Trump's trade war is creating 'paralysing uncertainty', warns top shipping boss
A top shipping boss has warned Donald Trump's trade war is creating 'paralysing uncertainty' – and said cheap imported T-shirts would cost £110 if made in the US.
Moller-Maersk chief executive Vincent Clerc said the number of containers travelling between the US and China is down as much as 40 per cent as the world's two largest economies hit each other with tariffs of over 100 per cent.
He told Bloomberg TV: 'This uncertainty is paralysing for a lot of customers, who have a really hard time understanding what the right decision is going to be.
'The dream of being able to produce locally, with all you'll need for your supply chain, is not possible.
Unemployment is at a historic low in the US, and they are deporting hundreds of thousands. If we have to pay US labour, no T-shirt will be sold for less than $150.'
Maersk runs about 14 per cent of the world's container fleet, and is seen as a barometer of world trade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tesla's public robotaxi rides to start on June 22, tentatively, CEO Musk says
SAN FRANCISCO, June 10 (Reuters) - Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab tentatively plans to begin offering rides on its self-driving robotaxis to the public on June 22, CEO Elon Musk said on Tuesday in a post on X.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Tariffs: US-China talks end with plan for Trump and Xi to approve
The US and China say they have agreed in principle to a framework for de-escalating trade tensions between the world's two biggest Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earths and magnets being sides said they would now take the plan to their country's presidents - Donald Trump and Xi Jinping - for announcement came after two days of negotiations in London between top officials from Beijing and Washington. Chinese exports of rare earth minerals, which are crucial for modern technology, were high on the agenda of the month, Washington and Beijing agreed a temporary truce over trade tariffs but each country has since accused the other of breaching the deal."We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus," Lutnick told reporters."Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it," he added."The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," Li said.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, U.S. appeals court decides
June 10 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play out. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
