
Researcher to cover migration and human smuggling in upcoming talk
As he was growing up, migration was a familiar concept for Jason De León, an anthropologist, researcher and author whose most recent book details up-close accounts of the lives of human smugglers and the migrants they guide.
The book, which was partially written in Santa Fe, will steer the topic of discussion at the School for Advanced Research's annual Mellon Lecture at 5:30 p.m. Thursday at SITE Santa Fe.
De León, who was one of the school's Weatherhead Resident Scholars in 2013 and 2014, returns to Santa Fe, his "favorite place to write and think," not to pen words this time but to talk about his book Soldiers and Kings: Survival and Hope in the World of Human Smuggling.
De León grew up surrounded by undocumented family members in Los Angeles and South Texas and was raised by parents who were immigrants from the Philippines and Mexico.
"I think immigration and borders were something that was always sort of there in my thinking and my background, but it wasn't something that I ever really considered in terms of a research subject," said De León, 47, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Working on excavations as a college student studying archeology in Mexico, De León began hearing stories and experiences related to migration that stuck with him.
"I found that over time, I became more and more interested in the things that they were telling me as opposed to the things that were that were coming out of the ground," De León said.
That sparked a 17-year journey in which he launched the Undocumented Migration Project — a nonprofit research and education collective that facilitated years of field work between 2009 and 2012 studying border crossings — and wrote two award-winning books published.
Soldiers and Kings, his most recent, won a National Book Award for nonfiction in November and is inspired by seven years of field work between 2015 and 2022 documenting the lives of Honduran human smugglers, or self-described migrant guides, in Mexico.
Book examines messy realities of smuggling
De León's experiences were marked by both enlightenment and tragedy. Within the first year, one of the primary smugglers De León had been interacting and talking with, a young man named Juan Roberto Paredes, was murdered. Paredes, a primary character in the book, was the one who pressed De León to write about smugglers in the first place.
"It was sort of his death that made me both question everything that I was doing as a researcher and whether or not I had any business trying to understand this stuff, but also was someone who kind of inspired me to follow through and to see what I could say about this young person's life that was cut so short," De León recalled.
De León sought to explore the messy topic with honesty in order to better understand migration, which he said can't be understood without understanding human smuggling.
"Just because things are are brutal and unpopular and ugly does not mean that we shouldn't be spending our time and energy to understand them," De León said.
One of the biggest misconceptions he said people have about human smuggling is that it is the same as human trafficking, with many fusing the two concepts.
"Human trafficking happens against people's will," De León said. "People who are smuggled are paying someone to be smuggled."
In his talk, De León said he hopes to convey how migration is set up as a system of labor in which smugglers provide a service to migrants, assisting them in traveling from point A to point B. He will also cover how Americans benefit from the labor of smugglers while simultaneously viewing immigrants as "public enemy number one" and "scapegoats" for many issues.
De León's earlier work with the Undocumented Migration Project and his first book, The Land of Open Graves: Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail, attempted to shift public perception and create empathy for immigrants by sharing the stories of thousands who have died making the journey to the U.S.
But De León has since pivoted from empathy as the goal. Instead, he now tries to reach people who prefer conversations around the economy, policy, systems and other global issues. For example, he sometimes tells immigration opponents they should become climate change or foreign policy activists if they really want to stop undocumented immigration, noting the growing severity of natural disasters and instability are among the biggest drivers pushing more migrants to make the increasingly treacherous journey to the U.S.
Author thinks tougher policies won't help
Over the next few months, De León said immigration will likely stall in response to the Trump administration's policies but will pick up again in no time. Smugglers will even benefit from President Donald Trump's policies, he said, as they will be able to charge more. Migrants won't be deterred, he predicts, as even thousands of deaths do not stop more from making the journey.
"They know it's dangerous, and they are still coming because they tell themselves, 'Well, I could die in Honduras of starvation or be murdered on a street corner, or I can die in the Arizona desert, but at least in the Arizona desert, I'm taking my life into my own hands and I'm choosing my own destiny,' " De León said.
De León believes the issues surrounding migration can not be bettered with one solution, such as a border wall, but rather will require a multifaceted approach and an understanding of the bigger picture — as well as hope and empathy.
"I learned a lot about how people hang on to hope and how people try to make the best decision for themselves and for their families in the most dire circumstances," De León said. "We can demonize people as much as we want from the ivory tower or the United States but people are as complicated as Americans are, and are struggling to make ends meet."
De León says he hopes his lecture, which will be followed by a Q&A, helps people to see the bigger picture of migration, ask better questions and lay a foundation for more nuanced conversations about root-cause solutions.
"Soldiers and Kings is really a book about everyday struggles, and it's not about migrants, it's not about smugglers," De León said. "It's about people who happen to be migrating, people who happen to be involved in smuggling, but who are much more than that."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Commentary: Why nostalgia for the 1950s of ‘Leave it to Beaver' persists in America's religious right
Anyone looking to drench themselves in the 1950s nostalgia currently favored by the religious right in America should consider watching 'Leave It to Beaver' stoned. Which is what I did with an old friend in the 1980s while attending graduate school at the University of California-Berkeley. Nostalgia for the '50s — that land beyond time where Catholic traditionalists such as Notre Dame political theorist and post-liberal prophet Patrick Deneen dwell — idealizes imaginary communities of yore such as Mayfield, the setting for 'Leave it to Beaver,' where the values of faith, family, friends and flag all flourished. According to this narrative, late-stage liberalism and the globalization of markets, with their characteristic rootlessness, dissolve this communal existence. When I was at Berkeley in the 1980s, a large number of my childhood friends from Princeton, New Jersey, somehow found their way to the Bay Area. One afternoon, one of my Princeton buddies was house-sitting for an uncle in a Bay Area suburb. The uncle, whom I'll call Uncle Jim, had been my Cub Scout pack leader in Princeton when I was in elementary school. One sun-drenched afternoon, my friend and I settled into a couch, he rolled some joints and we flipped the TV to 'Leave It to Beaver' reruns. The series, on the air from 1957 and 1963, is a resonant symbol of '50s nostalgia, one to which conservative Catholics have returned as a template for modeling natural law. To Catholics who moved to the suburbs in the '50s and '60s, 'Leave It to Beaver' was a 'medieval morality play,' as Jerry Mathers, the Catholic actor who played young protagonist Theodore 'Beaver' Cleaver, put it. The show was a guide for young souls more tethered to television than to the suburban church. Michael De Sapio, writing in the online journal The Imaginative Conservative in 2017, states that, according to Mather, Beaver Cleaver 'repeatedly succumbed to temptation, suffered the consequences, and was guided back on the path of virtue.' In other words, these archetypal storylines and characters represent a moral imagination that 'elevates us to first principles as it guides us upwards towards virtue and wisdom and redemption,' in the words of American philosopher Russell Kirk. De Sapio continues: 'The emphasis on decorum and good manners in the Cleaver family conveyed a vision of the good, true and beautiful.' Mathers shared that the casting directors for the show selected him to play Beaver when they asked where he would prefer to be after they noticed he was uneasy at the audition. His guileless reply: his Cub Scouts den meeting. Notably, the mission of the Scouts is to 'prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law.' Which returns us to Uncle Jim, my former Cub Scouts leader. He was an electrical engineer who ended his first marriage and moved to California in the 1970s, where he married a woman several decades younger and shed the trappings of his formerly decorous identity. 'Leave It to Beaver' mirrored and shaped the aspirations of millions of Catholics moving to the suburbs after World War II, and it has lingered as an idealized — and exclusive — depiction of the American Dream. The only nonwhite characters to appear in the show's 234 episodes were a Black man exiting a dairy truck in the episode 'Eddie, the Businessman' (1962) and a Black actress who plays a maid in the 1963 episode 'The Parking Attendants.' Within months of its final episode in June 1963 — following the March on Washington, D.C., in August led by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and the November assassination of President John F. Kennedy — 'Leave It to Beaver' had become a charming artifact of mid-century optimism, more a product of nostalgia and romantic imagination than a realistic model for America's future. _____ Peter H. Schwartz writes at the broad intersection of philosophy, politics, history and religion. He publishes the Wikid World newsletter on Substack. _____


Chicago Tribune
06-06-2025
- Chicago Tribune
Peter H. Schwartz: Why nostalgia for the 1950s of ‘Leave it to Beaver' persists in America's religious right
Anyone looking to drench themselves in the 1950s nostalgia currently favored by the religious right in America should consider watching 'Leave It to Beaver' stoned. Which is what I did with an old friend in the 1980s while attending graduate school at the University of California-Berkeley. Nostalgia for the '50s — that land beyond time where Catholic traditionalists such as Notre Dame political theorist and post-liberal prophet Patrick Deneen dwell — idealizes imaginary communities of yore such as Mayfield, the setting for 'Leave it to Beaver,' where the values of faith, family, friends and flag all flourished. According to this narrative, late-stage liberalism and the globalization of markets, with their characteristic rootlessness, dissolve this communal existence. When I was at Berkeley in the 1980s, a large number of my childhood friends from Princeton, New Jersey, somehow found their way to the Bay Area. One afternoon, one of my Princeton buddies was house-sitting for an uncle in a Bay Area suburb. The uncle, whom I'll call Uncle Jim, had been my Cub Scout pack leader in Princeton when I was in elementary school. One sun-drenched afternoon, my friend and I settled into a couch, he rolled some joints and we flipped the TV to 'Leave It to Beaver' reruns. The series, on the air from 1957 and 1963, is a resonant symbol of '50s nostalgia, one to which conservative Catholics have returned as a template for modeling natural law. To Catholics who moved to the suburbs in the '50s and '60s, 'Leave It to Beaver' was a 'medieval morality play,' as Jerry Mathers, the Catholic actor who played young protagonist Theodore 'Beaver' Cleaver, put it. The show was a guide for young souls more tethered to television than to the suburban church. Michael De Sapio, writing in the online journal The Imaginative Conservative in 2017, states that, according to Mather, Beaver Cleaver 'repeatedly succumbed to temptation, suffered the consequences, and was guided back on the path of virtue.' In other words, these archetypal storylines and characters represent a moral imagination that 'elevates us to first principles as it guides us upwards towards virtue and wisdom and redemption,' in the words of American philosopher Russell Kirk. De Sapio continues: 'The emphasis on decorum and good manners in the Cleaver family conveyed a vision of the good, true and beautiful.' Mathers shared that the casting directors for the show selected him to play Beaver when they asked where he would prefer to be after they noticed he was uneasy at the audition. His guileless reply: his Cub Scouts den meeting. Notably, the mission of the Scouts is to 'prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law.' Which returns us to Uncle Jim, my former Cub Scouts leader. He was an electrical engineer who ended his first marriage and moved to California in the 1970s, where he married a woman several decades younger and shed the trappings of his formerly decorous identity. 'Leave It to Beaver' mirrored and shaped the aspirations of millions of Catholics moving to the suburbs after World War II, and it has lingered as an idealized — and exclusive — depiction of the American Dream. The only nonwhite characters to appear in the show's 234 episodes were a Black man exiting a dairy truck in the episode 'Eddie, the Businessman' (1962) and a Black actress who plays a maid in the 1963 episode 'The Parking Attendants.' Within months of its final episode in June 1963 — following the March on Washington, D.C., in August led by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and the November assassination of President John F. Kennedy — 'Leave It to Beaver' had become a charming artifact of midcentury optimism, more a product of nostalgia and romantic imagination than a realistic model for America's future.


San Francisco Chronicle
04-06-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
How a neurologist faces the disease that is slowly stealing his cognitive powers
It was 2006 when Dr. Daniel Gibbs first noticed he was losing his sense of smell. But it wasn't what he didn't smell that tipped him off that something might be wrong. It was what he did smell: perfume, mixed with baked bread. "The same thing, every time." Gibbs, a neurologist in Portland, Oregon, knew this was an olfactory hallucination. And that meant something wasn't working properly in his brain. "I attributed it to getting older, which is a common cause of decreased ability to smell," he said. But Gibbs was just 57 – not so old that he should be losing his sense of anything. "I also knew losing your sense of smell was an early sign of Parkinson's disease, so I thought it might be that." It wasn't. Gibbs was experiencing an early symptom of Alzheimer's disease. But it would be another six years before he knew it. He has since written a book about his experience, which was turned into a documentary. He also keeps a regular blog to help people understand what it's like to live with Alzheimer's. These days, he spends a lot of his time learning and talking about how to slow progression of the disease, something he's been trying to do since he got his diagnosis more than a decade ago. Gibbs and his wife, Lois Seed, discussed what he's learned about Alzheimer's dementia and how he navigates the condition for " The Experts Say," an American Heart Association News series in which specialists explain how they apply their professional knowledge to their own lives. Their remarks have been edited. In 2012, Lois was doing a genealogical project, so we did some genetic testing. Mine came back showing I had two copies of APOE4, a gene known to influence the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease, which totally gobsmacked me. Having two copies means it is almost certain to eventually cause Alzheimer's. I had no measurable cognitive impairment at that time. I was in charge of the neurology resident training program at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, and I was seeing patients in the clinic, so it was a very busy year for me. Even though it was difficult, I was still able to get all the balls to balance in the air. What did you do once you knew your genetic risk for Alzheimer's? The first thing I did was to go to one of my colleagues and have some cognitive testing done. It was essentially normal with the caveat that all of my cognitive domains were in the 90th percentile except verbal memory, which was in the 50th percentile. So there was a strong hint that there was some incipient loss of function of verbal memory. With that in hand, I went to my department chair and explained the situation. I had no impairment but did not feel it was safe for me to continue to practice. I retired in 2013. Lois: You also went looking for studies you could join, because it's a big deal to see people before they experience symptoms. That's right, I went to the University of California in San Francisco, because they have a ton of studies there. The first study I was involved with was a longitudinal neuroimaging study. I had PET scans of abnormal amyloid and PET scans for tau proteins – two protein clusters in the brain that play a role in the development of Alzheimer's disease. And I had cognitive testing. They loved having me down there because they rarely have people with as early a stage of disease as I showed up with. About a year later, I joined a clinical trial for an anti-amyloid antibody drug that is now approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat early Alzheimer's disease. What else did you learn about how to slow progression of the disease? This is not rocket science. The sort of things that are good preventive behavior for brain disease are also good for preventing heart and vascular disease. There are evidence-based lifestyle changes that include getting daily aerobic exercise; eating a Mediterranean-style diet, such as the MIND diet; getting mentally stimulating activity; staying socially engaged; getting at least seven hours of sleep nightly; and getting good control of any cerebrovascular risk factors, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity and smoking. What's good for the heart is good for the brain! How do you put this knowledge into practice? Walking is just built into my day. I do it with my dog, Jack, an 11-year-old English cocker spaniel who is about to age out. He can't keep up with 10,000 steps as easily anymore, so I take some walks by myself. We live in the hills, so I'm getting very good aerobic exercise, short of running. I used to go to the gym, but that stopped at the start of the COVID pandemic. I also have a short workout at home. The first thing I do is I use resistance bands, which is a strength exercise. That takes about 15 minutes and then I do tai chi pretty religiously, something I started six months ago. I can clearly see that it helps my balance, but I can't see if it helps my brain, which is continuing to do more poorly. And thanks to Lois, I've been eating a healthy diet, really forever. Lois: I didn't have control over those french fries you were eating. I don't eat red meat anymore. I closely follow the MIND diet, which is essentially the Mediterranean diet with more berries and nuts. It includes a heavy focus on fruits and vegetables, especially green leafy vegetables, beans, nuts, whole grains, seafood, lean poultry and uses olive oil to cook. I'm quite happy with it. Because I lost my sense of smell, which is totally gone now, I have virtually no taste either. I eat the same thing for lunch and breakfast every day. I enjoy it. I make a sandwich on whole wheat bread that has tuna salad and garbanzo beans, avocado and arugula to get the dark leafy greens. Then some grapes or bananas and half a dark chocolate bar. Breakfast is homemade granola, and I add cranberries or blueberries. I throw walnuts in as well. Dinner is whatever Lois picks that I can eat. I stopped drinking alcohol. There's no safe amount of alcohol if you are on this trajectory. So I got rid of it, but I used to love red wine. Do you know what to expect as the disease progresses? That's a difficult question to answer. In the old days, when people got a diagnosis of Alzheimer's, they were only living three to five years after that because we made the diagnosis so late. There's less information out there about people who have known they have the disease for a long time and how they will do going forward. Lois: There's a lot of confusion and misconception because there are different types of dementia. Alzheimer's tends to progress more slowly. The early stage can last 20 years. Here we are 13 years after his diagnosis and Dan's really doing well. I'm a little more of a caregiver than I was a few years ago, but not by much. He dresses himself and monitors medications, and people who talk to him casually wouldn't even know. We've been at that plateau for quite some time. How would you describe the stage you're at right now? Right now, I have mild Alzheimer's dementia. To say you have dementia is to say you are having trouble managing your personal affairs. I'm just at a stage now where I can't balance a checkbook. And as things go along, I will have more problems with memory and the ability to recognize people and remember their names. I've lost my train of thought. Lois: You were talking about what stage you're at. When I'm not remembering where I am, then I will have severe dementia. There are memories I have going back through my whole life. They tend to be events that are emotionally laden. I'm terrible with names. I know my immediate family members. My neighbors, I forget their names. Lois is taking over the things I can't manage anymore, like the financial part of our lives, anything that involves planning ahead, scheduling, calendars, remembering all the family stuff, managing the household. She also goes with me when I have a talk to give. Lois: He gives talks on Alzheimer's, but almost every time that Dan is getting ready to speak to a group, he gets frustrated and says, "This is the last time I'm doing this," because getting his thoughts together is challenging. He writes out notes. Most of the talks he gives now are screening events for the film with question-and-answer sessions. It works well if Lois is there to find … Lois: Words. That makes it easier.