' Climate Commissioner Hashim Djojohadikusumo asked at a sustainability forum in early February.
Djojohadikusumo highlighted the disparity in carbon emissions per person between the two countries – the US emits around 13 tonnes of carbon per person annually, while the average Indonesian emits just 3 tonnes.
The commissioner added that it was not 'justice' for Indonesia to be asked to close its coal power plants with one of the world's largest emitters out of the accords.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Trump deploys Marines, more National Guardsmen to Los Angeles amid intensifying protests
US President Donald Trump on Monday ordered active-duty Marines into Los Angeles, vowing those protesting immigration arrests would be "hit harder" than ever. The extraordinary mobilization of 700 full-time professional military personnel -- who join hundreds of National Guard troops already there -- looked likely to stoke tensions in a city with a huge Latino population. California Governor Gavin Newsom slammed the move as "deranged." "US Marines have served honorably across multiple wars in defense of democracy," Newsom posted on X. "They shouldn't be deployed on American soil facing their own countrymen to fulfill the deranged fantasy of a dictatorial President. This is un-American." The deployment came after demonstrators took over streets in Downtown LA on Sunday, torching cars and looting stores in ugly scenes that saw law enforcement responding with tear gas and rubber bullets. "The people are causing the problems are professional agitators and insurrectionists," Trump told reporters in Washington. On social media, he said protesters spat at troops and if they continued to do so, "I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!" One small business-owner whose property was graffitied was supportive of the strongarm tactics. "I think it's needed to stop the vandalism," she told AFP, declining to give her name. "Everybody has the right to protest, but do it the right way. Don't vandalize or hurt your own town because you're hurting people that are trying to make a living." Others were horrified. "They're meant to be protecting us, but instead, they're like, being sent to attack us," Kelly Diemer, 47, told AFP. "This is not a democracy anymore." 'Go home!' A fourth day of protest was unfolding in Los Angeles triggered by dozens of arrests of what authorities said were illegal migrants and gang members. "Pigs go home!" demonstrators shouted at National Guardsmen outside a federal detention center. Others banged on the sides of unmarked vehicles as they passed through police containment lines. A swelling crowd was converging on the center, where they chanted "Shame! Shame! Shame!" at federal troops. A scuffle broke out in the otherwise peaceful crowd, with one man other protesters said was a Trump supporter being expelled. "He was basically aggravating people trying to start a fight, which kind of worked. Then everyone started chasing him away," an 18-year-old woman told AFP, declining to give her name. Trump's border czar Tom Homan said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was targeting members of cartels in Mexico and Colombia. Many locals painted a different picture. They are "people who are here earnestly trying to improve their lives (and) deserve a chance and don't deserve to be treated as criminals," Deborah McCurdy, 64, told AFP at a rally. Despite isolated and eye-catching acts of violence, which included the torching of several Waymo cars on Sunday, officials and local law enforcement stressed the majority of protesters over the weekend had been peaceful. Schools across Los Angeles were operating normally on Monday, while the rhythms of life in the sprawling city appeared largely unchanged. Mayor Karen Bass said in contrast to Trump's rhetoric, "this is isolated to a few streets. This is not citywide civil unrest." At least 56 people were arrested over two days and five officers suffered minor injuries, Los Angeles Police Department officials said, while about 60 people were arrested in protests in San Francisco. Trump's use of the military -- which he repeatedly threatened to do while campaigning for the White House -- marked a significant break from modern American political practice. The National Guard has not been deployed over the head of a state governor since 1965 at the height of the civil rights movement. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force on home soil absent an insurrection. The Pentagon said late Monday Trump had authorized an extra 2,000 Guardsmen. There were questions over how well prepared the National Guard had been for its sudden deployment, with pictures obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle appearing to show Guardsman sleeping on the floor of what the paper said was a federal building. "No federal funding available for food, water, fuel and lodging," the source of the photos told the paper. "This is really the failure of the federal government. If you're going to federalize these troops, then take care of them."
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Mexico seizes 42 tons of meth in illegal drug labs
Mexico announced Monday, June 9, the seizure of nearly 42 metric tons of methamphetamine worth more than $50 million during raids on illegal drug labs. The discovery, one of the biggest yet, comes as the Latin American nation faces mounting pressure from US President Donald Trump to curb drug trafficking. The seizures were conducted after personnel found five properties used as clandestine laboratories in the western state of Michoacan, a government statement said. The seizure represented a loss of 1.06 billion pesos ($55.7 million) to the traffickers, it estimated. Drums containing around 8,800 liters (2,300 gallons) of chemical precursors were also seized along with other drug production materials, it said. Mexico has showcased a series of major drug discoveries in an apparent attempt to highlight increased efforts to combat drug smuggling. Trump has cited trafficking of illegal drugs – particularly the synthetic opioid fentanyl – as one of the reasons for the tariffs he has imposed on imports from Mexico. In October, the Mexican navy announced that it had seized more than 8.3 tons of drugs found in vessels off the Pacific coast – a record for a single operation at sea. According to the US Drug Enforcement Administration, Mexican criminal groups are the main suppliers of methamphetamine to the United States, using chemicals that are mostly sourced from China. In April last year, the head of Mexico's criminal investigation agency described the country as the "champion" of production of synthetic drugs including methamphetamine. The illicit activity had been "the source of the greatest wealth and power" for Mexican criminal organizations, Felipe de Jesus Gallo said. He later withdrew his remarks and apologized after the government objected.

LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
Shaken by US and Chinese tariffs, the cognac industry questions its future
The countdown has started, with pressure mounting in the Cognac region in southwestern France. China has set a July 5 deadline on making permanent customs duties of between 35% and 39% on imports of the prized eau de vie(brandy) from Charente − duties that have been in place on a provisional basis since October 2024. This marks a major blow for the industry. These duties would come on top of the US tariffs on the French spirit, which have stood at 10% since April – a level that could rise further if trade negotiations between Washington and Brussels, with a deadline set by President Donald Trump for July 9, fail or prove unfavorable to the sector. Caught in this double bind, the cognac industry has entered a deep crisis and is questioning its future. "I feel that in France, people are not fully aware of the problem: 80% of global cognac sales are made in China and the United States," said Bernard Arnault during his hearing before the Senate on May 21, describing a "major risk." The head of the LVMH luxury conglomerate, which owns the cognac house Hennessy, added that in a worst-case scenario, "with a 40% increase in Chinese customs duties and no agreement with the United States, there would be dramatic repercussions for Charente viticulture, which employs around 80,000 people."