Trump's involvement in Ukraine peace talks ‘giving Putin more power', Yulia Navalnaya says
Yulia Navalnaya has said Donald Trump's negotiations with Russia on Ukraine are making Vladimir Putin 'feel stronger'.
The Russian activist and widow of the late Russian dissident Alexei Navalny said Trump speaking to the Russian president 'like they're equal' is making him more powerful.
She made the remarks while speaking at a sold-out event with Alastair Campbell at Wales' Hay Festival on Friday, which The Independent is once again partnering with.
'Putin is crime person he is a kind of mafia boss. He kills people. He started the war,' Ms Navalnaya said when asked how she felt about Trump's involvement in Ukraine peace talks.
'Trump - you can like him or not - but he's an elected president of a big country. He participated in real elections, he won these elections.
'But all of these negotiations happening like they're equal gives Putin - who is a tyrant - more power.
'I'm sure it was very difficult for Putin and that he suffered a lot during these last few years because nobody would have been meetings with him.
'He was just sitting in Moscow scared to go anywhere because he was at war and he could be arrested somewhere.
'But now all of these negotiations have given him again more power. I'm absolutely sure Putin now feels more strength and like he can do whatever he wants because he feels people want to speak with him, people want to negotiate with him.'
She added: 'Trump promised to stop this war and he's trying to show that he's capable of doing it. But it's very difficult in the end to do it with a person who promises something that you can't trust.'
Ms Navalnya's late husband was arrested in 2021 after returning to Russia and had been serving sentences totalling more than 30 years on a number of charges, which were widely rejected by the international community.
His death was announced by Russian authorities on 16 February 2024 while serving time in a 'special regime' penal colony in central Russia. The 47-year-old had reportedly fallen unwell after a walk, before losing consciousness.
Ms Navalnaya has previously claimed Putin is responsible for Mr Navalny's death and today revealed how she found out about her husband's death through a news story.
'I was at Munich Security Conference just at regular meetings in my hotel room just preparing. Then I just opened [my phone] and it was written, 'Alexei Navalny dead in prison',' adding she had seen false headlines about her husband being dead in media at least once before.
Since her husband's death, Navalnaya has vowed to continue his fight. Last July, Russia issued an arrest warrant for Ms Navalnaya herself, over accusations she has participated in an 'extremist' group.
She described her late husband as 'courageous, funny and the was best man in the world' after walking in to a standing ovation at the event to discuss his book 'Patriot'.
When asked if she hoped Russia would be a democracy one day at the end of the talk, she replied simply: 'Of course.'
Spread over 11 days, the 38th spring edition of the annual cultural event is set in Hay-on-Wye, the idyllic and picturesque 'Town of Books'. The star-studded lineup includes Mary Trump, Michael Sheen, Jameela Jamil, and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump is strongarming companies elsewhere into cutting DEI. Those that cave in now will regret it later
Organising a women's networking event in the US has become an act of defiance. Companies with equality-driven agendas risk losing government contracts. Some are receiving McCarthy-like letters asking them to confirm that they have no diversity policies. Activities designed to support women, including healthcare research, are being threatened, and companies are backtracking on former commitments. Women's networking events, the gathering of diversity data and targeted training are being questioned. And some companies are requesting that charities focused on women and girls consider changes to their programmes in order to navigate the current climate. The one I founded, Inspiring Girls, has already been asked to 'include men as role models'. This anti-diversity wave isn't just a social backlash to the many excesses of wokeness – it is politically orchestrated and driven. It crystallised in 2021, when the senator Josh Hawley devoted his entire keynote speech at the second National Conservatism Conference to 'reclaiming masculinity', calling for boys (not girls) to be taught competitiveness, strength, honesty and courage – as if those were only male values. Since then, the movement has reached the highest offices of power: the White House is its headquarters and its commander-in-chief is Trump's deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, who promised last year to tackle 'anti-white racism' if Trump won a second term. The anti-diversity brigade has no shortage of money or allies: several 'tech bros' (whether out of conviction or FOMO) have joined in – as have tech venture capitalists and other Maga financiers. These are men who operate in fields dominated almost exclusively by other men and who wield enormous wealth and influence, yet they often cast themselves as victims. They hide their anti-diversity stance under the disguise of meritocracy. On the progressive side, there is a movement claiming that it is actually boys – particularly white working-class ones – rather than girls who are 'in crisis'. It is led by the American Institute for Boys and Men, which last week received a $20m grant from Melinda French Gates. They argue that boys lag behind girls in education and employment. It is true, of course, that many of the manufacturing jobs that many young men used to rely on are vanishing due to automation and tech (ironically, for the benefit of mostly male tech moguls). Unfortunately, however, this well-meaning movement is fuelling the anti-diversity brigade's narrative – because they can now claim that even progressives admit it is white men who are suffering. The Trump administration has not yet imposed specific obligations on businesses to withdraw diversity programmes beyond companies who have contracts with the government – including, now, some companies across the EU, but many are taking spontaneous actions. Some companies are doing so because their diversity policies were just for show, while others are simply acting out of fear. The trend is clear: many are eliminating references to diversity and equality from their websites and in their reporting; others are reneging from aspirational targets, stopping data-gathering on recruitment and promotions, and dismantling training programmes. Some of the companies that are backtracking have headquarters in the UK or Europe. And many of the US tech companies and funds that are leading the diversity backlash have subsidiaries and offices on this side of the Atlantic. Their actions are in straightforward conflict with the letter and the spirit of British and EU legislation on equality, such as EU corporate sustainability reporting rules or equal opportunities and equal pay directives. And yet the equality ministries in the British and other European governments – and in the European Commission – have remained largely silent. Most equality ministries and agencies are led by herbivorous politicians and officials who favour performative programmes over meaningful action. Confronting Trump is far too scary for them, which is why they have not set the limits of what companies can and cannot do, whether specifically or in general guidelines. Over time, it is possible the anti-diversity movement will yield some positives, as it could drive companies who continue to believe in diversity towards more meaningful, effective and data-based policies. Besides, in a litigation-led country such as the US, it is only a matter of time before the courts impose some limits on government-led anti-diversity intimidation. When they do, the backlash against companies that have acted spinelessly will have its own consequences. But the UK and the rest of Europe cannot be passive spectators waiting for the pendulum to swing again. Our equality authorities should counteract Trump's raid on diversity by providing clear official guidance to companies on what they can and cannot do – it is their legal and moral duty to do so. America First should not mean America Everywhere when it comes to the fundamental principles of diversity, equality and inclusion. Miriam González Durántez is an international trade lawyer and the founder and chair of Inspiring Girls
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
White House staff were ‘caught off guard' by Elon Musk's broadside against Trump's bill, report says
President Donald Trump 's White House advisers were 'caught off guard' by Elon Musk 's astonishing attack on his 'big, beautiful bill' this week while Trump himself is said to be 'losing patience' with his billionaire ally, according to a report. Just days after Musk's 130-day tenure as a special government employee came to an end, the world's richest man began lashing out at Trump's signature tax and spending package, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' in an X post on Tuesday. A senior White House official now tells The Wall Street Journal that the president is not happy about Musk's intervention and is 'confused' by the billionaire's stance, given that they have spent the past four months working closely together. Asked whether it had hurt the relationship between the two men, the Journal 's sources indicated it was 'too soon to tell' but noted that, while Trump can be forgiving, he does not easily forget slights. Musk's bond with Trump certainly appears to be fraying, with the Big Tech boss cutting an increasingly beleaguered figure and reportedly annoyed by the bill's inclusion of a cut to an electric vehicle tax credit that benefits his Tesla customers and by Trump's recent decision to scrap his friend Jared Isaacman 's nomination to lead Nasa. The Tesla CEO last intervened over a Republican spending bill six months ago, firing out a string of tweets that forced House Speaker Mike Johnson into hasty rewrites just hours before Congress broke up for the Christmas recess. Musk's tweet on Tuesday sent shockwaves across the corridors of power in DC. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk wrote. He followed that up on Wednesday with a fresh appeal to 'KILL the BILL', imploring his millions of followers to contact their representatives and senators to remind them that 'bankrupting America is NOT ok!' Musk's opposition has garnered the support of conservative fiscal hawks like Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who share his concern that the bill could add at least $2.4 trillion to America's national debt over the next decade, with some estimates placing the total closer to $5 trillion. Invited to respond on Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill; it doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' While that has not yet happened this time, Speaker Johnson has expressed frustration. 'We had a great, very friendly, very fruitful conversation together,' Johnson said of Musk at his weekly press conference on Wednesday. 'Twenty-four hours later, he does a 180 and he comes out against the bill. And it surprised me, frankly.' Johnson argued that Musk is 'flat wrong' in his objections and said that while he himself was 'not upset,' Trump was 'not delighted that Elon did a 180,' a statement that might well be interpreted as a warning. One person who was delighted with Musk was Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, one of just two House Republicans who voted against the bill in the lower chamber last month. 'I figured he would eventually get there,' Massie told the Journal. 'You don't land rockets backwards or get cars to drive themselves by ignoring the people who are lying to you.'
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Anti-Brexit newspaper changes name to reflect ‘reality' of global politics
The New European, a 'Remainer' magazine launched in response to the Brexit referendum, is being renamed to reflect the changing picture of global politics. The rebrand to The New World is a nod to the 'the global unravelling' which started with Britain leaving the EU but is now being seen worldwide in countries such as the US, according to founder and editor in chief Matt Kelly. 'The New European was conceived as a pop-up provocation; a defiant middle finger to the rising tide of right wing populism that brought us Brexit,' said Mr Kelly. 'Nine years later, the world and The New European has changed dramatically. This is a reflection of that new reality. 'We know there is enormous appetite for our style of journalism - vibrant, constructive, witty and full of ideas and great reads that make sense of this extraordinary moment in world politics and culture.' The New European, which has published more than 400 editions, had 35,000 paying subscribers and claim revenues have trebled since the business moved independent three years ago. Tony Blair's former spin doctor Alastair Campbell, who is editor-at-large of The New European newspaper, said themes that underpinned Brexit are playing out around the world, including a political shift to the right in many nations. 'We're always going to be very passionately anti-Brexit, very pro internationalism, liberal democracy,' said Mr Campbell. 'When we started the paper, you could never have predicted [where we are]. Just to look at United States alone. You wouldn't have predicted that Ukraine and Russia were going to be fighting a war on the edge of Europe. Lots has happened - it's a reflection of that.' Mr Campbell said he will 'never resile from the view that Brexit is the biggest act of self harm that we've inflicted upon ourselves', but added: 'I'm hoping this will be the next chapter of a story that we're going to keep telling, which is that liberal democracy is the way forward, that nationalism is not the answer to the challenges that we face, that populism is doomed to fail, and there's a better way that involves people with an optimistic, internationalist outlook.' New contributing editors slated to join The New World include Sonia Sodha, formerly of The Observer, The Revenge of Power author Moises Naim and Tom Baldwin, Keir Starmer's biographer and former senior advisor to Labour.
