Verstappen punished after ramming into Russell
Red Bull's Dutch driver Max Verstappen competes during the Spanish Formula One Grand Prix at the Circuit de Catalunya in Montmelo, on the outskirts of Barcelona, on June 1, 2025. (Pierre-Philippe MARCOU)
Max Verstappen clattered into a fresh controversy on Sunday when stewards ruled he rammed rival George Russell in the closing laps of an eventful Spanish Grand Prix.
The incident happened shortly after racing restarted with five laps left following a safety car. Verstappen immediately lost third to Ferrari's Charles Leclerc and then went off the track as he tried to hold off Russell's Mercedes.
Advertisement
Verstappen's Red Bull team told their driver to hand the place to Russell, the Dutchman appeared about to do that as he slowed into turn five with two laps left. Instead he speared into the Mercedes.
Stewards handed the Dutchman a 10-second penalty and he finished 10th. He said later that he was unhappy at the way Leclerc had passed him and Russell had tried to overtake.
The 2016 world champion Nico Rosberg told British broadcaster Sky that Verstappen should have been disqualified.
"It looked like a very intentional retaliation," Roseberg said. "Wait for the opponent, go ramming into him, just like you felt the other guy rammed into you at turn one."
Advertisement
"I think the rules would be a black flag, yes. If you wait for your opponent to bang into him, that's a black flag."
After the race, Verstappen accused Leclerc of driving into him while overtaking and said Russell pushed him off track, forcing him to take to the escape road to retain fourth place.
Verstappen did not deny that his move on Russell – with whom he was involved in a war of words last season – was deliberate.
"Does it matter?" he said. "I prefer to speak about the race than just one single moment."
Verstappen brushed aside talk of his defence of his drivers' title.
Advertisement
"We are way too slow anyway to fight for the title. I think that was clear again today," he said.
Asked by Sky whether his reputation being tarnished by the collisions and penalty, he said: "Is it? Well that's your opinion. We will leave it there."
Russell said Verstappen's move remind him of video games.
"I was as surprised as you guys were," he told reporters. "I've seen these manoeuvres before on simulator games and in go-karting, but never in F1.
"Ultimately, we came home in P4 and he came home in P10. I don't know what was going through his mind. It felt deliberate in the moment so, yeah, it was a bit surprising.
Advertisement
"It is down to the stewards to decide if its deliberate or not. Max is such an amazing driver and so many people look up to him. It's a shame that something like that continues to occur. It seems totally unnecessary and it never seems to benefit himself."
Leclerc and Verstappen were both called to the stewards' office after the race to assist in more investigations into their collision.
str/pb/dmc
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
12 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
StanChart CEO Winters Says Private Credit to Keep Its Edge Over Banks
Private credit firms enjoy a significant capital advantage over traditional banks, according to Bill Winters, chief executive officer of Standard Chartered. "I don't think that's going to change anytime soon. The result of which is banks are disadvantaged lenders," Winters said in an interview with Bloomberg's Francine Lacqua. He also discussed the UK regulatory climate and the impact of US tariffs on the financial industry. (Source: Bloomberg)
Bloomberg
17 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Romania to Win Reprieve From EU in Struggle to Contain Deficit
Save The European Union is likely to offer the Romanian government a reprieve to introduce measures aimed at paring its ballooning budget deficit before moving to potential punitive action against the Black Sea nation. The European Commission will give Bucharest some time before moving to suspend EU funds as part of a report on Romania's progress under a so-called excessive-deficit procedure to be released Wednesday, according to people familiar with the deliberations who asked not to be identified as talks take place behind closed doors.
New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump's Foreign Policy, Explained
This is an edited transcript of an episode of 'The Ezra Klein Show.' You can listen to the conversation by following or subscribing to the show on the NYT Audio App, Apple, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts. One thing that's been on my mind is that we've not been covering Israel and Gaza or Ukraine and Russia nearly as much as we did in 2023 and 2024, frankly, as much as I think we should be. There have been two reasons for that. One has been that President Trump's second administration has felt, in many ways, like a domestic emergency, and it has pulled much more of our focus here. The other is that often, when we're covering these conflicts, what we're really covering — implicitly or explicitly — is the American position on them: How are we going to use our might, our money, our weaponry, our leverage to bring them to some kind of close or settlement? And early in Trump's second administration, he basically filled me with despair. He seemed to have little interest in Gaza, except for potentially building hotels there. Beyond that, he seemed perfectly happy to let Israel annex whatever it wanted. On Ukraine, he was at odds with Volodymyr Zelensky, and his main interest seemed to be his relationship with Vladimir Putin. But things have been changing a bit. Other parts of his 'America First' foreign policy have been coming into more focus. So what is Trump's foreign policy? What, at this point, can we say about it? How has it been evolving over the course of his still young second term? To help me think that through, I wanted to bring Emma Ashford back on the show. She is a senior fellow at the Stimson Center. She's the author of the forthcoming book 'First Among Equals,' and she's a foreign-policy analyst who is more of a realist. She's in fundamental ways more sympathetic to some of the motivating impulses of Trump's foreign policy, even if she doesn't always agree with how that's carried out. So I thought she'd be a good person to help me steel-man what the administration is doing and think through whether that's working or has a real chance of working. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
