
Trump disdains conservatism. His governing philosophy is absolute power
Donald Trump issued his declaration of war against his 'enemies within' at the Department of Justice on 14 March. Thus the president launched a constitutional crisis that encompasses not just a group of migrants snatched without due process and transported against federal court orders to a foreign prison, but a wholesale assault on virtually every major institution of American society.
'We will expel the rogue actors and corrupt forces from our government. We will expose, and very much expose, their egregious crimes and severe misconduct,' he pledged. 'It's going to be legendary.'
Trump's speech condensed his mission to its despotic essence. While he distilled his contempt, Trump also marked his disdain for the traditional conservatism of limited government, respect for the law and liberty. He defined his project, built on his executive orders as substitutes for the law, to crown himself with unrestrained powers to intimidate, threaten and even kidnap. His political philosophy is a ruthless quest for absolute power.
Trump hailed his appointees for being 'so tough' – the enthusiastically compliant attorney general, Pam Bondi, and the irrepressible flunky FBI director, Kash Patel. He attacked lawyers whose firms he would issue executive orders against to eviscerate their work – 'really, really bad people'. He claimed Joe Biden and the former attorney general Merrick Garland 'tried to turn America into a corrupt communist and third world country'. And he described 'people that come into our country' as 'stone cold killers. These are killers like – they make our killers look nice by comparison. They make our killers look nice. These are rough, tough people with the tattoos all over their face.' Trump's accusations are invariably projections of his own malice that he manufactures into politically pliable paranoia.
No staff attorneys within the department were invited to the speech, as people at the justice department told me. The senior lawyers from the Public Integrity Section had already resigned when Trump attempted to coerce them to participate in dropping the prosecution of New York City's mayor, Eric Adams, for corruption in exchange for his support of Trump's coming roundup and deportation of migrants. After Trump, a convicted felon, concluded by comparing himself to Al Capone, the mafia boss convicted of tax evasion – 'the great Alphonse Capone, legendary Scarface, was attacked only a tiny fraction of what Trump was attacked' – Trump's theme song from his political rallies, YMCA, blared out of the loudspeakers in the department auditorium.
The next day, Trump announced his executive order citing the Alien Enemies Act of 1789, a wartime measure, to incarcerate members of the Tren de Aragua gang he asserted were coordinating with the Maduro government of Venezuela to commit 'brutal crimes, including murders, kidnappings, extortions, and human, drug, and weapons trafficking'. (On 20 March, the New York Times reported: 'The intelligence community assessment concluded that the gang, Tren de Aragua, was not directed by Venezuela's government or committing crimes in the United States on its orders, according to the officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity.')
The 238 men abducted were taken without any due process to a maximum security prison operated by the Salvadoran strongman Nayib Bukele, who calls himself 'the coolest dictator' and whose government is being paid at least $6m in an arrangement with the Trump administration.
In a hearing on 24 March before the US court of appeals for the DC circuit, Judge Patricia Millett, criticizing the absence of due process, said: 'Nazis got better treatment under the Alien Enemies Act.' She asked the deputy assistant attorney general, Drew Ensign, arguing the administration's case: 'What's factually wrong about what I said?'
'Well, your Honor, we certainly dispute the Nazi analogy,' he replied.
Trump's assertion of emergency power under the Alien Enemies Act is more than a bit analogous to the ideas of Carl Schmitt, the chief legal scholar and apologist of the Nazi regime, 'Crown Jurist of the Third Reich'. The falsity, according to the intelligence community, of Trump's claim about the men underlines the analogy of Trump's argument to Schmitt's. 'Authority, not truth, produces law,' Schmitt wrote. 'Sovereign is he who decides on invocation of the state of emergency.' And then: 'Der Ausnahmefall offenbart das Wesen der staatlichen Autorität am klarsten' – 'The State of Emergency reveals most clearly the essence of the authority of the state … The exception is thus far more important that the ordinary rule. The normal state of affairs shows nothing; the emergency shows everything; it confirms not only the rule, rather the rule derives strictly from the emergency.'
The ACLU filed a lawsuit on 15 March before chief judge James Boasberg of the US district court of the District of Columbia to halt the flight to El Salvador. The judge issued an order for the planes to return to the US, but the Trump administration defied it.
Trump's defiance has set in motion a flurry of legal challenges and court cases heard in district courts and circuit courts of appeals, as well as the supreme court. On 7 April, the court ruled that the detainees had the right to due process, which they were denied. On 11 April, the justices unanimously ordered the administration to facilitate the return of one wrongly taken individual, Kilmar Ábrego García, a legal resident of Maryland who was identified by his family and had no criminal record. On 19 April, the court temporarily blocked a new round of deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.
CBS's 60 Minutes reported: 'We could not find criminal records for 75% of the Venezuelans.' Bloomberg News reported that about 90% had no criminal records.
On 14 April, Trump welcomed Bukele to the White House. Trump has turned the Oval Office into his small stage with cabinet secretaries and staff seated on the couches as his chorus. Bukele was dressed in black casual wear, but not admonished by JD Vance as he had criticized Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy for supposedly showing disrespect to Trump by not appearing in a suit and tie.
Trump and Bukele played the scene as a buddy movie, kidding each other, but not kidding, about repression. 'Mr President,' said Bukele, 'you have 350 million people to liberate. But to liberate 350 million people, you have to imprison some. That's the way it works, right?'
'The homegrowns are next, the homegrowns,' said Trump. 'You've got to build about five more places.'
'Yeah, we got the space,' Bukele said.
When the question of Ábrego García was raised by a reporter, Bondi said: 'That's not up to us,' and that it was 'up to El Salvador'.
'Well, I'm – supposed you're not suggesting that I smuggle a terrorist in the United States, right?' Bukele replied. Trump reassured him: 'It's only CNN.' Bukele called the question 'preposterous'.
'Well, they'd love to have a criminal released into our country,' said Trump. 'These are sick people. Marco, do you have something to say about that?' It was another test of the secretary of state's sycophancy. Marco Rubio rose to the occasion. 'No court in the United States has a right to conduct a foreign policy of the United States,' he said. 'It's that simple. End of story.'
Standing behind Rubio, Trump's most influential aide and the architect of his immigration policy, Stephen Miller, chimed in: 'To Marco's Point, the supreme court said exactly what Marco said. That no court has the authority to compel the foreign policy function in the United States. We won a case 9-0. And people like CNN are portraying it as a loss, as usual, because they want foreign terrorists in the country who kidnap women and children.'
But a reporter attempted to point out that the court had in fact ruled it was illegal to deprive the captives of due process. 'Well, it's illegal to, so I just wanted some clarity on it,' he asked. Trump jumped in: 'And that's why nobody watches you anymore. You have no credibility.'
On 17 April, the day the supreme court ruled on Ábrego García, on Trump said, 'I'm not involved in it,' though he had signed the executive order that authorized his kidnapping. Trump was reverting to the tactic of denial, however patently ludicrous, that he had been schooled in originally by Roy Cohn, the Republican power broker and mafia lawyer who had been his private attorney. The Trump administration continues to claim it has no control over the captives in the Salvadorian prison and they cannot be returned.
Trump's disavowal of responsibility made the homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem's, visit to the prison to tape a video on 26 March problematic on several levels. If Trump has no control, then how was Noem allowed the run of the place? If the prisoners were combatants under the Alien Enemies Act, then their status made her appearance a violation of the Geneva convention's Article 1 that outlaws 'outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment', and Article 13 that prohibits 'acts of violence or intimidation' and 'insults and public curiosity' – that is, using prisoners for propaganda purposes.
If Schmitt's argument is not Trump's argument, the difference has certainly not confused the judges handling the cases. Boasberg ruled that the Trump administration had acted with 'willful disregard' for his order and, while contempt proceedings were paused, threatened to appoint a special prosecutor if the Department of Justice declines to do so.
The Maryland federal judge Paula Xinis, who ordered the administration to return Ábrego García, said on 15 April she had seen no evidence of progress. She ruled on 22 April that such stonewalling 'reflects a willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations … That ends now.'
She also stated: 'Defendants must supplement their answer to include all individuals involved as requested in this interrogatory.' That discovery process might range into stranger precincts of Maga depths than imagined. The New Yorker reported on 'a Maga salon' at a tech billionaire's Washington residence to which a Republican lobbyist, Andrew Beck, brought Trace Meyer, self-described as the 'Babe Ruth of bitcoin', where they discussed with state department staffers the 'work-in-progress plan' for abducting migrants to El Salvador. The officials had reached 'an impasse in the negotiations. Meyer, through his crypto connections, was able to help reopen the conversation.' Add to the discovery list: Beck, Meyer and the state department officials.
In denying the Trump administration's motion for a halt in the Xinis ruling, Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III, of the court of appeals for the fourth circuit, issued a thunderous opinion on 17 April, marking a historic break between principled conservatism and Trump's regime. Wilkinson is an eminent conservative figure within the judiciary, of an old Virginia family, a clerk to Justice Lewis Powell, and a Ronald Reagan appointee revered in the Federalist Society.
'The government,' Wilkinson wrote, 'is asserting a right to stash away residents of this country in foreign prisons without the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order. Further, it claims in essence that because it has rid itself of custody that there is nothing that can be done. This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear.'
Wilkinson concluded with a siren call about Trump's threat. 'If today the Executive claims the right to deport without due process and in disregard of court orders, what assurance will there be tomorrow that it will not deport American citizens and then disclaim responsibility to bring them home? And what assurance shall there be that the Executive will not train its broad discretionary powers upon its political enemies? The threat, even if not the actuality, would always be present, and the Executive's obligation to 'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed' would lose its meaning.'
Wilkinson has defined the stark conflict headed toward a unstoppable collision. Against Trump's appropriation of Schmitt's authoritarian logic, the conservative jurist has thrown down the gauntlet of American constitutional law. Trump's disdain for that sort of conservatism moves the cases again and again toward the conservative majority of the supreme court, which must decide its allegiance, either like Wilkinson, to the constitution, or instead to Trump's untrammeled power that would reduce the court itself to a cipher.
Sidney Blumenthal, a former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, has published three books of a projected five-volume political life of Abraham Lincoln: A Self-Made Man, Wrestling With His Angel and All the Powers of Earth
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
21 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Frantic moment CNN reporter is hauled away by cops live on air at LA protests as anchor screams ‘what's going on?!'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) COPS have detained a CNN reporter live on-air as he covered the tense Los Angeles protests. Anchor Laura Coates yelled out, "What's going on?" after watching national correspondent Jason Carroll being led away with his hands behind his back. 7 CNN national correspondent Jason Carroll was detained live on-air while covering the Los Angeles protests Credit: CNN 7 Carroll, seen in 2014, was told to put his hands behind his back and leave the area Credit: Alamy 7 Cops have clashed with protesters in the days-long protests over President Donald Trump's ICE raids Credit: AFP 7 Carroll was told that he would be arrested if he came back to the area Credit: CNN Carroll had been covering the fourth day of protests over Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration when he suddenly lost touch with Coates on Thursday evening. "Jason? What's going on? I hear you. What happened Jason?" Coates said live on air. "I am being detained," said Carroll in the distance as his cameraman filmed several feet behind him. Carroll then chatted with the cops, who confirmed that he wasn't being arrested. "We're letting you go, but you can't come back," said the officer before threatening to arrest Carroll if he returned to the scene. The two appeared to have a friendly interaction before Carroll was put behind a wall of cops and lost touch with Coates. Later, Carroll explained that the officers didn't put him in zip ties but did grab both of his hands and told him, "you are being detained." The reporter was stunned by the sudden change as he had been roaming the streets of Los Angeles covering the protests since that morning. "It is something that I wasn't expecting simply because we have been out here all day," he said. "Normally, the officers [...] realize the press is there doing a job." Trump sends another 2k National Guard to riot-ravaged LA as chaos spreads with arrests in NYC & Texas Carroll was led away around the same time that officials told demonstrators that they had to leave or else they would be arrested. They cuffed a number of protesters and charged them with failure to disperse to finally break up Thursday's demonstration. 7 Carroll said he was stunned by the detainment because he had been covering the protests all day with no issues Credit: CNN 7 PROTESTS RAGE ON The protests, which started over the weekend, heated up after Trump sent around 2,000 National Guard troops to help keep the peace, despite California Governor Gavin Newsom warning him to back off. Newsom claims that the peaceful protests criticizing Trump's immigration crackdown turned into a protest once the troops arrived. Meanwhile, Trump has insisted that Los Angeles would have "burned to the ground" if he hadn't sent the soldiers, as he plans to send 700 Marines to the city. "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday morning. California has filed a lawsuit against Trump, accusing him of breaking the 10th Amendment when he sent in the guard. The protests have spawned more protests across the country, and hundreds of participants have been arrested. Trump has vowed to maintain law and order despite Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass begging him to pause the ICE raids. "There is a real fear in Los Angeles right now. Parents, workers, grandparents, young people scared to go about their daily lives," she said. "We are a city of immigrants. Washington is attacking our people, our neighborhoods and our economy."


The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
Frantic moment CNN reporter is hauled away by cops live on air at LA protests as anchor screams ‘what's going on?!'
COPS have detained a CNN reporter live on-air as he covered the tense Los Angeles protests. Anchor Laura Coates yelled out, "What's going on?" after watching national correspondent Jason Carroll being led away with his hands behind his back. 7 7 7 Carroll had been covering the fourth day of protests over Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration when he suddenly lost touch with Coates on Thursday evening. "Jason? What's going on? I hear you. What happened Jason?" Coates said live on air. "I am being detained," said Carroll in the distance as his cameraman filmed several feet behind him. Carroll then chatted with the cops, who confirmed that he wasn't being arrested. "We're letting you go, but you can't come back," said the officer before threatening to arrest Carroll if he returned to the scene. The two appeared to have a friendly interaction before Carroll was put behind a wall of cops and lost touch with Coates. Later, Carroll explained that the officers didn't put him in zip ties but did grab both of his hands and told him, "you are being detained." The reporter was stunned by the sudden change as he had been roaming the streets of Los Angeles covering the protests since that morning. "It is something that I wasn't expecting simply because we have been out here all day," he said. "Normally, the officers [...] realize the press is there doing a job." Trump sends another 2k National Guard to riot-ravaged LA as chaos spreads with arrests in NYC & Texas Carroll was led away around the same time that officials told demonstrators that they had to leave or else they would be arrested. They cuffed a number of protesters and charged them with failure to disperse to finally break up Thursday's demonstration. 7 7 PROTESTS RAGE ON The protests, which started over the weekend, heated up after Trump sent around 2,000 National Guard troops to help keep the peace, despite California Governor Gavin Newsom warning him to back off. Newsom claims that the peaceful protests criticizing Trump's immigration crackdown turned into a protest once the troops arrived. Meanwhile, Trump has insisted that Los Angeles would have "burned to the ground" if he hadn't sent the soldiers, as he plans to send 700 Marines to the city. "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday morning. California has filed a lawsuit against Trump, accusing him of breaking the 10th Amendment when he sent in the guard. The protests have spawned more protests across the country, and hundreds of participants have been arrested. Trump has vowed to maintain law and order despite Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass begging him to pause the ICE raids. "There is a real fear in Los Angeles right now. Parents, workers, grandparents, young people scared to go about their daily lives," she said. "We are a city of immigrants. Washington is attacking our people, our neighborhoods and our economy." 7


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House says it will spare some Aids programs that were on the chopping block
The White House is trying to reassure House Republicans that Donald Trump's plans to slash funding to Aids projects around the world will spare a number of key prevention programs. House Speaker Mike Johnson and his fellow GOP leaders in the lower chamber of Congress are racing to shore up support ahead of a vote on a $9.4bn package of spending cuts Thursday. Congressional Republicans have expressed particular concern over planned cuts to former commander-in-chief George W Bush 's signature President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR), which has been credited with saving millions of lives across the globe since 2003. As part of an effort to allay those worries and rally the troops, the House GOP leadership has vowed to retain treatments offered under PEPFAR as well as a number of other prevention schemes, according to Capitol Hill sources cited by Politico. Speaker Johnson's whip team reportedly spent Monday evening frantically texting Republicans and calculating probable votes for the 'rescissions' package, which, in addition to cutting hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign Aids funding, also targets public broadcasters like NPR and PBS, both of whom are currently suing Trump's administration over the withdrawal of federal funding. Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, told appropriators last week that the administration is seeking to take 'an analytical look' at Aids prevention and instead prioritize funding for 'life-saving treatment' for sufferers as part of its scaling back of PEPFAR. 'It is something that our budget will be very trim on,' he said of prevention funding. 'We believe that many of these nonprofits are not geared towards the viewpoints of the administration. And we're $37 trillion in debt. So at some point, the continent of Africa needs to absorb more of the burden of providing this healthcare.' Trump's cuts to Aids prevention funding, enacted under an executive order he signed within hours of returning to the Oval Office in January, have been forecast to have disastrous results. A crisis that had been on course to be brought under control by 2030 will now be extended at the cost of an estimated 4m more lives, according to forecasts from the United Nations Aids agency. The disruption to global HIV programmes by the U.S. is also projected to lead to more than 3m more Aids orphans than was previously anticipated by the end of the decade. But the president himself has insisted that it is Europe that needs to step up and invest more to help the nations worst-hit by the disease. 'Nobody does anything but the United States… Other countries should be helping us with that,' he told reporters onboard Air Force One last month. 'We're the only country. Where are the others? Where is France? Where is Germany? We've spent billions and billions of dollars.' documentary investigation by The Independent, which includes reporting from remote areas in Uganda and Zimbabwe, has recently demonstrated that Trump's brutal severing of aid – and abrupt halt in medication – is already tearing lives apart. Earlier this year The Independent revealed Trump's slashing of foreign aid has derailed the projected end of the Aids pandemic and could lead to four million extra deaths by 2030. Figures show the number of Aids-related deaths could jump from six million to 10 million in the next five years unless funding is reinstated, according to forecasts from the UN Aids agency (UNAIDS). The unprecedented disruption to global HIV programs by the U.S. is also projected to lead to more than three million more Aids orphans than previously expected by the end of the decade.