logo
CDL said to be selling majority stake in S$2.75 billion South Beach development to partner IOI

CDL said to be selling majority stake in S$2.75 billion South Beach development to partner IOI

Business Times3 days ago

[SINGAPORE] City Developments Limited (CDL) agreed to sell its majority stake in one of Singapore's most iconic office complexes, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the developer seeks to reduce debt and regain investor confidence after a family feud.
CDL will sell its 50.1 per cent stake in South Beach to minority owner IOI Properties Group, the source said, requesting not to be identified because the information is private. Malaysian developer IOI will have full ownership following the deal. The deal values the complex at about S$2.75 billion, the source said.
An IOI spokesperson declined to comment. CDL did not immediately respond to an e-mailed query. Shares of CDL rose about 1.6 per cent before a trading halt on Wednesday (Jun 4) morning, pending an announcement.
CDL has been under pressure to sell assets after a feud divided the Kwek family, the wealthiest clan in Singapore. Despite mending relations with his father and chairman Kwek Leng Beng, the firm's chief executive officer Sherman Kwek acknowledged in April that the dispute had hurt shareholders' confidence, and said that reducing the growing debt load is a priority.
The deal will help CDL to meet a pledge to exceed the roughly S$600 million in divestments it made in 2024, which fell short of a S$1 billion target.
The complex in Singapore's central business district includes retail space, a 34-storey office tower, and a 45-storey building housing a JW Marriott Hotel.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights
Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The purchase adds to IOI's growing presence in Singapore, with residential developments as well as assets such as IOI Central Boulevard Towers, a newly opened city centre office project. The Malaysia-listed firm is controlled by the Lee family, which made its fortunes from palm oil.
The South Beach development, designed by Norman Foster's architectural firm, has seen ownership changes before. CDL bought the site for nearly S$1.7 billion in 2007 along with two foreign partners, a unit of state-owned Dubai World, and El-Ad Group.
The global financial crisis led to a yearslong delay in construction and the two partners exited the project, with IOI eventually taking a minority stake in 2011. The elder Kwek resisted allowing IOI to take an equal stake in order to maintain control, according to a biography published in 2023.
Major tenant Meta Platforms gave up its seven floors of space at the office tower last year, and occupancy dropped to 92.4 per cent as at the end of March, compared with 94.4 per cent at the end of last year.
CDL shares were 1.64 per cent up on Wednesday morning before trading in the counter was suspended. BLOOMBERG

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

About 300 employees laid off by China-linked Singapore firm facing US sanctions over Iranian oil shipments
About 300 employees laid off by China-linked Singapore firm facing US sanctions over Iranian oil shipments

CNA

time3 hours ago

  • CNA

About 300 employees laid off by China-linked Singapore firm facing US sanctions over Iranian oil shipments

SINGAPORE: A China-linked, Singapore-based firm has laid off hundreds of employees and is going into liquidation after it was slapped with sanctions by the United States last month. CCIC Singapore was among 15 companies blacklisted by the US on May 13 for helping to conceal the origins of Iranian oil being shipped to China. The cargo inspection firm is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Certification & Inspection Group (CCIC), a Chinese state-owned enterprise headquartered in Beijing. Speaking to CNA on Friday (Jun 6), three affected employees said that staff across all departments of CCIC Singapore were notified of their retrenchments on May 30, and the terminations took effect the next day. Two of the employees said CCIC Singapore has over 400 workers in Singapore and Malaysia, with the majority based in Singapore. A third employee said the firm has more than 300 workers in Singapore alone. The employees, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the company had delayed the payment of salaries owed for May. Retrenchment notices attributed this to the firm's "pending liquidation". They also took issue with the severance pay of two weeks' salary for every year of service completed, especially for surveyors who rely on overtime pay and allowances to supplement their basic salaries. Junior surveyors earn less than S$1,000 in basic salary a month, while more senior surveyors may earn between S$1,000 and S$1,500, two of the employees said. According to the employees, CCIC Singapore is not unionised. Individual workers have reached out to the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) for assistance. CNA has contacted CCIC Singapore, its parent company CCIC, the Ministry of Trade and Industry and NTUC for comment. US SANCTIONS CCIC Singapore was set up in 1989 and has its registered address at Singapore Science Park. Its customers include Shell, BP, Total, Exxon Mobil and major Chinese petrochemical corporations, according to CCIC's website. Parent company CCIC was established in 1980 and is part of China's State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council. The US blacklisted CCIC Singapore for helping to obscure the origins of Iranian oil, which is typically done through numerous ship-to-ship transfers, oil blending and false documentation. Sepehr Energy, which is a front company of Iran's military, "consistently relied" on CCIC Singapore for cargo inspections of oil being delivered to China, according to the US Treasury Department. In 2024, CCIC Singapore provided inspection services during a ship-to-ship transfer of about 2 million barrels of Iranian oil from a sanctioned vessel. That same year, the firm also "likely provided" falsified documents to conceal the identity of another sanctioned vessel and certify its cargo of Iranian oil as Malaysian crude. According to the US Treasury Department, Iran's illicit oil trade funds the development of ballistic missiles and drones as well as regional terrorist groups. The sanctions freeze all US-linked assets of the blacklisted companies and individuals. Any company that is at least half-owned by those sanctioned is also blocked from transactions engaging US businesses or the US financial system. ANGER AMONG EMPLOYEES Two of the affected employees denied knowledge of the activities for which the US sanctioned CCIC Singapore, saying that their departments were not involved. Both employees told CNA they only learnt their firm had been blacklisted when customers started cancelling job orders on May 13, citing the sanctions. The severity of the sanctions did not sink in at first, they said. Over time, their concern over the blacklisting morphed into anger at how the management was communicating with employees. They criticised the firm's "flip-flop" on the impact of the sanctions, and what they called a lack of responsibility and transparency from CCIC Singapore's managing director. "If you really treasure or appreciate ... our efforts (that) we have put into this company, I think probably he has to come and thank us, or say sorry, this type of unfortunate thing happened," said one of the employees. But there was no such expression of apology or regret, he said, adding that before Friday, the company also did not give affected employees any support for job placement or career guidance. "This is a foreign company. They act like high and mighty, they leave us in the lurch, just like that. And I'm very mad because the top man doesn't even see us, talk to us," said the employee. While the company's US-linked assets have been frozen, the employees questioned why its assets in Singapore, including property and equipment, could not be used to pay salaries and retrenchment benefits. They also questioned why the parent company was not helping to ensure that employees were paid. "When your children are in trouble, rightfully, the parents should rescue them, right? Why aren't the HQ rescuing us?" the employee asked. INTERNAL EMAILS The employees showed CNA their retrenchment notices as well as internal company emails, which mark a timeline of how the impact of the sanctions played out for employees. On May 14, CCIC Singapore employees received an email from a human resources (HR) officer acknowledging concerns over the sanctions. The email stated that the company's headquarters was "fully committed to supporting our operations" and it had engaged legal counsel to appeal against the sanctions. "In response to the situation, a new company - fully backed by our HQ - will be established within this month," stated the email. "All employees will be smoothly transferred to the new entity, and operations will continue as usual. There will be no disruption to your roles, responsibilities, or employment terms." However, a day later, employees received another email from the HR department asking them to "disregard" the email from the day before. It made reference to an "internal restructuring initiative" but continued to assure employees that they would receive their salaries and claims as usual. On May 16, heads of department were asked to identify key staff members in preparation for a downsizing exercise. They were also informed that CCIC Singapore was "not in a position" to pay retrenchment benefits as its bank accounts had been frozen. A week later, a company-wide email said that salaries would also be delayed due to the freezing of accounts, and that the firm's managing director was going to Beijing for "high-level discussions". Employees received their retrenchment notices on May 30. These notices stated that the company was going into liquidation and retrenchment benefits would only be fully paid after that process was complete, with an estimated date of Jun 30, 2026.

Stonepeak said to be in exclusive talks for RM9 billion buyout of Yinson
Stonepeak said to be in exclusive talks for RM9 billion buyout of Yinson

Business Times

time5 hours ago

  • Business Times

Stonepeak said to be in exclusive talks for RM9 billion buyout of Yinson

STONEPEAK Partners is in exclusive talks for a buyout of Yinson Holdings that may value the firm at as much as RM9 billion (S$2.73 billion), according to people with knowledge of the matter, in what could be one of the biggest deals in Malaysia this year. New York-based Stonepeak is teaming up with the Lim family, Yinson's founder and biggest shareholder, to take the Kuala-Lumpur-listed energy infrastructure company private, said the people, asking not to be identified because the discussions aren't public. The Lim family owned 26.6 per cent of Yinson as at May 30. Considerations are ongoing and there is no certainty a deal will be reached, the people said. Yinson's shares jumped as much as 14 per cent following the Bloomberg News report on the talks, the biggest intraday gain since June 2019. That cut the year-to-date loss from 20 per cent as at Thursday's close and lifted Yinson's market value to about RM6.5 billion. Representatives for the Lim family and Yinson declined to comment. Stonepeak didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Founded in the 1980s as a transport and logistics firm, Yinson has since diversified into energy infrastructure, renewables and technology, its website shows. The company signed an agreement with a consortium of investors in January for a US$1 billion funding round for a unit that makes vessels used by the offshore oil and gas industry, Bloomberg News reported at the time. BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store