Farage as PM could push independence support close to 60%, poll suggests
But if Reform UK were to win the next general election that figure could near the 60% level some believe should be the tipping point for another referendum.
The figure rose from 50% in the last Norstat poll in January.
Support for independence sits at 54%, according to the poll (Jane Barlow/PA)
The highest that support for independence has reached in recent years is 58%, in an Ipsos Scotland poll for STV News in the early months of the pandemic, as Nicola Sturgeon received plaudits for her handling of Covid-19.
But the increase comes as support for the SNP continued to fall ahead of next year's Holyrood elections, with the party dropping two percentage points in both the constituency and regional list votes to 33% and 28% respectively.
Labour's support rose slightly to 19% in constituencies and 18% in Scotland's regions.
But Reform UK would see a surge, if the poll was to reflect the returns seen next May, with Mr Farage's party jumping to 18% in constituencies and 16% on the list – up two and three percentage points respectively.
Meanwhile the Scottish Tories dropped two points to 13% locally and remained at 15% in the regions.
The figures come ahead of a by-election in Lanarkshire this week, after the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie.
According to polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice, in projections for the Sunday Times, John Swinney was on track to win an unprecedented fifth term in office for his party next year, securing 54 seats.
Labour would drop to 20 seats, while Reform would win 18 in their first full political test in Scotland.
Meanwhile, the Tories would drop from being the second biggest party to the fourth, with just 17 MSPs, followed by the Lib Dems on 11 and the Greens on nine.
The poll also looked at Westminster voting intentions, with the SNP recording 31% of the vote, followed by Reform surging into second on 21% and Labour dropping 15 points from last year's election to 20%.
The Conservatives sit at 12%, while 8% said they would vote for the Lib Dems.
But despite leaping into second, Nigel Farage's party would not return a single MP, the polling expert said, with the SNP rising to 30, Labour falling to 16 and the Lib Dems and Tories remaining on six and five respectively.
SNP depute leader Keith Brown said his party has 'momentum' and Labour has lost Thursday's by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse.
'In government, Labour has taken away the winter fuel payment, cut £5 billion of support for disabled people and watched on as energy bills rose by £150,' he said.
'With an SNP Government, the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse are getting action on what matters to them: bringing back the universal winter fuel payment, record funding for our NHS and key costs lower, with peak rail fares scrapped and lower income tax for the majority of taxpayers.
'The Labour Party has let you down and Farage is trying to stoke division, but the SNP is always on your side.'
Scottish Labour's deputy leader Jackie Baillie said: 'Scotland has been let down for too long by this tired and out-of-touch SNP government.
'After 18 years in charge, the SNP has left our NHS at breaking point, our economy flatlining and our schools tumbling down the international league tables.
'This week the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse will get a chance to call time on SNP failure and choose a new direction with Scottish Labour.
'It's clear the SNP does not deserve to win this by-election and only Scottish Labour can beat them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Survey reveals the exact demographics behind Reform's growing support
Recent voting intention polling from YouGov (May 27) shows Reform UK in first place, 8% ahead of Labour and 10% ahead of the Conservatives, who are now in third place. The rising popularity of Nigel Farage 's party is an unprecedented threat to the major parties. This was driven home in recent local elections in England, where Reform won 677 seats and took control of 10 local authorities. But where does this support come from? The survey compares respondent voting intention to their votes in the 2024 general election. If we look at Conservative voters, 27% of them have switched to Reform in their voting intentions, while 66% remain loyal. Alarmingly for Labour, only 60% of their 2024 voters have remained loyal, and 15% intend to vote for Reform, while 12% switched to the Liberal Democrats and 9% to the Greens. Labour has been squeezed from both sides of the political spectrum, but the loss to the left is significantly larger than the loss to the right. In contrast, 73% of Liberal Democrat voters have remained loyal to the party, with only 7% switching to Reform and 8% going to Labour. Not surprisingly, 91% of Reform voters have remained loyal, with 5% going to the Conservatives and 3% going to the Greens. None of the Reform voters have switched to Labour or the Liberal Democrats. Reform's rise has led the Labour government to take more hardline stances on key issues, particularly immigration and asylum – which around half of YouGov respondents say is the most important issue facing the country. And with small boat crossings on the rise again, it remains to be seen whether the government's recent proposals to reduce net migration will be enough to hold onto wavering supporters. Social backgrounds and party support If we probe a bit further into the social characteristics of voters, only 8% of 18 to 24-year-olds support Reform, compared with 35% of 50 to 64-year-olds and 33% of the over-65s. Some 34% of the younger group support Labour, 12% the Conservatives, 15% the Liberal Democrats and 25% the Greens. As far as the 50 to 64-year-olds are concerned, 19% support Labour, 16% the Conservatives, 16% the Liberal Democrats and 9% the Greens. There is currently a significant age divide when it comes to party support. With respect to class (or 'social grade' as it is described in contemporary surveys), 23% of the middle-class support Reform compared with 38% of the working class. The latter were the bedrock of Labour support a couple of generations ago, but now only 19% support Labour, with 17% supporting the Conservatives and 12% the Liberal Democrats. Current support for the parties among middle-class voters, apart from Reform, is 22% for Labour, 21% for the Conservatives and 17% for the Liberal Democrats. Again, the middle class used to be the key supporters of the Conservative party, but at the moment the party is running third behind its rivals in this group. Finally, the relationship between gender and support for the parties is also interesting. Some 35% of male respondents support Reform compared with only 24% of female respondents. In contrast, 21% of both men and women support Labour. The figures for the Conservatives are 16% of men and 22% of women, and Liberal Democrat support is 14% from men and 16% from women. There is also notable support for Reform among those who voted Leave in the 2016 Brexit referendum in the YouGov survey. Altogether 53% of Leave voters in the EU Referendum opted for Reform and 24% supported the Conservatives, with 8% supporting Labour, 8% the Liberal Democrats and 4% the Greens. In the case of Remain voters, 10% chose Reform, 17% went for the Conservatives, 30% for Labour, 23% for the Liberal Democrats and 14% for the Greens. Not surprisingly, Reform takes the largest share of Brexit voters, but just over half of them – indicating that a lot of change has occurred in support since the 2016 referendum and Farage's role in the Leave campaign. The fact that 10% of Remain voters switched to Reform and 20% of Leave voters have switched to Labour, the Liberal Democrats or the Greens shows that it is not just a simple case of support for Brexit leading to support for Reform. Voting and volatility Before Nigel Farage starts picking out curtains for Number 10, it is worth looking at another volatile moment in British political history - the effects of the split in the Labour party in 1981, when the Social Democratic Party was formed by the 'gang of four' breakaway Labour politicians, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins, David Owen and Bill Rodgers. The newly formed party agreed to an electoral pact with the Liberals, which continued until the 1983 election. A Gallup poll published in December 1981 shows a massive lead for the SDP-Liberal Alliance. And yet, Margaret Thatcher's Conservatives won that election. Labour came second by a small margin ahead of the SDP-Liberal Alliance and remained the main opposition party. The point of this example is that a massive lead in the polls for the SDP-Liberal Alliance shortly after it was established did not provide a breakthrough in the general election two years later. Reform may be in the lead now, but this does not mean that it will win the general election of 2028-29. That said, there is a real risk for Labour continuing to lose support to both the left and the right – something which it needs to rapidly repair. Rachel Reeves 's 'iron chancellor' strategy, in which the government announces fiscal rules which it claims to stand by at all costs, is no longer credible. As the Institute of Government points out, every single fiscal rule adopted since 2008 has subsequently been abandoned. A strategy of continuing austerity by making significant cuts in the welfare budget to calm financial markets is likely to fail, both in the economy and with voters. Paul Whiteley is a Professor in the Department of Government at the University of Essex.
Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Starmer doesn't rule out scrapping two-child benefit cap after free school meals expansion
The expansion of free school meals is a "down payment" on the plan to lift children out of poverty, Sir Keir Starmer has said, as he did not rule out scrapping the two-child benefit cap. The prime minister hinted that he wants to go further after opening up free school dinners to half a million more pupils. Currently only those whose parents or guardians have an income of less than £7,400 a year are eligible, but from 2026 it will include children in households on universal credit - a move welcomed by child poverty campaigners. Asked if the change is a substitute or a starter for lifting the two-child benefit cap, Sir Keir said: "This is a statement of intent. It's something that we've been wanting to do for a long time." Pressed if intent meant going further and lifting the cap, he said: "I would say this is a down payment on child poverty. We've got a taskforce that will come out with a strategy. "I want to get to the root causes of child poverty. One of the greatest things the last Labour government did was to drive down child poverty. I am determined we will do that." Sir Keir has been under pressure to lift the cap from the moment he entered Downing Street, with seven Labour MPs suspended within weeks of last year's general election for voting with the SNP to scrap the cap. The cap was announced by the then Conservative chancellor George Osborne before coming into force in 2017 and prevents parents from claiming universal credit or child tax credits from the third child onwards, except in very limited circumstances. It was supposed to incentivise parents to work, but has plunged a rising number of children into poverty, multiple studies have shown. This includes 10,000 more children in the first three months of the Labour government, the Child Poverty Action Group found, adding to the 4.3 million children already living in relative poverty across the UK. Poverty taskforce delayed The government has resisted calls to scrap the cap, instead announcing a child poverty taskforce last July to look at tackling the "root causes" of child poverty, which essentially kicked the issue into the long grass. It was due to report its findings this spring but publication has been pushed back to later this year, fuelling speculation the government wants to use the next budget in the autumn to fund the policy. According to the Resolution Foundation, axing the cap would lift 500,000 children out of poverty by the end of the parliament at a cost of £4.5bn. 0:56 The thinktank said the government's child poverty strategy won't be credible without a commitment to scrap the limit, as other welfare cuts mean child poverty is projected to rise to an all-time high of 4.6 million by 2029. Pressure is mounting on the government following a drubbing at last month's local elections fuelled by the rise in Reform UK's popularity. Reform leader Nigel Farage has committed his party to scrapping the two-child cap, as well as reinstating the winter fuel benefit in full. Sir Keir has recently U-turned on his unpopular cuts to the winter fuel allowance, though the government has ruled out a return to all pensioners receiving it. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said more people will get the payment this winter, but it will likely still be means tested in some form. Calls to bring back Sure Start As well as being urged to scrap the two-child benefit cap, there are growing calls for ministers to revive Sure Start centres, seen by many in the party as one of the crowning achievements of New Labour. The early years service had a "remarkably long-lasting" positive impact on the health and education outcomes of children, a report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies last month found. They were disbanded by the coalition government, but the Child Task Force is expected to recommend their return, according to The Guardian. At a Westminster Hall debate on Wednesday, Labour MP for Bournemouth East Tom Hayes said stamping out child poverty required "nothing less than the resurrection of Sure Start". Meanwhile, writing in Labour List this week, Rother Valley MP Jake Richards suggested investing in Sure Start would be a better long-term approach to child poverty than removing the two-child benefit cap, saying family centres could deliver "tangible change" across the country on the government's key missions.
Glasgow Times
40 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Clyde Metro possible routes and cost known by 2027
Consultants are currently developing a case for investment which is seen as an 'essential' step towards providing a 'mass transit' system. Glasgow Labour has claimed the Metro scheme is a 'stalled plan dressed up as progress' — with no start date and no funding committed. READ NEXT:Glasgow's drug consumption centre is working says health secretary Transport spokesman Cllr Saqib Ahmed said: 'Clyde Metro should be Glasgow's next great infrastructure revolution — but right now, it's just another SNP soundbite.' A spokesman for the city's SNP group said the cross-party Glasgow City Region cabinet has allocated £12m to advance the business case, which Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) is progressing. 'That's a considerable amount of spend and effort for a soundbite,' he added. The funding, which will support the development of the case for investment (CFI), is from the City Deal, a more than £1bn infrastructure programme funded by both the UK and Scottish governments. Council officials have said the CFI will identify the funding strategy for 'subsequent stages of the Clyde Metro programme'. READ NEXT:'Don't blame us': Taxis hit back in Glasgow city centre transport row They also said 'one of the key objectives is to improve the sustainable transport access to Glasgow Airport' and this will 'continue to feature as a key priority in all the options we are exploring.' At a council meeting on Tuesday, Cllr Kieran Turner, Labour, asked whether there would be potential routes and costs at the end of the CFI process. An official said: 'Yes, absolutely. At the moment, as part of the initial engagement, we have four network options which were presented. 'Those network options will then get synthesised into a preferred network.' The process will involve deciding on which modes of transport will be included, such as heavy rail or tram, as well as a recommendation on 'what the first move needs to be'. Cllr Turner added: 'Until people start to see something that is a little more concrete, even in terms of option selection, there are still going to be questions in our constituents' minds around if any of this is ever going to happen. 'Is lots of money just getting spent on consultants? And will anything come of this?' The official said there will be answers at the end of the case for investment, including potential timelines. It will be 'absolutely critical' for securing 'a commitment from government to give funding', he said. Public consultation on the project could be held in spring or summer next year. After the meeting, Cllr Ahmed said: 'Communities have waited too long for transformation. Instead, they've been left behind by a government more focused on branding than building. 'Glasgow Labour will keep fighting for real investment in our transport network.' Labour want a commitment from the Scottish Government to fund phase one of the Metro project and a 'clear, costed and deliverable' construction timeline. The SNP spokesman said Clyde Metro is 'an agreed national transport priority'. 'Labour's failure to deliver the type of modern transport system developed by our peers during their time in power in Glasgow is why we have decades of missed opportunities to catch up on. 'If Labour councillors want to start being constructive perhaps they can insist from their party colleagues that we received a share of the £15bn the Chancellor is allocating to English cities for major transport projects.'
